On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:45:33PM +0200, Christophe Varoqui wrote:
> Le lundi 04 juin 2007 à 20:53 +0200, Guido Guenther a écrit :
> > Package: multipath-tools
> > Version: 0.4.7-3
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: pending
> >
> > This is just a notice, so people don't break their systems. Subject
Package: wmwave
version: 0.4-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building wmwave in wmwave_0.4-7.dsc
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
touch configure-stamp
dh_testdir
# Add h
Package: tart
version: 3.07-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/user/tart-3.07/src'
i486-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -I. -I../ -c -o main.o main.c
m
Package: xosview
version: 1.8.2-12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
g++ -W -Wall -O2 -I. -DXOSVIEW_VERSION=\"1.8.2\" -I/build/user/xosview-1.8.2
-I/build/user/xosview-1.8.2/linux -DP
Package: twin
version: 0.5.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
In file included from hw_tty_linux/kbd_raw.h:11,
from hw_tty_linux/driver_linux.h:39,
Package: yepp
version: 0.0.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user/yepp-0.0.5'
i486-linux-gnu-gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\"
-DPA
Package: timidity
version: 2.13.2-12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I.. -I../libarc -I../libunimod
-I../interface -I../utils -I/usr/inclu
Package: toshutils
version: 2.0.1-15
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
-DXMESSAGE=\"\" -DWALL=\"/usr/bin/wall\" -c ownerstring.c
gcc -s -o ownerstring ownerstring.o hci.o sci.o
Package: tvtime
version: 1.0.2-0.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user/tvtime-1.0.2/src'
if i486-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..`/u
Package: alsaplayer
version: 0.99.77-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering directory `/build/user/alsaplayer-0.99.77/input/flac'
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode
Package: wmtune
version: 1.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building wmtune in wmtune_1.1-3.dsc
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the packa
Package: workbone
version: 2.40-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building workbone in workbone_2.40-6.dsc
debian/rules build
test -f debian/rules
make CFLAGS="-O2 -g" L
Package: sysklogd
version: 1.4.1-20
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building sysklogd in sysklogd_1.4.1-20.dsc
debian/rules build
/usr/bin/make DEB="-DDEBRELEASE=\\\"20\
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 427588 grave
Bug#427588: openoffice.org-l10n-ja: The language package has not been included.
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> reassign 427588 openoffice.org
Bug#427588: openoffice.org-l10n-ja: The language package has not been included.
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419270: fixed in zsnes 1.510-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: texlive-base-bin
> Version: 2007-11
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> I recently tried upgrading (I track sid).
>
> Upon upgrading texlive-base-bin, the system ate all swap and eventually
> crashed.
>
> I subseque
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:27:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing dummy bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: enigmail
Version: 2:0.95.0+1-3
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
I just updated to 0.95, but Icedove still isn't able to use enigmail.
When I open the addons panel, it still shows enigmail version *0.94*
(and of course "not compatible with icedove 2.
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:17:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427185: fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.2-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
tags 427451 patch
tags 427452 patch
tags 427453 patch
tags 427454 patch
tags 427455 patch
tags 427457 patch
tags 427458 patch
tags 427459 patch
tags 427460 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> pltotf c6so12.pl
> make: pltotf: Command not found
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> fixed 426872 0.4.3.debian-2
Bug#426872: vegastrike: FTBFS with new boost libraries
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.4.3.debian-2.
> #PyErr_WarnEx is new in python2.5.
> #See http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.5/NEWS.txt
> #libboost-python-dev wi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 427451 patch
Bug#427451: hbf-cns40-6: FTBFS: make: pltotf: Command not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tags 427452 patch
Bug#427452: hbf-cns40-3: FTBFS: make: pltotf: Command not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:48:38AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: libmercator-0.2-4c2a
> Version: 0.2.5-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> libmercator-0.2-4c2a depends on libwfmath-0.3-4, which is not in
> unstable. This causes several packages to fail to build from source.
Newer wfmath
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jun 2007 07:18:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427392: libmercator-0.2-4c2a: unsat dep libwfmath-0.3-4
(not in unstable)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> package zsnes
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: zsnes
> tags 367942 + pending
Bug#367942: .desktop file needed for zsnes
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 380734 + pen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 427555 pending
Bug#427555: openafs-modules-source: FTFBS on powerpc64 (2.6.18 and 2.6.21)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
Could you try the following patch and see if that resolves the build
problem for you?
Indeed it does (once I remembered to tell m-a to not re-unpack the
tarball :) - I've not got my own kernel builds on ppc (just got the box
going).
Thanks for the quic
Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: openafs-modules-source
> Version: 1.4.4.dfsg1-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Stupid mail gateways :( Here's another attempt - and the log:
Could you try the following patch and see if that resolves the build
problem for you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
libboost-python-dev now uses either -lboost_python-st or
-lboost_python-mt. See http://bugs.debian.org/424038
boost_python-st was intended to be the default so modifications were
made to the disable_internal_boost and rebootstrap patches and
commited
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
package libpod-webserver-perl
merge 423804 425902
tags 423804 +patch
quit
Hi Alejandro,
Here's a patch that fixes your FTBFS, there's no need to delete the
`make test' command, in fact that would be wrong.
The patch moves `t/03_daemon.t' to `no_appl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package libpod-webserver-perl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libpod-webserver-perl
> merge 423804 425902
Bug#423804: libpod-webserver-perl: FTBFS: No such file or directory at
/build/user/libpod-webserver-perl-3.04/blib/lib/Pod/Webserver.pm line 427.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 427567 pending
Bug#427567: blender: Dependens on non-existent packages
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
tag 427567 pending
thanks
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05/06/2007):
> Blender depends on libavcodec0d and libavformat0d, which are not
> available anymore in sid.
> This makes the package uninstallable, thus the severity serious.
Thanks for the notice, I just checked that a binNMU would be
On 4 June 2007 at 16:20, Luigi Ballabio wrote:
|
| Dirk,
| I've just released QuantLib 0.8.1. It took a while to figure out the
| autoconf/automake magic I needed, but now it should work with Boost
| 1.34. Let me know if there are any problems.
Sweet!! Thanks a lot, I'll try to get to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: vlc-nox
> Version: 0.8.6.a.debian-6
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 3.5
>
> vlc-nox depends on libavformat0d/libavcodec0d which have been superseded
> by libavformat1d/libavcodec1d and the former packages ar
Package: vlc-nox
Version: 0.8.6.a.debian-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
vlc-nox depends on libavformat0d/libavcodec0d which have been superseded
by libavformat1d/libavcodec1d and the former packages are not available
anymore in sid. This makes the package uninstallable, thus the sev
Package: blender
Version: 2.44-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Violates policy 3.5
Blender depends on libavcodec0d and libavformat0d, which are not
available anymore in sid.
This makes the package uninstallable, thus the severity serious.
Michael
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> reassign 427547 openoffice.org
Bug#427547: 2.2.1~rc3-1 l10n packages are (near) empty
Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org-l10n-fr' to `openoffice.org'.
> tags 427547 + confir
Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: openafs-modules-source
> Version: 1.4.4.dfsg1-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Stupid mail gateways :( Here's another attempt - and the log:
Thanks. This looks very familiar -- it came up on the openafs-info list
as well. I
Package: texlive-base-bin
Version: 2007-11
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
I recently tried upgrading (I track sid).
Upon upgrading texlive-base-bin, the system ate all swap and eventually
crashed.
I subsequently attempted to remove texlive packages with dpkg
--force-
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427181: fixed in php5 5.2.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 427549 moreinfo
Bug#427549: sendmail-bin: Sendmail 8.14.1-4 and 8.14.1-2 don't start:
"Segmentation fault"
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks,
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Wolfgang Pf
tag 427549 moreinfo
thanks,
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
Package: sendmail-bin
Version: 8.14.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi
Hello
I get this with 8.14.1-4:
# /etc/init.d/sendmail start
Starting Mail Transport Agent (MTA): sendmail/etc/init
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:08:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This has been fixed in 2007-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:08:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This has been fixed in 2007-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 427547 grave
Bug#427547: 2.2.1~rc3-1 l10n packages are (near) empty
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Package: kino
Severity: critical
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hello,
There is some broken depedencies with Kino in sid.
kino: Depend: libavcodec0d (>= 0.cvs20060823) but it won't be installed
Depend: libavformat0d (>= 0.cvs20060823) but it won't be installed
Dep
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 423521 grave
Bug#423521: default wmiirc has broken keybindings for jkhl
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Le lundi 04 juin 2007 à 20:53 +0200, Guido Guenther a écrit :
> Package: multipath-tools
> Version: 0.4.7-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: pending
>
> This is just a notice, so people don't break their systems. Subject
> says it all, path detection is broken due to sysfs changes - I'm
> currently te
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:32:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424075: fixed in monodevelop 0.13.1+dfsg-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422729: fixed in grub2 1.95+20070604-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427526: fixed in happs 0.8.8+darcs20070523-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422729: fixed in grub2 1.95+20070604-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422729: fixed in grub2 1.95+20070604-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:35:50AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I don't have physical access to the machine; however, I've started a tcpdump.
> I'll check in 24 hours or so what it actually has reported (I guess
> update-notifier will eventually ask for a new Packages file?).
It's been a f
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:52:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419942: pitivi: Error in _init_gobject_gtk_gst
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Package: sendmail-bin
Version: 8.14.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi
I have to send this report with an old version of sendmail, because
8.14.1-4 didn't even start to be able to send it.
Latest sendmail versions on ppc, 8.14.1-4 and 8.14.1-2 were both crashing
wi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unblock 427184 by 427211
Bug#427211: firebird2-dev: libgds.so symlink points nowhere
Bug#427184: python-kinterbasdb - FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgds
Was blocked by: 427211
Blocking bugs of 427184 removed: 427211
> unblock 427197 by 427184
Bug#4
Greetings,
I believe this problem is fixed in the latest version of gpredict
(0.8.0), which has been released few days ago.
It is true that gpredict includes a copy of goocanvas and I agree that
this is a bad idea but I don't see any useful alternative at the
moment. I can not expect the average
Package: lesstif2
Version: 1:0.95.0-2
Severity: grave
Hi,
I'm not sure what exactly changed between 0.94.4-2 and 0.95.0-2, but
when I start xpdf I get the following warning:
xpdf: Symbol `_XmStrings' has different size in shared object, consider
re-linking
And when closing it:
XtUngrabButton(d
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Le dimanche 03 juin 2007 à 20:24 +0200, Claudius 'x2017' Hubig a écrit :
>> To reproduce it, do the following:
>> * Crash an application to make it not answering; I use claws-mail and remove
>> the
>>network-connection while it is fetching mails,
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427531: fixed in tntnet 1.6.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: multipath-tools
Version: 0.4.7-3
Severity: serious
Tags: pending
This is just a notice, so people don't break their systems. Subject
says it all, path detection is broken due to sysfs changes - I'm
currently testing a patch to fix this.
Cheers,
-- Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427481: fixed in libinotify-ruby 0.0.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426823: fixed in ksniffer 0.3~alpha1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426351: fixed in ksniffer 0.3~alpha1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: tntnet
Version: 1.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
rm -f calci18n.fi
( ../../../sdk/tools/ecppll/ecppll -o fi/calci18n.tntdata calci18n.ecpp
calci18n.txt.fi && cd fi && zip ../calci18n.fi calci18n.tntdata )
/bin/sh: zip: command not
Package: pbuilder
Version: 0.168
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
dh_movefiles -ppbuilder-uml --sourcedir=debian/pbuilder
dpkg-genchanges -B -mDebian Build Daemon
dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent packages
dpkg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> unmerge 427211
Bug#427211: firebird2-dev: libgds.so symlink points nowhere
Bug#427181: php5 - FTBFS: configure: error: libgds, libib_util or libfbclient
not found!
Disconnected #427
Package: ldb
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build (on amd64) with the following error:
Compiling snprintf.c
gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libldb.so.0 -o lib/libldb.so.0.9.0
modules/operational.po modules/rdn_name.po modules/objectclass.po
modules/paged_results.po mo
Package: happs
Version: 0.8.8+darcs20070523-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
Configuring HAppS-0.8.8...
configure: Dependency base-any: using base-2.1.1
configure: Dependency HaXml>=1.13&&<1.14: using HaXml-1.13.2
configure: Dependency parsec-any:
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:47:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425092: fixed in gcc-snapshot 20070604-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 427514 normal
Bug#427514: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: System does not boot with 2.6.21-4
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419307: fixed in im-sdk 12.3.91-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: squid
Version: 2.6.5-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I'm not sure, but this could be quite a serious issue for any user of
squid out there, hence the grave setting.
It appears that etch squid hangs completely when fed bad DNS data- and
the only recovery is
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:55:14PM +0200, Jack Malmostoso wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> since I have installed 2.6.21-4 from unstable I cannot boot my system
> anymore.
> First my configuration: an Asus A8N-E (nforce4) motherboard with two
> SATA disks.
> The disks are configured in a software RAID1 usi
Subject: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64: System does not boot with 2.6.21-4
Package: linux-image-2.6.21-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.21-5~snapshot.8808
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi there,
since I have installed 2.6.21-4 from unst
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:08:26AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Followup-For: Bug #427398
>
> I did this latest upgrade in testing, and svn appears to work OK for me.
> I tried svn status; svn update; and svn cleanup. There was one file updated.
> In no case did I get the errors o
Package: libc6
Followup-For: Bug #427398
I did this latest upgrade in testing, and svn appears to work OK for me.
I tried svn status; svn update; and svn cleanup. There was one file updated.
In no case did I get the errors of the original report.
I was hoping reportbug would give you a bit more
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:31:22PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I don't know who uploaded that version, but I'm no longer maintaining
> this package.
And how does that concern me? I didn't send that mail to you, I send it
to the BTS which send it to you...
Anyway:
- Christian Bayle uploaded
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> merge 421132 424508
Bug#421132: deskbar-applet: FTBFS: error: 'EContactPhoto' has no member named
'length'
Bug#424508: deskbar-applet - FTBFS: error: cannot convert to a pointer type
NLOCK_INIT
((__atomic_lock_t) { { 1, 1, 1, 1 } })
doesn't allow to do this:
./src/libc-lock.h:#if __LT_SPINLOCK_INIT == 0
| Automatic build of libnss-pgsql_1.4.0-1 on meitner by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started a
matic build of libnss-pgsql_1.4.0-1 on meitner by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started at 20070604-1207
| **
| Checking available source versions...
| Fetching source files...
| Reading package lists...
| Building dependency
Your message dated Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:12:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Duplicate of bug #426816
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Am Montag, den 04.06.2007, 14:40 +0100 schrieb David:
> Package: fglrx-driver
> Version: 8.37.6-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> The X server does not start, it reads "no screen found". Running
> dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg and changing
> no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> found 425604 2.1.0.dfsg-2
Bug#425604: wengophone - FTBFS: undefined reference to `GetAllProcessThreads'
Bug marked as found in version 2.1.0.dfsg-2.
>
End of message, stopping proces
David wrote:
> The X server does not start, it reads "no screen found".
Please attach the full X server log, otherwise there's no way to guess
what's wrong.
--
Ciao, Flavio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
found 422644 3.0.0-3
thanks
Hi,
this seems either back or never really fixed:
$ sudo dpkg -i build/libsuitesparse*deb
(Reading database ... 313542 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libsuitesparse-dbg (from .../libsuitesparse-dbg_
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 422644 3.0.0-3
Bug#422644: missing Conflicts:
Bug marked as found in version 3.0.0-3.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
package wengophone
reopen 425604
thanks
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:45:25PM +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On 6/4/07, Aurélien Gâteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Aurélien Gâteau a écrit :
> >> Marco Nenciarini a écrit :
> >>> http://dev.openwengo.org/trac/openwengo/trac.cgi/ticket/1673
> >>>
> >
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package wengophone
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wengophone
> reopen 425604
Bug#425604: wengophone - FTBFS: undefined reference to `GetAllProcessThreads'
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'fou
Dirk,
I've just released QuantLib 0.8.1. It took a while to figure out the
autoconf/automake magic I needed, but now it should work with Boost
1.34. Let me know if there are any problems.
Later,
Luigi
There is no opinion so absurd that
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 8.37.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The X server does not start, it reads "no screen found". Running
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg and changing
nothing except "ati" instead of "fglrx", fixes the problem.
I would be very happy with the
Package: xppaut
Version: 5.85-4
Followup-For: Bug #412102
Same bug, same fix.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Package: hdbc-sqlite3
version: 1.1.2.0
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), ghc6 (>= 6.6), ghc6 (<< 6.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 427353 + patch
Bug#427353: libdb4.2-ruby - FTBFS: error: 'struct RString' has no member named
'len'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing her
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425604: fixed in wengophone 2.1.0.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 427354 + patch
Bug#427354: libdb3-ruby - FTBFS: error: 'struct RString' has no member named
'len'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427334: fixed in evms 2.5.5-23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
hi again,
please note: attached patch will only apply after your debian/patches have been
applied to the sources,
bye,
- michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
