Processed: Re: Bug#426808: coreutils: Appending and verifying a tar file results in only newly appended files being visable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 426808 tar Bug#426808: coreutils: Appending and verifying a tar file results in only newly appended files being visable Bug reassigned from package `coreutils' to `tar'. > retitle 426808 tar: Appending and verifying a tar file results in only

Bug#426825: fails to remove, invoke-rc.d stop fails

Package: doodled Version: 0.6.6-4 Severity: serious After all doodled ever did on my amd64 was segfault, I purged it — I don't have the time to debug this. But I can't: Removing doodled ... + [ -x /etc/init.d/doodled ] + which invoke-rc.d + [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ] + invoke-rc.d doodled stop

Bug#361846: marked as done (invalid assertion of copyright on contents of core.schema)

Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2007 06:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#361846: fixed in openldap2.3 2.3.35-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#426823: file conflicts between packages

Package: ksniffer, python-dogtail Severity: serious Usertags: qa-file-conflict User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2 hi, both ksniffer and python-dogtail ship `/usr/bin/sniff' but do neither conflict nor add a diversion, thus fail to be installed in the same env

Bug#425929: marked as done (smc: FTBFS with new boost libraries)

Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2007 01:26:10 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Really close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#425929: Current version of smc builds successfully

Version: 0.99.6-1.1 As pointed out to me over private email, smc now builds, so I'm closing the FTBFS bug now. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#426818: rus-ispell: FTBFS: Cannot find i2myspell

Package: rus-ispell Version: 0.99g4-3 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... # Generate myspell dictionary i2myspell -d ./russian.dict > ru_RU.dic /bin/sh: i2myspell: command not found make: *** [build-arch] Error 127 -- Daniel Schepler

Bug#426813: et131x: FTBFS: Looks for /lib/modules/2.6.21-1-686/build

Package: et131x Version: 1.2.3-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/et131x-1.2.3' #@/usr/bin/make -C /lib/modules/2.6.21-1-686/build M=/tmp/buildd/et131x-1.2.3 modules make: Entering an unknown directory make: *** /lib/modules

Bug#426815: jruby1.0: FTBFS: Cannot find jruby-bin-1.0.0~rc2.tar.gz

Package: jruby1.0 Version: 1.0.0~rc2-3 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... [zip] Building zip: /tmp/buildd/jruby1.0-1.0.0~rc2/jruby-bin-1.0.0RC2.zip BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 21 seconds tar -zxf jruby-bin-1.0.0~rc2.tar.gz -C /tmp/buildd/jruby1.0-1.0.0~rc2/debian/jruby1.0/

Bug#426816: rofs-fuse: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

Package: rofs-fuse Version: 2006.11.28-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... debian/rules build dh_testdir /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/rofs-fuse-2006.11.28' cc `pkg-config fuse --cflags --libs` rofs.c -o rofs /bin/sh: pkg-config: command not found In file

Bug#426814: suitesparse: Build-Depends on non-free package libparmetis-dev

Package: suitesparse Version: 3.0.0-2 Severity: serious As the subject says... Packages in main are not allowed to Build-Depend on packages in contrib or non-free. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

Bug#426810: tripod: ia32

Package: tripod Version: 0.7.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #426810 Yes, it crashes under an ia32 environment. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (90, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kerne

Bug#426810: tripod: Crash when trying to create a new album

Package: tripod Version: 0.7.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I get a segfault directly: - Open - It detects my white 30G iPod (late 2006) mounted - I click to add a new album - Name it "All" - Click OK - Seg fault I'll try on ia32 port to see if it is amd6

Processed: tagging 422087, tagging 390954, tagging 361846

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 > tags 422087 pending Bug#422087: slapd: syncprov follows referrals Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 390954 pending Bug#390954: slapd is compiled withou SLAPI support There

Bug#426808: coreutils: Appending and verifying a tar file results in only newly appended files being visable

Package: coreutils Version: 5.97-5.3 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss Running 'tar -r -W -f archive.tar anotherArchive.tar' causes only the contents of anotherArchive to be visible, thus rendering whatever was in the archive prior to 'appending' anotherArchive.tar to

Bug#426371: Which Packages?

Le mercredi 30 mai 2007 20:35, Steinar H. Gunderson a écrit : > On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:24:17PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > I also have http.us.debian.org in that file, but my system does not seem > > affected by the problem. What I wanted to ask is, can you deny/confirm > > that the pro

Bug#426019: cruddy workaround

I'm currently suffering from this bug as well. If it's any comfort to you, your address book isn't lost. You can still get information from ~/.mozilla-thunderbird/*.default/abook.mab -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#407405: file conflicts between ncc and nemerle

Hi Sebastian, Ok, now that etch is release what shall we do about this bug, Anuradha? Does your upstream consider to change the name of the binary? Sorry for the late response, but I've been a bit busy lately and I've not had much time for anything else. But things should change soon, hopefull

Bug#426371: Which Packages?

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:24:17PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > I think we misunderstand. /usr/share/update-manager/channels/Debian.info is > not a configuration file, but shipped by update-manager. Ah, OK. It just looked a lot like a configuration file :-) > I also have http.us.debian.org i

Bug#425390: Error in icedove start even with a new profile

On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:42:07AM +0300, Igor Stirbu wrote: > Package: icedove > Version: 2.0.0.0-3 > Followup-For: Bug #425390 > > > It looks like something is wrong when Icedove starts. > I started icedove with the following command: Try: first uninstall ... then install icedove again. - A

Processed: Re: Bug#426769: gnbd.ko block device not packaged

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 426769 wishlist Bug#426769: gnbd.ko block device not packaged Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Deb

Bug#425390: Error in icedove start even with a new profile

Package: icedove Version: 2.0.0.0-3 Followup-For: Bug #425390 It looks like something is wrong when Icedove starts. I started icedove with the following command: icedove -ProfileManager -jsconsole and these were shown in the Error Console: Error: [Exception... "Component returned failure co

Bug#425625: CVE-2007-2754: integer overflow and heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in freetype

On Wed May 30, 2007 at 06:19:29 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Signed package for etch is on its way up to > right now (built with -sa, so > should indeed be ready for upload straight to security-master). Thanks a lot, Steve. > Let me know if there'

Bug#421140: marked as done (FTBFS: can't find file `epsf.tex'.)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 21:47:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421140: fixed in libgtkada2 2.8.1-5.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#426748: marked as done (gnbd.ko block device not packaged)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 13:02:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line should be at kernel or redhat-cluster source pkg (gnbd.ko block device not packaged) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#426371: Which Packages?

Le mercredi 30 mai 2007 11:52, Steinar H. Gunderson a écrit : > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:05:52AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > I'd check if update-manager is using the sid source > > in /usr/share/update-manager/channels/Debian.info > > Or just monitor network activity while checking updates

Bug#400344: marked as done (Uninstallable due to unmet dep on python2.3-libxslt1)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 22:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#400344: fixed in rubrica 2.0~rc3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Uninstallable packages are severity grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 422574 grave Bug#422574: trang not installable (depends on missing libgcj7-0) Severity set to `grave' from `important' > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (ad

Processed: found 426107 in 0.2.1-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > found 426107 0.2.1-1 Bug#426107: molly-guard: Molly-guard failed to stop me halting my server Bug marked as found in version 0.2.1-1. > End of message, stopping processing here. Ple

Bug#426499: marked as done (overwrites file from libpango1-ruby)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 21:47:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426499: fixed in ruby-gnome2 0.16.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#426500: marked as done (overwrites file from libatk1-ruby)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 21:47:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426500: fixed in ruby-gnome2 0.16.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#426498: marked as done (overwrites file from libgdk-pixbuf2-ruby)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 21:47:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426498: fixed in ruby-gnome2 0.16.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#426497: marked as done (overwrites file from libglib2-ruby)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 21:47:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426497: fixed in ruby-gnome2 0.16.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#407374: marked as done (Try to use /usr/local/etc/no-ip.conf)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 21:47:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#407374: fixed in ruby-gnome2 0.16.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#426769: gnbd.ko block device not packaged

severity 426769 wishlist thanks On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 12:50:47PM -0700, andremachado wrote: > Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6 > Version: 2.6.18-7+etch2 > Severity: serious What? Bastian -- A father doesn't destroy his children. -- Lt. Carolyn Palamas, "Who Mourns for Adonais

Bug#422899: I confirm the bug

I've got the same error message when I try to launch democracypalyer. -- +---+ | gpe92 | +---+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#426444: libtalloc-dev: Should depend on libtalloc1

Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-28 13:56]: >> Package: libtalloc-dev >> Version: 1.0.1-1 > > There's no such package afaict. Where did you find it? Current unstable: $ apt-cache policy libtalloc-dev libtalloc-dev: Installed: 1.0.1-1 Candidate: 1.0.1-1

Bug#422293: aolserver4 - Fails to install

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 07:21:20PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:41:25AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > /etc/ld.so.conf.d is not for private libs. Use rpath. > > Furthermore, the same failure is still happening on the buildds when using > > aolserver4 4.5.0

Bug#422293: aolserver4 - Fails to install

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:41:25AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > /etc/ld.so.conf.d is not for private libs. Use rpath. > > Furthermore, the same failure is still happening on the buildds when using > aolserver4 4.5.0-6. > Interestingly enough I'm not able to reproduce that on my own box. I

Bug#426769: gnbd.ko block device not packaged

Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6 Version: 2.6.18-7+etch2 Severity: serious --- Please enter the report below this line. --- gnbd.ko block device is not packaged into the binary debian package. This makes impossible to use gnbd_import from redhat-cluster packages. Regards. Andre Felipe Machado --

Bug#421140: NMU prep

Kees Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tags: patch > > Hi! Attached is the NMU I'd like to upload shortly. Approved. -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#426751: marked as done (libao2: should Replace (and Conflict?) libao-pulse)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 19:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426751: fixed in libao 0.8.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#425813: marked as done (texlive-base: upgrade fails with 'fmtutil-sys failed')

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 19:02:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#425781: fixed in texlive-base 2007-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#425781: marked as done (upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see solved bug #420390))

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 19:02:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#425781: fixed in texlive-base 2007-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Processed: severity of 426751 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > severity 426751 serious Bug#426751: libao2: should Replace (and Conflict?) libao-pulse Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#425802: marked as done (spampd: 2.30-17 pulled in by apt-get update; apt-get upgrade ; ; it fails to run w/ syntax error, et al)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 17:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#425802: fixed in spampd 2.30-19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#425781: marked as done (upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see solved bug #420390))

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 18:32:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#425781: fixed in texlive-bin 2007-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#425813: marked as done (texlive-base: upgrade fails with 'fmtutil-sys failed')

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 18:32:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#425781: fixed in texlive-bin 2007-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#426748: gnbd.ko block device not packaged

Package: linux-modules-extra Version: 2.6.18-7+etch2 Severity: serious --- Please enter the report below this line. --- gnbd.ko block device is not packaged into the binary debian package. This makes impossible to use gnbd_import from redhat-cluster packages. Regards. Andre Felipe Machado --- Sy

Bug#426361: marked as done (banshee: banshee crashed at startup)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 20:09:23 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426361: banshee: banshee crashed at startup has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Processed: curb your enthusiasm ;)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 388141 www.debian.org SPI copyright claim not legally valid until all > contributors are contacted for relicensing Bug#388141: www.debian.org copyright statements are false & website is illegal to publish until all contributors are contacted f

Processed: tagging 421140

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4ubuntu4 > tags 421140 patch Bug#421140: FTBFS: can't find file `epsf.tex'. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Bug#426534: FTBFS: localedef fails, missing build-dep on locales

Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, > Package: ipolish > > dpkg-source: building ipolish in ipolish_20070410-3.dsc > cannot read character map directory `/usr/share/i18n/charmaps': No such file or directory > (on another system); you seem to miss a build-dep on locales. Which version is your local ipoli

Bug#425802: still a problem with current version of spampd

James Cloos wrote on 27/05/2007 17:48: > I get this on startup with the current version of spampd: F*** You are right. Sorry for not noticing this when I checked the fixed up patch. > Starting spam checking proxy daemon: spampd > util: cannot untaint path: "REF(0x8c6d024)/bayes" > util: cannot u

Bug#419742: QL-Swig failed again on mips

On 30 May 2007 at 17:17, Thiemo Seufer wrote: | > | which is a soon-to-be fixed bug in libc. I believe the specialcase for MIPS | > | was introduced back when the buildds were too memory limited. Since the | > | system I tested on (a bcm91250a with 1GB RAM) is the same hardware as our | > | curre

Bug#422482: marked as done (FTBFS: scim_uim_imengine.cpp:839: error: 'uim_set_surrounding_text' was not declared in this scope)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 16:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422482: fixed in scim-uim 0.2.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#419742: QL-Swig failed again on mips

Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > Hi Thimo, > > Thanks for the feedback -- much appreciated. > > On 30 May 2007 at 16:07, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > | Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > > | > MIPSers, > | > > | > I have an open FTBFS [1] again quantlib-swig, and I don't understand it. > The > | > package

Bug#426371: Which Packages?

On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:05:52AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > I'd check if update-manager is using the sid source > in /usr/share/update-manager/channels/Debian.info > Or just monitor network activity while checking updates. Yes, indeed, Debian.info shows getting sid from http://http.us.deb

Bug#421140: NMU prep

Tags: patch Hi! Attached is the NMU I'd like to upload shortly. Thanks, -Kees -- Kees Cook@outflux.net diff -u libgtkada2-2.8.1/debian/control libgtkada2-2.8.1/debian/control --- libgtkada2-2.8.1/debian/control +++ libgtkada2-2.8.1/debian/control @@

Bug#419742: QL-Swig failed again on mips

Hi Thimo, Thanks for the feedback -- much appreciated. On 30 May 2007 at 16:07, Thiemo Seufer wrote: | Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > MIPSers, | > | > I have an open FTBFS [1] again quantlib-swig, and I don't understand it. The | > package builds fine on a number of architectures, used to

Bug#419742: QL-Swig failed again on mips

Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > MIPSers, > > I have an open FTBFS [1] again quantlib-swig, and I don't understand it. The > package builds fine on a number of architectures, used to build on mips too, > has not changed its build instructions but now fails. For the newest from > today see [2]. Older

Bug#263358: closed by "Hervé Rousseau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#263358: minit: Minit not to be included in sarge, experimental packaging)

Hello Hervé, Thanks for adopting minit! best regards, Erich Schubert -- erich@(vitavonni.de|debian.org)--GPG Key ID: 4B3A135C(o_ Reality continues to ruin my life --- Calvin//\ Die kürzeste Verbindung zwischen zwei Menschen ist ein Lächeln. V_/_

Bug#263358: marked as done (minit: Minit not to be included in sarge, experimental packaging)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 16:06:58 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#263358: minit: Minit not to be included in sarge, experimental packaging has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Processed: Re: Bug#426054: /usr/share/doc-base/ispell-manual: error upon upgrade: info...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 366100 426054 Bug#366100: doc-base: `Index' value missing for `info' Bug#426054: /usr/share/doc-base/ispell-manual: error upon upgrade: info... Bug#364535: Buggy /usr/share/doc-base/ispell-manual line 16 Bug#384157: ispell: install error:

Bug#426054: /usr/share/doc-base/ispell-manual: error upon upgrade: info...

forcemerge 366100 426054 thanks On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 05:44:25AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Package: ispell > Version: 3.1.20.0-4.3 > Severity: wishlist > File: /usr/share/doc-base/ispell-manual > > > Error in `/usr/share/doc-base/ispell-manual', line 16: `Index' value missing > for form

Bug#425784: marked as done (glibc_2.6~20070518-2(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: "Lowlevel primitives for ld.so not implemented")

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 15:13:37 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#425784: glibc_2.6~20070518-2(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: "Lowlevel primitives for ld.so not implemented" has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#425625: CVE-2007-2754: integer overflow and heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in freetype

On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 12:15:41PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: > On Sun May 27, 2007 at 12:47:58 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > I guess we should fix this, it's indirectly remotely exploitable at least > > by providing someone a malformed TTF font file. As libfreetype is an > > important > > i

Bug#426361: fixed

Yes, the bug seems to be fixed thanks to changes in mono packages. Marc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#426537: marked as done (FTBFS: libmyspell-dev gone)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 13:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426537: fixed in rus-ispell 0.99g4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#426533: marked as done (FTBFS: libmyspell-dev gone)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 13:02:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426533: fixed in ispell-et 20030606.5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#426708: dosemu-freedos: merge with dosemu

Package: dosemu-freedos Severity: serious Tags: confirmed patch pending I intend to merge dosemu and dosemu-freedos. The new name is dosemu. The severity is "serious" as in "in the package maintainer's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release". http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#sever

Bug#422957: marked as done (FTBFS: Please adapt to the $(moduledir) change in scim 1.4.6-1)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 11:17:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#422957: fixed in scim-thai 0.1.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#422293: aolserver4 - Fails to install

> /etc/ld.so.conf.d is not for private libs. Use rpath. Furthermore, the same failure is still happening on the buildds when using aolserver4 4.5.0-6. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move th

Bug#424770: marked as done (can't install git-core and cogito)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 09:07:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424770: can't install git-core and cogito has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#426023: marked as done (poppler: Missing Conflicts/Replaces: to old library names)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 08:47:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426023: fixed in poppler 0.5.4-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#426444: libtalloc-dev: Should depend on libtalloc1

* Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-28 13:56]: > Package: libtalloc-dev > Version: 1.0.1-1 There's no such package afaict. Where did you find it? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#426258: cinelerra: playback does not stop

* Florian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-27 16:39]: > Package: cinelerra This package doesn't appear to be in Debian. Did you get it from another web site? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Processed: severity of 426395 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 > severity 426395 important Bug#426395: initramfs-tools: omission of libgcc_s.so.1 from initramfs makes Linksys NSLU2 unbootable Severity set to `important' from `critical' > End of m

Bug#426332: marked as done (initramfs-tools: architectural confusion - looks for 486 instead of K7)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 09:53:00 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426332: initramfs-tools: architectural confusion - looks for 486 instead of K7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#426630: lwat on debian-edu

I had lwat 0.14-3 on my debian-edu etch system. /etc/lwat/admin.ini present purged lwat and reinstalled with lwat from sid version 0.14-3 I have /etc/lwat/admin.ini both in my etch installed from dvd and after the apt-get from sid. Ronny Aasen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Bug#426395: libc dlopening libgcc on arm

Aurelien Jarno a écrit : > Joey Hess a écrit : >> Just spent half an hour since my slug wouldn't boot and I had to reflash >> an old initramfs. This bug should be fixed ASAP before it breaks a lot >> of systems. >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/initramfs>mkinitramfs -o out -k >> Working files in /root/

Bug#426395: libc dlopening libgcc on arm

Joey Hess a écrit : > Just spent half an hour since my slug wouldn't boot and I had to reflash > an old initramfs. This bug should be fixed ASAP before it breaks a lot > of systems. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/initramfs>mkinitramfs -o out -k > Working files in /root/tmp/mkinitramfs_tj3082 and overl

Bug#426397: marked as done (libcrypto++: FTBFS: cp: cannot create directory `debian/tmp/usr/share/crypto--': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2007 09:01:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug