Hello,
There is currently a grave bug on belocs-locales-data ( #418840
belocs-locales-data: does not work with new libc).
I wonder if it is worth fixing it or if the belocs packages are no more
needed.
They are not currently actively maintained, and IIRC, they were useful
when it was very diffic
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 416404 etch fixed-upstream patch
Bug#416404: pptpd freeze
Tags were: etch-ignore
Tags added: etch, fixed-upstream, patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 416404 = etch fixed-upstream patch
Bug#416404: pptpd freeze
Tags were: patch fixed-upstream etch etch-ignore
Tags set to: etch, fixed-upstream, patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
owner 404279 !
severity 404279 important
thanks
The license issue is now categorised in a clone of #403117; I have a new
package (to be uploaded) that provides slightly more sane headers; and
we are no longer about to release, so I am more confident that the
necessary issues will be resolved and t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 404279 !
Bug#404279: Package unsuitable for release or testing
Owner recorded as Matthew William Solloway Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> severity 404279 important
Bug#404279: Package unsuitable for release or testing
Severity set to `important' from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 403117 !
Bug#403117: Incomplete copyright/license information: Additional restrictions
to GPL
Owner recorded as Matthew William Solloway Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> clone 403117 -1
Bug#403117: Incomplete copyright/license information: Additional
owner 403117 !
clone 403117 -1
close 403117
severity -1 important
retitle -1 Package license is ambiguous; may be incompatible with GPL
thanks
I'm closing #403117 as the copyright information is now listed
correctly. However, the issue as to the meaning of the license is
outstanding, so I am cloni
Tags:fixed-upstream patch
The bug seems to be fixed upstream[1].
Please contact upstream author if he want to integrate the patch in a
new 1.3.4. In the meantime we could integrate this patch on the official
debian version 1.3.0.
Contact also stable release manager for release this as update for e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 419298 important
Bug#419298: libcomplearn-mod-ppmdx: Uninstallable on 64-bit arches due to
ppmd's unavailability
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message,
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:21:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Am Samstag, 14. April 2007 18:46 schrieben Sie:
> > > Here are the listing of /lib/tls:
> > >
> > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 88904 2005-05-10 22:01 ld-2.3.2.so
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2006-07-14 00:59 ld-linux.so.2 ->
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419301: fixed in gtk2-engines-wonderland 1.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> José Luis Tallón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi José,
>
>
>>> waiting for a fixed source package.
>>>
>>
>> Which I will send later today
>>
>
> Any news on this ?
Sorry, had a busier end-of-week than expected.
> Beside the fix for this bug, the new vers
Package: scim-gtk2-immodule
Version: 1.4.4-7
Severity: serious
Usertags: gtk-2.10-transition
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version of your
Package: swf-player
Version: 0.3.6-2.2
Severity: serious
Usertags: gtk-2.10-transition
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version of your packag
Package: tamil-gtk2im
Version: 2.2-4.3
Severity: serious
Usertags: gtk-2.10-transition
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version of your packag
Package: uim-gtk2.0
Version: 1:1.2.1-9
Severity: serious
Usertags: gtk-2.10-transition
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version of your packag
Package: scim-bridge-client-gtk
Version: 0.4.10-1
Severity: serious
Usertags: gtk-2.10-transition
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version of
Package: gtk-im-libthai
Version: 0.1.4-2
Severity: serious
Usertags: gtk-2.10-transition
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version of your pack
Package: gtk2-engines-wonderland
Version: 1.0-3
Severity: serious
Usertags: gtk-2.10-transition
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version of yo
Package: imhangul
Version: 0.9.13-3.1
Severity: serious
Usertags: gtk-2.10-transition
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version of your package
Package: libginspx0
Version: 20050529-1
Severity: serious
Usertags: gtk-2.10-transition
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version of your packa
Package: gtk-qt-engine
Version: 1:0.8~svn-rev31-3
Severity: serious
Usertags: gtk-2.10-transition
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version of
Package: iiimf-client-gtk
Version: 12.3.91-3
Severity: serious
Usertags: gtk-2.10-transition
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version of your
Package: gtk2-engines-xfce
Version: 2.3.99.2-1
Severity: serious
Usertags: gtk-2.10-transition
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version of you
Package: gtk2-engines-cleanice
Version: 2.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version of your package to prevent any
pro
Package: gtk2-engines-magicchicken
Version: 1.1.1-7
Severity: serious
Usertags: gtk-2.10-transition
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version o
Package: gcin
Version: 1.3.4-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version of your package to prevent any
problem, but you nee
Package: libcomplearn-mod-ppmdx
Severity: grave
Version: 0.9.7-2
Hi
libcomplearn-mod-ppmdx is not installable on alpha, amd64 and ia64 because
ppmd does not work on these architectures.
The best thing is probably to not build this binary package on these
architectures as they cannot be used anyw
Package: gtk2-engines-qtpixmap
Version: 0.28-1.1
Severity: serious
Usertags: gtk-2.10-transition
Hi,
I've uploaded Gtk 2.10 to unstable and it changes ABI, which means that
your package will not work with Gtk 2.10 as is. The Gtk 2.10 package
added conflicts with the above version of y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> found 419020 3.13-7.1
Bug#419020: jadetex/texlive-lang-cyrillic: Conflicts with each other (install
fails)
Bug marked as found in version 3.13-7.1.
>
End of message, stopping proces
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 419020 jadetex
Bug#419020: jadetex/texlive-lang-cyrillic: Conflicts with each other (install
fails)
Bug reassigned from package `jadetex, texlive-lang-cyrillic' to `jadetex'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Am Samstag, 14. April 2007 18:46 schrieben Sie:
> > Here are the listing of /lib/tls:
> >
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 88904 2005-05-10 22:01 ld-2.3.2.so
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2006-07-14 00:59 ld-linux.so.2 ->
> > ld-2.3.2.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root9324 2005-05-10 22:01
> > libanl-2
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 08:56:28AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> Now that the debhelper change has been reverted, we can't rebuild
>> texlive with fixed tex-common. We need to upload a reverted tex-common,
>> and then rebuild texlive. Until this has hap
ivritex should be removed from testing so that it won't block texlive,
there is someone who said he is working on merging the needed ivritex
bits into upstream babel. I'll try to see how that goes and if we can
simply remove ivritex or just make it a setup package for Hebrew fonts.
Baruch
* Ralf
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 419255 + security
Bug#419255: proftpd allows logins with almost no password if configured with
SQLAuthTypes Plaintext
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 419255 + security
Bug#419255: proftpd allows logins with almost no password if configured with
SQLAuthTypes Plaintext
There were no tags set.
Tags added: security
> tags 419255 - security
Bug#419255: proftpd allows logins with almost no password
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 19:53:14 +0200 Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> Of course that partially depends on your authoritative information
> choice. If you added (disabled) system users to sql user table, that
> would not happen.
Yepp, but why should I? They have disabled passwords, that should be
eno
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419225: fixed in glibc 2.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: nvidia-kernel-source
Version: 1.0.8776-4
Followup-For: Bug #416594
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello all,
I can confirm that I've also experienced this problem with
nvidia-kernel-source package version 1.0.8776-4. I've got a slightly
different configuration to the pr
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 06:29:06PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> Package: proftpd-mysql
> Version: 1.3.0-19
> Severity: grave
>
> This is not really mysql related, but should apply to all proftpd sql
> packages. I have the following configuration in my proftpd.conf:
>
> SQLAuthTypes Crypt Plaintex
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:32:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419040: fixed in texlive-lang 2007-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 19:48:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line this is fixed in current version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:32:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419055: fixed in texlive-lang 2007-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:32:28 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419053: fixed in texlive-extra 2007-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 19:53:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line this bug seems to be fixed in upstream version 8.0.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 19:47:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line drbd8 is allowed to enter testing now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:32:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419055: fixed in texlive-lang 2007-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:32:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419040: fixed in texlive-lang 2007-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:32:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418994: fixed in texlive-lang 2007-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
José Luis Tallón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi José,
>> waiting for a fixed source package.
>
> Which I will send later today
Any news on this ? Beside the fix for this bug, the new version also
supports EFI machines which have a non-standard SMBIOS entry point,
which is the case of the Apple
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:17:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418995: fixed in texlive-bin 2007-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:17:12 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418993: fixed in texlive-base 2007-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:17:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418981: fixed in texlive-bin 2007-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:17:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418981: fixed in texlive-bin 2007-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:17:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418981: fixed in texlive-bin 2007-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418656: fixed in asterisk 1:1.4.2~dfsg-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Hi you two!
On Fre, 13 Apr 2007, Gerd Sebald wrote:
> fmtutil: no format depends on
> `/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/generic/config/language.dat'.
Bummer. Why this??? Frank, do you have any idea??? It should be
/var/lib/texmf/tex/generic/config/language.dat
tex-common's postinstall call
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 419254 +pending
Bug#419254: linux-headers-2.6.20-1-k7: Fails to install due to missing dep
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
> Here are the listing of /lib/tls:
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 88904 2005-05-10 22:01 ld-2.3.2.so
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2006-07-14 00:59 ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-2.3.2.so
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root9324 2005-05-10 22:01 libanl-2.3.2.so
Which version of libc6 was installed before you att
tags 419254 +pending
thanks
John Goerzen wrote:
> linux-headers-2.6.20-1-k7 depends on linux-kbuild-2.6.20; however:
> Package linux-kbuild-2.6.20 is not installed.
linux-kbuild-2.6 is waiting in NEW.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EM
> > There are a lot of files in /lib/tls that belong to libc 2.3.2
> > (libdl-2.3.2.so ...). Perhaps they were not deleted by an old upgrade.
>
> Could you please give us the date of those files (ls -l /lib/tls would
> be the best), so that we can try to trace the problem to a libc6 version?
Here
Package: proftpd-mysql
Version: 1.3.0-19
Severity: grave
This is not really mysql related, but should apply to all proftpd sql
packages. I have the following configuration in my proftpd.conf:
SQLAuthTypes Crypt Plaintext
SQLAuthenticate users* groups*
SQLConnectInfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] syscp MYSQL_
Package: linux-headers-2.6.20-1-k7
Version: 2.6.20-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
katherina:/tmp# dpkg -i linux-headers-2.6.20-1-k7_2.6.20-1_i386.deb
Selecting previously deselected package linux-headers-2.6.20-1-k7.
(Reading database ... 221096 files and directories cur
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> severity 332602 grave
Bug#332602: socks4-clients: should depend on libsocks4
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>>> Package: libc6
>>> Version: 2.5-1
>>> Severity: critical
>>>
>>> If I upgrade to libc6 2.5-1, I'll get this error:
>>>
>>> Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-1 (using
>>> .../archives/libc6_2.5-1_i386.deb) ... Unpack
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 419042 + upstream
Bug#419042: zabbix-frontend-php: cannot create hosts in web interface with
pgsql backend
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> tags 419042 + confirmed
Bug#419042: zabbix-frontend-php: cannot create hosts in web interfac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 33 !
Bug#33: xmltex: unmet dependencies in sid
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator set to Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tags 419042 + upstream
tags 419042 + confirmed
tags 419042 + patch
thanks
hi Christoph,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:39:34PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> I logged into the web interface, created a host and submitted the form.
> Then I got this output:
>
>
xmltex is not installable, most probably du to the removal of tetex
from sid. The analysis given by edos-debcheck is:
xmltex (= 1.9-11.1): FAILED
The following constraints cannot be satisfied:
xmltex (= 1.9-11.1) depends on tetex-extra {tetex-extra (= 2007-2)}
xmltex (= 1.9-11.1) depends on te
Package: pbox-tex
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: grave
pbox-tex is no longer installable due to the removalof tetex from sid.
Please move to texlive now. The analysis given by edos-debcheck is:
pbox-tex (= 1.0-2): FAILED
The following constraints cannot be satisfied:
pbox-tex (= 1.0-2) depends on te
Op 13-04-2007 om 08:31 schreef Renato S. Yamane:
> Hi Geert,
> I found another bug report about "CD ROM / HD not recognized" in Debian 4.0:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418972
With this message to both bugreports are they crosslinked
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 412833 grave
Bug#412833: ivritex: Please support texlive
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Package: hlatex
Version: 1.0.1-2.1
Severity: grave
hlatex is no longer installable due to its dependency on tetex. Please
move to texlive now. The analysis given by edos-debcheck is:
hlatex (= 1.0.1-2.1): FAILED
The following constraints cannot be satisfied:
hlatex (= 1.0.1-2.1) depends on tete
With the recent removal of tetex, disc-cover has become uninstallable.
Please move to texlive now. The analysis given by edos-debcheck is:
disc-cover (= 1.5.4-3): FAILED
The following constraints cannot be satisfied:
disc-cover (= 1.5.4-3) depends on tetex-extra {tetex-extra (= 2007-2)}
disc-c
Package: cweb-latex
Version: 1.1.1-14
Severity: grave
cweb-latex is no longer installable due to its dependency on tetex. Please
move to texlive. The analysis given by edos-debcheck is:
cweb-latex (= 1.1.1-14): FAILED
The following constraints cannot be satisfied:
cweb-latex (= 1.1.1-14) depend
Package: circ-tex
Version: 1.0f.0-1
Severity: grave
circ-tex is not installable due to the dependency on tetex. Please move
to texlive. The analysis given by edos-debcheck is:
circ-tex (= 1.0f.0-1): FAILED
The following constraints cannot be satisfied:
circ-tex (= 1.0f.0-1) depends on tetex-bin
reopen 418473
retitle 418473 cdrecord: improper migration of directory to a symlink
tags 418473 etch
thanks
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:59:52PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >> Since cdrecord depends on wodim, from the same source package, it can
> >> simply ship a symlink from /usr/share/doc/cdre
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 418473
Bug#418473: /usr/share/doc/cdrecord empty
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> retitle 418473 cdrecord: improper migration of directory to a symlink
Bug#418473: /usr/share/doc/cdrecord empty
Changed Bug title to cdrecord: improper migr
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 14:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417024: fixed in nis 3.17-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> forwarded 419225 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4362
Bug#419225: segfault on some kind of printf
Forwarded-to-address changed from
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show
Package: tetex-brev
Version: 4.22.3
Severity: grave
tetex-brev is no longer installable due to the dependency on tetex.
The analysis given by edos-debcheck is:
The following constraints cannot be satisfied:
tetex-brev (= 4.22.3) depends on tetex-bin {tetex-bin (= 2007-2)}
tetex-brev (= 4.22.3) de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> forwarded 419225 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4362
Bug#419225: segfault on some kind of printf
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://sourceware
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 418660 grave
Bug#418660: texmacs: Depends on tetex-base, tetex-bin, tetex-extra
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 403468 grave
Bug#403468: epix1: please adapt for texlive
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Package: sgmltexi
Version: 2003.00.00-2.1
Severity: grave
sgmltexi cannot be installed due to the dependency on tetex. This should
be changed into texlive.
The analysis of the situation by edos-debcheck is:
The following constraints cannot be satisfied:
sgmltexi (= 2003.00.00-2.1) depends on tet
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 400597 grave
Bug#400597: Please also depend on texlive as an alternative to tetex
Severity set to `grave' from `minor'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.5-1
> > Severity: critical
> >
> > If I upgrade to libc6 2.5-1, I'll get this error:
> >
> > Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-1 (using
> > .../archives/libc6_2.5-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
> > S
So now I finished installing the Debian system... As soon as I reboot
I get the same dmesg error:
ide0: I/O resource 0x1F0-0x1F7 not free.
ide0: ports already in use, skipping probe
ide1: I/O resource 0x170-0x177 not free.
ide1: ports already in use, skipping probe
That makes the bootup useless
Package: libc6
Version: 2.5-1
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
The recent libc6 makes printf segfault with some kind of arguments.
I do not (yet) test all of the possibility, but here is a small example :
#include
int main() {
//double a=0.009996246282942
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> package nis
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: nis
> tags 417024 + pending
Bug#417024: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm
Tags were: etch-ignore
Tags added: pending
> ta
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417160: fixed in postgresql-8.2 8.2.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.5-1
> Severity: critical
>
> If I upgrade to libc6 2.5-1, I'll get this error:
>
> Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-1 (using .../archives/libc6_2.5-1_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
> Setting up libc6 (2.5-1) ...
> dpkg: relo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 419199 libsane 1.0.18-5
Bug#419199: kooka seems to be scanning, but isn't
Bug reassigned from package `kooka' to `libsane'.
> severity 419199 normal
Bug#419199: kooka seems to be scanning, but isn't
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> rea
reassign 419199 libsane 1.0.18-5
severity 419199 normal
reassign 419198 libsane 1.0.18-5
severity 419198 normal
merge 419197 419198 419199
thanks
On Saturday 14 April 2007, Michael Burschik wrote:
> Package: kooka
> Version: 4:3.5.5-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
Hi Norbert, hi Frank!
>
> On Sam, 14 Apr 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> > > fmtutil: no format depends on
> `/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/generic/config/language.dat'.
> >
> > # sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/texlive-lang-german.postinst configure 2>&1 |
> tee postinst.log
> >
> > And send us the file
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 05:42:57AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > If I upgrade to libc6 2.5-1, I'll get this error:
> >
> > I use kernel 2.6.20.4.
>
> Which architecture?
obviously i386:
>> Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-1 (using .../archives/libc6_2.5-1_i386.deb)
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 11:26:29AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Package: libc6
>> Version: 2.5-1
>> Severity: critical
>>
>> If I upgrade to libc6 2.5-1, I'll get this error:
>>
>> Preparing to replace libc6 2.5-1 (using .../archives/libc6_2.5-1_i386.deb)
>> ...
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 419197 libsane 1.0.18-5
Bug#419197: xsane seems to be scanning, but isn't
Bug reassigned from package `xsane' to `libsane'.
> severity 419197 normal
Bug#419197: xsane seems to be scanning, but isn't
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tha
reassign 419197 libsane 1.0.18-5
severity 419197 normal
thanks
Michael Burschik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Xsane seems to scan, but doesn't actually. A progress bar is displayed
> and a completely black image is "scanned", but the scanner does not
> actually do anything. Kooka suffers from the
Package: kooka
Version: 4:3.5.5-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Kooka seems to scan, but doesn't actually. A progress bar is displayed
and a completely black image is "scanned", but the scanner does not
actually do anything. Xsane suffers from the same problem (I am
submi
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
