also sprach Peter Nuttall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.04.03.0020 +0200]:
> mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 works, as does your command above. The
> array is fine after resyncing, its just its contents that are
> gone.
I honestly have no idea what could have gone wrong. Can you check
whether the array's U
Your message dated Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:38:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [pkg-horde] Bug#417524: imp4 4.1.4 contains securityfixes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Package: tinymux
Version: 2.4.3.31-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-1655
Overview: Buffer overflow in the fun_ladd function in funmath.cpp in TinyMUX
before 20070126 might allow remote
attackers to cause a denial of
Sune Vuorela wrote:
>>> Hi, I'm using Etch RC2 and I use klaptopdaemon to lock and hibernate my
>>> laptop when I noticed an interesting little bug. I access lock and
>>> hibernate by right-clicking on the system tray icon and clicking on the
>>> option there.
>
> I have absolutely only very litt
Hi Andi,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:37:09AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 April 2007 00:29:16 dann frazier wrote:
> > hey Andi,
> > Debian is looking at patching our kernel to disable the hw iommu on
> > nvidia chipsets for the data corruption bug that's been discussed on
> > lkml[1].
Package: imp4
Version: 4.1.3-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
http://lists.horde.org/archives/announce/2007/000316.html mentions a new
version of horde, most important are:
* Fixed XSS vulnerabilities in the search screen and thread view.
I would like to see
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:37:09AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 April 2007 00:29:16 dann frazier wrote:
> > hey Andi,
> > Debian is looking at patching our kernel to disable the hw iommu on
> > nvidia chipsets for the data corruption bug that's been discussed on
> > lkml[1].
>
> It w
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 00:29:16 dann frazier wrote:
> hey Andi,
> Debian is looking at patching our kernel to disable the hw iommu on
> nvidia chipsets for the data corruption bug that's been discussed on
> lkml[1].
It would be better if you waited until the official solution. The
hardware deb
Your message dated Mon, 02 Apr 2007 22:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399510: fixed in libopensync-plugin-google-calendar 0.19-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
hey Andi,
Debian is looking at patching our kernel to disable the hw iommu on
nvidia chipsets for the data corruption bug that's been discussed on
lkml[1]. As far as I can tell there isn't an upstream solution yet, but
Steve Langasek has proposed the following patch which seems to work
for one of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> tags 417017 etch-ignore
Bug#417017: missing dependency on update-inetd
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch-ignore
> tags 417413 etch-ignore
Bug#417413: erlang-base: Uses ps in p
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:46:02PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Can you force-start the degraded array, using something like
>
> mdadm --assemble --auto=yes --force /dev/md0 /dev/sd[ab]1
> mdadm --run /dev/md0
>
> ?
>
> --
> .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : :' : proud
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:57:42PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> #> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:06:22PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> #> > So from looking at https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84874 it seems this
> #> > bug makes the package unusable an
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 417394 + upstream
Bug#417394: Possible UTF-8 overlong sequence decoding vulnerability
Tags were: security
Tags added: upstream
> tags 417391 + upstream
Bug#417391: CVE-2007-0242, Qt UTF-8 overlong sequence decoding vulnerability
Tags were: securi
> > Hi, I'm using Etch RC2 and I use klaptopdaemon to lock and hibernate my
> > laptop when I noticed an interesting little bug. I access lock and
> > hibernate by right-clicking on the system tray icon and clicking on the
> > option there.
I have absolutely only very little clue about this, but
Your message dated Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:47:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417259: fixed in zoph 0.6-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Frans Pop wrote:
> However, the syslog does show some strange activity while the installer is
> probing for other operating systems:
[...]
> Apr 2 10:45:48 kernel: EXT2-fs: sdb1: couldn't mount because of unsupported
> optional features (4).
> Apr 2 10:45:48 kernel: EXT3-fs: INFO: recovery requi
Can you force-start the degraded array, using something like
mdadm --assemble --auto=yes --force /dev/md0 /dev/sd[ab]1
mdadm --run /dev/md0
?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~
Heya,
Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
> because of wwwconfig-common beeing unavailable during postrm:
[...]
I have NMUed this, as we (ie the release team) didn't want to ignore
this bug for etch, but don't ha
Your message dated Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416916: fixed in leafnode 1.11.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: gpib-modules-source
Version: 3.2.06-3.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
when trying to compile the modules I get this:
$ tail -8
/var/cache/modass/gpib-modules-source.buildlog.2.6.18-4-686.1175543988
/usr/src/modules/gpib/agilent_82357a/agilent_82357a.c:1497: er
Your message dated Mon, 2 Apr 2007 21:47:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417328: links2: should not be part of any stable release
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415379: fixed in ldap-account-manager 1.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 417341 unreproducible
Bug#417341: invalid dependency: it tries to remove(!) postfix for exim which I
don't want
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> severity 417341 normal
Bug#417341: invalid dependency: it tries to remove(!) post
tags 417341 unreproducible
severity 417341 normal
thanks
I've tried installing postfix and then mutt in a chroot and I do not
see this behaviour. I've therefore downgraded this bug and tagged it
unreproducible. If the submitter can reproduce it (preferably on a clean
system) they can upgrade it a
On Monday 02 April 2007 18:33, Peter Nuttall wrote:
> D-I questions: I just pressed enter at the prompt, and set my keyboard
> and location to enGB. On reaching the disk stage, I asked it to set up
> hda as a LVM with / /home /tmp and /var on seperate paritions. On
> checking the result seemed to s
Your message dated Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:58:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417341: invalid dependency: it tries to remove(!) postfix
for exim which I don't want
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 417014 + pending
Bug#417014: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm
Tags were: etch-ignore
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> severity 417393 important
Bug#417393: openoffice.org-base: infinite loop at startup ?
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 417377 normal
Bug#417377: openntpd: fails to install when the servers are unreachable
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
severity 417377 normal
thanks
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:41:12PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> When the default (Debian) NTP servers are not reachable, the openntpd
> package fails to install:
> Dépaquetage de openntpd (à partir de .../openntpd_3.9p1-3_i386.deb) ...
> Paramétrage de openntpd (
Le lundi 02 avril 2007 à 15:41 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> Package: openntpd
> Version: 3.9p1-3
> Severity: serious
>
> When the default (Debian) NTP servers are not reachable, the openntpd
> package fails to install:
> Dépaquetage de openntpd (à partir de .../openntpd_3.9p1-3_i386.deb) .
Package: erlang-base
Version: 1:11.b.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2
erlang-base uses ps in the prerm without depending on procps, which
is not an essential package.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 06:45:46PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Peter Nuttall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.04.02.1833 +0200]:
> > If you have any questions, or I can help further, please ask. I'm psn on
> > oftc. Any suggestions as to what I did wrong or how to recover would be
> > re
tags 390369 +patch
thanks
Hello People,
sorry for the long answer time, I'm quite busy at the moment but here is
the patch. I hope someone will upload the package soon...
Regards
--
.''`. Mario Iseli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud user of Debian unstable
`. `'`
`- Debian - wh
also sprach Peter Nuttall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.04.02.1833 +0200]:
> If you have any questions, or I can help further, please ask. I'm psn on
> oftc. Any suggestions as to what I did wrong or how to recover would be
> really nice.
Please also pass the output of
/usr/share/bug/mdadm/script
Your message dated Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:47:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416746: fixed in linux-ftpd-ssl 0.17.18+0.3-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> Do you happen to use two keyboard layouts? I think this is important
> for the crash to happen.
I do have two layouts, but it could be your particular layout
triggers the bug.
> dam 25012 0.0 0.9 30748 10196 ?Sl 12:43 0:06
> /usr/
Hi KDE users,
anyone has experiment something like this:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:39:02PM +0100, Sheridan Hutchinson wrote:
> Package: klaptopdaemon
> Version: 4:3.5.5-3
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Hi, I'm using Etch RC2 and I use klaptopdaemon to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 417393 + unreproducible
Bug#417393: openoffice.org-base: infinite loop at startup ?
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
tag 417393 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Pascal A. Dupuis wrote:
> uname({sys="Linux", node="Tatooine", ...}) = 0
> socket(PF_FILE, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 5
> uname({sys="Linux", node="Tatooine", ...}) = 0
> uname({sys="Linux", node="Tatooine", ...}) = 0
> connect(5, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> tags 416824 + help
Bug#416824: klaptopdaemon: lock & hibernate allowing unauthorised access
Tags were: security
Tags added: help
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Your message dated Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:32:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417390: CVE-2007-0242, Qt UTF-8 overlong sequence
decoding vulnerability
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:33:02 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417391: CVE-2007-0242, Qt UTF-8 overlong sequence
decoding vulnerability
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:31:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417394: Possible UTF-8 overlong sequence decoding
vulnerability
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Package: kdelibs
Version: 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-7
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
>
> this is a notice about a significant bug in the Qt (3.x and 4.x) UTF 8
> decoder, that in certain cases can lead to security vulnerabilies. It causes
> XSS errors at least in Konqueror,
Package: qt-x11-free
Version: 3:3.3.7-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
> this is a notice about a significant bug in the Qt (3.x and 4.x) UTF 8
> decoder, that in certain cases can lead to security vulnerabilies. It causes
> XSS errors at least in Konqueror, thou
Package: openoffice.org-base
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
ooffice started behaving strangely. In the splash screen, the status
bar progress doesn't move at all. I tried a strace, and found this:
uname({sys="Linux", node="Tatooine", ...}) = 0
socket(PF_FILE, SOCK
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 03:18:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Actually, after doing some stuff with a 32 bits ekiga binary, I somehow
> > changed the configuration in such a way (probably left it in
> > "videophone" mode) that the 64 bits binary does crash on startup, again
> > due to the sa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 400340
Bug#400340: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> found 40034
Package: openntpd
Version: 3.9p1-3
Severity: serious
When the default (Debian) NTP servers are not reachable, the openntpd
package fails to install:
Dépaquetage de openntpd (à partir de .../openntpd_3.9p1-3_i386.deb) ...
Paramétrage de openntpd (3.9p1-3) ...
Starting openntpd: invoke-rc.d: initsc
Your message dated Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417037: fixed in noffle 1.2.0~rc1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package toshutils
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: toshutils
> merge 398532 417285
Bug#398532: toshutils: postrm fails: /var/lib/dpkg/info/toshutils.postrm: line
15: /sbin/update-modules: No such file or directory
Bug#417285: depends on non-essential pa
Hello:
I think it would be nice having this bug solved, since a patch is provided
and also is a RC bug.
Is there any reason why it is not solved yet?
Thanks,
--
Raúl Sánchez Siles
pgpJWe5Xuhb7i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-=| Loïc Minier, 2.04.2007 13:52 |=-
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>> After some hard-time debugging, I think the error is not in the code,
>> but in the fact, that there is missing .service file, as reported below.
>> ___
>> $ /usr/li
Your message dated Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416678: fixed in file 4.17-5etch1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415362: fixed in file 4.17-5etch1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415362: fixed in file 4.17-5etch1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416678: fixed in file 4.17-5etch1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
hello
what a pity when it gets removed. there was a very simple patch to
fix the problem: see http://bugs.debian.org/400718
the package nor the software is too shabby to be supported.
upstream was very fast fixing the issue, after they knew about it.
did the debian security team contact links a
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.13-1
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Tried to upgrade mutt.
I had postfix installed.
Then the upgrade tried to install exim and remove postfix.
I don't want that.
So my guess is that the dependencies are broken.
keetweej:/home/folkert/s
Package: pine-tracker
Version: 4.64-3
Severity: serious
Tags: etch-ignore
Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential
Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
because of debconf beeing unavailable during postrm:
Remo
Package: nttcp
Version: 1.47-8
Severity: serious
Tags: etch-ignore
Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential
Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
because of update-inetd beeing unavailable during postrm:
Removi
Package: links2
Version: 2.1pre16-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Justification: seem to buggy to be supported by the security team
Hi,
on December 21st, DSA 1240 was released from a member of the security
team. It was issued to fix 'arbitrary shell command execution'. Within a
week the stable
Package: libcwd-dev
Version: 0.99.44-0.1
Severity: serious
Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential
Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on install
because of debconf beeing unavailable during postinst:
Setting up libc
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> After some hard-time debugging, I think the error is not in the code,
> but in the fact, that there is missing .service file, as reported below.
> ___
> $ /usr/lib/gnome-screensaver/gnome-screensaver-dialog
Package: seyon
Version: 2.20c-23
Severity: serious
Tags: etch-ignore
Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential
Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
because of debconf beeing unavailable during postrm:
Removing s
Your message dated Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:41:20 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Resolved in version 0.2.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 408536 patch
Bug#408536: ipmitool: "impievd open daemon" doesn't work
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Following some advice, (thanks to moray and broonie :) I've created a
patch to the source for ipmitool 1.8.8-2, which contains the fix for
this specific issue. There are obviously many more fixes between 1.8.8
and 1.8.9 but I can't see any other critical fixes that need to be
included in etch.
reopen 416746
thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
> linux-ftpd-ssl (0.17.18+0.3-8) unstable; urgency=low
> .
> * debian/control: dropped update-inetd,as netbase has already
> provided it.
> * debian/postrm: replaced update-inetd with sed. (Closes: #416746)
-=| Sven Arvidsson, 1.04.2007 00:16 |=-
> On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 16:10 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>> After I lock my screen with gnome-screensaver from experimental, I am
>> then unable to unlock it.
>
> Can you try running /usr/lib/gnome-screensaver/gnome-screensaver-dialog
> and see if you can
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 416746
Bug#416746: depends on non-essential package update-inetd in postrm
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tha
Your message dated Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:41:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417280: nspluginwrapper: uninstallable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> tags 417285 etch-ignore
Bug#417285: depends on non-essential package modutils|module-init-tools in
postrm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch-ignore
>
End of message, stopping
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:24:04AM +0100, Rob Andrews wrote:
> On 02-Apr-2007 10:09.18 (BST), Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Package: nspluginwrapper
> > Version: 0.9.90.4-2
>
> I haven't produced a package for this version!
yeah sorry I forgot to strip that, it was a local package of mine.
> >
Hi,
Steve Langasek scheduled a bin NMU this morning.
I'll see how it goes and close the bug appropriately.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier
Package: toshutils
Version: 2.0.1-14
Severity: serious
Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential
Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
because of module-init-tools beeing unavailable during postrm:
Removing toshu
On 02-Apr-2007 10:09.18 (BST), Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Package: nspluginwrapper
> Version: 0.9.90.4-2
I haven't produced a package for this version!
> It has been built against a glib not in unstable.
Ah. I thought the glib version that I'm using was out of experimental.
I'll re-run it th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.1
> severity 417278 important
Bug#417278: Failed to symbolic-link boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-4-686 to initrd.img.
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> tags 417278 unreproducible
Bug#
Package: nspluginwrapper
Version: 0.9.90.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: package is uninstallable
It has been built against a glib not in unstable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Latest kernel package does not install correctly:
# LANG=C aptitude upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state inform
Your message dated Mon, 02 Apr 2007 08:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416746: fixed in linux-ftpd-ssl 0.17.18+0.3-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> tags 417259 - etch-ignore
Bug#417259: depends on non-essential package wwwconfig-common in postrm
There were no tags set.
Tags removed: etch-ignore
>
End of message, stopping process
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> tags 417259 - etch-ignore
Bug#417259: depends on non-essential package wwwconfig-common in postrm
Tags were: etch-ignore
Tags removed: etch-ignore
>
End of message, stopping processi
Package: zoph
Version: 0.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: etch-ignore
Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential
Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
because of wwwconfig-common beeing unavailable during postrm:
Remo
Package: xmcd
Version: 2.6-19.1
Severity: serious
Tags: etch-ignore
Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential
Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
because of debconf beeing unavailable during postrm:
Removing xm
87 matches
Mail list logo
