Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #Reopening to clarify the status of this bug, as just marking as found
> led to an incoherent status
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reopen 414045
Bug#414045: libX11: Buffer overflow in XGetPixel().
'reopen' may be inappropriate wh
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 413116 + confirmed
Bug#413116: jamvm: missing file: /usr/lib/logging.properties
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> #In Matthew's name, to control this time
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 06:19:09PM +0100, sean finney wrote:
> hi paul,
> On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 03:05 +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>> Would there be any interest in having PHP5 link its xmlrpc extension
>> against a distinct library packaging of xmlrpc-epi? (ie. to avoid
>> the situation which
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 413922 + upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#413922: SECURITY: multiple message problem
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: upstream, fixed-upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 414170 + upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#414170: SECURITY: multiple message problem
Tags were: security patch
Bug#413923: SECURITY: multiple message problem
Tags added: upstream, fixed-upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 10:01:22PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
> > But there is a problem with this translation:
> > @@ -319,6 +305,8 @@
> > #: ../templates:9001
> > msgid "LDAP server Uniform Resource Identifier:"
> > msgstr ""
> > +"Identificador de Recurso Uniforme (URI -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> close 358493 2.0.3-2
Bug#358493: FTBFS: testsuite failures.
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.0.3-2, send any f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 414332 normal
Bug#414332: fail to build madwifi with gcc 4.1
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Hi,
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Please provide a few more details:
dpkg -l asterisk-addons
There's no package asterisk-addons.
dpkg -S /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/format_mp3.so
wallace:~# dpkg -S /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/format_mp3.so
dpkg: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/format_mp3.so not found.
Package: gcc
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
/usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/modules/madwifi modules \
KERNELPATH=/lib/modules/2.6.18-4-686/build
KERNELRELEASE=2.6.18-4-686 KERNELCONF=/lib/modules/2.6.18-4-686/build/.config
ATH_RATE=ath_rate/sample
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 02:45:42AM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 13:22 -0800, Enyc wrote:
> > So far as I can tell that replacement will have similar problems
> >if you have a group-name on the system that starts with 'stats'.
> > E.g. if there is a group called 'statsr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # S/MIME is an optional feature, does not make the package unusable
> severity 408548 important
Bug#408548: new location for libnssckbi.so effects evolution
Severity set to `important
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 13:22 -0800, Enyc wrote:
> So far as I can tell that replacement will have similar problems
>if you have a group-name on the system that starts with 'stats'.
> E.g. if there is a group called 'statsrem' then the check will
>still incorrectly not-create-the-stats-group
Jose, please open a bug report against ftp.debian.org requesting the
removal of list.
Thanks for having maintained this package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/10/2007 04:10 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:13:28PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
> wrote:
>>> You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
>>> libpam-ldap.
>
>> I took the chance
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 408548 grave
Bug#408548: new location for libnssckbi.so effects evolution
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact m
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Le mardi 6 mars 2007 23:00, Mike Young a écrit :
Package: openbsd-inetd
Version: 0.20050402-5
Followup-For: Bug #386469
I'm seeing this same error on an etch update/upgrade today.
my pid for inetd doesn't change during the attempt at install, which
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 04:45:52PM +, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> > sfere$ type bash
> > bash is hashed (/bin/bash)
> > sfere$ bash -c 'type printf'
> > printf is a shell builtin
> > sfere$ bash -c 'printf spong' > /dev/full
> > sfere$ echo $?
> > 0
>
>
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Mike Young wrote:
I upgraded from 0.20050402-4 to 0.20050402-5
from /var/log/aptitude:
[UPGRADE] openbsd-inetd 0.20050402-4 -> 0.20050402-5
[...]
Let me know if you need anything more.
--Mike Young
You could have a try at downgrading openbsd-inetd manually (through dpkg)
Le mardi 6 mars 2007 23:00, Mike Young a écrit :
> Package: openbsd-inetd
> Version: 0.20050402-5
> Followup-For: Bug #386469
>
>
> I'm seeing this same error on an etch update/upgrade today.
> my pid for inetd doesn't change during the attempt at install, which
> suggests that the preinstall for o
found 409644 2.5.3-4.3
quit
Frank,
The 2.5.3-4.1 NMU of fuse is broken:
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
dh_compress -Xfusexmp.c
dh_fixperms
dh_installdebconf
- dh_makeshlibs
+ dh_makeshlibs -V "libfuse (>= 2.5)"
dh_installdeb
dh_shlibdeps
dh_gencontr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 409644 2.5.3-4.3
Bug#409644: libfuse2: please include a versioned shlibs file
Bug marked as found in version 2.5.3-4.3.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
So if anybody happens to read this bugreport, while the problem is still
persisting, please try to figure out the following:
Unless I'm not misstaken (there are only indications but no evidence so
far), then the cause of the problem we're witnessing here is, that
/etc/init.d/openbsd-inetd stop
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 04:45:52PM +, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> Package: bash
> Version: 2.05b-26
> Severity: grave
> sfere$ type bash
> bash is hashed (/bin/bash)
> sfere$ bash -c 'type printf'
> printf is a shell builtin
> sfere$ bash -c 'printf spong' > /dev/full
> sfere$ echo
David,
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 10:26:20AM -0500, David A. Harding wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 05:06:50PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > After discussing on IRC with Joey and other ion users, it seems that there
> > isn't really much demand for ion3 in a stable release after all;
> I run
Your message dated Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:02:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#407746: fixed in libpam-ldap 180-1.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:02:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#407746: fixed in libpam-ldap 180-1.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:02:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#407746: fixed in libpam-ldap 180-1.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 397350 pending
Bug#397350: ITP: vdr-xineliboutput -- Simple framebuffer and/or X11 front-end
for VDR
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 401603 pending
Bug#401603: d-i: i386
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> retitle 386469 "openbsd-inetd, action "start" failed" when upgrading
Bug#386469: openbsd-inetd: action "start" failed
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
ooops, sorry wrong bug number
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Ludo wrote:
Just had the same problem, this time on a Debian testing system,
instead of unstable as I had before.
As someone mentioned this, I purged netkit-inetd (still had its conf
files, etc.) to see if it helped, but it didn't.
Again, simply stopping openbsd-inetd made i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package netperf
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: netperf
> severity 413658 serious
Bug#413658: netserver can be locked by /tmp/netperf.debug
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
> tags 413658 security
Bug#413658: netserver can be locked by /tmp/net
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 07:04:22PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 12:15:33AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > > ../../lib/libdns.a: undefined reference to `_info'
>
> Well, that's a different error than I've seen on the mipsel buildd for
> unstable... Which I also haven'
Your message dated Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#411027: fixed in libkwiki-perl 0.38-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 414290 experimental
Bug#414290: Experimental libc-client packages almost empty
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Hi!
I've verified that Nicolas's patch works fine, and I'm currently
preparing an NMU for libkwiki-perl. A diff describing the changes is
attached.
Greetings,
bas.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 06
Your message dated Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413709: fixed in squid 2.6.5-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Le jeudi 8 mars 2007 19:23, vous avez écrit :
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 386469 help
Hi Marco,
could you help helping you a bit?
Are you still trying to identify in which case this bug occurs?
If not, please explain when it occurs.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> found 414045 2:1.0.3-6
Bug#414045: libX11: Buffer overflow in XGetPixel().
Bug marked as found in version 2:1.0.3-6.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Hi!
I've had lots of problems with this package before (although I usually
installed it directly from upstream). Afaik, it's totally broken for
firefox/iceweasel 2.0, and almost all of its features are included in
other extensions like Tabmix Plus.
Upstream's homepage [1] even reads:
> This e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry for the late answer..
Jens Seidel escribió:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:53:03AM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:47:59AM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
>>> Package: swi-prolog
>>>
>>> the current version fails to build on GN
Your message dated Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414283: fixed in openssl 0.9.8e-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 346306 important
Bug#346306: duplicity: Lost connection, can't resume transfer
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Package: list
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem on my system:
Setting up list (2.0.0-1) ...
chgrp: invalid group `stats'
chgrp: invalid group `stats'
dpkg: error processing list (--configure):
It is caused by this incorrect group e
hi paul,
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 03:05 +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> Would there be any interest in having PHP5 link its xmlrpc extension
> against a distinct library packaging of xmlrpc-epi? (ie. to avoid
> the situation which once existed for zlib being statically compiled
> into various othe
Source: uw-imap
Version: 7:2006d.dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Packages libc-client2006b.dfsg-1 and libc-client2006b.dfsg-1-dev end up empty,
except for some files in /usr/share/doc/*. Seems you forgot to update the
package names to 2006d in debian/control.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414203: fixed in partman-md 34
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:54:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Invalid bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Package: bash
Version: 2.05b-26
Severity: grave
sfere$ type bash
bash is hashed (/bin/bash)
sfere$ bash -c 'type printf'
printf is a shell builtin
sfere$ bash -c 'printf spong' > /dev/full
sfere$ echo $?
0
Compare:
sfere$ /usr/bin/printf spong > /dev/full
/usr/bin/printf: write
Package: wesnoth
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Wesnoth configuration fails unless we manually install g++
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linke
Package: libssl0.9.8
Version: 0.9.8e-3
Severity: serious
I upgraded openssl to 0.9.8e-3 while still having libssl0.9.8 0.9.8c-4
installed.
Today, I upgraded the ca-certificates package.
fetchmail then refused fetching any emails saying
29033:error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIF
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:53:03AM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:47:59AM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> > Package: swi-prolog
> >
> > the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD, mips, mipsel.
> >
> > please use attached tweak for debian/rules
> > to auto-update the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 414203 partman-md 33
Bug#414203: Installation problems: Wrong partition type for physical raid
partitions
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman-md'.
> severity 414203 serious
Bug#414203: Installation problems: Wrong p
(For the php-maint team. I've just ITP'd xmlrpc-epi as a dependancy
of the second-life client, and was poking around to see if there was
a good way of not having to package it.)
Interestingly, the code in ext/xmlrpc/libxmlrpc in the php5 5.2.0
tarball is a derivative of xmlrpc-epi. A quick check o
Package: linux-image-2.6-*
Version: 2.6.17, 2.6.18
Severity: serious
On amd64 processors, whenever which version (32-, or 64bit) of Debian is
installed, some programs (e.g. verlihub) after short uptime use 100% CPU. I
tested it on AMD Opteron 1210 with several kernels (and even distros), and
it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 346306 grave
Bug#346306: duplicity: Lost connection, can't resume transfer
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 05:06:50PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> After discussing on IRC with Joey and other ion users, it seems that there
> isn't really much demand for ion3 in a stable release after all;
Hi,
I run ion3 on Sarge and would like to upgrade to a more recent release
(developme
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 411787 412862
Bug#411787: redhat-cluster-modules-2.6.18-3-686: GFS Oops on mount at
do_add_mount
Bug#412862: redhat-cluster: system crash mounting gfs filesystem
Forcibly Merged 411787 412862.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
Just had the same problem, this time on a Debian testing system,
instead of unstable as I had before.
As someone mentioned this, I purged netkit-inetd (still had its conf
files, etc.) to see if it helped, but it didn't.
Again, simply stopping openbsd-inetd made it possible to upgrade. This
is open
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 354654 important
Bug#354654: general: fat32 gets corrupted
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> tags 354654 unreproducible
Bug#354654: general: fat32 gets corrupted
Your message dated Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414075: fixed in mplayer 1.0~rc1-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 05:41:55PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Freitag, 9. März 2007 13:33 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > Does your question for the cyrus team about this bug mean there is some
> > doubt about the patch David provided?
> We prefer to work in sync with the cyrus team, and in m
Your message dated Sat, 10 Mar 2007 04:15:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line upgrade-reports: X broken after apt-get upgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
> This is quite unfortunate for me. I, for one, am using officially packaged
> Ion3 on current stable and intended to use Ion3 also in upcomming Etch.
> I can't be bothered to install all those development packages just to
> compile the curent versions
Why do you want a random broken and unsuppo
Hi,
is there any news on this issue ? It's been a month since the bug has
been reported, and it's really painfull to force the build-dep against
libpng12-dev (as lots of package doesn't depend directly on libpng at
all).
Please, could you fix this issue ?
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUB
Is this the line you wanted ?
2007-02-23 08:59:46 upgrade openbsd-inetd 0.20050402-3 0.20050402-4
2007-02-23 08:59:46 status half-configured openbsd-inetd 0.20050402-3
2007-02-23 08:59:47 status unpacked openbsd-inetd 0.20050402-3
2007-02-23 08:59:47 status half-installed openbsd-inetd 0.20050402-
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:25:16AM -0800, Frank Bauer wrote:
> "After discussing on IRC with Joey and other ion users, it seems that there
> isn't really much demand for ion3 in a stable release after all; those I've
> talked to who use ion3 all say they run testing or unstable on their
> desktops,
Your message dated Sat, 10 Mar 2007 09:23:52 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409747: fixed in debian-installer 20070308
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> forcemerge 409477 355142
Bug#409477: FTBFS: cp: missing destination file operand after `oo2crc.tmp'
Bug#355142: FTBFS: cp: missing destination file operand after
Bug#394718: libooc-xm
Quoting Steve Langasek:
"After discussing on IRC with Joey and other ion users, it seems that there
isn't really much demand for ion3 in a stable release after all; those I've
talked to who use ion3 all say they run testing or unstable on their
desktops, and Joey notes that the ion3 upgrade path f
Your message dated Sat, 10 Mar 2007 08:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414069: fixed in ekiga 2.0.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> package ekiga gnomemeeting
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gnomemeeting ekiga
> tags 414069 + pending
Bug#414069: CVE-2007-0999: still vulnerable to format string exploits
Tags were:
73 matches
Mail list logo
