Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 410204 important
Bug#410204: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: Data corruption on dm-crypt+XFS
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # this works better
> close 395858 0.56-1.1
Bug#395858: libfile-homedir-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked a
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 12:26:00PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 07:46:34PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Steve Langasek, le Sun 04 Feb 2007 15:05:37 -0800, a écrit :
> > > I am raising the severity of 408741 to 'grave', which is the correct
> > > severity for such
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 410948
Bug#410948: license issues with des.tcl
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity 410948 minor
Bug#410948: license issues with des.tcl
Severity set to `minor' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
reopen 410948
severity 410948 minor
thanks
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 04:05:17AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
[...]
Again, this is an effort to keep the government from claiming *more* rights
over the software than what's permitted by the usual license, not to
tags 411192 pending
thanks
* Kees Cook ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: iceweasel
> Version: 2.0.0.1+dfsg-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security, fixed-upstream, patch
>
> http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-0981 says:
>
> "Mozilla based browsers allows remote attackers to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 411192 pending
Bug#411192: CVE-2007-0981: serious cookie-stealing vulnerability
Tags were: fixed-upstream patch security
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> reopen 410850 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#410850: CVE-2006-6980: magnatune shell escapes
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appr
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 20:38:22 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #411301,
regarding gaim DNS children die when gaim-otr is installed
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Thibaut VARENE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
(
severity 411305 normal
stop
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 the mental interface of
Michael Rasmussen told:
> Package: alsa-utils
> Version: 1.0.13-2
> Severity: grave
Not really, read [1]
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After upgrade of linux-sound-base (1.0.13-4) and alsa-base
> (1.0.13-4) a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 411305 normal
Bug#411305: running alsa-utils at boot breaks sound configuration
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Package: alsa-utils
Version: 1.0.13-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrade of linux-sound-base (1.0.13-4) and alsa-base (1.0.13-4)
alsa-utils is no longer working. Actually is completely messes up the sound
system.
Steps to reproduce the error:
1) Clean all sound
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 411301 upstream help
Bug#411301: gaim DNS children die when gaim-otr is installed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream, help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Your message dated Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:48:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #411301,
regarding gaim DNS children die when gaim-otr is installed
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) .
(NB: If you are a system administra
close 403062 2.3.2-1
thanks
Hi,
It seems you didn't include the changelog from the NMU, so the bts
thinks this wasn't fixed. You seem to have made the same change in
2.3.2-1 so I'm marking it as fixed in that version.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 403062 2.3.2-1
Bug#403062: scala: FTBFS: b-dep on gcj-4.0 which is not available anymore
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.3.2-1, send any further explanations to Lucas
Nussb
Let's try that again with accurate function and directory names:
diff -u asterisk-chan-capi-0.7.1/debian/patches/00list
asterisk-chan-capi-0.7.1/debian/patches/00list
--- asterisk-chan-capi-0.7.1/debian/patches/00list
+++ asterisk-chan-capi-0.7.1/debian/patches/00list
@@ -1,0 +2 @@
+02_capi-cmsg2
found 403022 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-4
thanks
The file doesn't exist, so I'm tagging this as affecting this version.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 403022 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-4
Bug#403022: Non-existent vlcintf.xpt file!
Bug marked as found in version 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 405461 1.4.3-3
Bug#405461: jabber 1.4.3-3.1 does not allow ssl connections
Bug marked as found in version 1.4.3-3.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Package: gaim-otr
Version: 3.0.0+cvs20060530-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After installing gaim-otr, when gaim is started it pops up a dialog box
titled "GStreamer Failure" and with contents "GStreamer failed to initialize"
In the console I started gaim from, several
found 405461 1.4.3-3
thanks
Hi,
This seems to be caused by using libssl0.9.8 instead of 0.9.7. The
amd64 version 1.4.3-3 was build after we changed to 0.9.8 so it's
linked to libssl0.9.8. So this should be affecting version 1.4.3-3 on
amd64 too. It will also cause problems if we ever need to d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 411049 python-numpy
Bug#411049: python-numpy-dev: file conflict with python-numpy
Bug reassigned from package `python-numpy-dev' to `python-numpy'.
> merge 411005 411049 410944
Bug#410944: python-numpy: trying to overwrite
`/usr/lib/python2.4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 411293 +patch
Bug#411293: asterisk-chan-capi: Need a mutex for calls to
capi_{cmsg,message}2str
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
tags 411293 +patch
thanks
Patch for asterisk-chan-capi:
diff -u asterisk-chan-capi-0.7.1/debian/patches/00list
asterisk-chan-capi-0.7.1/debian/patches/00list
--- asterisk-chan-capi-0.7.1/debian/patches/00list
+++ asterisk-chan-capi-0.7.1/debian/patches/00list
@@ -1,0 +2 @@
+02_capi-msg2str-mutex
tags 408530 patch
thanks
Patch for isdnutils:
diff -u isdnutils-3.9.20060704/debian/rules isdnutils-3.9.20060704/debian/rules
--- isdnutils-3.9.20060704/debian/rules
+++ isdnutils-3.9.20060704/debian/rules
@@ -388,6 +388,7 @@
ppp-2.4.4b1 \
vbox-little-endian \
toplevel-mak
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 408530 patch
Bug#408530: libcapi20-3: buffer overflow in "printbuf" called from capi_cmsg2str
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 07:24:16AM +1100, Paul Szabo wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Yes, the bug in the patch was mine: meant to check the return status of
> setgid(getegid()) but somehow managed to mis-type that into
> setgid(geteuid()). Stupid mistake. Shame on me.
>
> Now, linux-ftpd_0.17-20sar
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 408530 -1 -2
Bug#408530: libcapi20-3: buffer overflow in "printbuf" called from capi_cmsg2str
Bug 408530 cloned as bugs 411293-411294.
> reassign -1 asterisk-chan-capi
Bug#411293: libcapi20-3: buffer overflow in "printbuf" called from capi_cmsg2s
clone 408530 -1 -2
reassign -1 asterisk-chan-capi
retitle -1 asterisk-chan-capi: Need a mutex for calls to capi_{cmsg,message}2str
reassign -2 linux-2.6
retitle -2 linux-2.6: capi_{cmsg,message}2str not thread-safe; vulnerable to
buffer overflow
block -1 with 408530
tags -2 upstream
forwarded -2 h
* Frank Küster:
> I don't know Florians opinion about this, and he has the saying here.
> But if you ask me, unless there's a particular reason why you choose
> this bug (which I didn't read so far), I think it is a bad example for
> your famous talk. NMU work should be concentrated on RC bugs wh
* martin f. krafft:
> Why don't we simply drop a script into /etc/cron.hourly which sleeps
> for up to 60 minutes and then calls debsecan,
We do exactly this for bfk-backup-client. In my experience, the sleep
processes in the process list can be somewhat confusing. And I
believe packages should
Dear Maintainer,
Yes, the bug in the patch was mine: meant to check the return status of
setgid(getegid()) but somehow managed to mis-type that into
setgid(geteuid()). Stupid mistake. Shame on me.
Now, linux-ftpd_0.17-20sarge2.diff.gz was dated September 2006 as per
your latest "closure" message
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 05:31:34PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm told that dmcrypt+XFS has never worked in the upstream kernel or in
> Debian, so this is essentially an unsupported configuration. But you've
> filed this bug as critical with the justification that it "causes serious
> data lo
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 17:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409702: fixed in cheops-ng 0.2.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
This bug is related to the composite extension
shown in the xorg.conf..
Bug should probably moved over there.
--
Kristian Kvilekval
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~kris w:805-893-2526 h:504-9756
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 17:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410400: fixed in ldtp 0.7.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 411258 normal
Bug#411258: RM: gst-ffmpeg -- RoM; superseded by gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg and not
supported by the security team
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone #410352 -1
Bug#410352: gstreamer0.8: Should not be released with Etch
Bug 410352 cloned as bug 411258.
> retitle -1 RM: gst-ffmpeg -- RoM; superseded by gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg and not
> supported by the security team
Bug#411258: gstreamer0.8: Shou
clone #410352 -1
retitle -1 RM: gst-ffmpeg -- RoM; superseded by gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg and not
supported by the security team
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
stop
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: gambas
Version: 1.0.15-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I get the following error when trying to start Gambas:
sizeof(CLASS) = 256 !
ERROR: #51: Bad archive: Invalid argument
Gambas fails to start due to the above error.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why don't we simply drop a script into /etc/cron.hourly which sleeps
> for up to 60 minutes and then calls debsecan,
I have no opinion about what the right approach is for the timing stuff.
But it seems to me as if this is a different issue, for sure
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:33:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line charva: FTBFS: [...]/charva-1.1.1/build.xml:195: compilation
failed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Hallo Javier,
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-17 15:19]:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 02:48:49PM +0100, Adolf Winterer wrote:
> >
> > With the patch applied the program ran without any problems. The patch file
> > is attached.
>
> Ok. Since you confirm that the bug dis
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384690: fixed in dresden-ocl 1.1.debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384690: fixed in dresden-ocl 1.1.debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358736: fixed in dresden-ocl 1.1.debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358736: fixed in dresden-ocl 1.1.debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 02:48:49PM +0100, Adolf Winterer wrote:
>
> With the patch applied the program ran without any problems. The patch file
> is attached.
Ok. Since you confirm that the bug dissapears with the provided patch I will
make a new version upload fixing it with that patch.
Thanks
Hello Javier,
Nico Golde was so kind to investigate the segfault problem with cheops-ng. He
found the solution and provided a patch for the file probe.c .
As the program runs on a 32 bit computer without the patch this is indeed a
plattform specific issue.
A big thank you goes to Nico for hi
Hi,
accidently uncommented the wrong DEBUG.
Fixed patch attached.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de
JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
Forget about that mouse with 3/4/5 buttons,
gimme a keyboard with 103/104/105 keys!
--- cheops-ng-0.2.3/probe.c 2005-10-17 22:49:42.000
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 409702 + patch
Bug#409702: cheops-ng: Program cheops-agent immediately segfaults
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Hi,
I looked again at the issue and it seems like this is an
AMD64 issue, Adolf also uses AMD64.
A patch which should fix this for AMD64 is attached, I also
sent it to him.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de
JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
Forget about that mouse wi
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:10:01 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334350: fixed in flexbackup 1.2.1-2sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:09:53 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394025: fixed in asterisk 1:1.0.7.dfsg.1-2sarge4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:09:59 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402063: fixed in evince 0.1.5-2sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:10:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384454: fixed in linux-ftpd 0.17-20sarge2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:10:31 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#398317: fixed in trac 0.8.1-3sarge7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:10:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396099: fixed in ingo1 1.0.1-1sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:09:55 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401873: fixed in clamav 0.84-2.sarge.13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:10:32 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341394: fixed in webmin 1.180-3sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:10:29 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386519: fixed in sql-ledger 2.4.7-2sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:10:32 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405425: fixed in vlc 0.8.1.svn20050314-1sarge2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
severity 408325 important
thanks
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 02:01:55AM +, Brian Brunswick wrote:
> I would say if the server binary has ever worked on any arm machine, then
> keep it.
Good enough for me.
> So aap->pwauth->password is presumably coming in as an empty string, and of
> course
> I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 408325 important
Bug#408325: sfsauthd: fatal: Should not be reached - server fails on arm nslu2
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: kolab-cyrus-imapd
Version: 2.2.13-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Today I discovered that lmtpd segfaulted on any local mail. After a
little inveestigating, I found that the problem was caused by the
following lines in imap/quota_db.c:
---8<--
int quota_rea
Your message dated Sat, 17 Feb 2007 09:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#411198: fixed in gquilt 0.17-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
67 matches
Mail list logo
