Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27ubuntu7
> severity 410995 grave
Bug#410995: new upstream version 5.2.1 available
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> # whoops, I can't read
> merge 410561 410995
Bug#410561: php5
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410843: fixed in spamassassin 3.1.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:02:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410871: fixed in postfix 2.3.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hi,
I'm just trying to evaluate the severity, but does this happen for all
users on your system? For example, if you create a new user?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409750: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.32-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409750: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.32-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 410999 normal
Bug#410999: kicker fails to push up the panel after update
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 409440 mysql-server-5.0
Bug#409440: mysql-common: Upgrade to 5.0.32-3 thinks I modified my.cnf which is
not the case
Bug reassigned from package `mysql-common' to `mysql-server-5.0'.
> severity 409440 serious
Bug#409440: mysql-common: Upgrade
Package: kicker
Version: 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-6
Severity: grave
Hi,
I updated kicker from 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-5 to 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-6
and after that the panel failed to push up when the mouse pointer
touched the bottom edge.
Workaround: I configured the panel to raise when touching the
top edge and then
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 410978 important
Bug#410978: rlwrap: missing binary packages e.g. amd64
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> package libnautilus-extension1 libnautilus-extension-dev nautilus
> nautilus-data nautilus-dbg
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libnautilus-extension1 nautilus-data
libnautilus-extens
severity 410978 important
thanks
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:58:34PM +, Stuart Rowan wrote:
> Package: rlwrap
> Version: 0.24-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> So what I actually want is a way in reportbug of saying take the
> packages currently in unstable (0.28-
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410891: fixed in quik 2.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gst-ffmpeg
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status repor
Eddy Petrișor a écrit :
> I was wondering if the testing version of wormux is affected by this
> bug. I guess it is.
Not sure at all.
I think this comes from what I introduced in 0.7.9-2 to move pixmaps
from wormux-data to wormux.
The bug appeared when you want to build the arch independant part a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> reassign 326230 installation-reports
Bug#326230: Sparc IPX install problem
Warning: Unknown package 'install'
Bug reassigned from package `install' to `installation-reports'.
>
End o
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:48:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410978: rlwrap: missing binary packages e.g. amd64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
severity 410903 important
thanks
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:37:42PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> I think that it is clear that these files actually are configuration
> files. This has been discussed for example in #326637. Reading through
> this bug, one gets the impression that everyone who spo
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:59:12PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Package: amarock
> Version: 1.4.4-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch, security
>
> CVE-2006-6980 says[1]:
>
> "The ruby handlers in Amarok do not properly quote text in certain
> contexts, probably including construction of an unzip com
Package: rlwrap
Version: 0.24-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
So what I actually want is a way in reportbug of saying take the
packages currently in unstable (0.28-2) which exist for all
architectures.
Failing that, how about another go at building the version currently
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 410903 important
Bug#410903: xkb-data: configuration files have been moved to /usr/share
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:34:47 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410948: license issues with des.tcl
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 410821 important
Bug#410821: mysql-server-5.0: mysqld dies with '*** glibc detected *** double
free or corruption (!prev): 0x08dd1dd0 ***'
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> # Justification: causes *very* non-serious data loss
> thank
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 402389 normal
Bug#402389: usbmount fails to mount flash devices
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tags 377548 + confirmed
Bug#377548: usbmount: Fails mounting some parts in a n-in-1 device
Tags were: patch
Tags added: confirmed
> tags 3
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:07:11 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Reporter says it's fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks for you're message!
>
> Rolandas Juodzbalis wrote:
>>> To be completely sure you can set VERBOSE="no" in
>>> /etc/usbmount/usbmount.conf
>
> Oups, VERBOSE="yes" for sure :-)
> Can you please try this with your camera and show me the logs in this case?
>
>> p.s.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 410079 important
Bug#410079: hyphenation patterns distributed without license and copyright
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> severity 410093 important
Bug#410093
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 410956 important
Bug#410956: xorg: xserver freezes irregularly when applications use lots of
memory
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> reassign 410956 linux-2.6
Bug#410956: xorg: xserver freezes irregularly when applications use lo
severity 410956 important
reassign 410956 linux-2.6
thanks
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 22:13:11 +0100, Arjen Bax wrote:
> Package: xorg
> Version: 1:7.1.0-11
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
>
> From time to time, especially when using "big" applications (e.g., Gimp)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409523: fixed in gpe-edit 0.25-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409688: fixed in gpe-julia 0.0.6-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: r-other-gking-matchit
Version: 1.0-1-1
Severity: serious
Hello Dirk,
Upgrading r-other-gking-matchit from sarge to etch fails with
Preparing to replace r-other-gking-matchit 1.0-1-1 (using
.../r-other-gking-matchit_2.2-11-1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement r-other-gking-matchit
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370186: fixed in hal 0.5.8.1-6.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On 13/02/2007 Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> >
> >
> >Justification: causes non-serious data loss
> >
> Which data loss does this cause?
The data that you submit before the server crashs.
...
jonas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.1.0-11
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
>From time to time, especially when using "big" applications (e.g., Gimp)
the system just freezes, leaving nothing in the syslog. The only way of
recovering is by switching off and on the power switch. I f
Package: amsn
Version: 0.95+dfsg2-0.2
Severity: serious
des.tcl contains the following paragraph at the end of its license
terms:
GOVERNMENT USE: If you are acquiring this software on behalf of the U.S.
government, the Government shall have only "Restricted Rights" in the software
and related d
Thanks for you're message!
Rolandas Juodzbalis wrote:
>> To be completely sure you can set VERBOSE="no" in
>> /etc/usbmount/usbmount.conf
Oups, VERBOSE="yes" for sure :-)
Can you please try this with your camera and show me the logs in this case?
> p.s. you can close this bug, because I already
Package: debsecan
Version: 0.4.3.5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3, http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt (3.,
last paragraph)
$ cat /etc/cron.d/debsecan
# cron entry for debsecan
#
# AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED
# (Delete the preceding line if you edit this file.)
40 * * * * d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> notforwarded 410850
Bug#410850: CVE-2006-6980: magnatune shell escapes
Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138499.
>
End of message
Package: python-numpy
Version: 1:1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems python-numpy and python-numpy-dev are both shipping
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/f2py/src/fortranobject.h. It
probably should only be in the -dev package.
I get:
Selecting previously deselected package python-nump
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> package gpe-julia
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gpe-julia
> tags 409688 + pending
Bug#409688: FTBFS: gpe/render.h: No such file or directory
Tags were: pending patch sid
Tags added:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 409688 + pending
Bug#409688: FTBFS: gpe/render.h: No such file or directory
Tags were: patch sid
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Armin Berres wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Your bug doesn't look like a bug, at least no bug in usbmount.
> I guess it is a hardware or maybe driver problem.
> Did you try to mount your camera manually? Did this work? Can you mount
> other hardware, e.g. an usb stick?
>
> Your log snippet shows output which i
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410554: fixed in stlport5.1 5.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi!
Your bug doesn't look like a bug, at least no bug in usbmount.
I guess it is a hardware or maybe driver problem.
Did you try to mount your camera manually? Did this work? Can you mount
other hardware, e.g. an usb stick?
Your log snippet shows output which is generated _before_ usbmount is
act
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409356: fixed in cups-pdf 2.4.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 05:36:53AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:58:07AM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way
> > described in bug #410871 (verified by adding the 'set -x' in
> > postfix.postinst). My attempts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering if the testing version of wormux is affected by this
bug. I guess it is.
- --
Regards,
EddyP
=
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
Am Montag, den 12.02.2007, 23:46 +0100 schrieb Henrik Andreasson:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Alain Schroeder wrote:
>
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=caudium (caudium is
> scheduled for removal)
>
> I have a new aproach, shall we downgrade pike?
>
> If debian refuses to upgrade may
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 05:36:53AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:58:07AM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way
> > described in bug #410871 (verified by adding the 'set -x' in
> > postfix.postinst). My attempts
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 23:28:53 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> As I'm going to upload 0.3.5-1 soon, could you please test if you can
> reproduce this problem with 0.3.5-1
> Add "deb-src http://debs.michaelbiebl.de unstable main" to
> /etc/apt/sources.list,
> run "apt-get update && apt-get build-dep
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:23:43PM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On 2/14/07, LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The installation worked fine, but there now seems to be something else
> # mailq
> postqueue: warning: Mail system is down -- accessing queue directly
If postfix was not runnin
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410501: fixed in destar 0.2.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: clamcour
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
This package fails to compile in sid (but not in etch):
> Automatic build of clamcour_0.2.2-1 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by
> sbuild/powerpc 0.52
...
> make[4]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/clamcour-0.2.2/src'
> if powerpc-li
Yes, hopefully..
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote / napísal(a):
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#410907: egroupware -missing in repository,
which was filed against the egroupware package.
It has been closed by Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 09:46, David Härdeman wrote:
> Wasn't this package kept in the archive just to not break d-i RC1?
>
> If so, now would perhaps be a good time remove the package as d-i RC1
> is broken anyways due to the old security key issue?
Not if we want to keep the option to rele
On 2/14/07, LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:58:07AM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
> I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way
> described in bug #410871 (verified by adding the 'set -x' in
> postfix.postinst). My attempts to install postf
Trying another tactic, can you add this to /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://people.debian.org/~lamont/postfix /
And see if postfix-2.3.7-3~0 fixes the issue for you?
thanks,
lamont
I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way described
in bug #410871. Try to downgrade but
On Wed, February 14, 2007 11:02, Michael Prokop said:
> * David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070206 19:15]:
>> udevtrigger
>> udevsettle || true
>> ps > /begin.ps
>> while ps | grep -q "usb-stor-scan"; do
>>sleep 1;
>> done
>> while ps | grep -q "scsi_scan_"; do
>>sleep 1;
>> done
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:51:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410907: egroupware -missing in repository
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Sven Dowideit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hehe, sorry, and thanks - I've already fixed it, and a few other
> recomendations that were made
>
>
> BUT, I'd love some one to upload it for me
>
> the new version is at
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~spos/twiki_4.0.5-9.dsc
>
> and If this version ca
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:58:07AM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
> I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way
> described in bug #410871 (verified by adding the 'set -x' in
> postfix.postinst). My attempts to install postfix from experimental
> failed in the same way, as did
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:58:07AM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
> I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way
> described in bug #410871 (verified by adding the 'set -x' in
> postfix.postinst). My attempts to install postfix from experimental
> failed in the same way, as did
Package: egroupware
severity: grave
The egroupware packages are missing in testing/Etch repository! 2 weeks
ago they have been available!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > A more elegant way to fix network:// and the like is probably to give
> > > autogenerated files another MIME type, like
> > > application/x-desktop-virtual.
> > I'm not sure we foresee all the consequences of such a change,
> We have to list all
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410833: fixed in avscan 1.3.1-openssl-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way
described in bug #410871 (verified by adding the 'set -x' in
postfix.postinst). My attempts to install postfix from experimental
failed in the same way, as did downgrading to Etch's version.
--
Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: xkb-data
Version: 0.9-4
Severity: serious
After upgrading to etch, I noticed that it is no longer possible to use
locally adapted keyboard layouts. The reason is that the contents of
/etc/X11/xkb/ have been moved to /usr/share, and files at the old
location are no longer used.
I think t
Le mercredi 14 février 2007 à 11:49 +0100, Loïc Minier a écrit :
> > A more elegant way to fix network:// and the like is probably to give
> > autogenerated files another MIME type, like
> > application/x-desktop-virtual.
>
> I'm not sure we foresee all the consequences of such a change,
We have
hehe, sorry, and thanks - I've already fixed it, and a few other
recomendations that were made
BUT, I'd love some one to upload it for me
the new version is at
http://members.iinet.net.au/~spos/twiki_4.0.5-9.dsc
and If this version can go into Etch... even better.
I was thrilled about the a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 409820 serious
Bug#409820: initramfs-tools: mbr_check() does not work reliable with lilo and
grub around
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
End of message, stoppi
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> As for fixing #408556, I suggest the following course of action:
> * for computer:// and applications://, allow all .desktop files;
> * for network://, dns-sd:// and smb://, use clever filters;
> * for file://, only allow files belon
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 410803 patch
Bug#410803: twiki: postinst relies on data in /usr/share/doc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
tags 410803 patch
thanks
Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So please move the starter kit to /usr/share/twiki and symlink it from
> the doc directory, if you really want to have it available from there,
> too - and don't forget to change the tar extract line in the postinst
> script.
severity 366175 critical
forcemerge 366175 401916
tags 366175 -moreinfo
thanks
I'd say that this is the same bug as 401916 so I'm merging them (not sure
about the severity though but I picked the higher of the two).
Torsten, could you please read bug report #401916 and try the steps
suggested in
Package: quik
Version: 2.1-8
Severity: serious
This package fails to build:
> Automatic build of quik_2.1-8 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by
> sbuild/powerpc 0.52
...
> dh_testdir
> /usr/bin/make
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/quik-2.1'
> make[2]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/qui
* David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070206 19:15]:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 11:14:34AM +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > Any further tips, hints,... what I could try?
> Could you try these lines in the udev script and then mail the contents of
> /begin.ps, /middle.ps and /finish.ps? It wo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 366175 critical
Bug#366175: initramfs-tools: lvm is not initialized on USB disks
Severity set to `critical' from `normal'
> forcemerge 366175 401916
Bug#366175: initramfs-tools: lvm is not initialized on USB disks
Bug#401916: initramfs-tools:
Le mercredi 14 février 2007 à 09:15 +0100, Loïc Minier a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I see you went for a whitelist for .desktop files hanlding in nautilus
> for #408948; I think it lessens the impact of the lack of the MIME type
> mismatch checks in gnome-vfs2 and is less intrusive, and will pe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 393870 serious
Bug#393870: atlas3-base: Crashes with "Illegal instruction" on x86_64
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> forcemerge 393870 409691
Bug#393870: atlas3-base: Crashes with "Illegal instruction" on x86_64
Bug#409691: FTBFS
Have any of you guys who can reproduce this been able to do the additional
tests suggested in the bug report yet? This is one of the few remaining RC
bugs which is present in both Etch and Sid so it would be nice to make
some progress...
--
David Härdeman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Wasn't this package kept in the archive just to not break d-i RC1?
If so, now would perhaps be a good time remove the package as d-i RC1 is
broken anyways due to the old security key issue?
--
David Härdeman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
Hi,
I see you went for a whitelist for .desktop files hanlding in nautilus
for #408948; I think it lessens the impact of the lack of the MIME type
mismatch checks in gnome-vfs2 and is less intrusive, and will permit
downgrading 408948.
However, I think .volume needs to be added, and
83 matches
Mail list logo
