On Monday 11 December 2006 09:49, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Sunday 10 December 2006 21:48, Marcel Sebek wrote:
> > I don't know which package upgrade caused this but it is something
> > recent. When a call is finished, twinkle crashes with this error message
> > on the console:
>
> This is caused by
On 1/5/07, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-05 01:36]:
> However, I have found that I am unable to access the LUKS partition
> when the system is under heavy load and swapping.
Interesting. Can you check whether you see the same probl
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 23:29:07 +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.1.0-8
> Severity: serious
> Justification: 23:28 < vorlon> Sesse: I'd call it RC, no?
>
> After dist-upgrading (using etch's aptitude) from sarge to etch, one
> machine here was completely w
Hi.
I solved both bugs (#399843 and #358044).
Do you want my NMU package? or Do you want the .diff patch?
In the bug #358044, I just used the previously patch sent it.
In the bug #399843 I solved added some lines (two lines) in
debian/rules file. With this compile without problems.
Regards.
Joey Hess wrote:
Please file this as a separate bug on udev.
Done, see #405775.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 06, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marco: does udev need to be installed for udevinfo to work? In other
> words, could Jay rebuild udevinfo on his sarge box and run it from the
> build tree?
No, just copy it from another box.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital
tag 405611 + patch
thanks
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> I just tried removing the python2.3 line and it at least built.
Nothing in Build-Depends ensures the presence of python2.3 so I guess
this is the correct fix. Last time I contacted Vittorio, he was busy
with work. That's why I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 405611 + patch
Bug#405611: matplotlib: FTBFS: make: python2.3: Command not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 04:19:15AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Package: xtel
> Version: 3.3.0-5.4
> Severity: serious
This should rather be removed entirely:
- Last maintainer upload in 2003
- 2 voting popcon users (most definitely NMUers/QA people only)
- Minitel has ceased commercial operatio
This issue does not seem to appear in the latest upstream version,
9.53, released on 12 December.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is wrong with both having the -all packages in reccomends on thier own (so
that reccomends using package managers always pull them in on sarge-etch
upgrades) AND also having them as an alternative in depends so that they get
pulled in by new installs made using package management tools that
Hi Dann,
Unfortunatly after I looked at our sarge boxes I found out they
don't have udev installed, and sense these are my production machines
I'm not about to install it. I pulled the udev info off of a machine
with a 2020s zero channel raid card, though the output is from Ubuntu
6.06 LTS (I
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 05:20:09PM -0800, Jay Ellington wrote:
> Hi Dann,
>
> Unfortunatly after I looked at our sarge boxes I found out they
> don't have udev installed, and sense these are my production machines
> I'm not about to install it.
Marco: does udev need to be installed for udevin
This one time, at band camp, Neil McGovern said:
> Please find attached a patch which should solve (at least partially)
> this problem.
>
> * removes -r option from wget.
> * specifies an output file to ensure you don't end up with thousands of
> files.
> * performs perl syntax check to ensure i
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 03:27:24PM -0800, Jay Ellington wrote:
> I have access to quite a few machines currently that run sarge and have
> devices like the adaptec 2010s, 2020s, 2200s, and 2230slp. I'm not sure
> how to pull the udev info though? If you can let me know how to do this
> I can go gra
i think i've caught wind of a real-life case of this breaking the installtion
of a gui from the installer (the guy didn't give very many details but from the
symptoms he reports it sure sounds like it)
his post can be found at http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=11221.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # notfound doesn't work, reset versioning
> reassign 405679 openoffice.org
Bug#405679: Buffer overflows in EnhWMFReader::ReadEnhWMF and
WMFReader::ReadRecordParams
Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org' to `openoffice.org'.
> found 405679 1.1.3-
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 12:28:19PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:22:37AM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > To my eye, I think it would be much better to drop the /usr/lib/firefox
> > symlink. I wholly expect that people will want to install third-part
Your message dated Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:48:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line woody is no longer supportedby Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:34:24AM +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> Quoting http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags
> "etch-ignore
> This release-critical bug is to be ignored for the purposes of
> releasing etch. This tag should only be used by the release manager; do
> not set it yourself withou
Your message dated Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:48:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line woody is no longer supportedby Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:48:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line woody is no longer supportedby Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:48:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line woody is no longer supportedby Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:48:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line woody is no longer supportedby Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
severity 405757 normal
tags 405757 +unreproducible
thanks
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> # dvdisaster -r
> dvdisaster-0.70 Copyright 2004-2006 Carsten Gnoerlich.
> This software comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This
> is free software and you are welcome to redistribute it
> under the conditions of
I have access to quite a few machines currently that run sarge and have
devices like the adaptec 2010s, 2020s, 2200s, and 2230slp. I'm not sure
how to pull the udev info though? If you can let me know how to do this
I can go grab the information quick.
Jay Ellington
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 405757 normal
Bug#405757: dvdisaster crashes after a GLib error
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tags 405757 +unreproducible
Bug#405757: dvdisaster crashes after a GLib error
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Package: dvdisaster
Version: 0.70.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
# dvdisaster -r
dvdisaster-0.70 Copyright 2004-2006 Carsten Gnoerlich.
This software comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This
is free software and you are welcome to redistribute it
under the conditions
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 405726 by 405639
Bug#405726: ltsp-server: does not install all video and input packages
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 405726 added: 405639
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Dnia piątek, 5 stycznia 2007 19:30, Knock, Bob napisał:
> > - linux-image-2.6.18-3-i386 and linux-image-2.6.18-3-k7 (2.6.18-7)
>
> Did you try the -xen-686 flavor?
Yes, I meant -xen-686 and -xen-k7 flawours, sorry for my mistake.
Janusz
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # breaks tasksels desktop task
> severity 405639 serious
Bug#405639: xserver-xorg: installs arbitrary -input and -video packages
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
End of m
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2007 22:17:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:30:13AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 11:00:25PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > Depends: xserver-xorg-core (>= 2:1.1.1-11), xserver-xorg-video-1.0,
> > xserver-xorg-input, debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0, xkb-data |
> > xkb-data-legacy, xbase
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> notfound 405596 0.8.1-2
Bug#405596: Stellarium takes the complete memory of the system
Bug marked as not found in version 0.8.1-2.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 405062 pending
Bug#405062: CVE-2006-4842: setuid/setgid programs linked with NSPR allow
elevation of privilege
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stoppin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 405726 grave
Bug#405726: ltsp-server: does not install all video and input packages
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 393422 pending
Bug#393422: Contains non-free files.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 404723 + patch
Bug#404723: src/ne_uri.c:ne_uri_parse():179 (uri_lookup(x) macro) - SIGSERV
when parsing a non-ASCII character (>128)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Your message dated Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404723: fixed in neon26 0.26.2-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:46:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line openmosix removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
tags 404723 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my neon26 0.26.2-3.1 NMU.
diff -u neon26-0.26.2/debian/changelog neon26-0.26.2/debian/changelog
--- neon26-0.26.2/debian/changelog
+++ neon26-0.26.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+neon26 (0.26.2-3.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-mai
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:46:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line openmosix removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:55:16PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> P.S. For some reason, OOo does not crash in my i386 chroot. I don't know
> why since the bug is clearly arch independent.
Possibly since on i386, unsigned and char* have the same size, and thus
p[(unsigned)-128] will really be equ
I do not have any close at hand (cleaned out the hardware closet to
hazardous waste) :-(
But, as far as I am concerned :-), if it says 'DPT' or 'Adaptec' as the
manufacturer's name portion of the inquiry field, or has 'RAID' or
'Array' somewhere in the product name inquiry field, you have covered
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 405679 Buffer overflows in EnhWMFReader::ReadEnhWMF and
> WMFReader::ReadRecordParams
Bug#405679: [fixed for 2.2, cws cmcfixes30] Buffer overflows in
EnhWMFReader::ReadEnhWMF and WMFReader::ReadRecordParams
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # if it's unreproducible, it's probably not grave
> severity 405592 important
Bug#405592: iceweasel: segmentation fault on http://tsv1860.de
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
Frans Pop wrote:
> +fprintf(fp, "# Because to potential problems bringing up
> hotpluggable interfaces\n");
> +fprintf(fp, "# both an 'auto' and 'allow-hotplug' are used.\n");
> +fprintf(fp, "# See bugs #403706 and #403805 for further
> information.\n");
> +
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:43:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:43:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
"Shaun Jackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If #404616 is in fact an RC bug, then #405599 should be as well. If
> there are no objections, I'll bump the severity of #405599 to serious.
Boost's maintainers have already uploaded a fixed version, and I'm not
100% confident the two bugs are actuall
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 12:17:47PM -0500, Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
> The ips driver, indirectly via Firmware as it spoofs it's own inquiry
> data, reports the Removable bit set in the inquiry response for the
> arrays. The dpt_i2o driver similarly has the firmware constructing the
> bit set. Some of th
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Ta Marco d'Itri: this testcase may explain at least a fraction of Debian
> bug #403706 (because in Debian ifup is run, essentially, from udev
> rules), that's why the CC. Udev version is 0.100-2.3. Also reproducible
> with 0.103-1.
Please file this as a separate
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 405679 important
Bug#405679: Buffer overflows in EnhWMFReader::ReadEnhWMF and
WMFReader::ReadRecordParams
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> retitle 405679 [fixed for 2.2, cws cmcfixes30] Buffer overflows in
> EnhWMFReader::ReadEn
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Anyway. I manually loaded the kvm and kvm-intel module with which the ref
> count for kvm went to 1. But still no messages in dmesg and starting the kvm
> application complained the same message.
You should check 2 things:
- udev: KVM uses a dynamic minor hence you need
severity 405679 important
retitle 405679 [fixed for 2.2, cws cmcfixes30] Buffer overflows in
EnhWMFReader::ReadEnhWMF and WMFReader::ReadRecordParams
merge 405679 405679
# fixed package for sarge already at the security team
found 405679 1.1.3-9sarge3
close 405679 1.1.3-9sarge4
thanks
Hi,
Daniel
Your message dated Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:47:01 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403346: fixed in installation-report 2.26
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Joey Hess wrote:
> reportbug is able to pull the logs from a running d-i instance. Granted
> I don't know if a lot of people use it that way..
Probably none, since I thought I'd implemented it, but have apparently
not yet. :-)
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Frans Pop wrote:
> Is it really that important?
> It is only (optionally!) included if reportbug is used, which means that
> the install was more or less successful.
reportbug is able to pull the logs from a running d-i instance. Granted
I don't know if a lot of people use it that way..
> (Maybe
tony mancill wrote:
> Also, the new changelog indicates that
> a locale was added, but I don't think it should be there (and I can't seem
> to find it anyway.)
>
> tuxguitar (0.8dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * removed janel-ant (closes: #405295)
> * added german locale (closes: #398972)
Hi
If #404616 is in fact an RC bug, then #405599 should be as well. If
there are no objections, I'll bump the severity of #405599 to serious.
Cheers,
Shaun
On 1/4/07, Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think bug #405599 may be responsible for #404616 (which I tried to
x-debbugs-cc):
> Pac
On Jan 05, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Can you point me to (or explain) how the floppy group is currently
> > > defined and how it is differentiated by plugdev?
> > It's supposed to be used for removable media: floppy disks, memory cards
> > or USB and firewire hard disks.
> > (E
> I am not able to reproduce this bug on my Core2 Duo (2GB RAM)
> PC running linux-image-2.6.18-3-xen-amd64 with amd64 etch.
> - linux-image-2.6.18-3-i386 and linux-image-2.6.18-3-k7 (2.6.18-7)
Did you try the -xen-686 flavor?
I have not seen anyone actually explicitly confirm that the debian ker
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Package: pd-flext-dev
> Version: 0.5.0g-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
Hi,
thanks for catching this one. I must have had the files installed from
some test that I did, so I didn't notice (And obviously noone else did :). I
will uplo
tags 402316 + patch
thanks
Hello,
Please find attached a patch which should solve (at least partially)
this problem.
* removes -r option from wget.
* specifies an output file to ensure you don't end up with thousands of
files.
* performs perl syntax check to ensure it's a valid perl file.
Thi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 402316 + patch
Bug#402316: blars.org is down; hinfo-update fails miserably as a result
Tags were: security sid etch sarge
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 405641 normal
Bug#405641: /usr/share/man/man1/git.1.gz is a dangling symlink
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> reassign 405641 git
Bug#405641: /usr/share/man/man1/git.1.gz is a dangling symlink
Bug reassigned from package `git-core' to
severity 405641 normal
reassign 405641 git
thanks
Dangling symlinks to manpages are not serious bugs.
git-core does not use update-alternatives
on /usr/share/man/man1/git.1.gz symlink.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 03:23:40AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 05, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can you point me to (or explain) how the floppy group is currently
> > defined and how it is differentiated by plugdev?
> It's supposed to be used for removable media: floppy di
tag 405592 unreproducible
thanks
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:15:37PM +0100, soloturn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: iceweasel
> Version: 2.0.0.1+dfsg-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> $ iceweasel --safe-mode
> X Error: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter) 3
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 405592 unreproducible
Bug#405592: iceweasel: segmentation fault on http://tsv1860.de
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> close 318481
Bug#318481: CAN-2005-2180 gen-index file overwrite vulnerability
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further exp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package monotone
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: monotone
> block 404616 by 405599
Bug#404616: monotone: Segmentation fault on powerpc
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 404616 added: 405599
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:23:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gv: version 3.6.1-10sarge1 is effectively identical to 3.6.1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> close 398292 3.6.1-10sarge2
Bug#398292: GNU gv "ps_gettext()" Buffer Overflow Vulnerability (CVE-2006-5864)
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bu
Your message dated Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405120: fixed in linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 2.6.18-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 10:07:30PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
>>> The new upstream version uploaded to unstable includes a significant number
>>> of changes unrelated to the RC bugfix. Please prepare a targetted fix that
>>> can be uploaded to testing-proposed-updates. (Ap
Your message dated Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403525: fixed in linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 2.6.18-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 401488 experimental
Bug#401488: FTBFS: Aap: Recipe file
"/tmp/vsf/vim-spellfiles-20060604/upstream/vim-runtime-spell/af/main.aap" not
found
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.4.dfsg.2-2
Severity: critical
Tags: security patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The security issue and a patch were described at
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70042. From what is
written, this vulnerability can be used to ex
Hello Amaya,
Amaya wrote (Di 2007-Jan-02 12:21):
Can you confirm that this patch fixes this issue?
Any testing is greatly appreciated, as the main maintainer is on holiday
and I have limited time + resources to actually test this.
Sorry for the delay. I was sort of waiting for an inspiration
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 405559 important
Bug#405559: openoffice.org: crash on startup
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tag 405559 + moreinfo
Bug#405559: openoffice.org: crash on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> tag 405559 + unreproduc
severity 405559 important
tag 405559 + moreinfo
tag 405559 + unreproducible
thanks
Juergen Kosel wrote:
> like the machine of Brian Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> my computer
> also runs debian etch for amd64 and the same versions of openoffice.org
> and related packages are installed. (At least on the
Your message dated Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:42:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing #358135
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package pango1.0
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package glib2.0
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 05 January 2007 15:30, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
[...]
>
> 5) Now edit /etc/network/interfaces so that it mentions eth0 instead of
> eth1, and edit /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules by swapping eth0
> and eth1 (so that 00:0c:29:d8
To Marco d'Itri: this testcase may explain at least a fraction of Debian bug
#403706 (because in Debian ifup is run, essentially, from udev rules),
that's why the CC. Udev version is 0.100-2.3. Also reproducible with 0.103-1.
To repeat the steps below, you need a Debian Etch installation CD,
severity 405525 important
retitle 405525 Random crashes
thanks
Since the last message I have upgraded kdebase package and rebooted. I
don't know if it's because of this or not, but now k3b seems to be
working fine. I'll lower the severity below release critical level and
maybe later close this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 405525 important
Bug#405525: k3b: Crashes VERY often
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> retitle 405525 Random crashes
Bug#405525: k3b: Crashes VERY often
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The library was renamed again from Sarge to Etch, the the
>> provides/conflicts are fine in the control file.
>
> So that version fixes the bug, right? And what do you do when a new
> version fixes a bug?
Nope, the bug sti
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 402017 wishlist
Bug#402017: gcc-4.0-locales is not installable in etch
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
> tags 402017 + wontfix
Bug#402017: gcc-4.0-locales is not installable in etch
Tags were: patch etch
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
severity 402017 wishlist
tags 402017 + wontfix
thanks
Ralf Treinen writes:
> gcc-4.0-locales is not installable on any of the etch architectures
> (even including m68k). It depends on cpp-4.0 which is only availabke
> in unstable/hurd-i386.
sure, so it is installable on hurd-i386.
> Please remo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> notfound 331246 2.0.0-8
Bug#331246: Upgrade from 2.0.0-4 to 2.0.0-7 fails
Bug marked as not found in version 2.0.0-8.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
gcc-4.0-locales is not installable on any of the etch architectures
(even including m68k). It depends on cpp-4.0 which is only availabke
in unstable/hurd-i386.
Please remove gcc-4.0-locales from etch.
-Ralf.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Julien Danjou wrote:
> Package: wmii
> Version: 3.5.1-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> wmii is not installab and does not build:
libixp is waiting in NEW.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 402017 !
Bug#402017: Depends on removed cpp-4.0
Bug reopened, originator set to Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> tags 402017 + etch patch
Bug#402017: Depends on removed cpp-4.0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch, patch
> retitle 402017
Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The library was renamed again from Sarge to Etch, the the
> provides/conflicts are fine in the control file.
So that version fixes the bug, right? And what do you do when a new
version fixes a bug?
Marc
--
BOFH #57:
Groundskeepers stole the root password
On Friday 05 January 2007 02:30, Joey Hess wrote:
> Well, I'd hate to miss the syslog, it's invaluable when there's a
> problem. Perhaps the last N lines could be included, where N is
> sufficiently large to include most syslogs.
Is it really that important?
It is only (optionally!) included if re
Package: drscheme
Version: 1:352-9
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
At 1167976352 time_t, Source Builder wrote:
> Automatic build of drscheme_1:352-9 on nasya by sbuild/sparc 0.50
> Build started at 2007010
Package: wmii
Version: 3.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
wmii is not installab and does not build:
> Automatic build of wmii_3.5.1-1 on nasya by sbuild/sparc 0.50
> Build started at 20070104-2142
> **
> Checking available
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
