Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org
> Severity: serious
>
> From: Moritz Mühlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Potential non-free content in OpenOffice package
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:24:05 +
Hi Andrew,
this has been reported against the Debian package, but it looks like it
might exist in wwwoffle generally. Could you please have a look?
(Note that I'm not the maintainer, so I don't have an overview of the
changes that have been made to the Debian package)
Thanks in advance, Frank
I tested the daily build of the Debian Installer dated 2006-12-04 on
the NSLU2 with TCP window scaling disabled, and apt-get still fails
during the install in the same way as I mentioned earlier in this
thread.
I haven't been able to test the new apt version (0.6.46.3-0.2) that
has been uploaded,
Package: libswt3.2-gtk-jni
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Installation fails:
# apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libswt3.2-gtk-jni
The follo
Package: dsniff
Severity: serious
Version: 2.4b1+debian-15
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
Package dsniff FTBFS as it depends on package libnids1.20 which is
not available in unstable. It should depend on libnids1.21.
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signatur
Package: libpfm3
Severity: serious
Version: 3.2.060926-1
Hi,
this package is unnecessary, as libpfm3-3.2 has entered the archive, and
there are no reverse dependencies anymore.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
severity 390023 important
thanks
* Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061030 02:17]:
> It seems that when prerm script is run during upgrade, 0.4.7-1 init
> script isn't able to stop the daemon, since its pidfile is wrong. That's
> what causes the issue.
The version in sarge doesn
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 390023 important
Bug#390023: multipath-tools: fail to install
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package checkinstall
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: checkinstall
> close 356864 1.6.0-1
Bug#356864: checkinstall: LD_PRELOAD is wrong
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.6.0-1, send
* Peter Samuelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061115 04:43]:
> tags 396631 pending
Any hope for an upload soon?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Tollef Fog Heen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061112 09:53]:
> tags 396265 pending
When can we expect the upload to happen?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well known issue for ... oh the past year or two IIRC... It's why I haven't
done anything with any PEAR packages in almost 2 years now... file away the
bug and it will sit until the PHP license changes.
On 12/5/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: php-image-canvas
Version: 0.2.
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:34:54 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401793: CVE-2006-6302: Remote manipulation of host block
list
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Monday 04 December 2006 20:57, Frans Pop wrote:
> With some help from Colin, I managed to find as most probably cause
> that /dev/console and /dev/null have incorrect file attributes in the
> gtk initrd:
I cannot reproduce this error on my own machine, so I suspect it is
something local on Joe
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 00:06, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> Frans, I think that, not having a better solution, I am going to apply
> the two-line patch to linux-ntfs and release a new version, is it fine
> for you?
Yes, that would be fine with me.
However, I don't fully understand the
[(Hopefully) obvious caveat - I am a member of neither the ftp team nor
the release team. The following is personal opinion and observation - if
you want an official answer, ask someone official]
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 21:21 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 00:44 +, Ad
package libapache2-mod-auth-pgsql
severity 399562 important
thanks
I've received some report of working module with apache 2.2.
I think this is a configuration problem, so i need to deeply undestand
it then write a proper NEWS.Debian / README.Debian explaining how to
make the module working.
Cia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package libapache2-mod-auth-pgsql
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libapache2-mod-auth-pgsql
> severity 399562 important
Bug#399562: Does not works with apache 2.2
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition for
etch.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -Nur ../cfitsio-2.510~~/debian/changelog ../cfitsio-2.510/debian/changelog
--- ../cfitsio-2.510~~/debian/changelog 2006-1
> Nope, I am sure it's -n, because I simply don't want a newline.
> There are no control characters when interacting with debconf.
>
> I have uploaded a version that fixes this. Could you please test -6?
Sorry, this got lost on my inbox, I have updated to -6 when it hitted
unstable and it got ins
The NMU patch is attached to this mail.
The NMU changelog is:
Source: pmk
Version: 0.9.3s2-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 20:35:28 +0100
Closes: 316871 328362 395736
Changes:
pmk (0.9.3s2-2.1) unstable; urgency=
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 310314 pending
Bug#310314: scrabble: wrong score of blank
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 325441 pending
Bug#325441: Violates trademark
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401635: fixed in cfitsio 2.510-1.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
This one time, at band camp, Moritz Muehlenhoff said:
> Please see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157166 for details.
At first glance, it looks like this just means the regex needs
anchoring (and maybe expanding so that it can be anchored to end of
line).
--
-
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401518: fixed in bfilter 1.0.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 01:54:57PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Package: lha
> Version: 1.14i-10
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
>
> LHA seems to be affected by
> CVE-2006-4335
> CVE-2006-4337
> CVE-2006-4338
If GNU gzip can handle LHA archives I'm won
Package: php-image-canvas
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Image_Canvas-0.2.2/Canvas/Color.php has this copyright notice:
// | This source file is subject to version 2.02 of the PHP license, |
// | that is bundled with this package in the file LICENSE, and is|
// | available at
I went on this bug during the l10n NMU campaign, found the patch,
compiled the packagetested it and it installs fine.
Therefore, I'll soon upload a NMU.
Thanks, Alex for the patch...
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: denyhosts
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157163 for details.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh li
Package: zope-cmfplone
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
I don't know very much about Plone and I didn't investigate too deeply
as Sarge is not affected, but I suppose this needs to be fixed for Etch:
http://plone.org/about/security/advisories/cve-2006-4249/
| Plon
* William Pence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061205 23:28]:
> However, I don't see much point in continuing to support v2.510. It is
> now more than 2 years old, and the "changes.txt" file lists more than 80
> significant enhancements and bug fixes that have been made to CFITSIO
> since then.
I fully
Le mardi 05 décembre 2006 à 13:02 -0800, Keith Packard a écrit :
> On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 21:46 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > The fix is to have these packages register their fonts to defoma. This
> > > will automatically run fc-cache -f in the def
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> reassign 400885 hk-classes
Bug#400885: knoda: no drivers available after update
Bug reassigned from package `hk-classes' to `hk-classes'.
> found 400885
Bug#400885: knoda: no drivers
Andreas Barth wrote:
* William Pence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061205 20:49]:
Andreas Barth wrote:
* William Pence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061113 12:08]:
Note one additional change is necessary in the diffs shown below in the
ARM case: if BYTESWAPPED is TRUE, then MACHINE should not be defined.
(In
Package: fail2ban
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157166 for details.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh link
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> reassign 400885 hk-classes
Bug#400885: knoda: no drivers available after update
Bug reassigned from package `knoda' to `hk-classes'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
tags 401304 + patch
thanks
Hi,
I have an patch - if you want, I can as well NMU it.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -ur gst-ffmpeg-0.8.7~/debian/changelog gst-ffmpeg-0.8.7/debian/changelog
--- gst-ffmpeg-0.8.7~/debian/changelog 2006-12-05 22:04:36.0 +
+++ gst-ffmpeg-0.8.7/debian/changelog 200
tags 401311 + patch
thanks
Hi,
I extracted the patch for this RC-bug - if you want, I can as well NMU
it.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -ur gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg-0.10.1~/debian/changelog
gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg-0.10.1/debian/changelog
--- gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg-0.10.1~/debian/changelog 2006-12-05
22:10:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 401311 + patch
Bug#401311: CVE-2006-4800: GStreamer FFmpeg Plug-in Multiple Buffer Overflows
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
We've never had a request to run iASl on big-endian machines, so I'm not
surprised that it doesn't work.
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Guillem Jover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 10:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Mattia Dongili; An
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 401304 + patch
Bug#401304: CVE-2006-4800: GStreamer FFmpeg Plug-in Multiple Buffer Overflows
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400057: fixed in libbonobomm1.3 1.3.8-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Ok,
After a bit of time to build the CVS version, I tried the same thing,
and the problem didn't appear.
Since I don't know which patch could have fixed the problem, I can't
backport it and I don't have time to search for it at the moment.
I will instead finnish my work on patches which I am com
Package: wodim, xcdroast
Severity: serious
<-- snip -->
$ xcdroast
** (xcdroast:8852): WARNING **: No /usr/bin/readcd installed
** (xcdroast:8852): WARNING **: (Invalid lib-directory? Check -l option)
$
<-- snip -->
If this was intended:
- xcdroast and other packages depending on it
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:47:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328362: fixed in pmk 0.9.3s2-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401554: fixed in mpt-status 1.1.6-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition for
etch.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -ur ../libbonobomm1.3-1.3.8~/bonobomm/generated/Makefile.am
../libbonobomm1.3-1.3.8/bonobomm/generated/Makefile.am
--- .
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401198: fixed in cdcover 0.9.1-6.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401580: fixed in mpt-status 1.1.6-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 21:46 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > The fix is to have these packages register their fonts to defoma. This
> > will automatically run fc-cache -f in the defoma directory.
>
> Either defoma is borken, or dh_installdefoma doesn't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 401757 important
Bug#401757: horde3 configuration generated automatically is missing some
fundamental parameters
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400955: fixed in cyrus-sasl2 2.1.22.dfsg1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 20:53 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Keith Packard wrote:
> > I think I could fix upstream fontconfig to do a more careful check when
> > fc-cache is run and finds font files newer than the cache for their
> > directory. I don't do that at library initializa
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition for
etch.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -ur cdcover-0.9.1~/debian/changelog cdcover-0.9.1/debian/changelog
--- cdcover-0.9.1~/debian/changelog 2006-12-05 20:
Wishing you and those around you a very merry Christmas and a wonderful New Year
http://holidayoffnow.com
-
DEMANDTEC EMAIL NOTICE:
NOTICE: This email trans
Hi,
Thanks for the details. I tried it and didn't get the same problem as
you, , but still got some strange things. Attached is the result file
after simply adding a carriage return and a space, which contains some
funny characters, and is definitely a bug.
I also checked with a more recent versi
Hi,
this bug needed another patch to build on all arches, I just uploaded
it.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -Nur ../apt-0.6.46.3~~/apt-pkg/deb/debsrcrecords.cc
../apt-0.6.46.3/apt-pkg/deb/debsrcrecords.cc
--- ../apt-0.6.46.3~~/apt-pkg/deb/debsrcrecords.cc 2006-12-05
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> The fix is to have these packages register their fonts to defoma. This
> will automatically run fc-cache -f in the defoma directory.
Either defoma is borken, or dh_installdefoma doesn't generate the
appropriate snippet for what you describe. ttf-d
* William Pence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061205 20:49]:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> >* William Pence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061113 12:08]:
> >>Note one additional change is necessary in the diffs shown below in the
> >>ARM case: if BYTESWAPPED is TRUE, then MACHINE should not be defined.
> >>(In particul
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:41:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401411: Same with Bitstream Vera
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Wishing you the peace, joy and happiness of Christmas!
http://holidayoffnow.com
-
DEMANDTEC EMAIL NOTICE:
NOTICE: This email transmission and all attached f
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:41:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401411: Same with Bitstream Vera
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Wishing you a bright white holiday full of love
http://holidayoffnow.com
-
DEMANDTEC EMAIL NOTICE:
NOTICE: This email transmission and all attached files co
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Keith Packard wrote:
> I think I could fix upstream fontconfig to do a more careful check when
> fc-cache is run and finds font files newer than the cache for their
> directory. I don't do that at library initialization time for
> performance reasons, as font files are general
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 19:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400051: fixed in antigrav 0.0.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 334647 serious
Bug#334647: emacs-color-theme: standalone or in emacs-goodies-el package?
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> package l2tpns
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: l2tpns
> found 401742 2.1.19-1
Bug#401742: l2tpns Heartbeat Packets Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Bug marked as found in version 2.1.19-
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 20:08 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Keith Packard wrote:
> > Right, the current DejaVu font package has a broken version of condensed
> > which does not correctly report the setwidth value in the OS/2 header of
> > the file. I think this will cause the inco
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.85c
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Not much more to say. Any kernel image I build an initrd for now breaks in
the same way. Since I'm lazy and didn't feel like transcripting everything
it outputs, I took pictures of the screen when it
Package: gnupg
Version: 1.4.1-1.sarge5
Severity: grave
Justification: Introduces security hole
Tags: security, sarge
Hi,
in Sid, CVE-2006-6169 has been fixed with 1.4.5-3, but 1.4.1-1.sarge5
from Sarge is still missing the fix and therefore vulnerable.
Details:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 20:19:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401742: l2tpns Heartbeat Packets Buffer Overflow
Vulnerability
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Andreas Barth wrote:
* William Pence ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061113 12:08]:
Note one additional change is necessary in the diffs shown below in the ARM
case: if BYTESWAPPED is TRUE, then MACHINE should not be defined. (In
particular, it should not be defined as NATIVE). If BTYPESWAPPED is FALSE,
Ok, I've made so many mistakes this evening that it's best that I stay
off the computer for a while...
Here's a new patch... as usual, I have no idea if it's correct. The
medcon testcase no longer segfaults, but I don't know if the results are
totally wrong or not...
Hopefully this patch should b
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006, Keith Packard wrote:
> Right, the current DejaVu font package has a broken version of condensed
> which does not correctly report the setwidth value in the OS/2 header of
> the file. I think this will cause the incorrect font selection error
> that we've seen in this case.
I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 401554 pending
Bug#401554: mpt-status: init script fails due to use of daemon
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 07:12:51PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> At 1165341916 time_t, Dimitri Puzin wrote:
> > Strange enough, it runs like a charm when compiled with -O2 ?!?
> >
> > If you need more information, please let me know.
>
> Could you try to
(gdb) print index
$1 = 2108
(gdb) print i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 356652 serious
Bug#356652: gxmms: should bre removed now that playground is in debian
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
severity 401757 important
thanks
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 07:00:02PM +0100, Massimo Manghi wrote:
> Package: horde3
> Version: 3.1.3-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I installed horde3 on etch using a clean system that had no previous
> horde/imp installation. Afte
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 15:29 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I don't see how this relates to my analysis. I upgraded fontconfig,
> and the fonts were ugly. I removed DejaVu Condensed, and the fonts
> were nice again, and the result of fc-match changed as well; certainly
> you can explain what par
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 05:34:41PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
[...]
>
> ./libs/ljpg/mcu.h:
> typedef unsigned short ComponentType; /* the type of image components */
> typedef ComponentType *MCU; /* MCU - array of samples */
>
> test.c tell me that sizeof(unsigned short) is 2,
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:02:52PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Package: tdb
> Version: 1.0.6-13
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
>
[..]
This builds for me in pbuilder unstable i386.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hi,
I've compiled varmon again with -ggdb from vanilla source. Here is the
progress:
hostname:~/varmon-1.2.0# make clean
rm -f *.o core varmon
hostname:~/varmon-1.2.0# make varmon
gcc -o varmon varmon.c -Wall -lncurses -ggdb
varmon.c: In function ‘get_backplane_info’:
varmon.c:166: warning: pointe
At 1165341916 time_t, Dimitri Puzin wrote:
> Strange enough, it runs like a charm when compiled with -O2 ?!?
>
> If you need more information, please let me know.
Could you try to
(gdb) print index
(gdb) print inq.ProductIdentification[index]
(gdb) print *tmp
Is there any chance I could get acc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 375077
Bug#375077: udevd: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server -> boot fails
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug#375215: libnss-ldap hangs udev at startup
Bug
Package: horde3
Version: 3.1.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I installed horde3 on etch using a clean system that had no previous
horde/imp installation. After having carried out every single step
in the installation checklist, changed the authorization bits and so on,
Ok, the previous patch is totally wrong... sizeof(*curRowBuf) is not the
correct value to check the allocated number of columns, it's way to
small..
--
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> reassign 400341 iceape
Bug#400341: Contains non-free files.
Bug reassigned from package `mozilla' to `iceape'.
> merge 400341 401266
Bug#400341: Contains non-free files.
Bug#401266:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 05:36:32PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Package: l2tpns
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
>
> A vulnerabilit has been found in l2tpns. See
> http://secunia.com/advisories/23230/
> for details.
>
> According to secunia, it is fixed
I have absolutely no idea what these changes means, but it was quite
trivial to avoid segfaulting.
This might mean that we now produce incorrect results or some other
really misleading and stupid problem.
Anyway this avoids the segfault for the given testcase.
Patch attached.
--
Regards,
And
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 16:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401677: fixed in mailscanner 4.55.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: l2tpns
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A vulnerabilit has been found in l2tpns. See
http://secunia.com/advisories/23230/
for details.
According to secunia, it is fixed in 2.1.21.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Your message dated Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:30:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line documentation was removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Package: libxine1
Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A vulnerability has been found in the real plugin of libxine. See
http://secunia.com/advisories/23218/
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1603458&group_id=9655&atid=109
medcon recompiled without optimization and with debugging symbols:
CFLAGS="-g -O0" DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="debug, noopt, nostrip" dpkg-buildpackage -uc
-us -rfakeroot
Running on Debian Unstable AMD64.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x2aea4eac2d45 in DecodeFirstRow (dcPtr=0x
On 12/5/06, Jan Evert van Grootheest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am getting upset now
Apt-get is again segfaulting!
Yesterday I removed the *.bin files from /var/cache/apt. Then ran
apt-get update, apt-get -V upgrade and apt-get clean.
Now I do apt-get update and it segfaults again!!!
A
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 17:21, Roland Marcus Rutschmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 December 2006 14:33, David Baron wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 12:24, Roland Marcus Rutschmann wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > just checked with all available DICOM files available to me. Could you
> > > please
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 17:13:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line mozilla_2:1.7.13-0.3(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Jan
It has been suggested that this *may* be a networking problem [1, 2,
3]. This is a wild suggestion that could be totally wrong, but I think
that it is worth a shot.
Delete the *.bin files and have apt recreate them as before, and then
set the TCP window scaling to 0 with
echo 0 > /proc/sys/
Your message dated Tue, 5 Dec 2006 16:54:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396882: Acknowledgement (mozilla-calendar: crashes
whenever I try to add an entry)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 14:33, David Baron wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 December 2006 12:24, Roland Marcus Rutschmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > just checked with all available DICOM files available to me. Could you
> > please send me an example DICOM file that provokes the segfault. Which
> > program di
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
