Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 400066 patch
Bug#400066: lcdproc_0.5.1-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: impossible constraint in asm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
* Aurélien GÉRÔME ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 21:31]:
> tags 46 pending
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 02:52:46PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 02:12:28PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Aurélien GÉRÔME ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061104 15:26]:
> > > > I found a
I have gotten no relevant response from GTRC. Accordingly, I think this bug
really is "serious". Perhaps someone else could try asking them the Three
Questions.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 400358 normal
Bug#400358: netdiag: Segfaults and leaves port in promiscuous mode
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> merge 400358 7794 12306
Bug#7794: netdiag: Program(s) leave port in promiscuous mode
Bug#12306: netdiag: Failure to turn o
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:07:00 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400817: xephem conflicts with x11-common in sid, becomes
uninstallable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sounds like I'll wanna grab the current source, but it also sounds
> > like the changes you made and the changes I made are quite similar.
>
> Yes, and I just uploaded 4.0.1 which, according to its change log,
> fixes a few bugs,
Here's a fix on the postinst and prerm scripts to make zope-psycopgda2
installable again:
--- zope-psycopgda2.postinst.orig 2006-11-29 10:52:12.0 +0800
+++ zope-psycopgda2.postinst2006-11-29 10:51:14.0 +0800
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
fi
# End automatically added section
# Auto
Package: zope-psycopgda2
Version: 2.0.5.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Installing or uninstalling the current version of zope-psycopgda2 is not
possible
due to the lack of a Python-Version field.
Selecting previously deselected package zope-psycopgda2.
(Reading dat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 400753 important
Bug#400753: squashfs: FTBFS
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 399790 deluser fails in purge [+NMU diff]
Bug#399790: amanda-common: puring fails with deluser
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
retitle 399790 deluser fails in purge [+NMU diff]
thanks
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Package: amanda-common
> Version: 1:2.5.1p1-2
> Severity: serious
>
> postrm fails when deluser fails:
>
> | /usr/sbin/deluser: The user `backup' is not a member of group `disk'.
> | dpkg: err
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> tags 399790 pending
Bug#399790: amanda-common: puring fails with deluser
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Hi,
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:08, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> > There are two NTFS during resizing. The original and the resized. When
> > the resizing is over then the latter is consistent and the old one is
> > irrelevant. ntfsresize doesn't work lik
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393397: fixed in maradns 1.2.12.04-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 06:23:03PM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> Package: gaim-otr
> Followup-For: Bug #394299
>
> There needs to be another change in order to fix the following error:
> gtk-dialog.c:33:22: error: gtkstock.h: No such file or directory
>
> This need to be changed on line 33.
> -#incl
Package: gnome-nettool
Version: 2.16.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source, probably because of a missing
build-dependency.
| Automatic build of gnome-nettool_2.16.0-1 on odin by sbuild/sparc 79
| Build started at 20061128-2202
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> notforwarded 355261
Bug#355261: gnome-applets: drivemount_applet2 : should wait until unmounting
finished
Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to
http://bugzilla.gnome.org
Package: trac
Version: 0.10.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FHS
According to /usr/share/python-support/trac/trac/siteconfig.py, trac looks
for its global trac.ini file under /usr/share/trac/conf.
How about /etc/trac instead?
See http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracIni for more
-- System Info
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> found 399016 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1
Bug#399016: kaddressbook: Data loss, involving strange file duplication and
locking problems
Bug marked as found in version 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1.
>
End of
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393636: fixed in gnat-gps 4.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396045: fixed in libpam-openafs-session 1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397316: fixed in libpam-openafs-session 1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Hi,
It's my NMU that is involved, but I'm curious - why is this:
a) causing the build to halt
b) happening at all?
The error, if one actually exists, is not in the section you quoted,
but higher up:
...
tar: rivet-0.5.0/debian/control:
time stamp 2006-11-28 10:20:04 is 1088 s in the future
tar:
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396045: fixed in libpam-openafs-session 1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: xephem
Version: 3.5.2-1
Severity: grave
The last version of x11-common in sid (1:7.1.0-7) includes an
explicit conflict for xephem (with no version), so this extremely
useful astronomy package becomes uninstallable. A relatively
quick would be appreciated (recompilation?).
Regards,
--
Ál
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:20 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> > relocate_inodes() -> relocate_inode() -> at the end of the function
> > calls write_mft_record() which uses the ntfs_volume and the
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397316: fixed in libpam-openafs-session 1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> retitle 400785 rivet: tar timing errors
Bug#400785: rivet_0.5.0-3.1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: broken source package
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 161367 pending
Bug#161367: setpag causes problems with ssh-krb5
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: pending
> tags 396045 pending
Bug#396045: libpam-openafs-session: must not rely on -setpag
Tags were: pending
Bug#397316: '-setpag' with latest op
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 396045 pending
Bug#396045: libpam-openafs-session: must not rely on -setpag
Tags were: pending
Bug#397316: '-setpag' with latest openafs 1.4.2 and kernel 2.6.17 doesn't work
anymore
Tags added: pending
> tags 397316 pending
Bug#397316: '-setpag'
I found some interesting links about this topic:
http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/vga256/drivers/nv/Attic/README.RIVATNT.diff?r1=1.1.2.2&r2=1.1.2.3&hideattic=0&only_with_tag=xf-3_3_3
and
http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/vga256/drivers/n
Hello Frans,
hello Andree,
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:08, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
>> There are two NTFS during resizing. The original and the resized. When
>> the resizing is over then the latter is consistent and the old one is
>> irrelevant. ntfsresize doesn't work like
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> I could be wrong, but isn't this similar to bug 396939?
It's quite similar.
> A similar Ubuntu patch exists for the drivemount applet, maybe it can be
> added (with translations) too?
If you want to work on it, please go ahead. It will be dropped
tags 400753 + pending
thanks
Hello,
Thanks for the report. It will be uploaded tonight or tomorrow.
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: tdb
Version: 1.0.6-13
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of tdb_1.0.6-13 on nasya by sbuild/sparc 0.50
> Build started at 2006112
Hi,
Please note that the patch as it is has a very awkward side effect: Every
time you run ntfsresize and either you answer "no" to the "really proceed"
question or ntfsresize aborts without doing anything because it hits a
"this is not supported" case or you try to resize to a too small size o
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400753: fixed in squashfs 1:3.1r2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 400753 + pending
Bug#400753: squashfs: FTBFS
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
tags 46 pending
thanks
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 02:52:46PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 02:12:28PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Aurélien GÉRÔME ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061104 15:26]:
> > > I found a workaround. I will make ircd-hybrid use poll on Linux/Alpha
> > > a
Hi,
I wasn't able to reproduce the problem in the upstream bug report with
IMAP folders. I opened the offending emails with mutt and sent them to
my IMAP account. I could see all of the messages in 1.5.0.8.
I can verify that I could only see one of the messages if the folder was
local, as per ups
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 03:33:16AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 387089 openssl
> Bug#387089: Certificate links must not be removed
> Bug reassigned from package `ca-certificates' to `openssl'.
>From the c_rehash manpage:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 359452 pending
Bug#359452: libpam-openafs-session: please finish /usr/doc transition
Tags were: pending fixed
Tags added: pending
> tags 161367 pending
Bug#161367: setpag causes problems with ssh-krb5
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: pending
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400400: fixed in dh-make-perl 0.25
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
"Mattia Dongili" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> the kernel. could you please lower the severity and reassign?
Ok!
How could I do that?
--
Ciao
leandro
Un esteso e "normale" uso della crittografia è il sistema più forte
per rivendicare il diritto alla privacy nelle comunicazioni
telemati
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400653: fixed in gabber 0.8.8-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Attached is a patch that fixes pretty much all of the errors with 4.x
versions of gcc... there's quite a lot of them. The patch is against the
unpacked oskit in the build-tree/. Most of the patches are simple
fixes, but there's a few things of note:
1) freebsd/3.x/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395986: fixed in lcdproc 0.5.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394588: fixed in rivet 0.5.0-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
"Mattia Dongili" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Now I read more carefully.
>>
>> My platform is a last generation iBook G4 and cpufreqd worked fine also
>> with the kernel 2.6.17 home compiled. cpufreqd stops working from an
>> upgrade on.
>
> ok, and your logs say that _the_kernel_ i
Package: lphdisk
Version: 0.9.1-2
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: causes serious data loss / breaks whole system
The latest few versions of lphdisk completely and utterly break the system. If
run, lphdisk destroys the entire MBR and parition table.
I've tracked this down at least
On Tue, November 28, 2006 6:20 pm, leandro noferini said:
> "Mattia Dongili" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Now I read more carefully.
>>>
>>> My platform is a last generation iBook G4 and cpufreqd worked fine
>>> also
>>> with the kernel 2.6.17 home compiled. cpufreqd stops workin
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:32:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325206: fixed in rivet 0.5.0-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> tags 161367 pending
Bug#161367: setpag causes problems with ssh-krb5
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> tags 396045 pending
Bug#396045: libpam-openafs-session: must not rely on -
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition for
etch.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -ur php-imagick-0.9.11+1~/debian/changelog
php-imagick-0.9.11+1/debian/changelog
--- php-imagick-0.9.11+1~/debian/change
Package: php-imagick
Version: 0.9.11+1-4.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of php-imagick_0.9.11+1-4.1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20061128-1850
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package
Package: rivet
Version: 0.5.0-3.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of rivet_0.5.0-3.1 on peri by sbuild/hppa 98
> Build started at 20061128-1001
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:47:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#398585: fixed in php-imagick 0.9.11+1-4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: proftpd
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Another vulnerability has been reported in ProFTPd's mod_tls.
See
http://secunia.com/advisories/23141/
for details.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399205: fixed in libsmbios 0.12.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400694: fixed in preseed 1.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355656: fixed in rivet 0.5.0-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: gnupg2
Version: 2.0.0-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A vulnerability has been reported in GnuPG 2. See
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2006q4/000241.html
for details.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:20 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> >
> > relocate_inodes(), relocate_inode(), especially the $MFT part. There is a
> > strict order in what and when is relocated. At some point ntfs_volume is
> > mostly used only for re
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 02:33:43AM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> Package: zope-cmfforum
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> [...]
> Either way, please don't release this in Etch. It seems to be really
> old-hat and things have moved on.
I would suggest to ask ftpmasters
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package zope-cmfforum
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: zope-cmfforum
> tags 399957 + confirmed
Bug#399957: zope-cmfforum: Breaks "my folder" and probably other things
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
Hi,
Actually, my AMD64 works with sarge, so I tested fmit with
a new chroot environement with a debian unstable installed
tomorrow, so with latest versions of packages.
I didn't meet this bug, I cannot reproduce it, fmit
run well in my case. It is why I ask to you to test in
the same conditions.
Y
tag 400400 + pending
thanks
...Fixed in SVN. I'll tackle a few more bugs and will upload as soon
as possible.
Thanks!
--
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
--
To UNS
Package: squashfs
Severity: serious
Version: 1:3.1r2-4
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
squashfs seems to use bashisms in its debian/rules, please don't do
this (or use SHELL=/bin/bash in there):
DEB_MAKE_CHECK_TARGET unset, not running checks
DEB_MAKE_INSTALL_TARGET unset, skipping default makefile.mk
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400744: fixed in apt-listchanges 2.72
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Tue, November 28, 2006 1:44 pm, leandro noferini said:
> "Mattia Dongili" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> kernel bug? cpufreqd correctly complains about not being able to switch
>> to
>> ondemand. If this governor doesn't work for your platform, just
>> reconfigure cpufreqd to avoid u
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399047: fixed in mp3check 0.8.0-4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 400400 + pending
Bug#400400: dh-make-perl: Generated Build-Depends-Indep field makes no sense
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 13:08, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> There are two NTFS during resizing. The original and the resized. When
> the resizing is over then the latter is consistent and the old one is
> irrelevant. ntfsresize doesn't work like the other utilities: mount,
> modify, umount. It
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my mp3check NMU.
I have tested that Tobias' patch works fine, and i can not reproduce the
problem of the bug #227977.
diff -Nrua mp3check-0.8.0.orig/debian/changelog mp3check-0.8.0/debian/changelog
--- mp3check-0.8.0.orig/debian/changelog2006-11-28 15:38:57
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 09:54:08AM +0100, Ludovic RESLINGER wrote:
> Could you try to test with actual debian binary and without alsa for
> exemble?
Recompiling fmit with --disable-alsa seems to make it work reliably on
my Debian Testing PowerPC. Will try it on my Unstable AMD64 when I get
home...
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:45 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> A first look at the code shows the callback called when umount has
> completed is only used for displaying errors, not successful operations.
> There's definitely something wrong here.
I could be wrong, but isn't this similar to bug 3969
On November 27, 2006 at 10:55PM +0100,
maxx (at debian.org) wrote:
> > > On November 23, 2006 at 10:38PM +0100,
> > > maxx (at debian.org) wrote:
> > >
> > > > Package: mgp
> > > > Version: 1.11b-7
> > > > Severity: grave
> > > > Justification: renders package unusable
> > > >
> > > > $ mgp sample
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 14:20 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:08 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> > >
> > > There are two NTFS during resizing. The original and the resized. When
> > > the resizing is over then the l
Package: apt-listchanges
Version: 2.71
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
After last apt-listchanges upgrade, and doing after that
an upgrade from experimental I got the following Traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges", lin
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 09:54:08AM +0100, Ludovic RESLINGER wrote:
> This is strange because nobody meets exactly the same things in backtrace,
I have noticed, but I get the same backtrace every time on my amd64.
(Only one time I had different behaviour, but I don't know if that was
because I did
Anton Altaparmakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Argh! Thank you for persisting with this. I have now looked at the
> code and you are right it does not do the same thing. This is
> because when Yura ported my $LogFile code from the kernel for some
> unknown to me (or forgotten by me) reason he
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:08 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> >
> > There are two NTFS during resizing. The original and the resized. When
> > the resizing is over then the latter is consistent and the old one is
> > irrelevant. ntfsresize doesn
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399070: fixed in proftpd-dfsg 1.3.0-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:08 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>
> > > It's intentionally not umounted. Ntfsresize __rewrites__ NTFS and it's
> > > dangerous to umount because that could interfer, corrupt or destroy the
> > > resized, consistent NTFS
"Mattia Dongili" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Nov 27 12:19:35 janni kernel: ondemand governor failed to load due to too
>> long transition latency
>> Nov 27 12:19:37 janni cpufreqd: cpufreqd_set_profile : Couldn't set
>> profile "On Demand High" set for cpu0
>> Nov 27 12:19:37 janni cpufreqd
"Mattia Dongili" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> kernel bug? cpufreqd correctly complains about not being able to switch to
> ondemand. If this governor doesn't work for your platform, just
> reconfigure cpufreqd to avoid using it.
Now I read more carefully.
My platform is a last generatio
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:49:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Compiles without any issue
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
FWIW, I also experienced this when unmounting a USB stick using nautilus.
Because I pulled out the USB stick too quickly, I ended up with a corrupted
filesystem. :-/
Cheers,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | GnuPG key: 888354F7
| \/¯| http://atterer.net | 08A9 7B7D 3
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:49:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Compiles without any issue
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:49:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Compiles without any issue
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:49:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Compiles without any issue
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > It's intentionally not umounted. Ntfsresize __rewrites__ NTFS and it's
> > dangerous to umount because that could interfer, corrupt or destroy the
> > resized, consistent NTFS.
>
> Do you not keep the "ntfs_volume" of the mount consistent with y
Hi Szaka,
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:46 +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>
> > Ok, I just committed some more fixes to ntfsresize. It never actually
> > unmounted the volume, just exited which was very rude of it!
>
> It's intentionally not umount
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #kdebase
> close 194248 4:3.3.2-1
Bug#194248: kde startup finishes at frozen root window
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 4:3.3.2-1, send any further explanations to Paul
Anthony Ju
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> Ok, I just committed some more fixes to ntfsresize. It never actually
> unmounted the volume, just exited which was very rude of it!
It's intentionally not umounted. Ntfsresize __rewrites__ NTFS and it's
dangerous to umount because that could int
Le mardi 28 novembre 2006 à 12:38 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> * Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 12:36]:
> > Le mardi 28 novembre 2006 à 12:30 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > > > FWIW, fixing this bug requires changes in the kernel.
> > >
> > > Why that? AFAICR, umount must not
Le mardi 28 novembre 2006 à 12:30 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > FWIW, fixing this bug requires changes in the kernel.
>
> Why that? AFAICR, umount must not return before not everything is
> written down.
I don't think this is always the case.
Of course, if the applet is saying things are OK
severity 398760 important
tags 398760 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
other people and I cannot reproduce this bug with the current version of
aptitude, therefore I'm lowering severity now. Can you please check your
environment if it is correct?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 12:36]:
> Le mardi 28 novembre 2006 à 12:30 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > > FWIW, fixing this bug requires changes in the kernel.
> >
> > Why that? AFAICR, umount must not return before not everything is
> > written down.
>
> I don't think this
found 399070 1.3.0-13
found 399070 1.2.10-15sarge2
retitle 399070 CVE-2006-5815: remote code execution in ProFTPD
thanks
The previous fix fixed the wrong issue. See
http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2858
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
