Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 368562 + fixed
Bug#368562: mesa: debian/copyright does not contain all licenses
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 369895 + fixed
Bug#369895: libgl1-mesa-dri: _tnl_RenderClippedLine spews debug info
Tags were: patch
Bug#383387: libgl1-
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388008: fixed in fontconfig 2.4.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 10:51 +0800, Haifeng Chen wrote:
> While upgrading to version 2.4.1-1, it seems fontconfig-config automatically
> restore the setting back to default. I have to use dpkg-reconfigure to set it
> again.
Oops. Fontconfig wasn't looking for a new-style configuration during
upgra
Hi Marcelo,
As promised, I will be uploading 6.5.0.cvs.20060524-1 to unstable shortly.
The final diff for this NMU is attached. The only substantive difference to
the previous NMU diff is the addition of debian/control fixes to make the
package binNMU-safe, as documented in the other bug report I
The s390 build of lilypond 2.6.5-1 (but not others) also failed for
apparently this reason. See
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=lilypond&ver=2.6.5-1&arch=s390&stamp=1158538806&file=log&as=raw
At the end:
cd ./out ; fc-cache .
/build/buildd/lilypond-2.6.5/mf/out: failed to write cache
m
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:18:45AM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> Something seems to be broken. libslp1 depends on debconf. Why can't it
> rely on debconf being installed when the package is purged?
Because you can't rely on *any* non-essential packages being installed at
purge time.
> How we
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.22
Severity: serious
xserver-xorg.config requires /var/lib/x11 from x11-common, in order to
create /var/lib/x11/.migrateconfig; however, .config scripts cannot
count on Pre-Depends. This breaks upgrades from sarge:
xserver-xorg config warning: Migrating xserv
Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: libslp1
Version: 1.2.1-5
Severity: serious
Hello Ganesan,
Purging libslp1 fails with:
Removing libslp1 ...
Purging configuration files for libslp1 ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libslp1.postrm: line 4: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No
such file or directory
dpk
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 386202 patch
Bug#386202: gnome-pilot-conduits: FTBFS with libpisock9 (pilot-link 0.12.0)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Package: fontconfig-config
Version: 2.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
I use dpkg-reconfigure to modify the setting of fontconfig after
upgrade to version 2.4.0-5. Here are the associated debconf
config.dat
* My custom setting
Name: fontconfig
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 386201 patch
Bug#386201: gnome-pilot: FTBFS with libpisock9 (pilot-link 0.12.0)
Tags were: pending
Tags added: patch
> # I can not do the upload myself so remove the pending tag
tag 386202 patch
thanks
Hi,
I have prepared a patch for RC bug 386202 with updates the package to
the new upstream version 2.0.14. As I am no DD yet I can not do a NMU
myself so I would welcome some DD who can upload the new version.
I have attached the diff.gz. The complete package is availabl
reopen 387848
thanks
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:06:13AM +1000, Alexander Zangerl wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:49:39 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff writes:
> >Package: tun-source
> >Severity: grave
> >Justification: renders package unusable
> >| The stock 2.4.x Linux kernel series already include su
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 387848
Bug#387848: tun-source: tun - Obsolete as Etch will be Linux 2.6 only
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
José Parrella escribió:
> It seems to me that sti doesn't belong here (from the interpretation of
> the Principles of Operation [1]) so this might be either a problem in
> the configure script (-> autoconf) or an upstream bug in binutils. This
> is just my speculation, however.
I stand corrected.
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:06:13 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387848: tun-source: tun - Obsolete as Etch will be Linux
2.6 only
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
This package already implements the previous experiences from other
Debian maintainers regarding recent gcc and binutils interaction in s390
(that is, usage of -DNO_INLINE and correct --build and --host options
for the configure script)
It seems to me that sti doesn't belong here (from the interpr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 374104 O: apt-listbugs -- Lists critical bugs before each apt
Bug#374104: ITA: apt-listbugs -- Lists critical bugs before each apt
Changed Bug title.
> # close server errors that are since recovered.
> close 381350
Bug#381350: apt-listbugs: cra
reopen 334697
retitle 334697 versioned BTS handling
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 379146 pending
Bug#379146: headache: `line' setup does not works
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
hi,
upstream author has released a new hardinfo (0.4). So FTBS from 0.3 will
not be fixed. I was so busy this month, but now I have some time to fix
FTBS and related bugs (#385863, #387955) on hardinfo-0.4. I hope to
upload a new version supporting all archs without problem soon. This
will let hard
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 379146 + fixed
Bug#379146: headache: `line' setup does not works
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 334697
Bug#334697: apt-listbugs does not show several grave/serious bugs
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> retitle 334697 versioned BTS handling
Bug#334697: apt-listbugs does not show several grave/serious bugs
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Hi,
> Indeed. Please see for instance
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=334697
This bugreport sounds like a joke, really.
If the goal isn't to 'not release apt-listbugs with etch',
this is going to be bad.
Note that the load for apt-listbugs is quite huge, and I doubt
qa.deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> package gnome-pilot libgnome-pilot2 libgnome-pilot2-dev
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libgnome-pilot2-dev libgnome-pilot2 gnome-pilot
> tags 115763 + pending
Bug#115763: Network Syn
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380811: fixed in gdeskcal 0.57.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359855: fixed in lilypond 2.6.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387644: fixed in lilypond 2.6.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:47:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380866: fixed in rubrica 1.0.15-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308268: fixed in mboxcheck-applet 0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#357057: fixed in lilypond 2.6.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380866: fixed in mboxcheck-applet 0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: blam
Followup-For: Bug #386084
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
With this patch (basically taken from Ubuntu), blam should
start. There are binary versions at http://www.cmartin.tk/blam/ if
you don't want to compile it yourself and feel you can trust me ;)
This is b
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:35:30PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2006/09/17 23:25, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is a reasonable assumption on any sanely configured Unix
> > system. VServer's failure to provide a loopback interface is
> > inexcusable design brokenness.
>
Hi,
I have prepared a patch to upgrade gnome-pilot to the new upstream
version. I will prepare a patch for gnome-pilot-conduits as well.
After I have done that I will test them and see which bugs can be closes
due to the new upstream version. The new gnome-pilot 2.0.4 already fixes
6 bugs in the
Package: subversion
Version: 1.4.0
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
I looked at the failing self tests. The first one is a bug in the
created wrapper. The basic problem is that in
svn_delta.c:_wrap_svn_txdelta_apply_wrapper() the value of temp3 is not
Scripsit Steve Langasek
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:55:47PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > I have just grepped throught the mesa 6.4.2-1 sources for key phrases
> > in the problematic license clauses, without finding any of them. So it
> > seems that this bug does not apply to the current mesa
Hi,
The attached patch works around the problem. A better fix would be to
use an input constraint or to just use the C doe and have the compiler
generate altivec code. Is there a reason the gcc 2.95 generated altivec
code needs to be used ?
Thanks,
Peter (p2).
--
Goa is a state of mind
--- el
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 368560 mesa: material under SGI Free Software License B is not
> DFSG-free
Bug#368560: mesa: material under GLX Public License and SGI Free Software
License B is not DFSG-free
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
retitle 368560 mesa: material under SGI Free Software License B is not DFSG-free
thanks
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:55:47PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Steve Langasek
> > bug #368560 concerning what licenses the code is under. In the
> > sources of mesa 6.5 CVS (the version in experi
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:32:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387896: fixed in libaws 2.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: lfm
Version: 0.91.2-1
Severity: grave
Attached is a patch that updates lfm to current python policy.
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 387944 important
tags 387944 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 06:06:21PM +0200, Christian Pernegger wrote:
> When I tried to boot up this machine about 1h ago it would not come
> up properly - ssh or VLC logins would fail. Upon closer inspection it
> hung after the "
Scripsit Steve Langasek
> bug #368560 concerning what licenses the code is under. In the
> sources of mesa 6.5 CVS (the version in experimental), I'm unable to
> find any references to the "GLX Public License" at all. Does that
> mean we should consider this particular license issue resolved, or
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 385078 +patch
Bug#385078: xserver-xorg: impossible mouse configuration other than
/dev/input/mice
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 387944 important
Bug#387944: samba hangs during boot
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> tags 387944 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#387944: samba hangs during boot
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> thanks
S
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 387962 sid
Bug#387962: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on mono-classlib-2.0 (< 1.1.14)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
tags 385078 +patch
thank you
Please try this patch. I'm not a bash (nor debconf!) guru but I think
that it address your concerns regarding the non-interactivity for the
mouse device setting. Please let me know if the patch works for you.
Therefore I'm providing:
1) A full, NMU-ready, source packa
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 17:23 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> Package: fontconfig
> Version: 2.4.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Recent Sid versions cannot write font caches.
> Will report scanning of # directories, # fonts in log or using -v option,
> but will not wr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 386305 + fixed
Bug#386305: iacd won't start if the pidfile already exists
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 14:03:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387899: fixed in libaws 2.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 01:48:29PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> Package: perl
> Version: 5.8.8-6.1
> Tags: ftbfs
> Severity: serious
> The Perl test suite fails on the test "lib/Net/Ping/t/500_ping_icmp"
> when run on a Linux VServer, because it tries to ping 127.0.0.1 which
> is not available o
On 2006/09/17 23:25, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a reasonable assumption on any sanely configured Unix
> system. VServer's failure to provide a loopback interface is
> inexcusable design brokenness.
While VServer's design decision is indeed arguable, there might be
other r
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 14:02:51 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387925: fixed in gnome-panel 2.14.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 386458 + fixed
Bug#386458: libavcodec-dev: Missing dependencies for libraw1394-dev
libdc1934-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 382616 + fixed
Bug#382616: package is unusable for standalone development: uglib.h has
conflicts with glib-2.0 headers
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 379149 + fixed
Bug#379149: Package is not binNMU safe, arch-any gnomeicu depends on arch-all
gnomeicu-common (= ${Source-Version})
Tags were: pending patch
Bug#387738: Uninstallable due to binNMU-safe dependency on gnomeicu-common
Tags added: fixed
This patch uses %p to format pointers, instead of %x with an int cast.
--- assa/Reactor.cpp.orig 2006-08-13 20:56:22.0 +0200
+++ assa/Reactor.cpp2006-09-17 23:27:00.821168000 +0200
@@ -247,8 +247,8 @@
}
if (ret == true) {
- DL((REACT,"Found EvtH \"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 375297 + fixed
Bug#375297: libgtk-jni, libgtk-java: Circular depends.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 375872 + fixed
Bug#375872: libgtk-java has circular Depends on libgtk-jni
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 385943
Mirco Bauer wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 19:27 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Your package is not installable due to a dependency on mono-classlib-2.0 (<
>> 1.1.14) which is not available in unstable anymore. You might want to loosen
>> the versioned dependency.
>
> Sounds like you have mix
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 366620 + pending
Bug#366620: initramfs-tools: 2.6.16-1-powerpc fails to mount rootfs,
2.6.15-1-powerpc works
There were no tags set.
Bug#375035: Kernel 2.6.16 attempts to access root device before running
initramfs init
Tags added: pending
>
End
Heretik wrote:
> It's in non-free. Maybe you haven't got non-free in your sources.list ?
No, I haven't, though sorry for filing the bug as it's a contrib package which
I should have spotted in the first place...
Cheers
Luk
> $ apt-cache policy tremulous-data
> tremulous-data:
> Installé : 1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> close 387953
Bug#387953: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on tremulous-data
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explana
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> close 387962 1.1.17-1
Bug#387962: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on mono-classlib-2.0 (< 1.1.14)
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 375035 + pending
Bug#375035: Kernel 2.6.16 attempts to access root device before running
initramfs init
Tags were: pending
Bug#366620: initramfs-tools: 2.6.16-1-powerpc fails to mount rootfs,
2.6.15-1-powerpc works
Tags added: pending
>
End of m
Package: classpath
Version: 2:0.92-3
Severity: serious
Selecting previously deselected package classpath-gtkpeer.
Unpacking classpath-gtkpeer (from .../classpath-gtkpeer_2%3a0.92-3_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/classpath-gtkpeer_2%3a0.92-3_i386.deb (--unpack):
tryi
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 19:27 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> Your package is not installable due to a dependency on mono-classlib-2.0 (<
> 1.1.14) which is not available in unstable anymore. You might want to loosen
> the versioned dependency.
Sounds like you have mixed testing/unstable.
In test
It's in non-free. Maybe you haven't got non-free in your sources.list ?
$ apt-cache policy tremulous-data
tremulous-data:
Installé : 1.1.0-1
Candidat : 1.1.0-1
Table de version :
*** 1.1.0-1 0
990 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/non-free Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Luk C
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> package gnome-panel gnome-panel-data libpanel-applet2-0 libpanel-applet2-dbg
> libpanel-applet2-dev libpanel-applet2-doc
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libpanel-applet2-dbg libpanel-
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:08:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line sitebar: CVE-2006-3320: cross-site scripting
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: libhtml-mason-perl-examples
Version: 1:1.33-2
Severity: serious
Hello Charles,
There is an error when attempting to purge the package:
Removing libhtml-mason-perl-examples ...
Purging configuration files for libhtml-mason-perl-examples ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libhtml-mason-perl-exa
Olleg Samoylov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can't compile aws application.
>
> rateme.adb:4:06: file "ssl-thin.ads" not found
> rateme.adb:4:06: "Rateme (body)" depends on "Aws.Client (spec)"
> rateme.adb:4:06: "Aws.Client (spec)" depends on "Aws.Net.Ssl (spec)"
> rateme.adb:4:06: "Aws.Net.Ssl (
Package: egroupware-core
Version: 1.2-104.dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Hello Peter,
There is an error when attempting to purge the package:
Removing egroupware-core ...
Purging configuration files for egroupware-core ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/egroupware-core.postrm: line 15:
/usr/share/debconf/c
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:32:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387952: fixed in hwinfo 13.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Il giorno dom, 17/09/2006 alle 19.46 +0200, Luk Claes ha scritto:
> Package: libgalago1.0-cil
> Severity: serious
> Version: 0.5.0-1
>
> Hi
>
> Your package depends on libgalago2 which is not available in unstable (yet?).
hello luk,
yes, it's sitting in new.
ciao,
--
Riccardo Setti <[EMAIL P
Package: dokuwiki
Version: 0.0.20060309-5
Severity: serious
When deinstalling dokuwiki, the postrm script tries to stop the apache
which has been deinstalled (but not purged) previously. That makes
dokuwiki impossible to deinstall.
Removing dokuwiki ...
/usr/sbin/apachectl is not executable, exi
Package: dokuwiki
Version: 0.0.20060309-5
Severity: serious
dokuwiki's postinst and postrm script delete conffiles in
/etc/apache*/conf.d/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:18:52 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385951: fixed in mdadm 2.5.3.git200608202239-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Package: libgalago1.0-cil
Severity: serious
Version: 0.5.0-1
Hi
Your package depends on libgalago2 which is not available in unstable (yet?).
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
Package: mono-xsp2-base
Severity: serious
Version: 1.1.15-1
Hi
Your package is not installable due to a dependency on mono-classlib-2.0 (<
1.1.14) which is not available in unstable anymore. You might want to loosen
the versioned dependency.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 381526 serious
Bug#381526: vim: undeclared conflict with vim-doc
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Package: xkeysw-config
Severity: serious
Version: 1.1-1.3
Hi
Your package is not installable due to a dependency on python (< 2.4) which is
not available in unstable anymore. The package might need an update for the
python transition.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk -
This bug report is about a client error related to libssl.
Ah, right you are. I had read #338006 but managed to miss that
detail. Sorry, and thanks.
I tried my "svn list -R" with a build of Subversion linked against OS
X's native libssl, and all went swimmingly. I'll file a bug with
Darw
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 387500
Bug#387500: Debian installer fails to install GRUB
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping proce
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 387500 0.97-16
Bug#387500: Debian installer fails to install GRUB
Bug marked as found in version 0.97-16.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Package: hwinfo
Version: 13.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
gcc -c -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -pipe -g -fPIC -I../../src/hd -I
/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I /usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include -I
/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include kbd.c
kbd.c:24: error: redefinition of 'struct serial_struct'
make[3]: *** [kbd.o]
Package: libslp1
Version: 1.2.1-5
Severity: serious
Hello Ganesan,
Purging libslp1 fails with:
Removing libslp1 ...
Purging configuration files for libslp1 ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libslp1.postrm: line 4: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No
such file or directory
dpkg: error processing libs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 387925 + confirmed
Bug#387925: gnome-panel-data: postrm fails during purge
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Package: tremulous
Severity: serious
Version: 1.1.0-2
Hi
Your package depends on tremulous-data (>= 1.1.0-1) which is not available in
unstable.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:17:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384334: fixed in jadetex 3.13-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:17:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384332: fixed in jadetex 3.13-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.23c-1
Severity: critical
When I tried to boot up this machine about 1h ago it would not come
up properly - ssh or VLC logins would fail. Upon closer inspection it
hung after the "nmbd" part of the samba initscript output.
It's reproducible, not a timeout (I waited at
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 05:17:40PM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:21:33AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> > The kernel somehow loses the information where the initrd image is
> > placed in memory. The correct data is there in
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:p
found 0.97-16
thanks
I just had a look at grub version 0.97-16, and /sbin/grub-install is
still missing. This path is used by grub-installer in d-i beta 3, and
thus the installation fail. Adding a symlink in /target from
/sbin/grub-install to /usr/sbin/grub-install solved the problem.
Friendly
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 379743 important
Bug#379743: cynthiune.app: FTBFS (amd64): CynthiuneHeaderCell.m:100: internal
compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:3807
Severity set to `im
Package: open-cobol
Version: 0.32-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trying to compile the hello world example from the info pages
yields this error:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldb
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
I am a co
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:21:33AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> The kernel somehow loses the information where the initrd image is
> placed in memory. The correct data is there in
> arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:prom_check_initrd(), but in
> init/initramfs.c:populate_rootfs() it's wrong, i
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 08:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385757: fixed in octave-gpc 0.1.6-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: gnome-panel-data
Version: 2.14.3-1
Severity: serious
Hello GNOME,
when trying to purge gnome-panel-data, I get
Removing gnome-panel-data ...
Purging configuration files for gnome-panel-data ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/gnome-panel-data.postrm: line 7: update-gconf-defaults:
command
Quoting "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Package: roxen4
> Version: 4.0.425-2
> Severity: serious
>
> roxen4 has an entire MySQL database as conffiles:
>
> fugl:~/nmu/roxen4-4.0.425> cat debian/conffiles
> /var/lib/roxen4/my.cfg
> /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/host.frm
> /var/lib/rox
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
