Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 386902 + fixed
Bug#386902: Missing dependency on libgmime-2.0-2
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
Package: selinux-policy-refpolicy-src
Version: 0.0.20060907-3
Severity: grave
[This is a re-post, I or the BTS mail server seem to have email
problems. Please ignore/close if this is a duplicate.]
Hi Manoj,
the latest SELinux packages do not work in unstable anymore. When you
boot with selinux=
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 383166 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#383166: xprint: FTBFS: debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/Xprt.1x: No such file
or directory
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 385378 + fixed
Bug#385378: Uses deprecated dbus function
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
tags 386902 patch
thanks
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 12:58:01AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> The latest upload of libmime2.2-cil does not have a dependency on
> libgmime-2.0-2. Without libgmime-2.0-2 being installed packages that use
> libgmime2.2-cil like tomboy crash immediately:
Ok, attached is t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 386902 patch
Bug#386902: Missing dependency on libgmime-2.0-2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 12:58:01AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: libgmime2.2-cil
> Version: 2.2.3-1.1
> Severity: grave
> The latest upload of libmime2.2-cil does not have a dependency on
> libgmime-2.0-2. Without libgmime-2.0-2 being installed packages that use
> libgmime2.2-cil like tom
On 9/11/06, LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/11/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, we definitely will need more info, since this kernel is of course
> working for many other users. For starters, we probably want the driver
> your disk normally uses, and the exact erro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 386916 moreinfo
Bug#386916: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686: can't boot up
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> severity 386916 important
Bug#386916: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686: can't boot up
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Sto
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 386919 serious
Bug#386919: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/classpath/libgtkpeer.la', which is
also in package classpath
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'
> merge 386917
On 9/11/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, we definitely will need more info, since this kernel is of course
working for many other users. For starters, we probably want the driver
your disk normally uses, and the exact error messages printed out at boot
time.
driver maybe is:
tags 386916 moreinfo
severity 386916 important
thanks
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 09:46:07AM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686
> Version: 2.6.17-8
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> can't boot up. I stop at find root device, I think the kernel doe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 386305 + patch
Bug#386305: iacd won't start if the pidfile already exists
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
tags 386305 + patch
thanks
Many packages solve the problem with a rm in the stop case.
CaFeLUG September BTS
luciano
--- init.d.orig 2006-09-10 23:43:35.0 -0300
+++ init.d 2006-09-10 23:48:47.0 -0300
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
echo -n "Stopping $DESC: $NAME"
start-stop-daemon --oknodo
Package: classpath-gtkpeer
Version: 2:3a0.92-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
I got this today upon dist-upgrading:
Unpacking replacement classpath-common ...
Selecting previously deselected package classpath-gtkpeer.
Unpacking classpath-gtkpeer (from .../classpath-gtkpeer_2%3a0.92-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: er
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686
Version: 2.6.17-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
can't boot up. I stop at find root device, I think the kernel does not
detect my disk. It works fine under 2.6.16.
If you need more information, please mail me.
Thanks
-- System Informa
Package: classpath-gtkpeer
Version: 0.92-1
Severity: serious
classpath-gtkpeer overwrites files in classpath, but it doesn't declare
Replaces:.
Seo Sanghyeon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 385695 serious
Bug#385695: FTBFS on alpha: va_list is not a pointer
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reassign 368795 libtktable
Bug#368795: libtktable: Call a missing file
Bug reassigned from package `libtktable' to `libtktable'.
> found 368795 2.9-3
Bug#368795: libtktable: Call a m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 378411 + patch
Bug#378411: Buffer overflow in XML::Parser::Expat triggered by utf8
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
> This bug seems to be fixed in 0.2.3+0.2.4pre3-2:
>
>* Add 002_ftbs_64bit_fix.patch: Fix FTBFS on 64-bit platforms
> (patch courtesy of Andreas Jochens)
>
> (which was coincidentally uploaded exactly 37 seconds(!) earlier than this
> bug
> was reported ;)
Heh, verified. closing bug.
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:47:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324978: fixed in vlc 0.8.6-svn20060910.0.8.5-1-svn.debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 02:01:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of libgd2 2.0.33-5.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 384838 + fixed
Bug#384838: libgd2-xpm: libgd2 segfaults on corrupt gif
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 384243 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#384243: FTBFS (alpha): assembly syntax errors
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 08:25:47 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385801: FTBFS: Does not build on amd64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: libgmime2.2-cil
Version: 2.2.3-1.1
Severity: grave
The latest upload of libmime2.2-cil does not have a dependency on
libgmime-2.0-2. Without libgmime-2.0-2 being installed packages that use
libgmime2.2-cil like tomboy crash immediately:
NoteManager created with note path "/home/michael/.
Package: python2.3
Version: 2.3.5-15
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I installed etch using the daily netinst snapshot and a retarded mirror, and
now i'm syncing with the recent
packages. Python 2.4 refuses to install itself because some python-gnome
librairies complain
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 357996 pending
Bug#357996: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: extra qualification
Tags were: fixed fixed-upstream patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 01:03:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#371086: if you edit history, old RC bugs will show up again
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006 00:39:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of phpmyadmin 4:2.8.2-0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 15:32:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386859: fixed in hddtemp 0.3-beta15-27
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: sbcl
Version: 1:0.9.16.0-1
Severity: serious
; /build/buildd/sbcl-0.9.16.0/obj/from-host/src/compiler/target/vm.lisp-obj-tmp
written
; compilation finished in 0:00:10
; compiling file "/build/buildd/sbcl-0.9.16.0/src/code/early-type.lisp"
(written 05 SEP 2006 05:58:10 AM):
; compiling (
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 385889 + fixed
Bug#385889: link var/www -> /usr/share/phpmyadmin/ not good !
Tags were: security
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:41:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386886: "/usr/sbin/setfiles: Command not found",
reloaded...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 384146 -patch
Bug#384146: plptools: FTBFS (amd64): conflicting declaration 'typedef long long
unsigned int u_int64_t'
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
On Sunday 10 September 2006 23:22, you wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 03:56:39PM +0200, David Schmitt wrote:
> > Please find attached a minimal patch, fixing the binNMU security.
>
> This patch fixes nothing. There is *no* way for an arch: all package to
> have a strict versioned dependency on a
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 03:56:39PM +0200, David Schmitt wrote:
> Please find attached a minimal patch, fixing the binNMU security.
This patch fixes nothing. There is *no* way for an arch: all package to
have a strict versioned dependency on an arch: any package and still be
binNMU safe.
--
Ste
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:02:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379492: fixed in klog 0.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
I'm not sure it makes sense to say that acpid is "not needed for hal".
acpid turns a unicast channel into a multicast channel. No single
consumer of the channel needs that service; the service is needed
because there might be more than one consumer. Doing anything other
than letting acpid be
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:02:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383905: fixed in gnome-btdownload 0.0.25-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:02:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386737: fixed in reportbug 3.29.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:02:59 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386519: fixed in sql-ledger 2.6.18-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:02:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386737: fixed in reportbug 3.29.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:02:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386737: fixed in reportbug 3.29.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:02:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379815: fixed in klog 0.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:02:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379492: fixed in klog 0.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370743: fixed in gambit 0.2006.01.20-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:02:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379815: fixed in klog 0.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:02:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347030: fixed in scid 3.6.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315214: fixed in gambit 0.2006.01.20-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 384756 + fixed
Bug#384756: libgtk2-ruby: Command-line arguments break Gtk.init
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:29:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line BTS cleanup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Package: selinux-policy-refpolicy-src
Version: 0.0.20060907-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
There are still references to /usr/sbin/setfiles in the package,
see attached patch.
Also, the policy/modules/system/selinuxutil.fc file mentions both
/usr/sbin/setfiles _and_ /sbin/setfiles. Is that require
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 385382 serious
Bug#385382: Uses deprecated dbus function
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> severity 385378 serious
Bug#385378: Uses deprecated dbus function
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006, Chris Morris wrote:
> Package: sql-ledger
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2006-4244
> Recently fully disclosed at
> http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/445512/30/0/threaded
>
> Looking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 380866 patch
Bug#380866: Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 380866 patch
thanks
- --
.''`. Khalid El Fathi
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' www.edena-fr.org
`-GPG: 1024D/5801E0DA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmai
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 327339 grave
Bug#327339: CAN-2005-2860: Arbitrary webcode injection through XSS
vulnerability via Server field of a HTTP response header
Severity set to `grave' from `import
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 362698 38
Bug#362698: reportbug: Inaccurate error: "Your version of is newer than
that in Debian!"
Bug#38: reportbug checkes for newer pacakges, but claims I have packages
newer than debian
Forcibly Merged 362698 38.
> for
And people wonder why individuals leave the project...
On 9/10/06, Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
merge 386737 386644
thanks
Hi,
Sorry for flaming you, but:
Is running "reportbug reportbug" before uploading the package that hard?
Was this the second or third time this year that you
Hi,
The sole x86 machines I have are servers. My desktop machine is
a PowerPC and fmit runs great on it. Nonetheless, I tried to test
fmit on a x86 over an exported X11 display on a PowerPC and it worked
fine, but with ALSA disabled of course. However, it seems having ALSA
disabled does not reprod
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:22:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#386856: alsa-utils is missing versioned
depends on lsb-base >= 3.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: atokx2
Version: 17.0-2.0-4
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
/usr/sbin/atokx2mngdaemon, /usr/lib/atokx2/usr/lib/im/leif/atokx2.so,
/usr/lib/atokx2/usr/lib/im/locale/ja/atokx2/atokx2aux.so and so on
are depending on libstdc++.so.5.
Therefore atokx2 does not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 380843 - patch
Bug#380843: Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Le dimanche 10 septembre 2006 à 18:59 +0200, Martin Wuertele a écrit :
> Hi Josselin!
>
> * Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-10 18:52]:
>
> > Python-support shouldn't install anything at all in /usr/lib/python2.X.
> > Is the package exhibiting this behavior available somewhere, so th
Looks like I stupidly didn't notice that alsa-utils already depends on
lsb-base 3.0-9. This bug can be closed, sorry for the inconvenience.
regards
Andreas Janssen
pgpiYLnNPGpDK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
> > Not being a python programmer, I missed the tempfile.tempdir setting,
> > which, if it makes tempfile.mktemp use that temp dir, should make the
> > program safe for all calls to mktemp from then on. Whether it's
> > exploitable would thus depend on whether there are any c
tags 380843 - patch
thanks
Excerpts from IRC:
19:30 < Sesse> maxx: btw, your patch against #380843 is completely broken
19:31 < Sesse> maxx: it doesn't do half of what it's supposed to do (you need
to depend on python-central or python-support, call the
appropriate
Package: alsa-utils
Version: 1.0.11-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
The alsa-utils init script uses functions from /lib/lsb/init-functions from
the lsb-base package. lsb-base is not marked essential. The log_action_*
functions alsa-utils uses were introduced in lsb-base 3.0-6, so al
Package: hddtemp
Version: 0.3-beta15-26
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
The hddtemp init script uses functions from /lib/lsb/init-functions, but does
not depend on lsb-base. Because some functions are missing from older versions
of lsb-base, hddtemp needs to depend on lsb-base 3.0-3 o
Joey Hess wrote:
> Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> > Upon investigating this for stable, I wonder if the problem is as bad as
> > reported. It seems that archivemail sets up its own temp directory and
> > creates its files in it:
> >
> > # create a temporary directory for us to work in securely
> >
On 2006-09-10 at 14:53:03 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tobias Klauser wrote:
> > Thanks for your report.
> >
> > These vulnerabilities are fixed by the upload of 15.5+cvs20060902-1
> > (which is a CVS snapshot incorporating them). Obviously I was not
> > inspecting the up
Hi Josselin!
* Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-10 18:52]:
> Python-support shouldn't install anything at all in /usr/lib/python2.X.
> Is the package exhibiting this behavior available somewhere, so that I
> can see what is wrong?
Not anymore, I switched to python-central which beh
tags 381858 - pending
thanks
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 the mental interface of
martin f krafft told:
> Package: mutt-ng
> Version: 0.0+20060429-1
> Severity: serious
>
> The mutt-ng binary package depends on libqdbm12, which has since
> been replaced by libqdbm13. Please upload a binary NMU (for all
Le dimanche 10 septembre 2006 à 15:50 +0200, Martin Wuertele a écrit :
> Package: python-support
> Version: 0.4.1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 6.8
>
> python-support installst private modules that should be installed into
> /usr/share/python-support
If these are private modules, t
Severity: serious
Package: openuniverse
Version: 1.0beta3.1-6
By default, openuniverse currently saves a "log.txt" text file in the
directory from which it is executed, overwriting any previous so named
file. This may cause random conflicts and overwriting of files created
by users.
--
Luca Brivi
This should be fixed with todays upload of 0.4.2-9. After switching to
python-central no files are left from older version, duplicity finds
tarfile.py where it was installed and I can write backups as well as
restore them.
I leave the bug open untill proper funcionality has been confirmed tough
I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 382701 important
Bug#382701: xemacs21: Segfault on startup. Fatal error (11)
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
severity 382701 important
thanks
On August 12, 2006 at 9:02PM +0200,
manfredpaul (at gmx.net) wrote:
> Package: xemacs21
> Version: 21.4.19-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Today I tried xeamcs, but it there are some strange bugs.
> I started xemacs21 by typing:
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> retitle 379518 tries to check "inaccessible" partition tables and fails
Bug#379518: lilo: too clever for its own good
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Package: python-support
Version: 0.4.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 6.8
python-support installst private modules that should be installed into
/usr/share/python-support to /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/ - in EVERY version of
python and fails to remove them upon purge. pyversions is set to -2.3
and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 381858 - pending
Bug#381858: depends on non-existent library, binary NMU needed
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental pending
Tags removed: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:28:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381858: depends on non-existent library, binary NMU needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Hi Robert,
This bug will be fixed in sysstat 7.0.1 which will be released next week.
Sysstat will use the sysconf() system call to get the size of a page
instead of using PAGE_SIZE definition.
Regards,
Sébastien.
Robert Luberda wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
Forwarding another bug report - PAGE_SIZE
Package: plptools
Version: 0.15-1
Severity: serious
Justification: unknown
As the upstream maintainer it might seem bad form to report bugs to
Debian, but my C++ (minimal as it is) is not up to this:
rfsvfactory.cc:40: error: specialization of 'Enum::sdata::sdata() [with E =
rfsvfactory::errs]'
Hi!
Please find attached a minimal patch, fixing the binNMU security.
Regards, David
--
- hallo... wie gehts heute?
- *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch*
- gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;)
-- Matthias Leeb, Uni f. angewandte Kunst, 2005-02-15
diff -uwrbN libgtk-java-2.8.5.b
merge 386737 386644
thanks
Hi,
Sorry for flaming you, but:
Is running "reportbug reportbug" before uploading the package that hard?
Was this the second or third time this year that you uploaded a
reportbug package which didn't work at all?
I mean, noone expects you to test every single feature,
Hi!
This bug seems to be fixed in 0.2.3+0.2.4pre3-2:
* Add 002_ftbs_64bit_fix.patch: Fix FTBFS on 64-bit platforms
(patch courtesy of Andreas Jochens)
(which was coincidentally uploaded exactly 37 seconds(!) earlier than this bug
was reported ;)
Regards, David
--
- hallo... wie gehts
Package: tomcat5.5
Version: 5.5.15-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
hy,
I installed tomcat5.5 on an system which hast tomcat5 from etch installed.
After that I want remove the tomcat5 packages, cause tomcat5.5 is runnig
well.
tomcat5 removed the user tomcat5 so
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 386737 386644
Bug#386644: reportbug 3.29.4 syntax error
Bug#386737: crashs on startup with syntax error in /usr/bin/reportbug
Merged 386644 386737.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 09:49:11AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> bug 371086 shows up again as RC, as the version this bug was fixed in
> (pioneers/0.9.64-1) is no longer mentioned in the changelog.
Oops, I must have forgotten to synchronise the changelog.
> If this version was really
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 01:22:25PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Saturday 09 September 2006 12:35, Lo?c Minier wrote:
> > I think only apache was uploaded for CVE-2006-3918, and not
> > apache2. Do you intend to issue a DSA for apache2 as well? Or
> > isn't it affected by the vulnerability?
>
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 05:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386261: fixed in cryptonit 0.9.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 04:52:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369979: fixed in classpath 2:0.92-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 04:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378721: fixed in vim 1:7.0-094+1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 04:52:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301134: fixed in classpath 2:0.92-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 04:52:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#267040: fixed in classpath 2:0.92-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 04:52:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373791: fixed in classpath 2:0.92-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 12:10:08PM +0200, David Schmitt wrote:
> The new debian/copyright only contains licensing information for
> src/XvMCWrapper.c. The other source files
>
> ./include/X11/extensions/XvMClib.h
> ./src/XvMClibint.h
> ./src/XvMC.c
>
> do not contain any licensing information an
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
