Processed: notfound 263783 in 0.2.92

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > notfound 263783 0.2.92 Bug#263783: Do not include it on testing Bug marked as not found in version 0.2.92. (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) > End of message, stopp

Processed: found 378253 in 2.5.03.2382-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > found 378253 2.5.03.2382-1 Bug#378253: FTBFS on amd64: undefined reference to `__dn_expand' and `__res_query' Bug marked as found in version 2.5.03.2382-1. > End of message, stoppin

Bug#381255: coreutils_5.97-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors

Package: coreutils Version: 5.97-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of coreutils_5.97-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85 > Build started at 20060803-0555 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: gettext

Bug#379359: Bug in kiwi

Em Wed, 2 Aug 2006 19:25:27 +0200 David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > I didn't have any of the python2.3 files you wanted, and for 2.4, > the kiwi directory was missing (my suspicion is that the removal of > the old version was successful, but the installation of the new > version was

Bug#381248: forgot the URL

I forgot the [0] in the other message: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=libsdl1.2&ver=1.2.11-1&arch=powerpc&stamp=1154401402&file=log&as=raw -- Love, Marga -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#379750: diff for 0.52debian-1.4 NMU of python-gd

Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: python-gd > Version: 0.52debian-1.3 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Hi, > > Attached is the diff for my python-gd 0.52debian-1.4 NMU which I'll > upload to DELAYED-2. I'm looking for a new maintainer for python-gd. Are you interested? -- Ben

Processed: reopening, since it is still a problem

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 379359 1.9.8-6 Bug#379359: Installation failure Bug marked as found in version 1.9.8-6. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#381245: jfsutils: Missing lines in control file lead to wrong udeb

Package: jfsutils Version: 1.1.8-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch, d-i A user made me attend to the fact that he could not format a jfs partition in Debian installer on amd64. Some investigation learned that jfsutils-udeb was missing in the Packages file in the d-i section. Some more investigati

Bug#381248: libsdl1.2: FTBFS in powerpc due to the use of PAGE_SIZE

Package: libsdl1.2 Version: 1.2.11-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 5.6.8 Hi! libsdl1.2 is failing to build in powerpc [0] due to the use of PAGE_SIZE which was dropped in powerpc (and will soon be dropped in the other arches as well). I've created a patch that fixes this pr

Processed: tagging 373247

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 373247 sid Bug#373247: adabrowse: FTBFS: transition to GNAT 4.1 (waiting for asis) Tags were: pending Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#379200: Intent to NMU

Tags 379200 + pending Thanks I have prepared a package that fixes this problem (hopefully nothing was left out this time). It's a very simple change. I'm attaching the full interdiff output of the NMU that I'm about to do. -- Love, Marga. diff -u bluez-utils-3.1/debian/rules bluez-util

Bug#381228: freetype doesn't have a copyright file

severity 381228 wishlist quit On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 12:24:13AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: freetype > Version: 2.2.1-2 > Severity: serious > freetype doesn't have a copyright file Policy requires copyright files in /usr/share/doc//copyright. It does *not* require them in debian/co

Processed: Re: Bug#381228: freetype doesn't have a copyright file

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 381228 wishlist Bug#381228: freetype doesn't have a copyright file Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious' > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: tagging 373247

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > #oops > tags 373247 - sid Bug#373247: adabrowse: FTBFS: transition to GNAT 4.1 (waiting for asis) Tags were: sid pending Tags removed: sid > End of message, stopping processing here

Processed: Intent to NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Tags 379200 + pending Bug#379200: bluez-utils: FTBFS because sudo clears the environment Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Bug#378301: juman: FTBFS: Segmentation fault during makepat

Hi, >> On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:47:56 +0200 >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julien Danjou) said as follows: >Unfortunately the problem does not occur anymore with CFLAGS=-g... Do you mean change of optimization option resolves this problem? If you so, I doubt that this problem is caused by the bug of buildin

Bug#381226: marked as done (libxtst doesn't have a copyright file)

Your message dated Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:09:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#381226: libxtst doesn't have a copyright file has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processed: tagging 373247

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 373247 sid Bug#373247: adabrowse: FTBFS: transition to GNAT 4.1 (waiting for asis) Tags were: sid pending Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#381236: tkfont: tkfont fails to start

Package: tkfont Severity: grave Version: 1.1-12 Justification: renders package unusable Tags: patch tkfont will not run and dies with this error: , | Error in startup script: sort: Warning: "+number" syntax is | deprecated, please use "-k number" | while executing | "exec xlsfonts -u -f

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 375035 ! Bug#375035: Kernel 2.6.16 attempts to access root device before running initramfs init Changed Bug submitter from root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > submitter 369303 ! Bug#369303: [powerpc] On oldwo

Bug#379750: diff for 0.52debian-1.4 NMU of python-gd

Package: python-gd Version: 0.52debian-1.3 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, Attached is the diff for my python-gd 0.52debian-1.4 NMU which I'll upload to DELAYED-2. -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7

Bug#381227: libxtst doesn't have a copyright file

Package: libxtst Version: 1:1.0.1-5 Severity: serious libxtst doesn't have a copyright file -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#381226: libxtst doesn't have a copyright file

Package: libxinerama Version: 1:1.0.1-5 Severity: serious libxtst doesn't have a copyright file -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#381228: freetype doesn't have a copyright file

Package: freetype Version: 2.2.1-2 Severity: serious freetype doesn't have a copyright file -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#370671: marked as done (keyboard layout applet crashes X)

Your message dated Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:45:48 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in unstable and testing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#380686: initramfs-tools: busybox mount doesn't support nfs

On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 07:35:25PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:57:02AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > well, my ugly workaround was to add a hook that installs /bin/mount to > > /mount, and hack /usr/share/ltsp/scripts/nfs to use /mount directly. > > > > not at

Processed: Reopen

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 353882 Bug#353882: oftpd: Remote DoS vulnerability Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reopen 318286 Bug#318286: FTP USER buffer overflow (CAN-2005-2239) Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 353882 + security Bug#353882: oftpd: Remo

Bug#381225: libxinerama doesn't have a copyright file

Package: libxinerama Version: 1:1.0.1-4 Severity: serious libxinerama doesn't have a copyright file -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Intent to NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Tags 379813 + pending Bug#379813: FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60 Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#381204: marked as done (GnuPG security hole in memory allocation)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 22:05:18 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#381204: GnuPG security hole in memory allocation has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#380589: patch for FTBFS

Package: libopenobex1.0 Version: 1:1.0.0-rel-3 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, Attached is the diff for my libopenobex1.0 1:1.0.0-rel-3.1 NMU which I'll upload to DELAYED-7. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08

Bug#379265: diff for 1.0.3-0.1 NMU of magic-haskell

Package: magic-haskell Version: 1.0.3 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, Attached is the diff for my magic-haskell 1.0.3-0.1 NMU which I'll upload to DELAYED-2. -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D

Bug#379812: diff for 0.9.2-1.1 NMU of kde-style-polyester

Package: kde-style-polyester Version: 0.9.2-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, Attached is the diff for my kde-style-polyester 0.9.2-1.1 NMU which I'll upload to DELAYED-2. -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544

Processed: Intent to NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Tags 379812 + pending Bug#379812: FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60 Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#379812: Intent to NMU

Tags 379812 + pending Thanks I have prepared a package with this patch and I plan to upload an NMU that applies it. The patch is basically what Arjan sent, only with a different changelog entry. I'm attaching the full interdiff output for the NMU that I'm about to do. -- Love, Marga di

Bug#379813: Intent to NMU

Tags 379813 + pending Thanks I have prepared a package that fixes this bug, and I intend to upload it as an NMU. The changes I've made are basically what Arjan has indicated, only with a different changelog entry. I'm attaching the full interdiff output for the NMU that I'm going to do. -- Lov

Processed: setting package to cdbs, tagging 380499

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > package cdbs Ignoring bugs not assigned to: cdbs > tags 380499 + pending Bug#380499: cdbs 0.4.45 simple-patchsys.mk doesn't properly distinguish patches There were no tags set. Tags

Processed: Intent to NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Tags 379152 +pending Bug#379152: stardict - FTBFS: error: no matching function for call to 'min(long unsigned int, guint32&)' Tags were: fixed patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Processed: Intent to NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Tags 379492 +pending Bug#379492: klog: FTBFS: autoconf 2.60 is not supported Tags were: patch Bug#379815: FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60 Tags added: pending > Tags 379815 +pending Bug#379815: FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60 Tags were: pe

Processed: retitle 381185 to RM: amap -- RoM; non-free

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > retitle 381185 RM: amap -- RoM; non-free Bug#381185: ftp.debian.org: Please remove amap from unstable since it is not free Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing h

Bug#378571: Intent to NMU

tags 378571 +pending Thanks I have prepared a package that applies the patch Martin sent, and I'm going to upload it. This is a very simple fix, and hopefully it will make everyone happy even if lintian complains that it's a non-standard dir permission. I'm attaching the full output of interdiff

Bug#379152: Intent to NMU

Tags 379152 +pending thanks I have prepared a new package for stardict, that includes Mike's patch. I also needed to include the LIBTOOL_IS_A_FOOL patch because eventhough autogen.sh was relibtoolizing with the latest Debian version of libtool, it still made a mess with rpath (pointing to /usr/li

Bug#381127: marked as done (stunnel4: tries to chown /var/lib/stunnel4/stunnel.log)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 12:53:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#381127: fixed in stunnel4 2:4.150-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#379492: Intent to NMU

Tags 379492 +pending Tags 379815 +pending Thanks I have prepared a package to upload with the suggested changes, but I'm currently unable to build klog, due to the KDE transition. I'm going to retry the build after today's dinstall. I'm attaching the full interdiff output for the package. As yo

Processed: Intent to NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 378571 +pending Bug#378571: courier-authdaemon: socket directory should have 750 permissions Tags were: fixed patch security Tags added: pending > Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sys

Bug#381204: GnuPG security hole in memory allocation

Package: gnupg Version: 1.4.3-2 Severity: grave Tags: security GnuPG 1.4.5 corrects some potential security problems in memory allocation. From http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2006q3/000229.html : * Fixed 2 more possible memory allocation attacks. They are similar to t

Processed: Re: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#381153: slapd: Upgrade to 2.3.24-2 breaks system when using libnss-ldap

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 380658 381153 Bug#380658: slapd: Package upgrade hangs Bug#381153: slapd: Upgrade to 2.3.24-2 breaks system when using libnss-ldap Bug#379728: slapd: upgrade to 2.3.24-2 hangs Bug#380620: slapd hangs on upgrade Forcibly Merged 379728 380620 3

Bug#381007: mdadm: Fails to upgrade with devfsd-style udev

On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 03:47:07PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Could you please run > > rm /dev/md? > update-initramfs -t -u > > and confirm that this fixes it? It does indeed. > If it does, then this is an upstream problem I need to work around! Or get upstream to fix it. ;-) > Any

Processed: Fixed in NMU of stardict 2.4.7-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 379152 + fixed Bug#379152: stardict - FTBFS: error: no matching function for call to 'min(long unsigned int, guint32&)' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trac

Processed: Fixed in NMU of courier-authlib 0.58-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 378571 + fixed Bug#378571: courier-authdaemon: socket directory should have 750 permissions Tags were: patch security Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administ

Bug#381138: FTBFS: error: ODBC header files and/or libraries not found

On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 03:49:26PM +0200, Roberto Pariset wrote: > Package: sqliteodbc > Version: 0.69-1 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > sqliteodbc_0.69-1 FTBFS with the following error: > > checking for sqlite_trace in -lsqlite... yes > checking for SQLite3 header and library... no > configure: w

Bug#381185: ftp.debian.org: Please remove amap from unstable since it is not free

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: serious Please see bug #346313 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-ck1 Locale: LANG

Processed: severity of 378815 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > severity 378815 serious Bug#378815: lphoto: Missing KDE dep Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Bug#380532: marked as done (FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:02:28 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380532: fixed in kboincspy 0.9.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#357057: status report

These bug will be closed certainly by the time lilypond 2.8 hits the archive; work is proceeding on that effort. The bugs are RC bugs, but do not seem to be the sort that pose any actual inconvenience to anyone, so I don't intend to fix them in lilypond 2.6. However, if this poses some inconveni

Bug#381153: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#381153: slapd: Upgrade to 2.3.24-2 breaks system when using libnss-ldap

forcemerge 380658 381153 thanks On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 04:15:39PM +0100, Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote: > Package: slapd > Version: 2.3.24-2 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > I have users stored in LDAP, using libnss-ldap and libpam-ldap. The > upgrade process to install

Bug#380364: marked as done (cheesetracker: CVE-2006-3814: arbitrary code execution)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:02:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380364: fixed in cheesetracker 0.9.9-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#381153: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#381153: slapd: Upgrade to 2.3.24-2 breaks system when using libnss-ldap

severity 381153 important merge 381153 380658 thanks On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:15:39 +0100 Paul LeoNerd Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: slapd > Version: 2.3.24-2 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > > I have users stored in LDAP, using libnss-ldap and libpam-l

Bug#381167: postfix: preinst makes use of start-stop-daemon instead of invoke-rc.d

Package: postfix Version: 2.3.2-1 Severity: serious Hi, In the preinst you have: if [ ! start-stop-daemon -K -q -o \ --pidfile /var/spool/postfix/pid/master.pid \ --exec /usr/lib/postfix/master 2>/dev/null ]; then :; fi Please make use of invoke-rc.d to do

Bug#381074: Acknowledgement (python2.4 isn't as a dependence)

Gleidson Echeli Leopoldo wrote: > I installed the python2.4 package and now, the error is other: > > $ gajim > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "gajim.py", line 36, in ? > import message_control > File "/usr/share/gajim/src/message_control.py", line 14, in ? > import gtk > Imp

Bug#381136: FTBFS: error: You need to install libbfd.a from binutils.

Package: avarice Version: 2.4-1 Severity: serious Hi, avarice_2.4-1 FTBFS with the following error: checking for socket... yes checking for library containing inet_aton... none required checking for iconv_open in -liconv... no checking for libiconv_open in -liconv... no checking for dcgettext in

Bug#373785: Anything new?

On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:16:48PM +0100, Baruch Even wrote: > Hi, > > Anything new about this bug? While trying to update zpkg to the new python policy, I noticed that when zope3 moved to python2.4 broke zpkg. Very badly and quite a while ago. Nobody filed a bug == nobody cares. So, if I get th

Bug#380663: [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#380663: Supplemental: almost immediate failure

Hi, At Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:52:24 -0400, Carl Fink wrote: > Needing to print a document today, I purged and reinstalled cupsys again. I > was able to print two copies of my one three-page document. Now when I try > to print a different, one-page document cupsd exits silently. I can restart > it a

Bug#381007: mdadm: Fails to upgrade with devfsd-style udev

On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:57:22PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Can you please try (cut&paste into the shell should work): > > apt-get install -d mdadm=2.5.2-9 > dpkg --unpack /var/cache/apt/archives/mdadm_2.5.2-9_*.deb > wget -O /tmp/mdadm.config http://madduck.net/~madduck/scratch/mdadm

Bug#381138: FTBFS: error: ODBC header files and/or libraries not found

Package: sqliteodbc Version: 0.69-1 Severity: serious Hi, sqliteodbc_0.69-1 FTBFS with the following error: checking for sqlite_trace in -lsqlite... yes checking for SQLite3 header and library... no configure: warning: SQLite3 header files and/or library not found checking for sqlite3_column_tab

Bug#381007: mdadm: Fails to upgrade with devfsd-style udev

also sprach Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.02.1523 +0100]: > Here's the output. It seems something went wrong after all, even though > there's no error message. This doesn't sound like it's good: > I: mdadm: no RAID devices selected for initrd initialisation. > I: mdadm: not including RA

Bug#381007: mdadm: Fails to upgrade with devfsd-style udev

Can you please try (cut&paste into the shell should work): apt-get install -d mdadm=2.5.2-9 dpkg --unpack /var/cache/apt/archives/mdadm_2.5.2-9_*.deb wget -O /tmp/mdadm.config http://madduck.net/~madduck/scratch/mdadm.config echo -e '887ce8e8e8e5dd261216774847b6866fd3e2423f /tmp/mdadm.con

Bug#374685: Debian bug #374685: cdrecord and suid privs

Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is my understanding of the situation of cdrecord with Linux 2.6.x. > Please correct me if I am wrong. > >"cdrecord" will (perhaps with minor modifications) be able to write >CD's without root privileges for a user with access to rw t

Bug#380128: info: Incorrect (?) (unclear) copyright statement

Hi all texinfo gurus! Maybe this email got lost somewhere, so On Fre, 28 Jul 2006, preining wrote: > Hi Karl! > > We got notified that info and its man page refer to GPL without v2, > while the COPYING file refers to GPLv2. > > On Don, 27 Jul 2006, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > The file /usr

Bug#381153: slapd: Upgrade to 2.3.24-2 breaks system when using libnss-ldap

Package: slapd Version: 2.3.24-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system I have users stored in LDAP, using libnss-ldap and libpam-ldap. The upgrade process to install 2.3.24-2 tries to stop slapd, then run "useradd" to create the required user to run as, then start it again. Bec

Bug#378301: juman: FTBFS: Segmentation fault during makepat

On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:06:12PM +0900, TSUCHIYA Masatoshi wrote: > >> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 19:50:04 +0900 > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (TSUCHIYA Masatoshi) said as follows: > > >And, please check the value of "inkey" variable when your problem > >occurs? > > I am sorry that I have just missed your fi

Bug#381127: stunnel4: tries to chown /var/lib/stunnel4/stunnel.log

Package: stunnel4 Version: 2:4.150-4 Severity: grave this causes the postinst to fail: if ! test -f /var/log/stunnel4/stunnel.log; then touch /var/log/stunnel4/stunnel.log $CHOWN -R $USER:$USER /var/lib/stunnel4/stunnel.log fi that chown should be /var/log/ not /var/lib Cheers, Adrian

Bug#381097: maildrop_2.0.2-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: pcre.h not found

On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 09:00:37AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Package: maildrop > Version: 2.0.2-1 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > your package failed to build from source, probably due to missing > build-dependencies. Oh, yes, libpcre3-dev, silly me. But, hence experimental. If you can b

Bug#378005: marked as done (libcairo 1.2.0 text disappears after first word if anti-aliasing disabled)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:53:44 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#378005: fixed in libcairo 1.2.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#376714: marked as done (libcairo 1.2.0 text disappears after first word if anti-aliasing disabled)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:53:44 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#378005: fixed in libcairo 1.2.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#381007: mdadm: Fails to upgrade with devfsd-style udev

Does /dev/md_d0 exist on your system, and does mdadm --detail /dev/md_d0 || echo ERROR return something useful, or does it result in ERROR? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer and

Bug#381007: mdadm: Fails to upgrade with devfsd-style udev

also sprach Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.02.1116 +0100]: > Some testing shows that I did get further, it is now actually > running the postinst (and failing that) instead of the > preconfigure. could you run sed -i -e '1s,$,x,' /var/lib/dpkg/info/mdadm.postinst and rerun dpkg-reconf

Bug#381007: mdadm: Fails to upgrade with devfsd-style udev

also sprach Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.02.1206 +0100]: > On my system it shouldn't, but it seems fragile to need a name > that you recognised when the script was written for things to work > (assuming that that isn't really needed). Yes, I am working on that right now. -- Please do

Bug#380026: marked as done (FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:50:38 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380026: fixed in kbfx 0.4.9.1+20060611cvs-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#381007: mdadm: Fails to upgrade with devfsd-style udev

also sprach Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.02.1051 +0100]: > > The loop should stay endless, IMHO, to ensure that the user passes > > a proper device string (or 'all' or 'none'). > > The loop being endless if the user actually gets to answer the quesion is > fine. But my debconf priority

Bug#381007: mdadm: Fails to upgrade with devfsd-style udev

On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:44:08AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.02.1051 +0100]: > > > The loop should stay endless, IMHO, to ensure that the user passes > > > a proper device string (or 'all' or 'none'). > > > > The loop being endless if the u

Bug#378301: juman: FTBFS: Segmentation fault during makepat

>> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 19:50:04 +0900 >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (TSUCHIYA Masatoshi) said as follows: >And, please check the value of "inkey" variable when your problem >occurs? I am sorry that I have just missed your first report include the above information. It says "/build/buildd/juman-5.1/build-

Bug#380700: marked as done (FTBFS: cast from 'char*' to 'int' loses precision)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:58:40 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380700: fixed in raidutils 0.0.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#372796: marked as done (ImportError: No module named eric3config)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:47:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372796: fixed in aptitude 0.4.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#378301: juman: FTBFS: Segmentation fault during makepat

On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:00:51PM +0900, TSUCHIYA Masatoshi wrote: > You mean pure i386? or i386 family like pentium? > And more, what version of building tools including gcc and binutils? No, I mean arch is i386. Real processor is Celeron (Pentium 4). > Woops. You should add "-g" build option

Bug#375383: marked as done (airport-utils: does not depend on a package which supplies an AWT implementation)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:47:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#375383: fixed in aptitude 0.4.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Processed: Fixed in NMU of python-mode 1:1.0-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 378699 + fixed Bug#378699: python-mode: postinst failure while compiling for xemacs21 There were no tags set. Bug#379208: python-mode: again problems with emacs-snapshot Bug#381005: emacs-snapshot-gtk: can't install Tags added: fixed > quit Stoppin

Bug#378301: juman: FTBFS: Segmentation fault during makepat

Hi, Thanks for your kind help. Your help makes myself understand what occurs in your environment, but, still I cannot understand why your problem occurs. >> On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:28:03 +0200 >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julien Danjou) said as follows: >(gdb) bt >#0 0xb7e5cfe6 in fileno_unlocked () fr

Bug#302597: marked as done (raidutils: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'char*' to 'int' loses precision)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:58:40 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302597: fixed in raidutils 0.0.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#381122: Bashism in /etc/cron.daily/apticron

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: apticron Version: 1.1.16 Severity: serious /etc/cron.daily/apticron: /etc/cron.daily/apticron: 6: let: not found sleep: missing operand Try `sleep --help' for more information. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT

Processed: severity of 365230 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > severity 365230 serious Bug#365230: mcvs - FTBFS: There is no package with name "FFI" Bug#230947: There is no package with name "FFI" for hppa Bug#270876: clisp: FFI not available on

Bug#381007: mdadm: Fails to upgrade with devfsd-style udev

On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:51:51AM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 04:19:34PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > > also sprach Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.01.1322 +0100]: > > > This, plus the while true, which perhaps should be > > > while [ $ERROR -eq 0 ], leads to the

Bug#381007: mdadm: Fails to upgrade with devfsd-style udev

On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 04:19:34PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.01.1322 +0100]: > > This, plus the while true, which perhaps should be > > while [ $ERROR -eq 0 ], leads to the endless loop. > > The loop should stay endless, IMHO, to ensure tha

Bug#301957: this bug/#301957; tinysnmp-tools: community string mismatch

Justin Pryzby wrote: Does the tool work if you install snmpd? Does a strace indicate that it is connecting to localhost? Don't work after installation snmpd. Strace attached. -- Olleg Samoylov 13373 execve("/usr/bin/tinysnmpget", ["tinysnmpget", "localhost", "public", "1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0"], [/

Bug#380026: Patch to fix FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60

Op wo, 02-08-2006 te 11:40 +0200, schreef Fathi Boudra: > hi, > > thks for the patch, but it's too late ;) i have uploaded > kbfx_0.4.9.1+20060611cvs-1 around 1 hour ago :) No problem :) The patch was quite trivial anyway. Greetings Arjan signature.asc Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaa

Bug#379813: Patch to fix FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60

Hi, I have prepared a (quite trivial) patch which makes the package build with autoconf 2.60 (attached below). Greetings Arjan Oosting diff -u kxmleditor-1.1.4/debian/changelog kxmleditor-1.1.4/debian/changelog --- kxmleditor-1.1.4/debian/changelog +++ kxmleditor-1.1.4/debian/changelog @@ -1,3

Bug#346933: marked as done (openmotif: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:26:54 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in openmotif 2.2.3-1.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo

Bug#347166: marked as done (libmotif-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:26:54 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in openmotif 2.2.3-1.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo

Bug#346665: marked as done (asmounter: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:22:03 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in asmounter 0.3-3.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#355979: marked as done (FTBFS: error: X11/xpm.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:32:44 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in gnome-iconedit 1.2.0-9.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

  1   2   >