Bug#380054: CVE-2006-2898: Denial of service in Asterisk

Package: asterisk Version: 1.2.10.dfsg-1 Severity: grave Tags: security patch A problem has been discovered in the IAX2 channel driver of Asterisk, an Open Source Private Branch Exchange and telephony toolkit, which may allow a remote to cause au crash of the Asterisk server. The patch used for s

Processed: Fixed in upload of libxfont 1:1.2.0-1 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 362920 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#362920: needs truetype font support to be switched on Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 364854 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#364854: libxfont: new upstream version (xorg 7.1 RC1) Tags were: pa

Processed: Submitting patch to fix FTBFS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package libopentoken-dev Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libopentoken-dev > tags 378715 + patch Bug#378715: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on gnat (< 3.16) There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#378715: Submitting patch to fix FTBFS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 package libopentoken-dev tags 378715 + patch thanks Hi, Attached, you will find a patch against debian/control, I could build the package and install it after that change. Kind regards, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) "Debian.

Bug#337495: friendsd buffer overflow

This is fixed in the CVS Version. So the next release candidate 2.10pre3 will have the fix included. -- Jörg (Germany, Munich) http://www.ostertag.name/ TeamSpeak2: ts2.ostertag.name, user: tweety, Channel: "GPS Drive"

Bug#378721: vim-lesstif: gvim always crashes during startup

On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 12:25:04PM -0400, James Vega wrote: > > > This was reported a week or so ago on the vim-dev mailing list, > > > too. It seems that using lesstiff-dev/lesstiff1 also works well. > > > > I have tried the lesstiff-dev/lesstiff1 without success. Can't build vim > > with it...

Bug#379986: marked as done (conflicts with current xfce)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:14:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#379986: conflicts with current xfce has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#378712: Submitting patch to fix FTBFS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 package zope-ttwtype tags 378712 + patch thanks Hi, Attached you will find a patch against debian/control, with this small fix I could build the package. Kind regards, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) "Debian. Freedom to code.

Bug#376863: Hmmm, ok, sorry, patch already there

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm a little bit tired, didn't saw Tolimar (Alexander Schmehl) patch. Sorry about that. :-( Kind regards, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) "Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux

Processed: Submitting patch to fix FTBFS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package zope-ttwtype Ignoring bugs not assigned to: zope-ttwtype > tags 378712 + patch Bug#378712: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on zope-cmf | zope-cmf1.4 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: notfound 379986 in 4.3.90.2-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > notfound 379986 4.3.90.2-1 Bug#379986: conflicts with current xfce Bug marked as not found in version 4.3.90.2-1. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Bug#380052: search-citeseer: format change... it doesn't work

Package: search-citeseer Version: 0.2.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable patch attached -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/s

Processed: Submitting patch to fix FTBFS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > pacakge brltty Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > tags 376863 + patch Bug#376863: FTBFS: libbluetooth1-dev is not available anymore Tags were: patch Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#376863: Submitting patch to fix FTBFS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 pacakge brltty tags 376863 + patch thanks Hi, Attach you will find a patch for control file, after change that I could build the package with success. Kind regards, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) "Debian. Freedom to code. Co

Bug#380035: marked as done (no libggi2.so installed, only a broken link)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:02:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380035: fixed in libggi 1:2.2.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#380028: marked as done (mkvmlinuz requires -fno-stack-protector with gcc-4.1)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 06:26:46 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380028: mkvmlinuz requires -fno-stack-protector with gcc-4.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#362641: Making xorg-server FTBFS RC

On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 06:08:41 +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: > Xorg provides a dummy video driver and a void input driver, so yes, > building Xorg is perfectly valid. > Oops, I had forgotten that... Then the #ifdef's in hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_video.c probably need to add a test for __s390

Bug#199280: marked as done (gkrellongrun: FTBFS: Cannot find gkrellm binary)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 05:58:00 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#199280: fixed in gkrellongrun 0.6.1-2.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#189724: marked as done (gkrellongrun: FTBFS: cannot find gkrellm/gkrellm.h)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Jul 2006 05:56:01 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#189724: fixed in gkrellongrun 0.6.1-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#362641: Making xorg-server FTBFS RC

On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 06:08:41AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: > Xorg provides a dummy video driver and a void input driver, so yes, > building Xorg is perfectly valid. I have an updated version of the 06 patch, which fixes this part for s390. But it fails later, as the ioport util wants to use in*

Bug#362641: Making xorg-server FTBFS RC

On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 03:56:00AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Jul 8, 2006 at 21:42:11 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > I'm raising the severity of this bug to critical because, although > > xorg-server was never compiled in s390 before (thus bug was filed with > > severity: important),

Bug#380044: Installable because of dependency on libc6 >= 2.4-1

Package: vbetool Version: 0.7-1 Severity: serious vbetool seems to have been built against the wrong version of libc6. It's dependencies specify libc6 >= 2.4-1, which can't be satisfied by the version of libc6 in unstable. Cheers, Michael -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable

Bug#364374: Progress on this bug

Let me know what the status is on this bug, and when you're ready to do an upload (or if you already have another sponsor lined up.) Don Armstrong -- Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did, we'd be running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and listening to repetitive musi

Bug#362641: Making xorg-server FTBFS RC

On Sat, Jul 8, 2006 at 21:42:11 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > Hi, > > I'm raising the severity of this bug to critical because, although > xorg-server was never compiled in s390 before (thus bug was filed with > severity: important), it provides binary packages like xvfb that used to > be availa

Bug#380035: no libggi2.so installed, only a broken link

Package: libggi2 Version: 1:2.2.1-1 Severity: grave Package is broken: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib$ ls -la libggi.so.2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2006-07-27 03:12 libggi.so.2 -> libggi.so.2.0.2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib$ ls -la libggi.so.2.0.2 ls: libggi.so.2.0.2: No such file or directory thank

Bug#378303: linux-kernel-headers: bitmap.h: 'BITS_PER_LONG' undeclared

reassign 378303 ltp quit > > from /usr/include/asm/processor.h:8, > > from /usr/include/asm-i486/atomic.h:6, > > from /usr/include/asm/atomic.h:8, > > from swapon02.c:87: ltp should be upgraded to ltp-full-20060717, since it no l

Processed: Re: Bug#378303: linux-kernel-headers: bitmap.h: 'BITS_PER_LONG' undeclared

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 378303 ltp Bug#378303: linux-kernel-headers: bitmap.h: 'BITS_PER_LONG' undeclared Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-headers' to `ltp'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sys

Bug#378299: linux-kernel-headers: videodev.h:204: error: 'VIDEO_MAX_FRAME' was not declared in this scope

reassign 378299 camstream quit > > /usr/include/linux/videodev.h:204: error: 'VIDEO_MAX_FRAME' was not > > declared in this scope > > make[3]: *** [VideoSettingsDlg.moc.o] Error 1 camstream is using a hack to prevent videodev2.h from being included. If videodev.h were included, it would define V

Bug#380031: marked as done (libggi2: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/ggi/input/x.so', which is also in package libgii0-target-x)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:17:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380031: fixed in libgii 1:1.0.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Processed: Re: Bug#378299: linux-kernel-headers: videodev.h:204: error: 'VIDEO_MAX_FRAME' was not declared in this scope

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 378299 camstream Bug#378299: linux-kernel-headers: videodev.h:204: error: 'VIDEO_MAX_FRAME' was not declared in this scope Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-headers' to `camstream'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: Re: Bug#380031: libggi2: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/ggi/input/x.so', which is also in package libgii0-target-x

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 380031 libgii1-target-x Bug#380031: libggi2: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/ggi/input/x.so', which is also in package libgii0-target-x Bug reassigned from package `libggi2' to `libgii1-target-x'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please cont

Bug#379720: vdr-plugin-bitstreamout: FTBFS: error: 'fls' was not declared in this scope

$ gcc -x c -c -o test.o /usr/include/asm/bitops.h $ gcc -x c++ -c -o test.o /usr/include/asm/bitops.h /usr/include/asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h: In function 'int fls64(__u64)': /usr/include/asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h:10: error: 'fls' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/asm-generic/bitops/fls

Bug#379982: Misuse of alternatives

Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quoted from policy: > Two different packages must not install programs with different > functionality but with the same filenames. (The case of two programs > having the same functionality but different implementations is handled via > "alternatives" or [...] I t

Bug#379662: postinst: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'byte_compile'

Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 01:34:43AM +0200, Le Boulanger Yann wrote: >> Do you have python2.4 installed ? Gajim should depend on it (it's a >> problem) but wil that fix your bug ? > No, I have no python2.4 installed. I am installing it now and... > well, it looks somewhat

Processed: Redundant bug reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 379987 important Bug#379987: Can not start squid after recent update (July 26,2006) Severity set to `important' from `grave' > severity 379873 important Bug#379873: no transparent proxy support in newest squid package Severity set to `importan

Bug#376777: marked as done (apt-utils: apt-ftparchive fails to generate Contents files)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:17:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#376777: fixed in apt 0.6.45 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#380028: mkvmlinuz requires -fno-stack-protector with gcc-4.1

Subject: mkvmlinuz requires -fno-stack-protector with gcc-4.1 Package: mkvmlinuz Version: 23ubuntu1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system mkvmlinuz requires0 to be compiled with the -fno-stack-protector flags with gcc-4.1 since it seems gcc-4.1 enables -fstack-protector by defa

Bug#380031: libggi2: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/ggi/input/x.so', which is also in package libgii0-target-x

Package: libggi2 Version: 1:2.0.5-1.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable # apt-get install libggi2 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libgii1 libgii1-target-x Suggested packages: libggi-target-emu

Bug#378296: xracer: FTBFS: GL library was not found

tag 378296 patch thanks On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 08:31:35AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > Package: xracer > Version: 0.96.9-12 [...] > There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > > checking for glNewList in -lGL... no > > checking for glNewList in -lMesaGL... no > > configure: error: GL

Processed: Re: xracer: FTBFS: GL library was not found

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 378296 patch Bug#378296: xracer: FTBFS: GL library was not found There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debia

Bug#378183: marked as done (apt: All SHA256 hashes generated/used by APT are wrong)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:17:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#378183: fixed in apt 0.6.45 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#379377: marked as done (ivtv-source: missing depends on dpatch)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:02:23 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#379377: fixed in ivtv 0.6.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#380024: needs to Replaces: lyx-common

Package: lyx Version: 1.4.1-2 Severity: serious Preparing to replace lyx 1.4.1-2 (using .../archives/lyx_1.4.2-1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement lyx ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/lyx_1.4.2-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/tex2lyx', which is also in p

Bug#379732: popularity-contest: Fails to upload using http

severity 379732 normal thanks [Richard Antony Burton] > Can no longer upload popcon result by http (which as the default > method probably means few other people are able to either). I added > the -d option to the uploader and ran it a few times (with several > different results): I am unable to

Processed: Re: Bug#379732: popularity-contest: Fails to upload using http

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 379732 normal Bug#379732: popularity-contest: Fails to upload using http Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrat

Bug#379662: postinst: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'byte_compile'

Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 01:34:43AM +0200, Le Boulanger Yann wrote: >> Do you have python2.4 installed ? Gajim should depend on it (it's a >> problem) but wil that fix your bug ? > No, I have no python2.4 installed. I am installing it now and... > well, it looks somewhat

Processed: Re: patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 353564 patch Bug#353564: mova does not work without less There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs d

Bug#379662: postinst: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'byte_compile'

On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 01:34:43AM +0200, Le Boulanger Yann wrote: > Do you have python2.4 installed ? Gajim should depend on it (it's a > problem) but wil that fix your bug ? No, I have no python2.4 installed. I am installing it now and... well, it looks somewhat better. The gajim has been configu

Bug#353564: patch

tag 353564 patch thanks Clint's patch works fine for me. Tagging +patch Cheers, Christian Aichinger signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#377985: marked as done (FTBFS: b-d cannot be fulfiled, gnat version too high)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:18:00 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#377985: fixed in adacgi 1.6-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#379557: marked as done (asis-doc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper, texinfo')

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:18:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#379557: fixed in asis-doc 2005-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#379930: marked as done (gaphor: not installable in sid)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:19:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#379930: fixed in gaphor 0.8.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#369052: marked as done (binutils: ld doesn't search libraries in (/usr)/lib32 on amd64)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:18:46 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#369052: fixed in binutils 2.17-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#370114: marked as done (FTBFS with new xfce4-panel pending new upstream version)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:19:56 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#370114: fixed in xfce4-cpufreq-plugin 0.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#374209: python-parted NMU.

On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 03:58:01PM +, Gustavo Franco wrote: > python-parted (0.11.3) unstable; urgency=low > > * Non-maintainer upload. > * debian/control: >- Build-Depends on libparted1.7. (Closes: #374209) > * Merge new parted API patch by Colin Watson. (Closes: #284081, #377262) >

Bug#378962: konqueror: CVE-2006-3672: remote denial of service (crash)

Alec Berryman wrote: > CVE-2006-3672: "KDE Konqueror 3.5.1 and earlier allows remote attackers > to cause a denial of service (application crash) by calling the > replaceChild method on a DOM object, which triggers a null dereference, > as demonstrated by calling document.replaceChild with a 0 (zer

Processed: found 379390 in

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > found 379390 Bug#379390: libxmlsec1-gnutls: Dependency information incorrect. Links agains libgutls13, depends on libgnutls11 Bug reopened. > End of message, stopping processing her

Bug#377986: marked as done (FTBFS: b-d cannot be fulfiled, gnat version too high)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:18:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#377986: fixed in adasockets 1.8.4.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#380014: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libyaz

Package: tellico Severity: serious Version: 1.1.6-1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on libyaz which is not available in unstable anymore. You might want to update that dependency to libyaz2 (by changing the build-dep to libyaz2-dev for a start). Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http

Bug#357231: Dupe of #340590 ?

YL wrote: I think that this bug is a dupe of bug #340590 . Am I right or wrong ? I don't think you're right. #340590 was about an improper version of libcln and was fixed Fri, 25 Nov 2005. #357231 was about improper versio

Bug#380006: gal0.x: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on automake1.4

Package: gal0.x Version: 0.24-7 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log (on i386, with an up-to-date sid chroot): ... -> Installing flex libgnome-dev gnome-common gettext libxml-dev libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev libgnomeprint-dev libgnome-vfs-dev libglade-gnome0-dev debhelper intltool libgtkxm

Bug#379987: This is a feature, not a bug

I ran into the same problem a couple of days ago. Have a look at /usr/share/doc/squid/RELEASENOTES.html.gz (Lynx will view gzipped HTML, so I've just learned) The method of configuring acceleration has changed. The documentation hasn't been updated, and I consider that a bug. Here's my new con

Bug#379359: More information on installation failure

On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 08:11:53AM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > Em Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:50:04 +0200 > David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > > Still the same... > > Ok, I updated the package again, can you give it one more go? Same > location. This is with the extra print stat

Processed: found bug #376979

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 376979 0.8.5-1 Bug#376979: democracyplayer: Segmentation fault on start Bug marked as found in version 0.8.5-1. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Bug#377449: swapspace: still does fail to parse /proc/meminfo here

Hi! > [..] > I've just committed a patch to make the care a bit less extreme. Could > you test this? [..] Thank you very much for the patch. I am neither a developer nor a debian package maintainer, but I tried my luck with apt-get source, patch -p 0, apt-get -b source and dpkg -i. And now it ru

Bug#368804: Bug#375453: bugs 368804 and 375453 present in 0.4.9-2 in sarge?

Hi Stefan, Stefan Fritsch schrieb: > Just for the record, has anyone of you checked whether these bugs are > present in sarge? no, the invalid password option was introduced with LAM 0.5. Sarge has 0.4.9. Greetings Roland -- LDAP Account Manager http://lam.sourceforge.net signature.asc

Processed: Fixed in upload of apt 0.6.45exp1 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 296103 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#296103: APT 0.6 sometimes fails with gpgv Tags were: patch Bug#376227: Inappropriately suggests running apt-get update Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 368038 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#368038: INTL:vi Vie

Bug#378183: apt: All SHA256 hashes generated/used by APT are wrong

On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 04:01:46AM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote: > Package: apt > Version: 0.6.44.2 > Severity: critical > Tags: security patch > Justification: breaks the whole system Thanks for your bugreport and your patch. I applied the patch and I added a test in tests/hashes.cc for the sha256 cod

Processed: tagging 379930

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 379930 + confirmed pending Bug#379930: gaphor: not installable in sid There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#379987: Can not start squid after recent update (July 26,2006)

Package: squid Version: 2.6.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After Squid update on Etch I can not start the program any longer with the following settings in my config file: httpd_accel_host virtual httpd_accel_port 80 httpd_accel_with_proxy on httpd_accel_uses_host_hea

Bug#379986: conflicts with current xfce

Package: xfdesktop4 Version: 4.3.90.1-2 Severity: grave xfdesktop4 depends on libxfce4util2. Most other xfce stuff depends on libxfce4util4 which conflicts with libxfce4util2. So one has to choose... I guess xfdesktop4 just needs a recompile with the new lib. -- Robbe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#379988: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libyaz

Package: libnet-z3950-perl Severity: serious Version: 0.51-1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on libyaz which is not available in unstable anymore. You might want to update that dependency to libyaz2 (build depending on libyaz2-dev). Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.deb

Bug#363061: seminar is not DFSG-free, needs relicensing

Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 22.07.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> Hilmar Preuße <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On 21.07.06 Frank K?ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hi, > >> >> - non-commercial >> >> >> >> - renamed copies may not be distributed at all, only "f

Processed: Re: Bug#379837: postinst does not respect existence of file-rc (using rm -f /etc/rc0.d/K88pcmciautils)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 379837 normal Bug#379837: postinst does not respect existence of file-rc (using rm -f /etc/rc0.d/K88pcmciautils) Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Processed: pending upload

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 375601 pending Bug#375601: ltsp-server: ltsp-build-client using gettext without load gettext.sh There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system ad

Bug#263783: marked as done (Do not include it on testing)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:39:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line debpartial-mirror: allow to propegate to testing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#379982: Misuse of alternatives

Package: git Version: 4.3.20-8 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.1 10.1 Binaries Two different packages must not install programs with different functionality but with the same filenames. (The case of two programs having the same functionality but different implementations is handled via

Bug#379837: postinst does not respect existence of file-rc (using rm -f /etc/rc0.d/K88pcmciautils)

severity 379837 normal thanks On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:58:27PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > Package: pcmciautils > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 9.3.1 > > > # cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/pcmciautils.postinst > [...] > # Remove shutdown and reboot links; >

Bug#363061: seminar is not DFSG-free, needs relicensing

On 22.07.06 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hilmar Preuße <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 21.07.06 Frank K?ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, > >> - non-commercial > >> > >> - renamed copies may not be distributed at all, only "fragments", > >> whatever that is. > >> > > There is

Bug#375601: pending upload

tag 375601 pending thanks this is fixed in our bzr branch, and should be fixed with the next upload. live well, vagrant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#376863: brltty: needs NMU

Hi, Rudy Godoy, le Wed 26 Jul 2006 07:56:06 -0500, a écrit : > Hi, I think maybe it's better to depend on the generic libbluetooth-dev, so > it'll avoid the same problem in the future, provide that the library package > still provides it. It seems to. Samuel

Bug#379479: fixing patch

tags 379479 + patch thanks Hi, the attached patch adds r-cran-xml as build-dep and so let it build fine (tested in a pbuilder). Please apply it. Cheers, Luca -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno : :' : The Universal O.S.| luca.br(AT)uno.it `. `'` | GPG

Processed: fixing patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 379479 + patch Bug#379479: statdataml: FTBFS: Error: package 'XML' could not be loaded There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Bug#376777: apt-utils: apt-ftparchive fails to generate Contents files

On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 07:59:45PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:31:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > package apt-utils > > tag 376777 - help > > tag 376777 + patch > > thanks > > > > I'm pretty sure this bug is simply due to misuse of auto_ptr in writer.cc > > Okay,

Processed: tagging 369860, found 369860 in 0.16.1-3.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > tags 369860 - fixed Bug#369860: calls gconftool-2 on old schemas file Tags were: fixed patch Tags removed: fixed > found 369860 0.16.1-3.1 Bug#369860: calls gconftool-2 on old schema

Bug#369860: NMU diff

tag 369860 - fixed found 369860 0.16.1-3.1 thanks Le samedi 10 juin 2006 à 14:47 +0200, Clément Stenac a écrit : > Hello, > > Please find attached the NMU diff > > Regards, Looking at it (yes, very late), I don't think it fixes the problem at all. The schemas should be *removed* from /etc, not

Bug#379624: closed by Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#379624: fixed in smarteiffel 1.1-10)

Roberto Pariset wrote: > Same issue, you can check: ok. consider amd64 as dropped now as I don't have one myself, and pergolesi is locked. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/

Bug#379202: half-fixed

hi, I fixed the "afile missing" FTBFS with a simple patch (attached) like: ** -afile=afile +afile=bglafile ** to etc/bigloo/configure, but then it fail with other errors which i can't understand: ** touch configure-stamp dh_testdir # Add here commands to compile the packa

Bug#379177: marked as done (zope-plonearticle: Site error when adding or editing)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Jul 2006 07:18:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#379177: fixed in zope-plonearticle 1:3.2.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#379648: csound: There are some files with a license not DFSG compatible

close 379648 stop On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 at 19:37 +0200, Roberto Gordo Saez wrote: > Files are not there, so please, consider removing the notice from > copyright file. It does remain another strange thing, though. Now, > paying more attention to the output of grep, I see that scansyn and > scansynx

Bug#284770: Bug #284770: dbmail: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment

I dont know. José claims he has uploaded packages six weeks ago, but there's nothing to be found online. I've checked packages.qa.d.o and bugs.d.o... But the ITP hasn't been closed, so I suppose it never made it. Also, the dbmail packages depend on libsieve >=2.1.12, which was only released last w

Processed: setting package to zope-plonearticle, tagging 379177

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > package zope-plonearticle Ignoring bugs not assigned to: zope-plonearticle > tags 379177 + pending Bug#379177: zope-plonearticle: Site error when adding or editing Tags were: pending

Processed: setting package to zope-plonearticle, tagging 379177

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > package zope-plonearticle Ignoring bugs not assigned to: zope-plonearticle > tags 379177 + pending Bug#379177: zope-plonearticle: Site error when adding or editing There were no tags

Bug#357231: Dupe of #340590 ?

I think that this bug is a dupe of bug #340590 . Am I right or wrong ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#379266: fixing FTBFS

tags 379266 + patch thanks Hi, the FTBFS can be avoided just relaxing the build-dep (libxclass0-dev << 0.9.0). I really think it can be avoided, as it compile and build even with newer libraries. So I've removed it, and the build goes fine. Attached is the patch to fix this. Cheers, Luca -- .

Processed: fixing FTBFS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 379266 + patch Bug#379266: FTBFS: needs an update for new libxclass0-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrat

Processed: diff for 0.9.12-4.4 NMU

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 379800 patch Bug#379800: silc-toolkit: libsilc.so and libsilcclient.so should be in the -dev package There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sys

Processed: Re: Bug#379624 closed by Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#379624: fixed in smarteiffel 1.1-10)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 379624 Bug#379624: FTBFS: `debian/smarteiffel/usr/lib/smarteiffel/bin/compile': No such file or directory 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originat

Bug#379624: closed by Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#379624: fixed in smarteiffel 1.1-10)

reopen 379624 thanks Same issue, you can check: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=smarteiffel&ver=1.1-10&arch=amd64&stamp=1153913092&file=log&as=raw Roberto Debian Bug Tracking System ha scritto: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #379624: FTBFS: `debian/smarteif

Bug#379585: Bug#379441: [Pkg-kde-extras] how to continue: digikam 0.9-beta1 in unstable instead of experimental

> Le mer 26 juillet 2006 12:17, Mark Purcell a écrit : [...] > you will need an epoch, because people will have the 0.9 version > installed. your fight is over, you lost already. let it go, shit > happens, epoch is indeed designed for such situations. > > so it's your epoch-able problem number 1,

  1   2   >