Your message dated Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:53:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
The bug #377259 on libcairo2-dev explain why this problem occurs. Since
libcairo2-dev is corrected the package gcolor2 must build without problems.
-- Carlos C Soto :: eclipxe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:02:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377536: fixed in namazu2 2.0.16-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
2006/7/11, Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The other package which I know of (which I was searching for in Debian)
is JavaSVN. (snip)
See also http://bugs.debian.org/374256.
Seo Sanghyeon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
# This is actually a bad bug to be reopening, there's two bugs mixed in
# together; the second reporter confused the symptoms.
# However, Matt and Bob are already looking at this bug, so there's some
# benefit.
reopen 325650
reassign 325650 ppp
thanks
Looks like a bug in ppp's postinst to me:
O
> Well, the mailbox is not valid. The reason appears to be that antispam.rc
> has truncated the mailbox in an invalid way. Namely, the multipart
> boundaries have been ignored, so that the ending for:
>
> =_NextPart_000_0008_01C684B1.30F8FE30
>
> Is no longer there.
Ah yes, good point. ;)
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # This is actually a bad bug to be reopening, there's two bugs mixed in
> # together; the second reporter confused the symptoms.
> # However, Matt and Bob are already looking at this bug, so there's some
> # benefit.
> reopen 325650
Bug#325650: pbuilder
> Yes, I wonder about that too. The jar file really is named svn-javahl,
> for historical reasons: there was once a second effort (now dead, I
> believe) to produce java bindings which were not "high-level".
>
> There is also an independent project out there, not affiliated with the
> Subversion
Package: phpmyadmin
Version: 4:2.8.1-1 4:2.6.2-3sarge1
Severity: serious
Tags: security patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
CVE-2006-3388: "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in phpMyAdmin
before 2.8.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or
HTML via the ta
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
There may be something to look for. I'll forward you an email that
describes a problem. I'm hoping someone can send me a sample mailbox.
Your hopes can be upheld ;)
Attached a sample mailbox, and debug output. It's my spam box (using
grepmail is nif
[Charles Fry]
> According to the current java policy, section 2.4:
>
>"Java libraries packages must be named libXXX[version]-java (without
>the brackets), where the version part is optional and should only
>contain the necessary part.
[...]
> In other words, if distributing the jar '
4/lib'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/squid3-3.0.PRE4'
> make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2
> ******
> Build finished at 2006071
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Change 323626 to serious as per reasoning below:
> severity 323626 serious
Bug#323626: apt-listbugs: unusable with new versioned BTS
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks control
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > There is no problem with distributing executables as the CDDL and the GPL
> > > do not require contradictory conditions...
> >
> > You must give the licensee a copy of GPL:
> >
> > 6. Each time you redi
# Change 323626 to serious as per reasoning below:
severity 323626 serious
thanks control
On 7/11/06, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On (11/07/06 08:19), Nigel Jones wrote:
> So, far I have been attempting to incorporate your patches into the
> code, but I have decided to start from scr
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:55:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of karrigell 2.2.5-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 376555 + fixed
Bug#376555: Uninstallable due to python transition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 02:30:21PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Kurt,
> Any chance I can get access to a box to play around with? This (and
> other problems) could pop up all over the place in the code, it'd be nice to
> be able to tackle them all at once instead of just uploading a new ve
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.5.8.0-1
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Ever since I migrated to the testing xorg packages, I've experienced very
frequent full system freezes. My xorg.conf will be posted below, but here is a
summary:
- Radeon 7000/VE (l
On 2006-07-10 Steven M. Christey wrote:
> Speaking of MySQL, the following item recently showed up in an FrSIRT
> advisory. In light of last week's vendor-sec discussions, let me know if
> there's too much guesswork going on here :)
I asked FrSIRT and MySQL if they have more information, and re
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:27:58 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321671: fixed in qcad 2.0.5.0-1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:27:58 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#288190: fixed in qcad 2.0.5.0-1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On amd64 (and other 64 bit arches?) we're seeing something simular:
bt_nice_size.c: In function 'bt_nice_size':
bt_nice_size.c:34: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long unsigned
int', but argument 4 has type 'u_int64_t'
bt_nice_size.c:34: warning: format '%llu' expects type 'long long uns
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 11:45:40AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: mod-bt
> Version: 0.0.18+p4.1178-2
> Severity: serious
(Previously send to the wrong bug report)
On amd64 (and other 64 bit arches?) we're seeing something simular:
bt_nice_size.c: In function 'bt_nice_size':
bt_nice_size.c
Package: libtexttools
Version: 2.0.3-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Libtexttools currently can't be build anymore since gnat has been
replaced by gnat-4.1.
Maybe it can also be supported on more arches now?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Julien Louis wrote:
> it's a known and documented bug in the README.Debian
> gere is part of the README.Debian regarding this bug:
That's a similar set of symptoms, but at this stage I don't think there
is enough informatino to link it directly to this bug report.
The reason for PHPwiki running
Package: libdnsres
Version: 0.1a-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
When building your package, we get the following:
x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./compat -I/usr/include
-Wall -O0 -g -DRESOLVSORT -c strlcpy.c
x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./compat -I/usr/include
Hi Alexis,
Alexis Huxley wrote:
> Hi, Just installed phpwiki. Followed the debconf screens. Visited the wiki
> page. It looked fine until I tried to edit the front page and then got:
>
> Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 8388608 bytes exhausted
> (tried to allocate 184320 bytes)
First an important note: you seem to like to manipulate things as you
intentionally shorten the Cc: list. Please don't do this anymore, it is
very bad practice
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is no problem with distributing executables as the CDDL and the GPL
> > do not
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:27:58 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347061: fixed in qcad 2.0.5.0-1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 377704 important
Bug#377704: madman: Madman crashes with 'tRuntimeError' when trying to do
anything!
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 377704 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#377704: madman: Madman crashes with 'tRuntimeError' when
On (11/07/06 08:19), Nigel Jones wrote:
> So, far I have been attempting to incorporate your patches into the
> code, but I have decided to start from scratch again, and try and kill
> the RC bug (334697), I have been in contact with Aba (Andreas) and we
> should have some fresh data files built (b
severity 377704 important
tags 377704 + moreinfo unreproducible
stop
Hello Jammin
On 2006-07-10 Jamm!n Wheeler wrote:
> Justification: renders package unusable
I downgrade a bit as it does work for me so must be a more specific problem.
> Someone's obviously been hard at work on madman, it's cha
Package: phpwiki
Version: 1.3.12p2-1
Followup-For: Bug #377692
Hi,
it's a known and documented bug in the README.Debian
gere is part of the README.Debian regarding this bug:
Known Bugs / Limitations
There appears to be a bug in PHPWiki's page loading functions that caus
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 336993 patch
Bug#336993: yaboot breaks booting with initramfs from xfs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
So, far I have been attempting to incorporate your patches into the
code, but I have decided to start from scratch again, and try and kill
the RC bug (334697), I have been in contact with Aba (Andreas) and we
should have some fresh data files built (based off the output of
bts2ldap), I'm sure it c
Speaking of MySQL, the following item recently showed up in an FrSIRT
advisory. In light of last week's vendor-sec discussions, let me know if
there's too much guesswork going on here :)
- Steve
==
Name: CVE-2006-3486
Status: Candidate
URL: ht
tag 336993 patch
thanks
I think that does not deserve any explainations (clue: unmaintained
code)...
Cheers,
--
((__,-"""-,__)) Aurélien GÉRÔME .---.
`--)~ ~(--` Free Software Developer / \
.-'( )`-. Unix Sys & Net Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]@./
`~~`@) (@`~~`
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 08:41:30AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> This package builds fine (haven't tested it) if I remove this patch:
> * debian/patches/999_ia64_atomic_ops_broken.patch
> + Added. Uses atomic builtins that gcc-4.0 know on ia64, instead
> of those
> for gcc-4.1. (Patch
Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: graphviz
Version: 2.8-2.1
Severity: serious
apparently, a build-conflict or a build-dependency is missing.
swig -c++ -lua -o gv_lua.cpp gv.i
if /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../lib/
Package: madman
Version: 0.94beta1.20060611-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Someone's obviously been hard at work on madman, it's changed quite
drastically at the last update (and not entirely for the better!).
However, it now has a serious crash problem.
It loads up m
Steven M. Christey wrote:
> > > >* Fixed DoS bug where any user could crash the server with
> > > > "SELECT date_format('%d%s', 1); (CVE-2006-).
> > > > The vulnerability was discovered by Maillefer Jean-David
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and filed as MySQL bug #20729.
> > > >
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 376516 patch
Bug#376516: caudium: FTBFS: no makefile found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
tags 376516 patch
thanks
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:06:09PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Package: caudium
> Version: 2:1.4.7-14
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> > make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/caudium-1.4.7/src/cmods/Mhash'
Hello
On 2006-07-05 Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> On Jul 05, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > Hello MySQL Security-Team
> >
> > Bug #20729 seems to be security relevant as it allowes crashing the
> > complete server by any unprivileged user by issuing a simple query.
>
> Agree.
Hm, the latest 4.1 is vul
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367618: fixed in expect 5.43.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368364: fixed in expect 5.43.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368580: fixed in expect 5.43.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368364: fixed in expect 5.43.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368580: fixed in expect 5.43.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: phpwiki
Version: 1.3.12p2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi, Just installed phpwiki. Followed the debconf screens. Visited the wiki
page. It looked fine until I tried to edit the front page and then got:
Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 8388608 byte
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367618: fixed in expect 5.43.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Monday 10 July 2006 20:31, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why do you say that ? This main problem is the distribution of the binary
> > (Executable Versions) form!
>
> There is no problem with distributing executables as the CDDL and the GPL
> do not requi
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375869: fixed in expect 5.43.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367618: fixed in expect 5.43.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368364: fixed in expect 5.43.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On 2006-07-04 Christian Hammers wrote:
> > > It's time for a new MySQL DSA :) On
> > > http://www.lathspell.de/linux/debian/mysql/sarge-4.1
> > > you find *sarge5.deb pacakges that fix the following two vulnerabilities:
> > >
> > >* Fixed Do
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368580: fixed in expect 5.43.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: graphviz
Version: 2.8-2.1
Severity: serious
apparently, a build-conflict or a build-dependency is missing.
swig -c++ -lua -o gv_lua.cpp gv.i
if /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile i486-linux-gnu-g++
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../lib/gvc -I../../lib/common
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 01:49:51AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 09:52:52PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > It seems that the created tar files are good, but during
> > extraction it doesn't always react the same.
The problem seems to be this code in
src/incremen.c:try_pur
As far as I know libghemical deeply changed, especially in the moldyn part
of the code. I have a patch to fix this particular issue but it's not
sufficient to make ghemical buildable again. You may want to try a cvs
snapshot...
--
Jérémie
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377474: fixed in sooperlooper 1.0.8c-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do you say that ? This main problem is the distribution of the binary
> (Executable Versions) form!
There is no problem with distributing executables as the CDDL and the GPL
do not require contradictory conditions...
> CDDL 1.0 says:
>
> 3.5. Dist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 375863 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#375863: gforge-web-apache: Forum posting broken
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tag 376155 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#376155: gforge-web-apache: missing db_stop i
On 2006-07-09 Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libgcrypt11
> Version: 1.2.2-2
> Severity: serious
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> > Automatic build of libgcrypt11_1.2.2-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
> [...]
> > /usr/bin/make check-TESTS
[...]
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> Aaron M. Ucko a écrit :
> > Indeed, though the problem's actually (as I suspected) a 64-bit
> > cleanliness issue, which the attached patch addresses; could you
> > please apply it when you get a chance?
>
> Hello Aaron,
>
> many thanks for this pat
gt; make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > make[3]: Leaving directory
> > `/build/buildd/mod-bt-0.0.18+p4.1178/src/libbttracker'
> > make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mod-bt-0.0.18+p4.1178/src'
> > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mod-bt-0.0.18+p4.1178'
> > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> > **
> > Build finished at 20060710-0513
> > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm really sorry,
this bug is fixed in the 2.0.5 which is available
on SourceForge since june the 15th; but it's right we are quite
busy so that release has not yet been announced on Freshmeat.
Patrick
Quoting "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 08:02:07PM +0200
Package: vzctl
Version: 3.0.10-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
/var/lib/dpkg/info/vzctl.postinst has an error that causes
installation to fail. 'invoke-rc.d package start' should be
'invoke-rc.d vz start'.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unsta
> * Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Before writing more, it seems to be iomportant to mention a common
>missconception:
>
> Both, the CDDL and the GPL are _source_ licenses.
Why do you say that ? This main problem is the distribution of the binary
(Executable Versions) form!
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 375863 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#375863: gforge-web-apache: Forum posting broken
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tags 376155 + fixed-in-experimenta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 376155 + experimental
Bug#376155: gforge-web-apache: missing db_stop in postinst
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:17:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376856: fixed in xmlrpc++ 0.7+cvs20040713-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
thanks, i'll prepare an upload later today to fix this and a build issue.
regards
stefan
Romain Chantereau wrote:
> Package: revelation
> Version: 0.4.7-3
> Followup-For: Bug #376149
>
> Hi !
>
> I made a quick patch in order to be able to read my passwords again.
>
> Cheers,
> Romain.
Hi,
great. http://packages.debian.org must be out of sync then. i'll prepare
an upload later today.
regards
stefan
Romain Chantereau wrote:
> Package: revelation
> Version: 0.4.7-2
> Followup-For: Bug #377362
>
>
> Hi !
>
> The applets.def can be found in the python-gnome2-desktop-dev
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:47:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373713: fixed in gpass 0.5.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:47:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340512: fixed in gpass 0.5.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:03:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377644: fixed in libipoddevice 0.4.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:03:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377580: fixed in python-docutils 0.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:47:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376154: fixed in gpass 0.5.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, George Danchev wrote:
...[deleted]
> > /**
> > * This software contains an ad hoc version of the 'Alleged RC4' algorithm,
> > * which was anonymously posted on sci.crypt news by cypherpunks on Sep
> > 1994. *
> > * My implementation is a complete rewritten of the one found in
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:47:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373713: fixed in gpass 0.5.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2006 07:47:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376154: fixed in gpass 0.5.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 03:55:11PM +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
>Building modules, stage 2.
>MODPOST
> *** Warning: "loop_compute_md5_iv_v3" is undefined!
> *** Warning: "loop_compute_sector_iv" is undefined!
> *** Warning: "md5_transform_CPUbyteorder_C" is undefined!
>
Package: revelation
Version: 0.4.7-3
Followup-For: Bug #376149
Hi !
I made a quick patch in order to be able to read my passwords again.
Cheers,
Romain.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers experimental
APT policy: (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'unstable'), (50
This package builds fine (haven't tested it) if I remove this patch:
* debian/patches/999_ia64_atomic_ops_broken.patch
+ Added. Uses atomic builtins that gcc-4.0 know on ia64, instead
of those
for gcc-4.1. (Patch by LaMont Jones from the ubuntu package)
lamont: can debian drop this
Package: loop-aes-source
Severity: serious
Version: 3.1d-3
hi,
loop-aes fails to build from source, i dont know if this problem is
related to kernel 2.6.17:
kida:/home/abi# m-a a-i -t loop-aes
Extracting the package tarball, /usr/src/loop-aes.tar.bz2, please
wait...
[..]
cd tmp-d-kbuild &&
Aaron M. Ucko a écrit :
> Indeed, though the problem's actually (as I suspected) a 64-bit
> cleanliness issue, which the attached patch addresses; could you
> please apply it when you get a chance?
Hello Aaron,
many thanks for this patch: it gives me a valuable hint for other issues
related to 64
Il giorno sab, 08/07/2006 alle 09.17 +0100, Neil McGovern ha scritto:
> Hi there,
>
> This has been given a Mitre ID CVE-2006-3458.
> Please mention this in changelogs.
>
> Cheers,
> Neil
Hi Neil,
thanks for your reports, but I have some hardware problems and I won't
be able to work on these
Package: revelation
Version: 0.4.7-2
Followup-For: Bug #377362
Hi !
The applets.def can be found in the python-gnome2-desktop-dev package, I was
then able to build revelation.
Cheers,
Romain.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'un
Package: xball
Version: 3.0-16
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
xball searches fpr rgb.txt in /usr/lib/X11/
This cannot work, cause rgb.txt is in /etc/X11/
Please compile another version with the correct path or add a symbolic
link.
Thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian R
tags 367435 + pending
thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
>> found 367435 1:4.1.0-1+ia32.libs.1.12+b1
> Bug#367435: lib32gcc1: Will not install: conflict
Hi, I agree with Mark in that it is a little unintuitive.
Specially since the man page for wx-config is in the wx-common package
but the executable is in another package and the wx-common package
doesnt reference the -dev package and nothing about it in the
documentation for the wx-common package.
Package: libipoddevice0
Version: 0.4.5-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
This package is uninstallable because libgtop2-5 has benn replaced by
libgtop2-7.
Please rebuild your package against the latest libgtop2-dev package.
Christian
-- System Information:
Debian R
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 367435 + pending
Bug#367435: lib32gcc1: Will not install: conflicts with libgcc1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
Package: xmcd
Version: Sid (July 10)
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The latest Sid version refuses to install. I can run xmcdconfig and it gives
the following error (in a file in /tmp):
The directory
/home/adrian/DEBIAN/xmcd/xmcd-2.6/debian/xmcd/usr/share/xmcd/tbl
is mis
Hello,
I noticed that installing "xfs" package, it works fine.
Thanks.
daniele giacomini
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Well, I think it makes sense -- it's just unnecessary.
Anyway, thanks for reminding me that I have to remove it
from the source build, too. I filed a removal request for the
package already a while ago but obviously it can't be removed
if every rebuild puts it back :-\
If you want it gone ASA
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 358309 FTBFS: error: request for member '_mp_a' in something not a
> structure or union
Bug#358309: FTBFS: undefined reference to 'init_gcl_cmpfun'
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
retitle 358309 FTBFS: error: request for member '_mp_a' in something not a
structure or union
thanks
This is the current failure:
> Automatic build of gclcvs_2.7.0-54 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by
> sbuild/powerpc 0.47
...
> gcc -c -Wall -DVOL=volatile -fsigned-char -pipe -mlongcall -O3
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
