Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 23:02:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377449: fixed in swapspace 1.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 377449 serious
Bug#377449: swapspace: Fails to start with /proc/meminfo parse error
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Package: xcal
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
apt-get -t unstable install xcal
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstab
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 06:00:24PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> I would like to hear FSF position on this matter and somehow I have a
> feeling their interpretation of GPL license is different from what is
> claimed here. Eben Moglen, General Counsel for the Free Software
> Foundation, noted that h
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 21:11 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 20:59]:
> > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > * Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 12:28]:
> > > > The GPL enforces other contidions under which the resultant binary ma
Your message dated Sun, 9 Jul 2006 01:56:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376869: Uninstallable due to aspell-pt-pt not being
available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Newest upstream is now 13.0. I've taken the patch, forward-ported it to 13.0
> and fixed a few errors (valgrind is very useful for this kind of work, by the
> way). It works without crashing or giving valgrind hits (at least "h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 356352 + patch
Bug#356352: hwinfo - FTBFS: warning: implicit declaration of function
'sysfs_read_dir_links'
Tags were: help
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:24:22PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 18:02 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Your package is not installable as it depends on libpetsc2.3.0 which is
not available anymore. You might want to update the
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Luk Claes]
>> Your package is not installable as it depends on
>> gtk2-engines-clearlooks which is not available in unstable
>> (anymore).
>
> Anyone know where that package went? It was present when I wrote the
> dependency. I find
> http://packages.debian.org/test
tags 356352 + patch
thanks
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 09:06:39PM +0200, Morten Werner Olsen wrote:
> The patch applies fine with 12.33 (newest upstream I found atm), but I
> get this error when running hwinfo (this is the shared libary one -
> similar source package that is in experimental, but with
Very good call then and makes sense... Maybe once I've finished moving and have my computers set back up at my new location cross-country I'll get to dealing with stuff that is currently being neglected. Note I'm sending this from my Gmail account as my systems are offline and unavailable till ever
Package: pida
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When staring pida all I get is:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pida", line 5, in ?
from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
ImportError: No module named pkg_resources
-- System In
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:24:22PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 18:02 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> Your package is not installable as it depends on libpetsc2.3.0 which is
> >> not available anymore. You might want to update the dependency to
> >> libpe
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don,
I see that you again seem to make wrong conclusions from the facts you
mention.
Answering your mail will take a long time in case you like to get
useful quotes for my claims.I will do this later.
For this reason, I like to send you a question th
reassign 377369 xfonts-base
thanks
Hi
This package have been able to show that font for ages. It must be the
package that provide that package that is wrong now.
I know that the directory have been changed, but if it breakes when
pointing out a new directory then this must be the fault of the
fo
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 22:48:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377423: linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp: Fails to find
boot device (AHCI ICH7 Family)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 10:09:48PM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 09:59:34PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > This is the same as #328238, mozilla sources need to be built on s390,
> > and crosscompiling is not very well supported. I think that shouldn't
> >
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 377369 xfonts-base
Bug#377369: Xvnc4 still cannot find the "fixed" font.
Bug reassigned from package `vnc4server' to `xfonts-base'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
On Sat, 08 Jul 2006, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The GNU GPL only allows this when it is possible to satisfy the
> > conditions of the GPL for the distributed work. For example, this
> > is why it is possible to combine MIT licensed works with GPLed
> > wor
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 01:50:40PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> While investigating the possibility of building your package with automake1.9
> I discovered a problem. I then just tried to build with the plain sources from
> unstable in a clean chroot with the default compiler from unstable and it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> block 377234 with 377259
Bug#377234: gnome-keyring: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lSM
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 377259
>
End of message, stopping processin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 376402 + fixed
Bug#376402: Uninstallable due to xorg transition
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 364512 + fixed
Bug#364512: xcalendar-i18n: conflicts with x11-common
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
> tag 376403 + fixed
Bug#376403: Uninstallable due to xorg transition
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp
Version: 2.6.16-14
Severity: serious
Justification: 3
Hardware:
ASUS P5WD2
Maxtor SATA 300G
DELL monitor with 4 usb card readers FPW2004
Configuration:
Maxtor hard drive connected to SATA port 1 (sda)
The ATA bus is configured in BIOS to AHCI mode.
Prob
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 09:59:34PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> This is the same as #328238, mozilla sources need to be built on s390,
> and crosscompiling is not very well supported. I think that shouldn't
> qualify as RC. What do you think ?
This is not crosscompiling. The host and the build arch
Hi,
yaboot-installer_1.1.7 was uploaded three days ago and fixed #375505 and
#377098 which look quite similar to these bugs - could you please try again
with a new daily build from sid and see if the bug still exists?
From the changelog:
* Only write magicboot= line on NewWorld PowerMacs (
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 21:45:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376167: solfege - FTBFS: Cannot rebuild html docs because
we are missing the docbook stylesheet.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362641 serious
Bug#362641: xorg-server - FTBFS: Uses inline assembler unconditionaly
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 12:32]:
> > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Please see Don's reply. It contains all useful information. Even though
> > > you behave like a Kindergarte would be the right place for you, I'm
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 09:23:01PM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: xulrunner
> Version: 1.8.0.4-2
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
This is the same as #328238, mozilla sources need to be built on s390,
and crosscompili
e[2]: *** [common.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/vzquota-3.0.8/src'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/vzquota-3.0.8'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> ***
Package: mod-bt
Version: 0.0.18+p4.1178-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of mod-bt_0.0.18+p4.1178-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by
> sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.2
[Luk Claes]
> Your package is not installable as it depends on
> gtk2-engines-clearlooks which is not available in unstable
> (anymore).
Anyone know where that package went? It was present when I wrote the
dependency. I find
http://packages.debian.org/testing/gnome/gtk2-engines-clearlooks>,
and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 377401 serious
Bug#377401: libdnsres: FTBFS: incomplete build-depends
Warning: Unknown package 'libdnsres'
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
End of message, stopp
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 12:32]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please see Don's reply. It contains all useful information. Even though
> > you behave like a Kindergarte would be the right place for you, I'm not
> > doing total mouthfeeding for you now.
>
>
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 20:59]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 12:28]:
> > > The GPL enforces other contidions under which the resultant binary may be
> > > distributed but it does not enforce _anything_ on the n
lt] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xulrunner-1.8.0.4'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20060708-2029
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2
> ******
> Build finished at 20060708-1845
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 376488 linux-2.6
Bug#376488: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: unmet dependencies
Bug reassigned from package `linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686' to `linux-2.6'.
> forcemerge 368544 376488
Bug#368544: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-amd64-k8: depends on non-exist
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 12:28]:
> > The GPL enforces other contidions under which the resultant binary may be
> > distributed but it does not enforce _anything_ on the non-GPL source.
>
> Well, but it might result in the binary being
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 12:28]:
> The GPL enforces other contidions under which the resultant binary may be
> distributed but it does not enforce _anything_ on the non-GPL source.
Well, but it might result in the binary being unredistributable at all.
This is the case here. A
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 376166 + fixed
Bug#376166: sablotron: FTBFS: Undefined references
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:07:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376586: fixed in dar 2.3.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: ldm
Severity: serious
Version: 0.87debian2
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on gtk2-engines-clearlooks
which is not available in unstable (anymore).
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 376488 grave
Bug#376488: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: unmet dependencies
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 376166 + patch
Bug#376166: sablotron: FTBFS: Undefined references
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks سÙاÙ
ש×ת ש×××
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
tag 376166 + patch
thanks سلام שבת שלום
> Everything is not yet clean. I'll rework the patch and send a good one.
> Sorry for the noise.
Here it is. Sorry again.
--
adn
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
diff -u sablotron-1.0.2/debian/control sablotron-1.0.2/debian/control
--- sablotron-1.0.2/debian/con
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 18:02 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Package: libluminate7
>> Severity: serious
>> Version: 0.10.0-2
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Your package is not installable as it depends on libpetsc2.3.0 which is
>> not available anymore. You might want to update the dependency t
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.22
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hello,
dpkg currently fails to build from source on mips, which stops its
transition to testing.
The build log is available at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=dpkg&ver=1.13.22&arch=mips&stamp=115
Package: python-qt3
Version: 3.16-1.2
Severity: serious
Hi,
python-qt3 fails to build from source on arm:
sipqtpart0.cpp: In function 'PyObject* func_qUncompress(PyObject*, PyObject*)':
sipqtpart0.cpp:11196: error: invalid conversion from 'QByteArray*' to 'int'
sipqtpart0.cpp:11196: error: ini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 377293 pending
Bug#377293: boson-music: unnecessarily depends on boson.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 373856 python-central
Bug#373856: python2.4-minimal: Install/Upgrade fails: "TypeError: unindexable
object"
Bug#373857: Unable to update python2.4-minimal v2.4.3-7 and pytho
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 11:48 -0400, Andrew Moise wrote:
> Bruno, would you object if I NMUed a new version of this package, with
> the copyright file I attached earlier in this bug report?
I would prefer if we can discuss the changes in IRC or through Email.
What do you plan to do? I'm intereste
tag 376166 - patch
thanks سلام שבת שלום
> Here a fixed patch (the first had some superfluous or wrong things in it).
Everything is not yet clean. I'll rework the patch and send a good one.
Sorry for the noise.
--
adn
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 376166 - patch
Bug#376166: sablotron: FTBFS: Undefined references
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks سÙاÙ
ש×ת ש×××
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 377375 linux-2.6
Bug#377375: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: Requires linux-kbuild-2.6.17 which does
not exist
Bug reassigned from package `linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7' to `linux-2.6'.
> forcemerge 368544 377375
Bug#368544: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 376249 + fixed
Bug#376249: spandsp: runaway `extern "C"' in
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> tag 376166 patch
> thanks سلام שבת שלום
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2006, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > /tmp/buildd/sablotron-1.0.2/src/engine/parser.cpp:381: undefined reference
> > to `XML_SetEncoding'
> > ...
>
> Here is a patch that fix the FTBFS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 357788 dmapi
Bug#357788: FTBFS (64 bit): conflicting types for '__s64'
Bug reassigned from package `xfsdump' to `dmapi'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 17:23:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of spandsp 0.0.2pre25-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 08:00:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278527: fixed in pvpgn 1.7.9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: apt-proxy
Version: 1.9.33-0.1
Followup-For: Bug #375677
The following patch for the file
/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/twisted/manhole/telnet.py
fixed the problem
Sincerly,
DaB.
8c8
< from twisted.conch import telnet
---
> from twisted.protocols import telnet
-- System Informat
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Subject says it all. This headers package has been out here for over
a week without a corresponding kbuild package.
Kindly provide the kbuild package, or fix the headers package not to require
the kbuild p
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 08:00:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373245: fixed in pvpgn 1.7.9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: vnc4server
Version: 4.1.1+X4.3.0-10
Severity: grave
Xvnc4 cannot find the "fixed" font. For example with this command:
$ Xvnc4 -fp /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc :1 [Enter]
--
Couldn't open RGB_DB '/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: revelation
Version: 0.4.7-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of revelation_0.4.7-2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.47
> Build started at 2006070
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376131: fixed in cogito 0.17.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: thewidgetfactory
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of thewidgetfactory_0.2.1-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.47
> Build started at 2006070
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: gnomemeeting
Version: 1.2.3-4
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of gnomemeeting_1.2.3-4 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.47
> Build started at 20060707-1805
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 319389 serious
Bug#319389: acidlab: ACID looks dead should get replaced by BASE
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Package: gparted
Version: 0.2.5-1.1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of gparted_0.2.5-1.1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.47
> Build started at 20060707-2002
> **
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
In addition to the bug reports regarding missing standard options, I'd
like to remark that the option '_netdev' is also no longer recognized -
a mount command returns with the message 'unknown option'. But, most
importantly, 'user' is no longer a valid option.
Kind Regards,
Stefan Förster
--
Q
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 11:42:56AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> >
> >I'm seeing the same issue; however, while IMAPS does indeed not work,
> >"netstat -tl" shows me that dovecot does properly listen to port 143,
> >i.e., the "regular" IMAP port.
>
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 13:41:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fwd: Bug#307365: siptoolbox removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 13:41:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fwd: Bug#307365: siptoolbox removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 04:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375356: fixed in ferret 0.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 376740 pending
Bug#376740: vdrift - FTBFS: error: impossible constraint in `asm'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 375931 minor
Bug#375931: warning message on tail +8, use tail -n +8
Severity set to `minor' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
severity 375931 minor
thanks
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 07:21:34PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> There's one bug that's not addressed; the warning message.
That is surely not RC; downgrading.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Quoting =?UTF-8?B?VmVkcmFuIEZ1cmHEjQ==?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Same here, except I can't login[1] even using sash.
>
> If I start nscd, login, and then disable nscd, sash will work (unlike bash
> or zsh).
>
> [1] Authentication is, actually, successful, I see the MOTD, but shell
> isn't started a
Quoting Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've also tried sash and that seems to work fine..
If I understand you correctly, you've tried zsh and bash but then you can't
login, but if you try sash, then it works?!
Then maybe you have some faulty .bash{rc,_profile} as well?
> So it still seems
Package: eagle-usb-modules-source
Version: 2.1.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (1001, 'testing'), (101, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel:
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
