Hello,
Martin Pala wrote:
> this is AMD64 only related bug which is addressed by this patch for
> monit-4.8:
>
> http://www.tildeslash.com/monit/dist/monit-4.8-patch01
>
> Neil Broderick wrote:
>> Also trying to start monit manually results in:
>>
>> ruby:/home/ngb# monit
>> Starting monit daemon
Paul Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: gnucash
> Version: 1.8.12-9
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> $ gnucash
> ERROR: Unbound variable: gnc:debugging?
>
> This is because gnucash-common (1.9.6-1) is in unstable, but gnucash
> itself is still at 1.8.12-9
Hi Julien,
could you please try and send feedback if this is still an issue with
the latest packge from here:
http://people.debian.org/~nobse/temp/libapache2-mod-python/
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
Package: courier-authlib
Version: 0.58-1.0
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
Installation of courier-imap-ssl also installs:
courier-authlib-userdb
courier-authlib
courier-base
courier-imap-ssl
courier-imap
courier-ssl
but not:
courier-authdaemon
However,
$ authenumerate
ERR: aut
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 07:37:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 08:49:48 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [close] jwm: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 07:37:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Package: gnucash
Version: 1.8.12-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
$ gnucash
ERROR: Unbound variable: gnc:debugging?
This is because gnucash-common (1.9.6-1) is in unstable, but gnucash
itself is still at 1.8.12-9 on the mirrors, and there's only a
Recommends now between
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 07:21:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ecj-bootstrap: takes over /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/javac with
../../../../bin/ecj
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 07:20:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line java-gcj-compat_1.0.54-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: error:
invalid Python installation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 00:08:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362048: libnss_ldap library dependencies screwed on IA64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 366861 = upstream confirmed l10n patch
Bug#366861: The correct name of Mexico is "México", not "Méjico"
Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo upstream confirmed l10n patch
Tags set to: upstream, confirmed, l10n, patch
> tags 365558 + moreinfo unrep
Package: tex-common
Version: 0.22
Severity: serious
Installing tex-common 0.22, I get
Setting up tex-common (0.22) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/tex-common.config: 163: arith: syntax error: "usercount++"
dpkg: error processing tex-common (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:05 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> To top it all off, now I don't see it any more. GAH. I haven't upgraded
> any dependencies since I started seeing it till
Hmmm, now I started getting it again. Then I tried attaching to the
process with gdb and I didn't get any crashes. After
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 01:28:50PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Indeed. AFAICS that is because the symlink is not part of the x11-common
> package and is created on-the-fly. Another reason why the current
> solution sucks.
Ok, that's fair. Here's what I'll try to implement over the next few days
(
I found out some more about this problem and have worked around it as
a result. It seems related to gsfonts-x11, which seems to have some
reports about similar problems. The problem I had with xfig not
finding fonts goes away if I delete the alias lines in
/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1/fonts.alias
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 21:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367339: fixed in xfonts-encodings 1:1.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
C++ ABI is behind us -- shouldn't this be closed?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEaUYa4J/vJdlkhKwRAhTQAKCKy6F0iLlcujo5Qb1aMPQZRK97DQCfboab
FOJ8rr60myrvACb2cvIR74Y=
=HVjp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSU
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 15:02 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> Do you have a backtrace of the crash? It seems to work for me (latest
> sid).
Since it wouldn't happen when scite was run from a terminal, a rebuild
fixes it and there are no debug symbols in the package, I didn't think
that would help.
T
Package: libapache2-mod-python
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
After dropping all the references to python2.2, I did not manage to get
libapache2-mod-python build. configure fails as following:
rm -f config.cache config.status
export PYTHON_BIN=/usr/bin/python2.3
env
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> merge 353805 362474
Bug#353805: "FTBFS: Build-Depends on removed python2.2-dev"
Bug#362474: libapache2-mod-python: Please drop support for python2.2
Merged 353805 362474.
>
End of me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 353805 patch
Bug#353805: "FTBFS: Build-Depends on removed python2.2-dev"
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks dude
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
tag 353805 patch
thanks dude
On Mon, May 15, 2006, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> python2.2-dev has been removed from the archive (see #362047).
Here is a patch that addresses the issue. But I can't get the package
building from source because of the configure/configure.in files.
I am filing
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 17:32:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367049: fixed in util-linux 2.12r-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 338286 + pending
Bug#338286: lirc-modules-source does not build
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
tags 366861 + moreinfo unreproducible
severity 366861 important
thanks
Hi Ferenczi!
I can not reproduce your error. It's quite strange. We have not any
reports (excepts your one) about this kind of behaviour.
In fact, words like "tiny" doesn't appears in the davfs2's source code.
A
On 2006-05-15 15:43:31 -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 05:01:56AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > A solution that breaks the system is not a good solution. The breakage
> > for official Debian packages is avoided thanks to the many conflicts
> > in the "Conflicts:" field, b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> severity 361408 important
Bug#361408: md/mdadm fails to properly run on 2.6.15 after upgrading from 2.6.11
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> tags 361408 + moreinfo
Bug#36
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 367435 ia32-libs
Bug#367435: lib32gcc1: Will not install: conflicts with libgcc1
Bug reassigned from package `lib32gcc1' to `ia32-libs'.
> severity 367435 serious
Bug#367435: lib32gcc1: Will not install: conflicts with libgcc1
Severity set to
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 18:18:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Freetype bugs closed in 2.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
27;
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20060515-0835
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnucash
Source-Version: 1.9.6-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest versio
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> package dpkg dpkg-dev dselect
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: dselect dpkg-dev dpkg
> tags 169125 + pending
Bug#169125: dpkg --ignore-depends doesn't support multiple comma-separated
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> > Care to report a bug ?
>>>
>>> Will you contact upstream anyway? Are you going to adopt the package,
>>> or just do an NMU?
>>
>> I was just trying to help fixing a RC bug, and abntex was the first on
>>
Package: mediawiki1.5
Version: 1.5.8-1
Severity: grave
I've had big troubles installing mediawiki1.5 due to LocalSettings.php
permissions and directory. But let's start from the beginning...
After having installed mediawiki1.5, this is what installation page
says: "Installation successful! Move
/
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 14:17:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#35: fixed in classpath 2:0.91-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 14:18:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367334: fixed in gmsh 1.65.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 14:18:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365991: fixed in cynthiune.app 0.9.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 14:17:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#35: fixed in classpath 2:0.91-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 14:20:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346789: fixed in xbat 1.11-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 14:18:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367340: fixed in gmsh 1.65.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 14:17:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356353: fixed in classpath 2:0.91-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 14:17:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356663: fixed in classpath 2:0.91-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 365603 + fixed
Bug#365603: New version available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 365653 + fixed
Bug#365653: ketchup: problem with stable kernels > .9
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Pleas
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 14:17:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356663: fixed in classpath 2:0.91-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:25:33AM +0200, Martin Waitz wrote:
> Package: mount
> Version: 2.12r-9
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> It seems the new NFS4 patch is not entirely fixed as CFS does not work
> with the new mount version. Going back to 2.12r-8 makes CF
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 335719 + fixed
Bug#335719: etw_3.0.cvs20050714-1(m68k/experimental): missing uudecode
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 362897 + help
Bug#362897: briquolo: SIGSEGV on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
> tag 316268 + wontfix
Bug#316268: links2: Tabbed browsing would be nice
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> tag 327381 + help
Bug#327381: pa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 353805 "FTBFS: Build-Depends on removed python2.2-dev"
Bug#353805: libapache2-mod-python: Source package does not build.
Changed Bug title.
> thanks dude
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
retitle 353805 "FTBFS: Build-Depends on removed python2.2-dev"
thanks dude
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006, jeremy avnet wrote:
> Package: libapache2-mod-python
> Version: 3.1.3-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
>
> The ./configure file appears to be broken. Since this f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 338286 fixed-in-experimental
Bug#338286: lirc-modules-source does not build
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 05:01:56AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2006-05-14 21:06:50 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > We've found a good solution for this bug.
> A solution that breaks the system is not a good solution. The breakage
> for official Debian packages is avoided thanks to the many
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:25:59PM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote:
> Yes. I have tcsh-kanji 6.14.00-3 installed and upgrading to recent sid
> doesn't change it. (Which I already tested for 6.14.00-4.)
Oops. Ok, in this case I'll take personal responsibility for this problem
because you've warned me b
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356640: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.56-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 11:02:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323815: fixed in bzflag 2.0.8.20060515
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355972: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.56-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360996: fixed in module-assistant 0.10.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346658: fixed in amphetamine 0.8.10-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355972: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.56-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361913: fixed in linphone 1.3.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365934: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.56-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 10:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356640: fixed in java-gcj-compat 1.0.56-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 313605 pending
Bug#313605: dpkg removes a file from another package using a local diversion
There were no tags set.
Bug#315784: dependencies should ensure md5sum is present
Tags
Hi Martin,
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 05:00:07PM +0200, Martin Godisch wrote:
> tcsh 6.14.00-5 just drops tcsh-kanji, hence tcsh-kanji users will not
> get updates anymore. Instead, there should be a transition from
> tcsh-kanji to the binary package tcsh, which was already prepared in
> 6.14.00-4 (e
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Care to report a bug ?
>>
>> Will you contact upstream anyway? Are you going to adopt the package,
>> or just do an NMU?
>
> I was just trying to help fixing a RC bug, and abntex was the first on
> the list...
Ah, well. Okay, I'll file a bug about
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 05:25:36PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 04:12:35PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> > Is there a way to avoid using this file ?
> >> >>
> >> >> Th
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 05:31:05PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
> Below you'll find my patches for dpkg and coreutils which I'm about to
> upload into Ubuntu Dapper right now. I think these same changes
> should be applied in sid's coreutils and dpkg. (I'm afra
Frank Lichtenheld writes ("Re: md5sum diversion: patches which restore sanity"):
> I will apply the patch to dpkg.
Excellent, thanks.
> Since the patch for coreutils only adds some checks so that it doesn't
> try to fix something that isn't broken it is probably safe to do so
> in a uncoordinated
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 05:31:05PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Below you'll find my patches for dpkg and coreutils which I'm about to
> upload into Ubuntu Dapper right now. I think these same changes
> should be applied in sid's coreutils and dpkg. (I'm afraid that the
> patch to coreutils will r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> severity 313605 serious
Bug#313605: dpkg removes a file from another package using a local diversion
Severity set to `serious' from `minor'
> merge 313605 315784
Bug#313605: dpkg rem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 365230 clisp
Bug#365230: mcvs - FTBFS: There is no package with name "FFI"
Bug reassigned from package `mcvs' to `clisp'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 08:47:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365171: fixed in cl-irc 20060514-dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 08:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365199: fixed in araneida 0.90.1-dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: gnucash
> Version: 1.9.6-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Oh shoot. This was supposedly fixed in 1.9.5, but the fix didn't
actually get into the package. For the record, the bug is not about
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 08:47:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365200: fixed in cl-portable-aserve
1.2.42+cvs.2006.04.24-dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:41:27AM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 10:00:40AM -0700, Robert Woodcock wrote:
> > Note to Florian: those are only "patches" from your perspective. All of
> > those files are automatically generated by autoreconf/aclocal/autoconf/
> > automake/etc.
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 04:12:35PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >> > Is there a way to avoid using this file ?
>> >>
>> >> That depends on why it is used. If it only uses the file, but does not
>> >> us
Package: libgssapi-perl
Version: 0.20-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log, made at a time when I was offline:
...
/usr/bin/make test
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libgssapi-perl-0.20'
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
'blib/lib'
Hi, Thijs
You are right.
I will upload webalizer patched today.
Regards
Jose Carlos
2006/5/12, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello Jose Carlos,
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:24:09 -0300, you wrote:
> I have one sponsor, Im solving another bugs before send him webalizer.
> I will send this
Your message dated Mon, 15 May 2006 08:02:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367362: fixed in magnus 20060324-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 334350 + patch
Bug#334350: flexbackup default config insecure temporary file creation
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Package: flexbackup
Followup-For: Bug #334350
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gentoo has two patches for this issue. The first [1], attached to bug
#105000 [2], is supposedly from Debian, but was apparently never
uploaded. The patch reportedly breaks remote backups [3], though, an
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 04:12:35PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> > Is there a way to avoid using this file ?
> >>
> >> That depends on why it is used. If it only uses the file, but does not
> >> use latex2html itself, it can probably be replaced.
Alec Berryman wrote:
> Package: cscope
> Version: 15.5+cvs20050816-1
> Followup-For: Bug #340177
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Upstream appears to have stalled on this issue because some cscope
> targets platforms do not have snprintf(). Debian has snprintf(), so
> this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> #no patch attached and link is 404
> tags 285902 - patch
Bug#285902: CAN-2004-1294: Arbitrary file overwrite vulnerability
Tags were: patch fixed-upstream security upstream
Tags remo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 359042 + patch
Bug#359042: [CVE-2006-1354] EAP-MSCHAPv2 vulnerability
Tags were: fixed-upstream security
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
