Bug#366020: marked as done (konqueror should depend on libkonq4)

Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 02:04:16 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed through binNMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#365680: CGIIRC vulnerability (Bug#365680)

Elrond wrote: > On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 09:16:35AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > [...] > > If an update enters stable-security and the version in testing ist the > > same as in stable, then the new version propagates into testing. If, > > additionally, the version in unstable is the same, this ve

Bug#362492: marked as done (xfs: Config file location has changed - postinstall and documentation fails to note this)

Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2006 21:47:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#362492: fixed in xfs 1:1.0.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365888: marked as done (libxvmc1: Looks for config file in wrong place and doesn't document it AT ALL)

Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2006 20:47:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365888: fixed in libxvmc 1:1.0.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#366371: latex209-base: "isolatin1.sty"

On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 09:58:14PM -0300, Robson Roberto Souza Peixoto wrote: > Package: latex209-base > Version: 25.mar.1992-7 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks unrelated software > The package abntex need isolatin1.sty. > macros/latex209/contrib/misc/isolatin1.sty -> > http://www.cta

Bug#366371: latex209-base: "isolatin1.sty"

Hi, >> On Sun, 07 May 2006 21:58:14 -0300 >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robson Roberto Souza Peixoto) said as follows: >Justification: breaks unrelated software >The package abntex need isolatin1.sty. Your explanation is too short for me to understand what I should do. Could you add more explanation? I

Bug#350648: marked as done (Please move to libreadline5-dev)

Your message dated Sun, 7 May 2006 19:20:14 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 3.6.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#366371: latex209-base: "isolatin1.sty"

Package: latex209-base Version: 25.mar.1992-7 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software The package abntex need isolatin1.sty. macros/latex209/contrib/misc/isolatin1.sty -> http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex209/contrib/misc#jh792a3a56a11512ceec4d7b73999dbf3b -- System

Bug#366370: hald dies upon startup

Package: hal Version: 0.5.7-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable hald dies upon startup despite stating that it's becoming a daemon: # hald --daemon=yes --verbose=yes 17:29:12.443 [I] hald.c:469: hal 0.5.7 17:29:12.443 [I] hald.c:478: Will daemonize 17:29:12.443 [I] hald.c:4

Bug#366362: configure fails on first install

Sven Mueller wrote on 08/05/2006 02:20: > Joey: What would you say I (or possibly you) should do here? Changing > the init script would violate an Etch release target (LSB 2.1 > conformance). Not changing the init script would require a change in how > debhelper handles init script return codes. >

Processed: Re: Bug#366362: configure fails on first install

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Package spampd Ignoring bugs not assigned to: spampd > Tags 366362 + moreinfo Bug#366362: configure fails on first install There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debi

Bug#366365: marked as done (cervisia: should depend on libcvsservice0)

Your message dated Sun, 7 May 2006 17:32:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#366365: cervisia: should depend on libcvsservice0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#366362: configure fails on first install

Package spampd Tags 366362 + moreinfo Thanks Sven Mueller wrote on 08/05/2006 01:54: > As you see, the invoke-rc.d result is somewhat ignored (well, the script > exits cleanly when invoke-rc.d returned an error) by appending "|| exit > 0". Therefore, dpkg shouldn't return an error during configur

Bug#365925: marked as done (ssl-cert: post-installation script exits with error 1)

Your message dated Mon, 08 May 2006 10:12:54 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365925: ssl-cert: post-installation script exits with error 1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#366362: configure fails on first install

Package spampd Tags 366362 + moreinfo unreproducible Laurent Bigonville wrote on 08/05/2006 01:06: > Package: spampd > Severity: grave > Version: 2.30-3 > > The postinstall script failed because STARTSPAMPD=0. > > Paramétrage de spampd (2.30-3) ... > Starting spam checking proxy daemon: spampd (

Bug#360552: marked as done (d4x_2.5.6-2(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: Old build dependency on xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2006 16:17:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346654: fixed in d4x 2.5.7.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366334: marked as done (gcc-4.1: libgnat{vsn,prj}-dev depend on nonexistent packages)

Your message dated Mon, 8 May 2006 01:08:10 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#366334: gcc-4.1: libgnat{vsn,prj}-dev depend on nonexistent packages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#339419: marked as done (d4x crashes in strlen () from /lib64/libc.so.6)

Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2006 16:17:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339419: fixed in d4x 2.5.7.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#346654: marked as done (d4x: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2006 16:17:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346654: fixed in d4x 2.5.7.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366365: cervisia: should depend on libcvsservice0

Package: cervisia Version: 4:3.5.2-1+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Cervisia should depend on libcvsservice0; without libcvsservice0, entering cervisia in Konqueror ALWAYS displays an error dialog: There was an error loading the module Cervisia. The diagnostic is: libc

Bug#362876: Misleading changelog entry

Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > procps (1:3.2.6-2.2) unstable; urgency=low > > * NMU > * Document the copyright of the emacs bindings bit of pgrep in > debian/copyright (Closes: #362876) > > -- Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:45:25 -0700 All of pgrep i

Bug#366362: configure fails on first install

Package: spampd Severity: grave Version: 2.30-3 Hi, The postinstall script failed because STARTSPAMPD=0. Paramétrage de spampd (2.30-3) ... Starting spam checking proxy daemon: spampd (disabled in /etc/default/spampd). invoke-rc.d: initscript spampd, action "start" failed. dpkg : erreur de trait

Bug#366343: boson-base: No longer build on amd64, shouldn't build on any 64 bit arch?

Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: boson-base Version: 0.11-4 Severity: serious Hi, Hello, From your last changelog: * boson-base: architecture amd64 removed You will need a good reason not to build it only only amd64. Looking at #354971, it says that it crashed on amd64. And the result als

Bug#365780: marked as done (gcc-4.1: FTBFS on amd64, sparc with "configure.in:2177: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_FOR_TARGET")

) unstable; urgency=low . * Update to SVN 20060507. * debian/rules.d/binary-java.mk: Use $(lib32) everywhere. Closes: #365388. * Always configure hppa64-linux-gnu with --includedir=/usr/hppa64-linux-gnu/include. * Make libgnatvsn4.1 and libgnatprj4.1 priority optional. Closes: #365900.

Bug#365388: marked as done (gcj-4.1: FTBFS on amd64: mv: target `debian/lib32gcj7/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/.' is not a directory)

1.0-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Update to SVN 20060507. * debian/rules.d/binary-java.mk: Use $(lib32) everywhere. Closes: #365388. * Always configure hppa64-linux-gnu with --includedir=/usr/hppa64-linux-gnu/include. * Make libgnatvsn4.1 and libgnatprj4.1 priority optional. Closes: #36

Processed: Re: Processed: [bts-link] source package ocaml

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 179254 http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=1710 Bug#179254: ocaml: module Graphics: foreground and background colors should be changeable Forwarded-to-address changed from http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3D1710, merged-u= to htt

Processed: [bts-link] source package omake

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package omake > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report for

Bug#366288: Install also fails with different error with newest adduser

Package: beagle Version: 0.2.6-1 Followup-For: Bug #366288 With adduser 3.87, postinst also fails with: Setting up beagle (0.2.6-1) ... chown: `beagleindex': invalid user dpkg: error processing beagle (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Apparently addu

Processed: [bts-link] source package omake

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package omake > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report for

Bug#358901: w3c-markup-validator: Any validation fails with "Software error"

On 4/28/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Steve, What are your plans for getting a new package uploaded to unstable that fixes this bug? Is the 0.7.2 package at http://www.mathgen.ch/debian/experimental/ suitable for upload sponsoring as-is? The package you mentioned above sho

Bug#363294: gnutls13 - rebuild looses dep against libtasn1

On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 06:41:42PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > block 363294 with 356694 > thanks > On 2006-04-18 Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Package: gnutls13 > > Version: 1.3.5 > > Severity: grave > > A rebuild of gnutls13 looses its dependency against libtasn1 and uses a > >

Processed: [bts-link] source package gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote st

Processed: [bts-link] source package libmail-box-perl

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package libmail-box-perl > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status

Processed: [bts-link] source package libimage-librsvg-perl

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package libimage-librsvg-perl > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote s

Bug#365925: ssl-cert: post-installation script exits with error 1

Package: ssl-cert Version: 1.0.12 Followup-For: Bug #365925 Sorry for bothering you. openssl was not correct installed. Can you please close my bug report? Thanks, Christoph -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'exper

Processed: Re: Bug#366323: inkscape: memory leak prevents starting

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 366323 important Bug#366323: inkscape: memory leak prevents starting Severity set to `important'. > tags 366323 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#366323: inkscape: memory leak prevents starting There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, mor

Bug#366323: inkscape: memory leak prevents starting

severity 366323 important tags 366323 unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 01:43:09PM +0200, Jiří Paleček wrote: > Package: inkscape > Version: 0.43-4 > Severity: serious > Justification: renders package unusable > when I start inkscape, it starts eating memory very quickly. In

Bug#364068: Imp fails to display any mail messages at all)

Just upgraded to imp 4.1 and things seem to work now, no more problems. Thanks! Mikko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#358306: FTBFS in unstable: There is no package matching [libgd2-dev]

On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 03:28:16PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > > > > d-devlibdeps debian/libgdchart-gd2-noxpm-dev.substvars > > > libgdchart-gd2-noxpm/libgdc.so.0.11.5 > > > --> libc6-dev package exists. > > > --> libfreetype6-dev package exists. > > > devlibs error: There is no package ma

Processed: block 366303 with 366222

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > block 366303 with 366222 Bug#366303: FTBFS: dh_strip failure Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 366222 > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Bug#366343: boson-base: No longer build on amd64, shouldn't build on any 64 bit arch?

Package: boson-base Version: 0.11-4 Severity: serious Hi, >From your last changelog: * boson-base: architecture amd64 removed You will need a good reason not to build it only only amd64. Looking at #354971, it says that it crashed on amd64. And the result also was that you don't build for am

Bug#366340: mozilla-thunderbird: Thunderbird crashes on startup: 'BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)'

Package: mozilla-thunderbird Version: 1.0.7-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi When starting Thunderbird, I get the following error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mozilla-thunderbird selected locale: en-US DOUBLE-CLICK: 250 --> -1 THRESHOLD: 8 --> -1 The program 'mozilla-thunder

Bug#360375: marked as done (boson: not installable in sid and FTBFS)

Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2006 08:17:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#358593: fixed in boson-base 0.11-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#365102: synfigstudio: 365102: please provide a backtrace

Paul Wise wrote: I don't have this problem on i386. Can you please install synfigstudio-dbg and get a gdb backtrace? Sorry for taking so long on this. Anyway, here it is: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 46912570136816 (LWP 7679)] 0x2e65701f i

Bug#232428: NMU

Hi, Since this RC bug was reintroduced by the last NMU, i'm going to do a delayed upload (NMU) with the following changelog entry: docbook-xsl (1.68.1.dfsg.1-0.2) unstable; urgency=low * NMU * make the package install again by fixing the postinst mkdir call (closes: #232428) -- Gust

Bug#364068: [pkg-horde] Bug#364068: imp4: Fails to display any message

On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 01:44:23AM +0300, Mikko Visa wrote: > > I'll try imp 4.1, any idea when it comes to testing? Seems to be in > unstable already. It is now: http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/imp4/news/20060506T210819Z.html Regards -- Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG:1024D/C1027A0

Processed: mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/xsl'

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 232428 grave Bug#232428: mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/xsl' Bug#232119: 1.64.1.0-4 fails to install (stylesheet/xsl does not exist) Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please conta

Bug#360724: marked as done (siproxd: FTBFS: Patch amd64.diff does not exist)

Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2006 08:02:41 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360724: fixed in siproxd 1:0.5.11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#358593: marked as done (boson-base: FTBFS: AL/altypes.h not found)

Your message dated Sun, 07 May 2006 08:17:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#358593: fixed in boson-base 0.11-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#366334: gcc-4.1: libgnat{vsn,prj}-dev depend on nonexistent packages

Package: gcc-4.1 Version: 4.1.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch In the source package gcc-4.1, there is a typo in control.m4 that causes the binary packages libgnatvsn-dev and libgnatprj-dev to depend on nonexistent packages. Patch below. -- Ludovic Brenta. --- control.m4 216e8e17760cbf85a0b1

Bug#232428: please apply my patch for #232428

found 232428 1.68.1.dfsg.1-0.1 thanks Hello, This bug is present in docbook-xsl 1.68.1.dfsg.1-0.1. Please fix this. It is exactly the same patch that is needed. Regards, Arnaud Fontaine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM

Processed: Re: please apply my patch for #232428

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 232428 1.68.1.dfsg.1-0.1 Bug#232428: mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/xsl' Bug#232119: 1.64.1.0-4 fails to install (stylesheet/xsl does not exist) Bug marked as found in version 1.68.1.dfsg.1-0.1. > thanks Stopp

Bug#366300: marked as done (xfce4: Xfce4 package uninstallable due to version problems in dependency)

Your message dated Sun, 7 May 2006 15:00:12 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#366300: xfce4: Xfce4 package uninstallable due to version problems in dependency has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#366330: gnbd: FTBFS: Can't satisfy build dependencies for libmagma-dev

Package: gndb Version: 0.trunk20050206-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package can't satisfy it's build dependencies anymore. You have a build dependency on: libmagma-dev (>> 0.trunk20050206), libmagma-dev (<< 0.trunk20050207) But now unstable has version 1.02.00-4 (from redhat-cluster) Kurt

Bug#304066: #304066: conffile prompt is probably fixed but bug isn't closed

tags 304066 fixed quit On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 11:24:27AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > This problem seems to have been "fixed" by modifying the conffile in > sid to be the same as the one in sarge. This isn't a very good > solution, because you might decide that you actually want to both > change

Bug#366323: inkscape: memory leak prevents starting

Package: inkscape Version: 0.43-4 Severity: serious Justification: renders package unusable Hello, when I start inkscape, it starts eating memory very quickly. In some 20 seconds (which is before it would show its main window) it would eat more than 300 MB, which is more than all my memory. I t

Bug#366049: mysql woody/3.23 done

hey christian, just fyi to keep things fully documented, i've backported the relevant patches for all 4 CVE's to the woody/3.23 version of mysql. i've been able to verify that the vulnerabilities exist, and are exploitable by modifying the posted PoC code from the OP. i've also been able to veri

Processed: Re: #304066: conffile prompt is probably fixed but bug isn't closed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 304066 fixed Bug#304066: Prompted about unmodified conffile There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Processed: RC

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 360684 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#360684: When I push the record button istanbul crash There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#365164: marked as done (screentest: FTBFS with new X packages: Missing libraries for static version)

Your message dated Sat, 06 May 2006 23:47:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365164: fixed in screentest 1.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y