reopen 365688
thanks
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 12:49:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:56:35AM -0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
> > I think have figured out the problem of aptitude trying to evict emacs21.
> > emacs21 version 21.4a-3.1 depends on emacs21-common and emacs21
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 365688
Bug#365688: emacs21 is uninstallable
Bug#365597: emacs21: FTBFS: X11/Xaw/Paned.h: No such file or directory
Bug#365714: emacs21: FTBFS on most architectures, xaw issues.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing h
Package: pan
Version: 0.95-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of pan_0.95-3 on quickstep by sbuild/m68k 69
> Build started at 20060503-2223
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depend
Your message dated Wed, 3 May 2006 23:06:43 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365970: libxmlsec1-openssl: is optional, but depends on
libssl0.9.7 which is extra
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 06:35:56PM -0400, Ray Kohler wrote:
> Package: x11-common
> Version: 1:7.0.16
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> Version 7.0.16 of x11-common depends on xfree86-common, which is a
> "useless" compatibility package. Making things worse is that
> xf
Package: libxmlsec1-openssl
Version: 1.2.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.5
Policy 2.5 says:
Packages must not depend on packages with lower priority values (excluding
build-time dependencies). In order to ensure this, the priorities of one or
more packages may need to be adjus
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 22:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365824: fixed in sqlfairy 0.07-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 22:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365826: fixed in sqlfairy 0.07-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 22:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365825: fixed in sqlfairy 0.07-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 365950 -moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#365950: ntp-simple must be configured before ntp-server
Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo, unreproducible
> severity 329746 serious
Bug#329746: User root does not exist (wtf?)
Severity se
tags 365950 -moreinfo unreproducible
severity 329746 serious
severity 365950 serious
merge 329746 365950
thanks
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 03:46:48AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > Package: ntp-server
> > Priority: optional
> > Section: net
> > Installed-Size: 176
> > Maintainer: Debian NTP Tea
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 13:40 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
> Can you guys check and report which dbus version you are running, and if
> it's installed at all. There is probably some package down the
> dependency chain that should depend on the correct version of dbus.
faerun:/home/tepperly/usb_conte
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 364522 + fixed
Bug#364522: vacation: incomplete copyright file
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
The installation is not clean.
You can find the following script in the xfree86-common.postinst.
# Just move the Xsession file if it's still around
if [ -f /etc/X11/Xsession ]; then
mv /etc/X11/Xsession /etc/X11/Xsession.xfree86
fi
This action makes a big broken in my system. I can't use start
Attached is the patch for the NMU to fix 364522.
Don Armstrong
--
Do not handicap your children by making their lives easy.
-- Robert Heinlein _Time Enough For Love_ p251
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
diff -ru tmp/debian/changelog vacation-3.3.0/debian/changelo
On Wed, 3 May 2006 18:26:11 -0700
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tags 365950 moreinfo unreproducible
> quit
>
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 01:18:18AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > Package: ntp-server
> > Severity: grave
> > Version: 4.2.0a+stable-8.1
>
> > I just installed ntp-s
tags 365950 moreinfo unreproducible
quit
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 01:18:18AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Package: ntp-server
> Severity: grave
> Version: 4.2.0a+stable-8.1
> I just installed ntp-server on my debian sid, and the configuration
> failed because the ntp user doesn't exist. The
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 365950 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#365950: ntp-simple must be configured before ntp-server
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
Your message dated Wed, 3 May 2006 18:16:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365946: Acknowledgement (openbox: Openbox menu are unable
to launch X apps except terminal)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 11:33 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 05:59:10PM +1200, Adam Warner wrote:
> > > I typically upgrade Debian for IA32 in a chroot environment of Debian
> > > for AMD64. nfs-common package upgrades consistently break (i.e. I've
> > > finally
I screwed this up. It installs fine if I do it right.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Package: ntp-server
Severity: grave
Version: 4.2.0a+stable-8.1
Hi,
I just installed ntp-server on my debian sid, and the configuration
failed because the ntp user doesn't exist. The ntp user is created by
ntp-simple. ntp-simple must be configured before ntp-server.
Regards
Laurent Bigonville
Notes from the upstream author. Maybe we should wait a day or two with
the DSA as it could break something with the current patch.
bye,
-christian-
On 2006-05-03 Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Wed, 3 May 2006, Christian Hammers wrote:
>
> > Can I use the second version of the patch to prepare the Debi
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 15:17:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365620: fixed in libdvdread 0.9.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received. It is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they wil
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 15:17:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364972: fixed in libdvdread 0.9.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 365797 confirmed
Bug#365797: evolution is using lots of CPU
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 15:17:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365332: fixed in libdvdread 0.9.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 15:17:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365620: fixed in libdvdread 0.9.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 15:17:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365620: fixed in libdvdread 0.9.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 15:17:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365332: fixed in libdvdread 0.9.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 15:17:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365332: fixed in libdvdread 0.9.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 15:17:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364972: fixed in libdvdread 0.9.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tag 365797 confirmed
quit
Hi,
I've learned to know that you are NM for the libnm-glib0 package. I'm NM
for evolution, and we have a problem with the new 1.6.1 release, see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365797
I've pretty much isolated the problem. Evolution uses NetworkManager
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.16
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Version 7.0.16 of x11-common depends on xfree86-common, which is a
"useless" compatibility package. Making things worse is that
xfree86-common conflicts with x11-common. This prevents x11-common from
bein
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 15:17:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364972: fixed in libdvdread 0.9.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: openbox
Version: 3.2-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since last dist-upgrade, my openbox menux are inactive. I mean i'm able
to launch x terminal emuilator, but no other app launches.
Laurent
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefe
Package: gdm
Version: 2.14.4-1
Followup-For: Bug #365598
Dear all!
I have seen that this bug is closed, but it states:
+ Fixes logins that don't use ssh-agent
and another poster mentiones that having
use-ssh-agent
in /e/X/Xsession.options makes the bug disappear, but this is not t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> tags 364729 - pending
Bug#364729: Should stop building libgnutls-dev and gnutls-bin
Tags were: fixed pending patch
Tags removed: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Mon, 1 May 2006 15:19:08 +0200 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 07:41:28PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 01:55:55 +0200 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > > Do I need to get the copyright holder of the documents to
> > > relicense it under the GPL? It seems clear to
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 14:02:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361680: fixed in atk1.0 1.11.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 364729 + fixed
Bug#364729: Should stop building libgnutls-dev and gnutls-bin
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 364235 + fixed
Bug#364235: thinkpad-base: bad interaction with udev 0.090-2: *all* devices end
up group 'thinkpad' (?!)
There were no tags set.
Bug#364283: udev: /dev/null not writable
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please con
FWIW, rebuilding the package is enough. It would be sane to have better
dependency on libgcj6-dev
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Links in /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj point to
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/include/ while the directory provided
by libgcj6-dev is /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.4/include/
That makes packages using java-gcj-comp
Your message dated Wed, 3 May 2006 12:49:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365688: dependency chain is broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 363430 supercollider_20051211-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: cast from
> 'PyrObject*' to 'uint32' loses precision
Bug#363430: supercollider_20051211-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: clz.h unsupported
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pl
Your message dated Wed, 3 May 2006 12:49:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365688: dependency chain is broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
retitle 363430 supercollider_20051211-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: cast from
'PyrObject*' to 'uint32' loses precision
thanks
The clz.h message is just a warning. The cast is the problem.
But while at it, you should get rid of the warning by using
__builtin_clz.
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Your message dated Wed, 3 May 2006 12:49:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365688: dependency chain is broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
severity 320375 normal
retitle 320375 conquest-gl: require visual with at least 1bit of alpha channel
quit
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 11:37:39PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 07:34:32PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Once upgrading (only) freeglut3 to 2.4.0-5, I get
> >
Stephen Gran wrote:
> Daniel, can you make sure to increment the shlibs accordingly? I am
> going to have to use some new functions from this version.
sure.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.pa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 320375 normal
Bug#320375: conquest-gl: fail to start (Assertion `window->Window.VisualInfo !=
((void *)0)' failed.)
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 320375 conquest-gl: require visual with at least 1bit of alpha channel
Bug#320375: conques
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Matteo Rosi wrote:
| Package: Hostapd
| Version: 0.3.7-2
| Severity: critical
| Tags: security, patch, sarge
|
| Description:
| An invalid value, in a field of EAPoL frame, causes a segmantation fault
| error in hostapd deamon.
|
| We found it usi
Package: ssl-cert
Version: 1.0.12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
it seems that some changes in the Folderstructure are not correct.
Post installation Process ends with error 1:
chgrp and chmod /etc/ssl/private fails (directory does not exist)
and consequently
chgrp
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 11:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365568: fixed in gdm 2.14.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 11:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365568: fixed in gdm 2.14.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 11:17:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365721: fixed in nfs-utils 1:1.0.7-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 11:17:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365514: fixed in nfs-utils 1:1.0.7-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 11:17:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365514: fixed in nfs-utils 1:1.0.7-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 11:17:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365721: fixed in nfs-utils 1:1.0.7-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
This one time, at band camp, Steinar H. Gunderson said:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 06:11:53PM +0200, Thomas Krennwallner wrote:
> > nfs-common tries to add a new user with homedir /home/statd. However,
> > /home is an nfs-mounted filesystem and user root is not allowed to
> > create/modify files on
Your message dated Wed, 3 May 2006 20:21:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Cannot upgrade nfs-common in a chroot environment
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> severity 365721 serious
Bug#365721: nfs-common: Creating statd directory under /home
Severity set to `serious'.
> merge 365721 365514
Bug#365514: nfs-common: Can't create /home/statd
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 365447
Bug#365447: Cannot upgrade nfs-common in a chroot environment
Bug#365514: nfs-common: Can't create /home/statd in post-installation script
Disconnected #365447 from all other report(s).
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 06:11:53PM +0200, Thomas Krennwallner wrote:
> nfs-common tries to add a new user with homedir /home/statd. However,
> /home is an nfs-mounted filesystem and user root is not allowed to
> create/modify files on it:
Actually, it adds a system user; if system users aren't cre
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 04:04:14PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The RFC's published here all were made by individuals, and were
> > not made by some IETF process.
> >
> > rfc1459 comes from a document that was always part of the irc
> > source packa
unmerge 365447
thanks
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 04:42:54PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> merge 365447 365514
> severity 365447 serious
> thanks
>
> Using /home goes against the FHS, which mandates applications not to
> rely on it.
This seems to be two different bugs caused by different changes
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 05:59:10PM +1200, Adam Warner wrote:
> invoke-rc.d:
> invoke-rc.d: WARNING: invoke-rc.d called during shutdown sequence
> invoke-rc.d: enabling safe mode: initscript policy layer disabled
> invoke-rc.d: ---
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 03:02:10PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 04:59:05PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> docbook-xsl include the following jar files in the extensions directory:
>
> saxon643.jar saxon651.jar saxon653.jar xalan25.jar
> saxon644.jar
> Emphasis there on 'should'. Fabio found some problems so ended up
> adding the default ZAM back, but I don't know whether or not that's
> resolved in current CVS.
OK. Well, in case the template is re-added, I suggest pinging me or
grabbed the "old" translations from the PO files in the 6.9 bra
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 12:45:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Invalid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 11:01 +0200, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Upstream needs to know if this still occurs in 0.95 which should now be in
> experimental.
Yes, with 0.95-2. If you'd put a new debugging version up, then I would
be able to get a full backtrace, which might help upstream.
Package: Hostapd
Version: 0.3.7-2
Severity: critical
Tags: security, patch, sarge
Description:
An invalid value, in a field of EAPoL frame, causes a segmantation fault
error in hostapd deamon.
We found it using Stress: a software for protocol implementation testing
and security testing, you can f
Package: libgnatprj4.1
Version: 4.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.5
priority standard libgnatprj4.1 depends on optional libgnat-4.1.
I don't think ada or ada libraries should be priority standard.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
AP
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
> # 0.59r-* are definitely affected, maybe even older versions
> found 361863 0.59r-1
Bug#361863: CVE-2006-1655: Unspecified vulnerability in mpg123
Bug marked as found in version 0.59
This one time, at band camp, Bj|rn Englund said:
> Sorry for the delay but now
> I have released libdvdread-0.9.6.
> Hopefully the dvdbackup patch will work now :)
Good news, thank you.
Daniel, can you make sure to increment the shlibs accordingly? I am
going to have to use some new functions f
(MAKE) distclean" in the clean target itself.
| Automatic build of pan_0.95-3 on odin by sbuild/sparc 79
| Build started at 20060503-0820
| **
| Checking available source versions...
| Fetching source files..
Package: libxvmc1
Version: 1:1.0.1-4
Severity: serious
Upon trying to use an XVMC-using app, I see:
XvMCWrapper: Could not open config file "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XvMCConfig".
XvMCWrapper: No such file or directory
Several problems with this:
1) That file does not exist
2) That location for confi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 361995
Bug#361995: evolution: Creating new address book creates only an alias, but
deleting deletes the original folder
Bug#353881: evolution: Cannot remove task lists plus existing lists do not
function
Bug reopened, originator not change
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.999.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package fails to build from source. It complains that it needs
--disable-sanity-checks for the configuration chosen.
| Automatic build of glibc_2.3.999.1-1 on odin by sbuild/sparc 79
| Build started at 20060503-0819
reopen 361995
thanks
I cannot confirm that the issue is fixed.
I've tried to create a new address book today, and encountered the same
problem of only creating an alias for the last existing one. Deleting
the alias, also deleted the content for the original address book.
Is the fix supposed to
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The RFC's published here all were made by individuals, and were
> not made by some IETF process.
>
> rfc1459 comes from a document that was always part of the irc
> source package.
Understood, but it seems that RFC 2810-2813 may have been improved by
the
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:00:50PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:08:21PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:08:35PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > > Right, I'm not really sure why Daniel removed the template in the ubuntu
> > > stuff. I'll look in
Subject: xserver-xorg uninstallable, X not working even on new system
Package: xserver-xorg
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
xserver-xorg in not installable because preconfigure fails. This bug was
apaprently fixed in 7.0.14,
Subject: xmms: No fonts displayed on dialog boxes and menus
Package: xmms
Version: 1.2.10+cvs20060429-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
All GTK menu's and dialog carry no textual labels. The shortcut text
however seems to be
Package: pure-ftpd-mysql
Version: 1.0.21-1
Followup-For: Bug #363303
Cannot install the latest version of pure-fptd-mysql due to dependancy of
libmysqlclient15 which is not
available in the package repository. At the moment this service cannot be used
at all. Is there any
way to temporary fix i
Sorry for the delay but now
I have released libdvdread-0.9.6.
Hopefully the dvdbackup patch will work now :)
/Bj|rn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
> About the .xsession-errors problem, that's a bit weird. My error file
> always stops growing at 200KiB.
~ > ll .xsession-errors
-rw--- 1 xxx users 308919562 2006-05-03 14:33 .xsession-errors
~ > ll .xsession-errors
-rw--- 1 xxx users 322823058 2006-05-03 14:33 .xsession-errors
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2006 05:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365629: fixed in cyrus-imapd-2.2 2.2.13-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: pvpgn
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
your package depends on libmysqlclient12 which has been removed from the
archive. As your package already depends on libmysqlclient15-dev only a
rebuild (or binnmu??) should be needed to fix this problem.
Regards,
Stefan
This is fixed in version 1:7.0.16 of xserver-xorg in incoming.
Confirmed fixed. Sorry for the dupe (I did check, but somehow missed it).
Richard.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: htcheck
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
your package depends on libmysqlclient12 which has been removed from the
archive. Please rebuild your package, so that the current
libmysqlclient15off dependency is picked up. Your build dep
libmysqlclient-dev is provide
I think have figured out the problem of aptitude trying to evict emacs21.
emacs21 version 21.4a-3.1 depends on emacs21-common and emacs21-bin-common
emacs21-common version 21.4a-3.1 wants
emacs21-bin-common version 21.4a-3.1
Since there is no emacs21-bin-common version 21.4a-3.1 for i386 lin
tags 365804 + pending
severity 365804 normal
thanks
On 3 May 2006 at 06:56, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
| Subject: r-cran-rodbc: not loading (R 2.3?)
| Package: r-cran-rodbc
| Version: 1.1.5-2
| Severity: grave
| Justification: renders package unusable
|
| *** Please type your report below this line
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 365804 + pending
Bug#365804: r-cran-rodbc: not loading (R 2.3?)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> severity 365804 normal
Bug#365804: r-cran-rodbc: not loading (R 2.3?)
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
Can you guys check and report which dbus version you are running, and if
it's installed at all. There is probably some package down the
dependency chain that should depend on the correct version of dbus.
If you have dbus-1 (from "stable") installed, you might have this kind
of problem because it i
Package: gcompris
Version: 7.4-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
gcompris_7.4-2 FTBFS with error:
cecking for poptDupArgv in -lpopt... no
configure: error: You must have popt 1.5 or newer to compile gcompris.
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1
Since we have that:
libpopt-dev: usr/lib/libpopt.a
libpopt-de
Package: mtr
Version: 0.71-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
mtr_0.71-1 FTBFS with error:
make -C mtr
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/mtr-0.71/mtr'
cd .. && \
/bin/sh /build/buildd/mtr-0.71/missing --run automake-1.7 --gnu Makefile
/build/buildd/mtr-0.71/missing: line 46: automake-1.7: co
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:36:54AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> reopen 365714
> thanks
>
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 09:45:22AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
>
> > Mmmm, missed closing in changelog. It does not depend on libxaw8-dev now
> > (and on any other X -dev package indeed). Thi
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
