Bug#350624: Why this childish behavior?

2006-05-01 Thread Pawel Wiecek
On May 1, 11:14pm, Joerg Schilling wrote: > I will keep closing the bug unless someone is able to You are abusing the BTS. Pawel -- (___) | Pawel Wiecek - Coven / Svart - | < o o > | http://www.coven.vmh.net/<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>GSM: +48603240

Bug#365353: missing debconf template: xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping

2006-05-01 Thread Christian Perrier
> Right, I'm not really sure why Daniel removed the template in the ubuntu > stuff. I'll look in to it and possibly add it back. Removing it will go > well with my ultimate plan to dismember dexconf though, so that'll be my > preference if it's something sensible. In such case, I suggest you let

Processed: retitle 327564 to can't start aria on amd64

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 327564 can't start aria on amd64 Bug#327564: can't start aria Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs databa

Bug#362170: Good backtrace for bus error on sparc

2006-05-01 Thread Jurij Smakov
Hi, By installing firefox-dbg package, I was able to obtain the attached backtrace for the bus error problem. According to it, the crash happens on line 5105 of layout/generic/nsTextFrame.cpp, which looks like this: 5102 while (aNumChars-- > 0) { 5103// XXX: If you crash here then you ma

Processed: severity of 327564 is grave, tagging 327564

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 327564 grave Bug#327564: can't start aria Severity set to `grave'. > tags 327564 + confirmed Bug#327564: can't start aria There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: severity 365115 serious

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 365115 serious Bug#365115: x-ttcidfont-conf: missing deps (or broken path) to mkcfm Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrat

Bug#365601: marked as done (coin2: FTBFS: error: 'GLU_TESS_BEGIN_DATA' was not declared in this scope)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 19:17:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365601: fixed in coin2 2.4.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365680: cgiirc: buffer overflow in client.c

2006-05-01 Thread Paul Wise
Package: cgiirc Version: 0.5.4 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Upstream has just released 0.5.8, which fixes a buffer overflow in client.c amongst other things. The 0.5.8 timeline can be seen here: http://cvs.cgiirc.org/timeline?d=300&e=2006-Apr-30&c=2&px=&s=0&dm=

Bug#365353: missing debconf template: xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping

2006-05-01 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:44:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 08:40:03AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Quoting Adam Borowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Package: xserver-xorg > > > Version: 1:7.0.15 > > > Severity: grave > > > Justification: renders package uninstal

Bug#365522: marked as done (xprint-utils: FTBFS: Can't exec "aclocal": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/autoreconf line 176.)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 18:17:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365522: fixed in xprint-utils 7.0.0+cvs20040414-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#350624: star: acceptance of CDDL is undecided

2006-05-01 Thread Steve Langasek
reopen 350624 quit On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:41:05PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > More than 10 weeks have passed and nobody was able to name a part > of the CDDL and explain why it should be incompatible with the DFSG. Sure, comments like "Debian would obviously be anti-social and not trustwo

Processed: Re: Bug#350624: star: acceptance of CDDL is undecided

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 350624 Bug#350624: star: acceptance of CDDL is undecided Bug reopened, originator not changed. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs data

Processed: close 350624

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 350624 Bug#350624: star: acceptance of CDDL is undecided 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > End of message, stopping processing

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libdatetime-perl 1:0.2901-1.1

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 355982 + fixed Bug#355982: FTBFS: Failed 1/36 test scripts Tags were: pending patch fixed-upstream Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Bug#365418: marked as done (console-tools: new console-screen.sh fails to start on S/390)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 14:32:30 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365418: fixed in console-tools 1:0.2.3dbs-62 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#350624: Why this childish behavior?

2006-05-01 Thread Joerg Schilling
I will keep closing the bug unless someone is able to send a proof for the original claim The current state is: there is no bug as nobody is able to verify it. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni) [EMAI

Processed: reopening 350624

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > reopen 350624 Bug#350624: star: acceptance of CDDL is undecided Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assis

Bug#335473: cricket: Completely broken with latest rrdtool package 1.2

2006-05-01 Thread Christian Marillat
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > tags 335473 +upstream > thanks mate > > Hi > > This bug should get fixed upstream, though upstream is not very active > as at least there was nothing significant done the last 11 monts on > sf.net... maybe this package should just be removed? > > Though it s

Processed: reopening 350624

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > reopen 350624 Bug#350624: star: acceptance of CDDL is undecided Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assis

Processed: Re: Bug#350624: star: acceptance of CDDL is undecided

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 350624 Bug#350624: star: acceptance of CDDL is undecided 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Processed: notfound 365447 in 1.0.7-10, found 365447 in 1:1.0.7-10

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > notfound 365447 1.0.7-10 Bug#365447: Cannot upgrade nfs-common in a chroot environment Bug#365514: nfs-common: Can't create /home/statd in post-installation script Bug marked as not f

Processed: tagging 365282

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > # there's no agreed-upon patch here > tags 365282 - patch Bug#365282: xserver-xorg 7.0.15 fails installation (pre-inst exit status 10) Tags were: patch Bug#365353: missing debconf te

Processed: close 350624

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 350624 Bug#350624: star: acceptance of CDDL is undecided 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Jörg Unknown command or malformed ar

Processed: severity of 339641 is serious

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 339641 serious Bug#339641: postgresql-pljava: remove postgresql-server-dev-8.0 build-dependency Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admin

Processed: severity of 361142 is grave

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > # uninstallable is grave > severity 361142 grave Bug#361142: Uninstallable in unstable: libgwenhywfar17c2 (>= 1.18.0) it is not installable Bug#359883: libaqbanking: FTBFS: Out-of-d

Bug#365598: gdm fails to start gnome, kde (setuid, setgid, root error)

2006-05-01 Thread Wouter Van Hemel
Package: gdm Version: 2.14.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #365598 The last GDM upgrade broke Gnome and KDE. Upon logging in, I get errors telling me I'm not welcome running as root (setuid/setgid). The previous message in this report does a good job of describing the errors in detail, so I'm going to be

Bug#350624: star: acceptance of CDDL is undecided

2006-05-01 Thread Joerg Schilling
More than 10 weeks have passed and nobody was able to name a part of the CDDL and explain why it should be incompatible with the DFSG. It is obvious that the CDDL is compatible with the DFSG. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365640: gnome-session segfault

2006-05-01 Thread Emmanuel Fuste
Package: gnome-session Version: 2.14.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable strace of gnome-session: execve("/usr/bin/gnome-session", ["/usr/bin/gnome-session"], ["SHELL=/bin/bash", "TERM=linux", "HUSHLOGIN=FALSE", "USER=efuste", "MAIL=/var/mail/efuste", "PATH=/usr/local/bi

Bug#353134: marked as done (RM: libtest-builder-tester-perl -- RoM; module included in libtest-simple-perl)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 11:30:59 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#353134: fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#365505: marked as done (Version in include/linux/version.h is incomplete)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 11:03:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365505: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.16-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#361308: marked as done (Fails to install 2.6.15: "dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.15-1-486 (--configure):")

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 11:03:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#361308: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.16-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#344725: marked as done (RM: libdb2-ruby -- RoM; depends on obsolete db2)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 11:28:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344725: fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#315784: md5sum shouldn't be able to disappear

2006-05-01 Thread Nicolas François
Hello, After reading the log of #315784 (dpkg: dependencies should ensure md5sum is present), I wonder why adding a Pre-Depends: coreutils (>= ...) field to dpkg would break (c)debootstrap. I made a tarball for debootstrap with a modified dpkg and I noticed no problem. Goswin, do you rem

Processed: closing 315143

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > close 315143 Bug#315143: segfault on "apt-build --noupdate clean-build" 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanati

Bug#365197: marked as done ([NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 09:17:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365197: fixed in stunnel 2:3.26-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#340113: marked as done (stunnel4: stunnel fails to run)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 09:17:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340113: fixed in stunnel4 2:4.150-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#364890: marked as done (orgadoc: FTBFS: Cannot find eiffel compiler)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 09:32:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364890: fixed in orgadoc 0.8-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#315143: segfault on "apt-build --noupdate clean-build"

2006-05-01 Thread Niko Tyni
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 11:57:15PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: > Ok, so actually this bug is caused by #317058 in libapt-pkg-perl. > It is still present and may cause segfaults sometimes. Hi, just a heads-up: #317058 was fixed recently, so apt-build should be OK now as well. Cheers, -- Niko T

Bug#365630: segfault in gdmgreeter and gdmlogin

2006-05-01 Thread Emmanuel Fuste
Package: gdm Version: 2.14.4-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Since the X11R7 transition, gdm fail to start, xserver start is killed restart etc.. in an endless loop. The latest gdm (2.14.4-1) reach unstable, but the problem is the same. gdm is very hard to debug, enab

Bug#365629: cyrus-common-2.2 version 2.2.13-1 0: cyrdeliver segfaults

2006-05-01 Thread Michael Holtermann
Package: cyrus-common-2.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable With current version 2.2.13-1 of cyrus-common-2.2 a non-working cyrdeliver will be installed. If called from command line # cyrdeliver -m user.micha Segmentation fault will occur. Downgrading to 2.2.12-5 solved th

Processed: Re: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#365613: wpasupplicant: Upgrading remote system makes it unmaintainable after reboot

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 365613 wishlist Bug#365613: wpasupplicant: Upgrading remote system makes it unmaintainable after reboot Severity set to `wishlist'. > retitle 365613 Please retain the system service wpasupplicant Bug#365613: wpasupplicant: Upgrading remote sy

Bug#365613: [pkg-wpa-devel] Bug#365613: wpasupplicant: Upgrading remote system makes it unmaintainable after reboot

2006-05-01 Thread Reinhard Tartler
severity 365613 wishlist retitle 365613 Please retain the system service wpasupplicant tags 365613 wontfix merge 365613 360387 stop it right now and finally, felix! Severity wishlist, this does not break your whole system, but your network connection. So I'm merging this with 360387, which is the

Bug#365614: marked as done (rsync: Integer overflow in the receive_xattr function (remote exploit))

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 1 May 2006 17:12:28 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365614: rsync: Integer overflow in the receive_xattr function (remote exploit) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#365620: dvdbackup: Fails to work, error message "undefined symbol: UDFFindFile"

2006-05-01 Thread Stephen Gran
reassign 365620 libdvdread3 merge 365620 364972 thanks This one time, at band camp, Florian Cramer said: > Since recently, dvdbackup fails to work with the message: > "dvdbackup: symbol lookup error: dvdbackup: undefined symbol: UDFFindFile" > This happens with any DVD thrown at the program, and se

Bug#365623: Undeclared conflicts: pathname conflict at usr/share/man/man4/ipfw.4.gz between freebsd-manpages, ipchains

2006-05-01 Thread Justin Pryzby
Package: freebsd-manpages,ipchains Severity: serious The etch release policy states that: | http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt | If two packages cannot be installed together, one must list | the other in its "Conflicts:" field. Both freebsd-manpages and ipchains include the

Processed: Re: Bug#365620: dvdbackup: Fails to work, error message "undefined symbol: UDFFindFile"

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 365620 libdvdread3 Bug#365620: dvdbackup: Fails to work, error message "undefined symbol: UDFFindFile" Bug reassigned from package `dvdbackup' to `libdvdread3'. > merge 365620 364972 Bug#364972: symbol lookup error: dvdbackup: undefined symbo

Bug#365614: rsync: Integer overflow in the receive_xattr function (remote exploit)

2006-05-01 Thread Paul Slootman
On Mon 01 May 2006, Jay Kline wrote: > Package: rsync > Version: 2.6.4-6 > Severity: grave > Tags: security > Justification: user security hole > > > Integer overflow in the receive_xattr function in the extended > attributes patch (xattr.c) for rsync before 2.6.8 might allow attackers > to exec

Processed: gtkhtml bug?

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 363586 + unreproducible moreinfo Bug#363586: monodoc-browser: Monodoc-browser crashes mono There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug track

Bug#363935: marked as done (mozilla-firefox 1.0.4-2sarge has remote vulnerabilities)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 09:14:44 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#364231: [parisc-linux] Re: Bug#364231: exception catching

2006-05-01 Thread John David Anglin
> Er, no; we're talking about official Debian packages here, and the > libstdc++.so.6 in Debian is now from gcc-4.1. The problem is precisely that > GMP *is* being built using gcc-4.0, but libstdc++ is from gcc-4.1, resulting > in the double libgcc_s problem. Then, you must build *eveything* for

Bug#365194: Fwd: Re: [NONFREE-DOC] RFC1459, 2810-2813: IRC (Internet Relay Chat).

2006-05-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 07:41:28PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 01:55:55 +0200 Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > Do I need to get the copyright holder of the documents to > > relicense it under the GPL? It seems clear to me that it > > already is covered by the GPL, but it shouldn't

Bug#363586: gtkhtml bug?

2006-05-01 Thread Mirco Bauer
tags 363586 + unreproducible moreinfo thanks I believe this is a bug in gtkhtml3.8 which does some unclean memory management, which shows up now with glib 2.10. Please upgrade libgtkhtml3.8-15 to the latest version and try again. For me this crash does not happen, thus tagging it unreproducible.

Bug#365613: wpasupplicant: Upgrading remote system makes it unmaintainable after reboot

2006-05-01 Thread Felix Homann
Package: wpasupplicant Version: 0.4.8-4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system I tried upgrading wpasupplicant from 0.4.7-4 to 0.4.8-4 on a remote system that is connected to the network via a WPA connection using wpa_supplicant. The system is a "server only" system: It does

Bug#365534: marked as done (libapt-pkg-perl_0.1.19 (alpha/unstable): FTBFS with new sudo behavior)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 07:02:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365534: fixed in libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#365620: dvdbackup: Fails to work, error message "undefined symbol: UDFFindFile"

2006-05-01 Thread Florian Cramer
Package: dvdbackup Version: 0.1.1-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Since recently, dvdbackup fails to work with the message: "dvdbackup: symbol lookup error: dvdbackup: undefined symbol: UDFFindFile" This happens with any DVD thrown at the program, and several DVD drives

Bug#365614: rsync: Integer overflow in the receive_xattr function (remote exploit)

2006-05-01 Thread Jay Kline
Package: rsync Version: 2.6.4-6 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Integer overflow in the receive_xattr function in the extended attributes patch (xattr.c) for rsync before 2.6.8 might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted extended attributes that tr

Processed: /home/statd

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 365447 365514 Bug#365447: Cannot upgrade nfs-common in a chroot environment Bug#365514: nfs-common: Can't create /home/statd in post-installation script Merged 365447 365514. > severity 365447 serious Bug#365447: Cannot upgrade nfs-common in a ch

Processed: closing 363050

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 363050 2.14.0-2 Bug#363050: libgnomecanvas: Needs rebuild for new libxrender, not binNMU safe. 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 2.14.0-2, send any further explanations to Kurt

Bug#365386: marked as done (xprint: FTBFS: error: GL/gl.h: No such file or directory)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 05:47:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365386: fixed in xprint 1:1.0.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#360386: help

2006-05-01 Thread Krzysztof =?UTF-8?Q?Krzy=C5=BCaniak
I will glad to help You with checking & uploading packages for erlang into debian. eloy -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] jak to dobrze, że są oceany - bez nich byłoby jeszcze smutniej

Bug#365386: xprint: FTBFS: error: GL/gl.h: No such file or directory

2006-05-01 Thread Drew Parsons
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 12:39 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > found 365386 1:1.0.1-5 > retitle 365386 xprint: FTBFS: error: GL/gl.h: No such file or directory > thanks > > It looks like you're still missing some build dependencies: > In file included from g_disptab.c:36: > glxserver.h:64:19: error: GL/g

Processed: Fixed in NMU of sqlite3 3.3.5-0.2

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 361412 + fixed Bug#361412: libsqlite3-tcl: version in pkgIndex.tcl is wrong There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 364196 + fixed Bug#364196: sqlite miscompiled on at least ia64, -fno-strict-aliasing is missing There were no tags set. Tags

Bug#365539: marked as done (thunderbird:FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./Header.bmp': No such file or directory)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 05:02:35 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365539: fixed in thunderbird 1.5.0.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Tagging patch

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 365282 patch Bug#365282: xserver-xorg 7.0.15 fails installation (pre-inst exit status 10) There were no tags set. Bug#365353: missing debconf template: xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/zaxismapping Tags added: patch > End of message, stoppin

Bug#364454: firefox-locale-de: "incompatible" version is compatible

2006-05-01 Thread Nis Martensen
Package: firefox-locale-de Version: 1.5.0.1lang20060327-1 Followup-For: Bug #364454 Instead of reinstalling, I ran "touch $(dpkg -L firefox-locale-de)" which helped, too. Apparently firefox decides about compatibility of extensions based on file timestamps. I didn't check which file, though. Ni

Bug#365001: marked as done (libgdl-1-0: Binary-only NMU breaks dependencies)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 04:32:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365001: fixed in gdl 0.6.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#365598: gdm: after upgrade, GTK+ refuses to initialize

2006-05-01 Thread Andreas Kroschel
Package: gdm Version: 2.14.4-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software After upgrade to 2.14.4-1, GTK+ refuses to initialize. As a result, xfce4 and Gnome session do not start, and if I use a non-GTK+ dependent windowmanager like Windowmaker, a lot of programs refuse to execute

Bug#365597: emacs21: FTBFS: X11/Xaw/Paned.h: No such file or directory

2006-05-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: emacs21 Version: 21.4a-3.1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: make[5]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/emacs21-21.4a/debian/build-x/lwlib' x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -c -DUSE_LUCID -Demacs -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DUSE_LUCID -I. -I/build/buildd/emacs21

Bug#365601: coin2: FTBFS: error: 'GLU_TESS_BEGIN_DATA' was not declared in this scope

2006-05-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: coin2 Version: 2.4.5-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../../include -I../../include -D_REENTRANT -DCOIN_DEBUG=1 -DCOIN_INTERNAL -g -O2 -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -Wno-unused -Wno-multichar -Woverloaded-virtual -fno-

Bug#365386: xprint: FTBFS: error: GL/gl.h: No such file or directory

2006-05-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
found 365386 1:1.0.1-5 retitle 365386 xprint: FTBFS: error: GL/gl.h: No such file or directory thanks It looks like you're still missing some build dependencies: In file included from g_disptab.c:36: glxserver.h:64:19: error: GL/gl.h: No such file or directory In file included from glxserver.h:66,

Processed: Re: xprint: FTBFS: error: GL/gl.h: No such file or directory

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 365386 1:1.0.1-5 Bug#365386: xprint: FTBFS: Can't exec "aclocal": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/autoreconf line 176. Bug marked as found in version 1:1.0.1-5. > retitle 365386 xprint: FTBFS: error: GL/gl.h: No such file or directory Bug#

Bug#365556: marked as done (linux-wlan-ng-source: Does not build against 2.6.16)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 1 May 2006 12:19:12 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Already closed in last upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo

Bug#340119: marked as done (Fails to upgrade)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 06:00:43 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#365288: marked as done (xfaces: please update for X11R7)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 1 May 2006 11:38:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 3.3-26 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r

Processed: severity of 365547 is serious

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > severity 365547 serious Bug#365547: manpages-dev uninstallable because of conflicting file sem_destroy.3.gz from glibc-doc Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping proc

Bug#363115: marked as done (php4-mapscript: post-installation fails with exit status 10 -- can not install package)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2006 00:17:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363115: fixed in mapserver 4.8.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#365386: marked as done (xprint: FTBFS: Can't exec "aclocal": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/autoreconf line 176.)

2006-05-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 30 Apr 2006 23:47:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365386: fixed in xprint 1:1.0.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y