Your message dated Thu, 2 Mar 2006 02:24:09 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line properly closing bugs "fixed" by NMU by sponsor
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:02:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280807: fixed in docbook-defguide 2.0.8-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> tags 354180 moreinfo
Bug#354180: sylpheed-claws-gtk2: segfaults
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Your message dated Wed, 1 Mar 2006 22:36:43 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closed in 0.20-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
severity 354756 important
thanks
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:39:33AM -0500, Mike Furr wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Your point is non-obvious to me. A Replaces: w/o Conflicts: makes sense
> > only if ownership of files has moved from one package to another, which is
> > not the case here sin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 354756 important
Bug#354756: -legacy should Replace regular nvidia pkg
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:03:56AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The Section: field of a Debian package's control file is a technical detail
> > of the package, as is the location of a package on the Debian mirror. You
> > may consider t
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 11:44:10PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Attached the patch for the version I uploaded. Please respond if
> you think that the attached patch won't work.
This patch looks fine.
Oy! Why do the OpenSSL people have to keep breaking their API?
Happy hacking,
--
Simon Law
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348706: fixed in amaya 9.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346632: fixed in amaya 9.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341424: fixed in amaya 9.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336150: fixed in amaya 9.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:02:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336014: fixed in amaya 9.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: python-sqlobject
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: grave
python2.3-sqlobject in unstable is not installable due to the requirement
of python2.3-formencode, which is not in unstable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Ar
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 01:57:35 +0100
Manwe Sulimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: sylpheed-claws-gtk2
> Version: 2.0.0-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
[...]
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ sylpheed-claws-gtk2
>
> ** (process:2303): WARNING **: plugin loading error: `
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:02:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354839: fixed in directfb 0.9.22-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:02:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347627: fixed in directfb 0.9.22-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 354898 wishlist
Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> severity 354899 wishlist
Bug#354899: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
St
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:57:55AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > I've opened bugs now, I don't know if it hasn't happened before.
> > > Please Cc' the respective bugs so that we know it's fixed either way.
> > > The possible options that I see are:
> > > 1. audacity/portaudio are removed fr
severity 354898 wishlist
severity 354899 wishlist
thanks
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 06:41:19PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:15:05AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I've opened bugs now, I don't know if it hasn't happened before.
> > Please Cc' the respective bugs so that
Hi,
> > I've opened bugs now, I don't know if it hasn't happened before.
> > Please Cc' the respective bugs so that we know it's fixed either way.
> >
> > The possible options that I see are:
> >
> > 1. audacity/portaudio are removed from Debian
> >
> > 2. license text is modified so that it cl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 348390 important
Bug#348390: lirc: Irman driver stopped to work after upgrade
Severity set to `important'.
> merge 348390 352767 351723 326084 343189
Bug#326084: lirc: configure doesnt behave
Bug#343189: "Lirc kernel modules need kernel 2.6.12
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:15:05AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I've opened bugs now, I don't know if it hasn't happened before.
> Please Cc' the respective bugs so that we know it's fixed either way.
>
> The possible options that I see are:
>
> 1. audacity/portaudio are removed from Debian
>
On 3/1/06, Roberto Pariset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> swt-gtk_3.1.2-2 is failing again (at least) on amd64. Errors are similar to
> the following one. There are still many cast warnings as well.
...
> Please check the last log at:
> http://amd64.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=&pkg=swt-gtk
>
> T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> severity 354894 normal
Bug#354894: ia32-libs: Missing libXft.so.2 for amd64
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 337453 + fixed
Bug#337453: ssldump: FTBFS with openssl 0.9.8: MD5_CTX undeclared
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> # amd64-specific build failures are not RC
> severity 354856 important
Bug#354856: splashy: FTBFS on amd64: conflicting types for 'int64_t'
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of mes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 354743 important
Bug#354743: reporbug: crashes with IOError: Not a gzipped file
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 354743 +moreinfo +unreproducible
Unknown tag/s: +unreproducible.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed po
Hi,
> > Can you please identify yourself as someone who has final authority for
> > giving this advice.
>
> I will be very surprised if Don satisfies that request. No
> debian decision is final: we reserve the right to find or admit
> bugs in the future, whether coding, usage or licensing. The m
tags 354743 unreproducible moreinfo
severity 354743 normal
thanks
This bug is not reproducible here; the grave severity seems to be
unwarranted.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I uploaded. Please respond if
you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
diff -u ssldump-0.9b3/config.sub
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 335656 linux-2.6
Bug#335656: linux-image-2.6.13-1-386: PCI error
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.13-1-386'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.13-1-386' to `linux-2.6'.
> reassign 321409 linux-2.6
Bug#321409: hda: dma_timer_
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> package firefox-locale-ar firefox-locale-bg firefox-locale-cs
> firefox-locale-da firefox-locale-de firefox-locale-el firefox-locale-en-gb
> firefox-locale-en-us firefox-locale-es-a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 304066 libcupsys2 1.1.23-12
Bug#304066: Prompted about unmodified conffile
Bug reassigned from package `libcupsys2-gnutls10' to `libcupsys2'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 06:50:57PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> IMO all this needs some thought and changes in the implementation. I have
> therefore uploaded a version of preseed without support for dhcp pre-
> seeding but with the fixes needed for existing preseeding functionality.
From the cha
Package: portaudio
Severity: serious
I'm filing a bug so that we can remember there is an issue here.
regards,
junichi
At Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:19:18 -0800,
Don Armstrong wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Ross Bencina wrote:
> > [someone said]
> > >Or, if the "request" clause is not
Package: audacity
Severity: serious
Hi,
I'm filing a bugreport against audacity in case we forget at all.
It kind of sneaked in; without a resolution this package should be removed from
Debian.
regards,
junichi
> [1 ]
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Ross Bencina wrote:
> > [someone said]
> >
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 304370 + fixed
Bug#304370: Bugs in python-nautilus crash nautilus
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Package: ia32-libs
Version: 1.5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
ia32-libs installs libXft.so.1.1 while the requested version is .so.2
in fact. I have seen also resolved bug 'libz' request and some others. in my
package
there is still lack of libz library in the appriopria
Hello Luk,
> Attached the patch for the version I uploaded. Please respond if
> you think that the attached patch won't work.
Thanks for the patch and NMU!
*/ Christoffer Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>
>
> Salut Arnaud,
>
> Sorry to bother you again, but it's been a very long time. Should I look
> for another sponsor?
Yep, sorry, I wasn't able to build nice on my powerpc laptop, sorry.
- --
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 354743 grave
Bug#354743: reporbug: crashes with IOError: Not a gzipped file
Severity set to `grave'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 07:33, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > For one thing, my dhcp server setup [1] already uses 'filename' for
> > PXE netbooting. So it seems that the chosen solution is incompatible
> > with netbooting which I doubt was the intention.
>
> No, see the documentation (
tags 354339 patch pending
thanks
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:33:47PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > For one thing, my dhcp server setup [1] already uses 'filename' for PXE
> > netbooting. So it seems that the chosen solution is incompatible with
> > netbooting which I doubt was t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> package nautilus-python python-nautilus
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: nautilus-python python-nautilus
> tags 304370 + pending
Bug#304370: Bugs in python-nautilus crash nautilus
Ther
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 10:47:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354859: fixed in rxtx 2.1.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 304066 serious
Bug#304066: Prompted about unmodified conffile
Severity set to `serious'.
> # Justification and precedent: #337992
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:27:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 285911 and 210963 acknowledged in recent upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Can I expect to see this bug fixed for etch?
http://bugs.debian.org/339056
Justin
* [33]#343138: tktable: FTBFS/unknown cause
* [36]#348633: ghc6: effective FTBFS because of a bug in
* [40]#290242: prozilla: note in ftpparse.c is ambiguous
* [43]#301236: mutt: Attachments with
Sorry for that
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can I expect to see this bug fixed for etch?
http://bugs.debian.org/339056
Justin
* [33]#343138: tktable: FTBFS/unknown cause
* [36]#348633: ghc6: effective FTBFS because of a bug in
* [40]#290242: prozilla: note in ftpparse.c is ambiguous
* [43]#301236: mutt: Attachments with
Can I expect to see this bug fixed for etch?
http://bugs.debian.org/339056
Justin
* [33]#343138: tktable: FTBFS/unknown cause
* [36]#348633: ghc6: effective FTBFS because of a bug in
* [40]#290242: prozilla: note in ftpparse.c is ambiguous
* [43]#301236: mutt: Attachments with
Can I expect to see this bug fixed for etch?\n\nhttp://bugs.debian.org/339056
* [33]#343138: tktable: FTBFS/unknown cause
* [36]#348633: ghc6: effective FTBFS because of a bug in
* [40]#290242: prozilla: note in ftpparse.c is ambiguous
* [43]#301236: mutt: Attachments with absol
Can I expect to see this bug fixed for etch?\n\nhttp://bugs.debian.org/339056
* [33]#343138: tktable: FTBFS/unknown cause
* [36]#348633: ghc6: effective FTBFS because of a bug in
* [40]#290242: prozilla: note in ftpparse.c is ambiguous
* [43]#301236: mutt: Attachments with absol
Can I expect to see this bug fixed for etch?\n\nhttp://bugs.debian.org/339056
* [33]#343138: tktable: FTBFS/unknown cause
* [36]#348633: ghc6: effective FTBFS because of a bug in
* [40]#290242: prozilla: note in ftpparse.c is ambiguous
* [43]#301236: mutt: Attachments with absol
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 353135 + fixed
Bug#353135: libtest-pod-perl: FTBFS with perl 5.8.8
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 08:32:24 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342619: fixed in exim4 4.50-8sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 350141 + fixed
Bug#350141: gtk-qt-engine: ftbfs [sparc] autoconf: command not found
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I uploaded. Please respond if
you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
diff -u libtest-pod-perl-1.20/de
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I uploaded. Please respond if
you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
signature.asc
Description: Ope
Sorry, I forgot the patch.
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
diff -u gtk-qt-engine-0.60/debian/rules gtk-qt-engine-0.60/debian/rules
--- gtk-qt-engine-0.60/debian/rules
+++ gtk-qt-engine-0.60/de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 353968 sshfs
Bug#353968: RSync may not replace files on SSHFS volumes...
Bug reassigned from package `rsync & sshfs' to `sshfs'.
> reassign 353932 awstats
Bug#353932: machine compromised with awstats.pl?configdir (should have been
Warning: Unk
Bdale Garbee ha scritto:
> I just had a look, and I can't tell much from that level of the build
> log. These failures are completely unexpected, and I suspect I'll need
> your help to understand what the problem actually is. If you still have
> the build tree around, you should find some log fil
Hi Dave,
Dave Beckett said:
>> To fix this, I suppose rdf_log.h should include raptor.h
>
> You should never include rdf_log.h directly, always #include
> which pulls in raptor.h there.
Just for the record, the code isn't mine, but comes from Amaya (the
browser), which includes (not rdf_log.h).
Regis Boudin wrote:
> Package: librdf0-dev
> Version: 1.0.2-2
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
>
> Trying to build Amaya using the system librdf fails because the
> raptor_locator type is not defined in rdf_log.h
>
> To fix this, I suppose rdf_log.h should include raptor.h
You should never include rdf
Package: rxtx
Version: 2.1.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'rxtx' on unstable, I get the following error:
debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp
rm src/gnu/io
rm: cannot remove `src/gnu/io': No such file or directory
make: *** [clean] Error 1
Package: banshee
Version: 0.10.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Banshee fails to start due to a SIGSEGV:
$ banshee
** (:21451): WARNING **: The following assembly referenced from
/usr/lib/banshee/banshee.exe could not be loaded:
Assembly: dbus-sharp(assemb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Your point is non-obvious to me. A Replaces: w/o Conflicts: makes sense
> only if ownership of files has moved from one package to another, which is
> not the case here since the two versions of the package aren't necessarily
>
Hello, again, I wanted to precise a bit my explanation.
As the repeat keyword is also used in other part of the code, the repeat string should be replaced only where it is used
to contruct a SQL query ;)
for example, there were many occurence in the appointment.pinc file : see
#
# Secon
Package: splashy
Version: 0.1.7
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Hello,
splashy 0.1.7 FTBFS on amd64 with the following error:
[...]
if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/direct
Roland Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: tetex-base
> Version: 2.0.2c-9
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> I get this error when upgrading to tetex-base 3.0-14:
>
> /etc/texmf/map/dvips/context/original-adobe-euro.map: md5sum not known.
> Exiting
Thanks
Package: muine
Version: 0.8.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: It allows itself to be installed with an incompatible library
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just upgraded to dbus-0.61, including libdbus-1-cil, and now Muine refuses to
run. The following error message is display
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 15:38 +0100, Roberto Pariset wrote:
> tar 1.15.1-4 FTBFS on amd64, because not all tests from /bin/sh
> ./testsuite are successful. In fact:
>
> ## - ##
> ## Test results. ##
> ## - ##
>
> ERROR: 32 tests were run,
> 2 failed unexpectedly.
> 6 tests
Frans Pop wrote:
> For one thing, my dhcp server setup [1] already uses 'filename' for PXE
> netbooting. So it seems that the chosen solution is incompatible with
> netbooting which I doubt was the intention.
No, see the documentation (in the installation manual). It's possible to
conditionalise
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:30:28PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 07:49:10PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> > tags 346695 -pending
> > thanks
> >
> > ivtools is in ugly shape, so not NMUing.
> > Attached is a file with all the lintian + linda problems.
>
> ...
>
> > W: ivtools-uni
Package: xserver-xorg-video-savage
Version: 1:2.0.2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
There is nothing in this package. Probably a packaging mistake.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: tar
Version: 1.15.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Hello,
tar 1.15.1-4 FTBFS on amd64, because not all tests from /bin/sh
./testsuite are successful. In fact:
## - ##
## Test results. ##
## - ##
ERROR: 32 tests were run,
2 failed un
Hello,
swt-gtk_3.1.2-2 is failing again (at least) on amd64. Errors are similar to
the following one. There are still many cast warnings as well.
[...]
g++ -O -DXPCOM_GLUE=1 -DMOZILLA_STRICT_API=1 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions
-Wall -DSWT_VERSION=3139 -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fPIC -I.
-I/usr/include/mo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> severity 347627 grave
Bug#347627: libdirectfb-0.9-22: Please build against libsysfs2
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Package: libsdl1.2,directfb
Version: N/A
Severity: serious
libsdl1.2 and directfb have a build-dependency/dependency loop, which
makes directfb unbuildable and both uninstallable, as libdirectfb-0.9.22
depends against a removed package.
Bastian
--
Without followers, evil cannot spread.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 07:45:45PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>
> >Over the weekend I confirmed that removing the ".SECONDARY:" fixed the
> >problem, at the slight expense of make being less convenient while doing
> >development. I've checked it works OK on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 345563 yelp 2.12.2-2
Bug#345563: No help topics are displayed in yelp
Bug reassigned from package `yelp' to `yelp'.
> severity 352628 grave
Bug#352628: Don't load the file ~/.gnome2/yelp-bookmarks.xbel
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 352628
Package: adduser
Version: 3.84
Severity: serious
Justification: maintainer decision
3.84 has too many issues for testing, 3.85 is due later this week.
Greetings
Marc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Ar
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 03:17:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349396: fixed in affix-kernel 2.1.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 354145 + pending
Bug#354145: mindi: Cdrom not detected after cdrom boot
Tags were: patch confirmed
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Christian Hammers wrote:
>block 343762 by 337250
>thanks
>
>Bacula FTBFS which prevents me from doing an NMU upload :(
>
>
The upload is coming, sorry.
Just hadn't had the time to finish it.
>bye,
>
>-christian-
>
>
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 02:47:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#103594: fixed in xgdipc 1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 354694 normal
Bug#354694: beep: No sound with latest release
Severity set to `normal'.
> tags 354694 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#354694: beep: No sound with latest release
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> thank
severity 354694 normal
tags 354694 + unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
* Vedran Fura?? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-28 10:17]:
> Releases -15/-16 worked fine, but after upgrade to -17 it stoped working.
> $ beep -l 2000 -f 440 gives me two seconds of silence.
I can't reproduce it, sorry. It works w
Hi ff-locale-maintainers,
would it help to involve more DDs in co-maintaining this package?
Firefox is an important package and I guess for many non-techies an
uninstallable locale renders firefox useless.
I suggest to ask for help e.g. on d-devel. This way you can attract at
least a few DD who c
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 01:32:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328003: fixed in xexec 0.0.3-23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 353929 minor
Bug#353929: gkrellm: GKrellm falls over far too often in Openbox
Severity set to `minor'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 01:02:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353112: fixed in aranym 0.9.3beta-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 01 Mar 2006 01:17:22 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342533: fixed in gtkguitune 0.7-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hello, I had this problem, and solved it on my server.
The cause is that the word "repeat" is a reserved word for Mysql 5.0.
when used as a field or table name, it must be "backquoted" with ``,
otherwise Mysql refuses the syntax.
So I looked in tutos code for the string repeat and I replaced it
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:01:01PM -0500, Mike Connor wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Firefox (the name) is equally protected and controlled by the same
> trademark policy and legal requirements as the Firefox logo. You're
> free to use an
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:20:26PM -0500, Mike Furr wrote:
> Package: nvidia-kernel-legacy-source
> Version: 1.0.7174-2
> Severity: serious
> The template file in the legacy source package needs to Replace
> nvidia-kernel-#KVERS# in addition to conflicting with it so that us
> old-time card users
Hello Guyz,
I have just realized that I have completely forgot to pass down som
infos. I have discussed all the bugs with upstream (because one of them
is my ex-roommate) and fixed everything in upstream.
So I am really sorry for wasting you time. Anyway thank you for you
work.
Antonin
--
98 matches
Mail list logo
