Hi,
Hope I am not writing to wrong address. I am nice, pretty looking
girl. I am planning on visiting your town this month. Can
we meet each other in person? Message me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> # does not appear to make the package unusable
> severity 354535 important
Bug#354535: gnome-cups-manager: Unable to find the program from Menu
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of
Package: gnome-cups-manager
Version: 0.31-1.1
Severity: grave
Hi,
This is a usability problem that I encountered. I expected the
gnome-cups-manager (or some kind of print configuration menu) to
appear under the Applications->System Tools menu as to be expected
with any GNOME configuration tool, b
Hi there lovely,
I was searching the net few days ago. I am new to this thing.
and saw your profile. I decided to email you cause I found
you attractive. I might come down to your city in few weeks.
Let me know if we can meet each other in person.
I am attractive girl. I am sure you won't regret
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 350390 = upstream help
Bug#350390: gnubg: Segmentation fault
Tags were: experimental
Tags set to: upstream, help
> severity 350390 grave
Bug#350390: gnubg: Segmentation fault
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
On 2006-02-27 02:56:37 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > > dixsept:~> echo ".$(/usr/bin/stat --format="%G" /var/cache/fonts)."
> > > .UNKNOWN.
> >
> > Ahh, so I assume that /var/cache/fonts exists, but it is owned by a
> > group id NOT listed in /etc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> reopen 354521
Bug#354521: libgpevtype0-dev: Missing dependencies.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> severity 354521 wishlist
Bug#354521: libgpevtype0-dev: Missing dependencies.
Severity set to `wishlist'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > dixsept:~> echo ".$(/usr/bin/stat --format="%G" /var/cache/fonts)."
> > .UNKNOWN.
>
> Ahh, so I assume that /var/cache/fonts exists, but it is owned by a
> group id NOT listed in /etc/groups, so stat cannot find it.
I suggest the following fix to t
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> GROUP=$(stat --format="%G" /var/cache/fonts 2>/dev/null)
>
> On this machine (currently):
>
> dixsept:~> echo ".$(/usr/bin/stat --format="%G" /var/cache/fonts)."
> .UNKNOWN.
Ahh, so I assume that /var/cache/fonts exists, but it is owned by a
group
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:02:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351572: fixed in libgpevtype 0.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> tags 337632 + help
Bug#337632: matchbox-panel: floating point exception on amd64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
On 2006-02-27 00:22:56 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> The interesting question is *HOW* did it come that there is nothing else
> saved in this variable, HOW did it happend that debconf returned
> something strange.
/var/lib/dpkg/info/tex-common.config contains:
GROUP=$(stat --format="%G" /var
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 353312 patch
Bug#353312: sufary: FTBFS with new make
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs datab
tag 353312 patch
thanks
The attached patch fixes the build problems that sufary has when using
the new make.
--
Matt
diff -ru sufary-2.1.1-orig/debian/rules sufary-2.1.1/debian/rules
--- sufary-2.1.1-orig/debian/rules 2006-02-26 11:32:51.0 -0800
+++ sufary-2.1.1/debian/rules 2006-
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:17:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336119: fixed in cflow 1:1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:17:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#235235: fixed in cflow 1:1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
HI Stephen!
Thanks for all the ideas...
On Son, 26 Feb 2006, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > That looks like an untrapped error from debconf, off-hand. debconf will
> > > return strings like "UNKNOWN THIS OR THAT" on error, and it looks like
> > > it was truncated to just UNKNOWN.
> >
> > and in posti
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 229237 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#229237: popularity-contest: doesn't report kernel usage
Changed Bug submitter from Andre Lehovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
> submitter 224125 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#224125: obsolete key creates sec
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:47:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351586: fixed in mednafen 0.5.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 353309 + fixed
Bug#353309: mguesser: FTBFS: invalid syntax in conditional
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> # DoS-only is important, not grave
> severity 354464 important
Bug#354464: [CVE-2006-0876] popfile remote DoS
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:02:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354489: fixed in libcatalyst-perl 5.65-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # The patch is relevant for vacation, not maildrop.
> tags 339749 - patch
Bug#339749: maildrop: kills processes it shouldn't
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 353315 + fixed
Bug#353315: upsd: FTBFS with new make
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Hello,
I'm doing an NMU of mguesser to fix #353309; diff attached.
Thanks,
Matej
diff -u mguesser-0.2/debian/changelog mguesser-0.2/debian/changelog
--- mguesser-0.2/debian/changelog
+++ mguesser-0.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+mguesser (0.2-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-mainta
This one time, at band camp, Norbert Preining said:
> On Son, 26 Feb 2006, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > > tex-common/groupname: UNKNOWN
> >
> > That looks like an untrapped error from debconf, off-hand. debconf will
> > return strings like "UNKNOWN THIS OR THAT" on error, and it looks like
> > it
Hello,
I'm doing an NMU of upsd to fix #353315; diff attached.
Thanks,
Matej
diff -u upsd-2.6/debian/changelog upsd-2.6/debian/changelog
--- upsd-2.6/debian/changelog
+++ upsd-2.6/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+upsd (2.6-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Makefi
Le Dimanche 26 Février 2006 19:57, Uwe Hermann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:20:42PM +0100, Fabrice Flore-Thebault wrote:
> > Exactly the same errors on ppc. It simply doesn't build.
>
> Yeah, I guess all architectures are affected. I'm not so sure what the
> exact problem is. Ther
Package: tulip
Version: 2.0.2-7
Severity: serious
Justification: ftbfs
Hi,
The package declares Build-Depends on mesag-dev (>= 6.2.1-5), which no
longer can be satisfied in sid since mesag-dev is a virtual package
provided by libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev.
Best Regards,
robert
-- System Information
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:30:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 0.1.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 352375 patch
Bug#352375: preferences: FTBFS because of unmet build-dep on
libgnustep-gui0.9-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 11:43:47AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> The attached patch changes the build-dependencies on
> libgnustep-gui0.9-dev and gnustep-back to libgnustep-gui0.10-dev and
> gnustep-gpbs, respectively, which fixes the build.
And now for the actual patch.
--
Matt
diff -ru preference
tag 352375 patch
thanks
The attached patch changes the build-dependencies on
libgnustep-gui0.9-dev and gnustep-back to libgnustep-gui0.10-dev and
gnustep-gpbs, respectively, which fixes the build.
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello Kurt,
>> will/could the changes in 0.9.8a-7 have any effect on the postfix issues
>> I'm experiencing? Is it worth a try?
> A new postfix version has been uploaded to unstable, which has as
> changelog entry:
> * New upstream, fixes various TLS/SASL bugs.
> I suggest you try that.
Thank yo
Package: libcatalyst-perl
Version: 5.65-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'libcatalyst-perl' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
/usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
*** Module::AutoInstall version 1.01
*** Checking for dependencies...
[Core Features]
- UN
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:50:41 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 1.3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:04:43 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349852: fixed in libeventdb 0.20-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 350435 by 351408
Bug#350435: FTBFS due to unmet build-dep on libgnustep-gui0.9-dev
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 351408
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 353857 pending
Bug#353857: libspf: FTBFS with current make
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
tag 353857 pending
thanks
Per Mattias's message that this is just waiting for a sponsor, I'm
marking this bug pending.
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Romain Francoise:
> Update about this bug: I notified upstream about it two weeks ago but
> nobody seemed to care; the project is pretty much dead upstream.
Do we really want to release software which is dead upstream?
> That being said, I'm not sure that the issue is RC anyway, the problem
>
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:20:42PM +0100, Fabrice Flore-Thebault wrote:
> Exactly the same errors on ppc. It simply doesn't build.
Yeah, I guess all architectures are affected. I'm not so sure what the
exact problem is. There seems to be a mising *.moc file (or the build tools
don't find it),
block 350435 by 351408
thanks
I created a patch that should fix this bug but when I tested it, the
build failed because of bug 351408. I've attached the patch anyway.
--
Matt
diff -ru lusernet.app-0.4.1-orig/debian/control
lusernet.app-0.4.1/debian/control
--- lusernet.app-0.4.1-orig/debian/co
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 02:16:03PM +, Peter Salisbury wrote:
> Package: zeroconf
> Followup-For: Bug #351540
>
> zeroconf was installed automatically and caused various network
> problems because it overwrites the ip address and broadcast address
> for eth0.
> This interface was configured i
Hi all!
On Son, 26 Feb 2006, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > tex-common/groupname: UNKNOWN
>
> That looks like an untrapped error from debconf, off-hand. debconf will
> return strings like "UNKNOWN THIS OR THAT" on error, and it looks like
> it was truncated to just UNKNOWN.
In which circumstances
Hi Miguel!
On Son, 26 Feb 2006, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
> ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 The teTeX binary files
> ii tetex-base 2.0.2c-9 Basic library files of teTeX
>
> >
> > This is very strange. Did you NOT upgrade tetex to tetex3? In case you
> > are running still tetex2, t
On 23 Feb 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> I have prepared an NMU for gworkspace to compile it against the new
> GNUstep libraries. Unfortunately, while preparing the NMU, I found a
> bug that I had introduced in pdfkit.framework that prevented
> gworkspace from compiling. I've p
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:02:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346957: fixed in libsdl1.2 1.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:02:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337668: fixed in libsdl1.2 1.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:02:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318238: fixed in libsdl1.2 1.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:02:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317578: fixed in libsdl1.2 1.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:02:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318238: fixed in libsdl1.2 1.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:02:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317578: fixed in libsdl1.2 1.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:02:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315561: fixed in libsdl1.2 1.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:02:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291268: fixed in libsdl1.2 1.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:02:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291268: fixed in libsdl1.2 1.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:02:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291331: fixed in libsdl1.2 1.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:02:16 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291331: fixed in libsdl1.2 1.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: libpam-poldi
Version: 0.3.0-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
if the smartcard daemon hangs, poldi waits forever for a connection to the
daemon, so it becomes impossible to logon or become superuser until the da
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:32:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301364: fixed in rxtx 2.1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:32:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290420: fixed in rxtx 2.1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: python-cherrypy
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Cite:
Directory traversal vulnerability in the staticfilter component in
CherryPy before 2.1.1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files
via ".." sequences in unspecified vectors.
http://www.securityf
This is CVE-2006-0855
Please mention the CVE number in the changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: php-auth
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Cite:
Multiple unspecified injection vulnerabilities in unspecified Auth
Container back ends for PEAR::Auth before 1.2.4, and 1.3.x before
1.3.0r4, allow remote attackers to "falsify authentication
credentials," rel
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:26:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354414: www.debian.org: Invalid URL in jigdo files used to
download Debian Stable DVD ISO
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 350904 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#350904: xnc always crashes with segfault when trying to start
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> severity 350904 important
Bug#350904: xnc always crashes with segfault when trying to
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 01:44:04AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> --- ../adduser-3.81.orig/adduser2006-02-04 12:16:30.0 +
> +++ ./adduser 2006-02-06 01:35:04.0 +
> @@ -331,7 +331,8 @@
> printf STDERR gtx("No UID/GID pair is available in the range
> %d-%d
Package: mambo
Severity: grave
Tags: security experimental
Justification: user security hole
Cite:
Unspecified vulnerability in Mambo 4.5.3, 4.5.3h, and possibly
previous versions, has unspecified vectors and impact. NOTE: This
information is based on a vague vendor announcement; an official
discl
Package: popfile
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Cite:
POPFile before 0.22.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of
service (application crash) via unspecified vectors involving
character sets within e-mail messages.
see also
http://popfile.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ReleaseNotes/0.22.4
Subject: zoo: buffer overflow when processing archives
Package: zoo
Version: 2.10-16
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
Tags: security
Hello,
Jean-Sébastien Guay-Leroux has found a buffer overflow vulnerability in zoo:
o http://secunia.com/advisories/19002/
o http://seclists.o
Package: bugzilla
Version: 2.20-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Several security problems have been found in Bugzilla. Please
see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.bugtraq/22040
for details. None of these issues affect oldstable or stable.
Cheers,
Package: zeroconf
Followup-For: Bug #351540
zeroconf was installed automatically and caused various network
problems because it overwrites the ip address and broadcast address
for eth0.
This interface was configured in /etc/network/interfaces as static so
should not be overwritten.
Installing
Package: zeroconf
Followup-For: Bug #351540
zeroconf was installed automatically and caused various network
problems because it overwrites the ip address and broadcast address
for eth0.
This interface was configured in /etc/network/interfaces as static so
should not be overwritten.
Installing
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 05:32:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352782: fixed in ezmlm-browse 0.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> severity 333052 grave
Bug#333052: race in the modules loader?
Bug#333522: udev: modules randomly aren't loaded at startup - "Unknown symbol"
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> severity 333052 normal
Bug#333052: race in the modules loader?
Bug#333522: udev: modules randomly aren't loaded at startup - "Unknown symbol"
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of messa
Package: tetex-base
Version: 2.0.2c-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I get this error when upgrading to tetex-base 3.0-14:
/etc/texmf/map/dvips/context/original-adobe-euro.map: md5sum not known. Exiting
The package cannot be installed.
-- System Information:
Debian Re
I dont think the problem you are observing is related to module-init-tools. I
am using the same version and do not see these errors. IMHO, there is something
wrong with the kernel image you are using. The best way to solve symbol
problems like that is to use the kernel-package tool and build you
Update about this bug: I notified upstream about it two weeks ago but
nobody seemed to care; the project is pretty much dead upstream.
That being said, I'm not sure that the issue is RC anyway, the problem
remains theoretical and I don't think anyone in their right mind would
use tcc to compile pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: xine-ui
Version: 0.99.3-1.3
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
When I start the xine it opens the window and shows the splash screen.
Then it dies with error "can't create mcop directory".
By the way, what the hell do xine need such crazy thinks like
Package: xine-lib
Severity: serious
xine-lib_1.1.1-1 fails to build from source on these release architectures:
alpha, hppa, ia64, mips, mipsel. It does build on i386, amd64 and
powerpc though.
In fact, it fails to build on m86k, sparc and s390, too, but they aren't
release archs (at least not A
notfound 333052 3.2.2-2
thanks
On Feb 26, Dionisio Martínez Soler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: module-init-tools
> Version: 3.2.2-2
> Severity: grave
Get real. Look at the log kernel log, you or some package probably
configured a bad parameter:
> FATAL: Error inserting snd
> (/lib/modul
Package: module-init-tools
Version: 3.2.2-2
Severity: grave
I don't know for sure if this is probably related to this bug, but it
seems very similar. Using linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 (v. 2.6.15-7) I get
this while loading snd_intel8x0 (both at boot time and manually with
modprobe):
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 307299 important
Bug#307299: Perl taint error on TWiki diffs page after twiki/apache upgrade
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
This one time, at band camp, Norbert Preining said:
> Hi Vincent!
>
> On Son, 26 Feb 2006, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Adjusting permissions of TeX font cache... chown: `root:UNKNOWN': invalid
> > group
> > tex-common/groupname: UNKNOWN
>
> This is strange, how did the UNKNOWN came into the tex
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear Miguel!
>
> On Sam, 25 Feb 2006, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
>
>
>
> Uuups, where did you got this from?
>
> Do you have teTeX or TeX live installed?
tetex
>
> You are running sid, but what is your version of tetex-bin?
>
> Please send me the output of
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> tags 231082 + unreproducible
Bug#231082: spamassassin: spamc hangs since most recent perl package updates
for stable
Tags were: woody
Tags added: unreproducible
>
End of message, st
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 03:31:35PM -0700, Peter Sebastian Masny wrote:
>I have what I believe is the same problem using working postfix and
>procmail. In detail:
>
>apt-get install spamassassin librazor-perl
>enable spamd in /etc/default/spamassassin
>/etc/init.d/spamassasin restart
>
>then in my
89 matches
Mail list logo
