Hi Peter,
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has kindly agreed to sponsor an NMU
of aspell-fo based on my patch (included above). Please let us know if
there any reason why it should not be done, otherwise it is going to be
uploaded next weekend (March 4-5).
Best regards,
Jurij Smak
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:10:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Hi Daniel,
I just stumbled across this bug whilst looking into an issue with the
mondo package that I maintain and writing DVDs under sudo which does not
work because of the situation described in this bug.
I believe that rather than applying a patch as suggested by LaMont, all
that would be requ
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I've downloaded jigdo and template files from
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/i386/jigdo-dvd/
After jigdo-lite (installed from the jigdo-file package)
started to download files, I got error messages for e
Updating checkinstall to version 1.6.0 fixes the segfaults with the latest Sid
sources.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:33:04 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line twiki: TWiki Remote Command Execution Vulnerability
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Salut Yann,
Thanks a lot for reporting this issue and for mentioning the workaround
you found!
I can confirm the problem and it's all my fault: When I made the change
in 1.06-2 to get DMA to work on VIA chipsets, I relied on the
ide-generic module to get loaded later, which is wrong as the CD can
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 354145 + confirmed patch
Bug#354145: mindi: Cdrom not detected after cdrom boot
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
On 2006-02-26 01:42:04 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> This is strange, how did the UNKNOWN came into the tex-common/groupname?
I really don't know. It was previously 82 (in my config.dat backup from
2006-02-22 01:07:52), and now UNKNOWN.
In the past, /etc/group contained:
users:x:82:
(I had t
Hi Vincent!
On Son, 26 Feb 2006, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Adjusting permissions of TeX font cache... chown: `root:UNKNOWN': invalid
> group
> tex-common/groupname: UNKNOWN
This is strange, how did the UNKNOWN came into the tex-common/groupname?
Did you enter it? The default for groupname is us
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
But there's also files in the talks subdirectory for which no source is
currently available. Do you know about the license situation for them,
or should I try to contact Ulrik or Taco? And, for that matter, I guess
roadmap.eps has been created with M
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> # as I said, FTBFS are only RC if there is a previous package version in the
> Debian archive
> severity 354342 important
Bug#354342: FTBFS: can't find res_mkquery
Severity set to
Dear Miguel!
On Sam, 25 Feb 2006, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
> >>kpsewhich: unrecognized option `-var-value'
>
> /usr/bin/kpsewhich
>
> > and
> > kpsewhich --version
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/media/loop0$ kpsewhich --version
> kpathsea version 3.4.5
Uuups, where did you got this from?
Do y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11
> tags 248654 + pending
Bug#248654: should use the new debhelper 4.2 udeb support
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 260173 + pending
Bug#260173: cdbs: Run dh_installmi
Package: tex-common
Version: 0.18
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When setting up tex-common:
Setting up tex-common (0.18) ...
Adjusting permissions of TeX font cache... chown: `root:UNKNOWN': invalid group
dpkg: error processing tex-common (--configure):
subprocess post-
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:57:36 -0800
Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> The version which was listed as fixing the bug is indeed present in
> testing and unstable (rather, a later version is present).
Whoops. For some dumb reason I took 2.0.4.20051017-0.1 as an earlier
version than 2.0.4.20051017 because o
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:47:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354356: fixed in python-htmltmpl 1.22-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:47:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354200: fixed in e2undel 0.8-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:47:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352103: fixed in portreserve 0.0.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
reopen 323815
thanks
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:22:01PM -0500, Chris Metzler wrote:
> This bug was marked fixed and closed four months ago; but the version
> which fixes the bug is not in unstable and never made it to testing.
The version which was listed as fixing the bug is indeed present in t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 323815
Bug#323815: bzflag: shoots trough other players
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 347095 patch
Bug#347095: pixmap: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tag 349443 patch
Bug#349443: FTBFS: overrides internal X11 headers
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping p
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 08:53:41PM +0100, Manolo Díaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After install the new package mozilla-thunderbird is still in English,
> even removing .mozilla-thunderbird dir. Afteward, I've tried to remove
> or reinstall the package with no success.
Yes, the prerm script is not correct,
tag 347095 patch
tag 349443 patch
thanks
The attached patch fixes both of these bugs. To fix bug 347095, it
removes the build-dependency on xlibs-dev. To fix bug 349443, it
removes the X11 subdirectory.
--
Matt
diff -ru pixmap-2.6pl4-orig/debian/control pixmap-2.6pl4/debian/control
--- pixmap-
Package: checkinstall
Version: 1.5.3-3
Severity: grave
When attempting to execute "checkinstall" scripts after updating Sid today, I
get segfaults during package creation. Checkinstall was working prior to
upgrading system packages.
--SNIP--
checkinstall 1.5.3, Copyright 2001 Felipe Eduardo Sa
Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Sam, 25 Feb 2006, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
>
>>Package: texinfo
>>Version: 4.8-5
>>Severity: grave
>>
>>kpsewhich: unrecognized option `-var-value'
>
>
> Please tell me the output of
> which kpsewhich
/usr/bin/kpsewhich
> and
> kpsewhich --version
[
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 353315 patch
Bug#353315: upsd: FTBFS with new make
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 352849 http://bugzilla.remotesensing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1097
Bug#352849: libtiff-tools: tiff2pdf segfaults
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://bugzilla.remotesensing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1097.
> severity 352849 normal
tag 353315 patch
thanks
The attached patch implements Daniel's suggestion. I verified that it
fixed the build.
--
Matt
diff -ru upsd-2.6-orig/Makefile upsd-2.6/Makefile
--- upsd-2.6-orig/Makefile 2006-02-24 20:38:56.0 -0800
+++ upsd-2.6/Makefile 2006-02-24 20:39:34.0 -080
forwarded 352849 http://bugzilla.remotesensing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1097
severity 352849 normal
thanks
After some more investigation, it is clear that this bug is only in
tiff2pdf and not in the actual tiff library. (Other programs that use
libtiff can handle this image fine, including tiff2ps an
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> severity 354379 normal
Bug#354379: wesnoth: Wesnoth crash Xorg
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
Hi,
After install the new package mozilla-thunderbird is still in English,
even removing .mozilla-thunderbird dir. Afteward, I've tried to remove
or reinstall the package with no success.
Best regards,
Manolo Díaz
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: pts 0
#~ LC_ALL=C aptitude reinstall mozilla-thunderb
Hello,
I have the same problem kpathsea from tetex-bin version 2.0.2-31:
kpathsea version 3.4.5
Copyright (C) 1997 - 2002 K. Berry & O. Weber.
It worked after I upgraded tetex-bin to 3.0-14:
kpathsea version 3.5.4
Copyright (C) 1997 - 2004 K. Berry & O. Weber.
I think you should add a dependenc
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> When building 'cdbs' on amd64/unstable,
> I get the following error:
>
> PASS: recursive.sh
> PASS: udeb-1.sh
> FAIL: hdparm.sh
Yes, I had already made the same detection. It will be fixed in the
next upload as soon as the current one goes through to testing.
--
To UN
Hi,
After install the new package mozilla-thunderbird is still in English,
even removing .mozilla-thunderbird dir. Afteward, I've tried to remove
or reinstall the package with no success.
Best regards,
Manolo Díaz
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: pts 0
#~ LC_ALL=C aptitude reinstall mozilla-thunderb
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:32:38PM +0100, Martin Sebald wrote:
> Hello Kurt,
>
> will/could the changes in 0.9.8a-7 have any effect on the postfix issues
> I'm experiencing? Is it worth a try?
A new postfix version has been uploaded to unstable, which has as
changelog entry:
* New upstream, fixes
On Saturday, 25 February 2006 20:27, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
> Package: wesnoth
> Version: 1.1.1-3
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
> When starting wesnoth, the display becomes all black and the monitor
> display a label "No signal". I cannot do anything but kill the
More info. Maybe the dump can be sent directly to the list (or CC'd).
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 10:39:17 -0500
From: Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The difference between the two is that in case (1) (the "good" case)
we're calling pmap_getmaps() in orde
tag 354358 +confirmed
severity 354358 serious
retitle 322897 azureus: unusable on AMD64
retitle 331723 azureus: unusable on AMD64
block 322897 on 354358
thanks
On 2/25/06, Lauri Alanko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libswt-gtk-3.1-java
> Version: 3.1-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: ren
Package: bzflag
Version: 2.0.4.20051017-0.1
Followup-For: Bug #323815
reopen 323815
thanks
This bug was marked fixed and closed four months ago; but the version
which fixes the bug is not in unstable and never made it to testing.
The versions in both testing and unstable remain unusuable; this b
Package: wesnoth
Version: 1.1.1-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
When starting wesnoth, the display becomes all black and the monitor
display a label "No signal". I cannot do anything but kill the Xserver
(Ctrl+Alt+Backspace).
I managed to run wesnoth from a console
(
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:08:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #354358,
regarding libswt-gtk-3.1-java: Unusable on amd64 (ia32-specific sources used)
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) "Billy Biggs" <[EMA
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 10:17:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354371: fixed in lastfmsubmitd 0.22-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: lastfmsubmitd
Version: 0.22-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'lastfmsubmitd' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
dh_testroot
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
python setup.py clean --all
make: python: Command not found
make: *** [c
Package: matplotlib
Version: 0.86.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'matplotlib' in a clean unstable chroot,
I get the following error:
copying lib/matplotlib/backends/Matplotlib.nib/classes.nib ->
/matplotlib-0.86.2/debian/python-matplotlib-data/usr/share/lib/python2.3/site-pack
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 354204 + confirmed pending
Bug#354204: loop-aes-source: FTBFS: Cannot find debian/patches
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
tags 354204 + confirmed pending
thanks
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:25:12AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: loop-aes-source
> Version: 3.1c-2
> Severity: serious
>
> From my pbuilder build log:
>
> ...
> dh_installdocs
> dh_install
> cp: cannot stat `./debian/patches': No such file or dir
I am preparing an upload with your patches.
If 9.3 is ready like you intended to, please send it over.
--
.''`. I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think
: :' : I have ended up where I needed to be -- Douglas Adams
`. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux
`
Quoting Geert Stappers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:14:18PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > It seems that preseed always tries to retrieve a preseed file...
> > even for not preseeded installs.
>
> >From which location does it try to fetch a preseed file? (file: ? http: ?
Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.34
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'cdbs' on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:
PASS: recursive.sh
PASS: udeb-1.sh
FAIL: hdparm.sh
PASS: distutils-1.sh
make[5]: Entering directory `/cdbs-0.4.34/test'
make[5]: Nothing to be done for `tarballs'.
make[5
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 354206 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#354206: steghide: FTBFS: invalid conversion
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> severity 354206 important
Bug#354206: steghide: FTBFS: invalid conversion
Severity set to `important'.
tags 354206 + unreproducible moreinfo
severity 354206 important
thanks
Hello
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:43:50AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: steghide
> Version: 0.5.1-7
> Severity: serious
I can not reproduce this problem (on latest etch). For what architecture do
you build it and wi
Package: libswt-gtk-3.1-java
Version: 3.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Azureus hasn't been working on AMD64 Debian out of the box ever, I think.
This seems to be why.
>From a Sun Hotspot 1.5.0_05 error log after a sigsegv when starting
Azureus:
Stack: [0x7f96
Package: python-htmltmpl
Version: 1.22-6
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'python-htmltmpl' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
cd . && python setup.py build --build-base="./build"
/bin/sh: python: command not found
make: *** [common-build-impl] Error 127
Please a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 354323 important
Bug#354323: openoffice.org: [oowriter] Freezes when trying to export *.rtf as
XHTML
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> reassign 351495 festival
Bug#351495: The package is unusable without the patch #335845
Bug reassigned from package `festlex-ifd' to `festival'.
>
End of message, stopping processing
On Sam, 25 Feb 2006, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
> Package: texinfo
> Version: 4.8-5
> Severity: grave
>
> kpsewhich: unrecognized option `-var-value'
Please tell me the output of
which kpsewhich
and
kpsewhich --version
I tested
kpsewhich -var-value TEXMFSYSVAR
on curre
John,
Am Freitag, den 24.02.2006, 11:14 -0600 schrieb John Goerzen:
> merge 354240 354132
> thanks
>
> I had this symlink:
>
> /var/lib/asterisk -> /asterisk/lib
>
> It turns out that one of the asterisk maintainer scripts must be blowing
> away that symlink and then creating a directory at /va
Package: php-net-checkip
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'php-net-checkip' on unstable,
I get the following error:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
E: Build-Depends-Indep dependency for php-net-checkip cannot be satisfied
because no available vers
Package: texinfo
Version: 4.8-5
Severity: grave
When installing it, it fails like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get -f install
S'està llegint la llista de paquets... Fet
S'està construint l'arbre de dependències... Fet
0 actualitzats, 0 nous a instal·lar, 0 a eliminar i 356 no actualitzats.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 02:14:18PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> It seems that preseed always tries to retrieve a preseed file...
> even for not preseeded installs.
>From which location does it try to fetch a preseed file? (file: ? http: ?)
GSt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 354342 serious
Bug#354342: FTBFS: can't find res_mkquery
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 347376 +moreinfo +unreproducable
Unknown tag/s: +unreproducable.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimen
Hi,
bricolage does run just fine for me in default configuration, I cannot
reproduce this bug.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To U
Salut Arnaud,
Sorry to bother you again, but it's been a very long time. Should I look for
another sponsor?
Daniel
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Yes, busy, your mail is in red in my inbox ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Package: preseed
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
It seems that preseed always tries to retrieve a preseed file...even for not
preseeded installs.
I found this while running a standard install with the sid_d-i netinst of
20060224.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: tes
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:39:15 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line saxon-catalog: #327068 done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353711: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353563: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353577: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350480: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350480: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:32:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#350480: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:43:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line redboot: #326940 done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:41:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ggz-docs: #326862 done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:42:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line aspectj-anttasks: #304180 done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:40:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line cursel: #300885 done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> retitle 345100 libxine1 makes pornview segfault on startup
Bug#345100: segfaults on startup
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
Just wanted to not that libxine version 1.1.1 does not fix this bug.
pornview still segfaults somewhere in libxine.so.
pornview spawns 8 additional threads, each of them doing different tasks
in xine like loading alsa module, loading config and so on. I suspect
there is a race condition somewhere
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:24:24 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line oftc-hybrid: #287846 done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:22:05 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line boson-data: #299665 done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:27:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line hptalx: #294452 done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:23:05 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ggz-gnome-client: #266112 done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:02:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340044: fixed in a2ps 1:4.13b.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:02:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#267527: fixed in a2ps 1:4.13b.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:02:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#267527: fixed in a2ps 1:4.13b.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> tags 336437 pending
Bug#336437: libxine1: use of internal libmad makes other apps crash in amd64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: serious
The Writer completely freezes and the program must be separately killed
from terminal when it is exporting an *.rtf document in XHTML format.
The *.rtf (written in Windows Word) document that was used it at
http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 354217
Bug#354217: DEVPTS_FS not present at linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to marlon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> reopen 344217
Bug#344217:
Frank Küster wrote:
But there's also files in the talks subdirectory for which no source is
currently available. Do you know about the license situation for them,
or should I try to contact Ulrik or Taco? And, for that matter, I guess
roadmap.eps has been created with MetaPost - do you happen
90 matches
Mail list logo
