Package: zynaddsubfx
Version: 2.2.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'zynaddsubfx' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
g++ -O6 -Wall -DOS_LINUX -DALSAMIDIIN -DFFTW_VERSION_3 -DASM_F2I_NO
`fltk-config --cflags` -DOSSAUDIOOUT -DJACKAUDIOOUT `pkg-config --cflags
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 00:42 -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> Are you guys using dash for /bin/sh?
>
> * Stuart T. R. Rowan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 22:28 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike, it's not obvious how to backtrace that shell script so go a litt
Your message dated Wed, 08 Feb 2006 22:17:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349988: fixed in kdbg 2.0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:56:42PM -0500, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:53:56PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > > It works just fine for me...
> >
> > Not for me. Neither with my old ~/.mozilla and ~/.firefox
> > nor with them moved out of the way.
> Let me
Are you guys using dash for /bin/sh?
* Stuart T. R. Rowan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 22:28 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Mike, it's not obvious how to backtrace that shell script so go a little
> > > easier mebe? ;)
> >
> > I thought you were running firefox-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 351898 firefox: upgrade to 1.5.0.1 and no longer starts up
Bug#351898: firefox 1.5.0.1 fails to start with 2.6 kernels
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
retitle 351898 firefox: upgrade to 1.5.0.1 and no longer starts up
thanks
* Justin Pryzby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> retitle 351898 firefox 1.5.0.1 fails to start with 2.6 kernels
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:00:11PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > > Let me guess, Clint runs a 2.6 kern
Package: libfacile-ocaml-dev
Version: 1.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: not usable by non-root users in the most common case
The kdeedu package is failing to build on several architectures because the
timestamps on /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.1/facile/facile.cmi and
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.1/facile/facile.
Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>>Jérôme Marant wrote:
>>
>>>Sooner or later, Debian will have to decide if it definitely wants to
>>>leave the project in the hands of extremists. I hope the GR will lead
>>>us to the right path, that is getting rid of fund
Your message dated Wed, 08 Feb 2006 20:32:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351813: fixed in libspoon-perl 0.23-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 347083 +patch
Bug#347083: sablevm-classlib: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 347083 +patch
thanks
Hello,
the following patch fixes the problem by replacing 'xlibs-dev' with
'libxt-dev, libxtst-dev' in the Build-Depends in debian/control.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/sablevm-classlib-1.13/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/sablevm-class
Vincent Bernat wrote:
OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du jeudi 26 janvier 2006, vers
11:57, je disais:
I have just upgraded to 0.6.4-1 and the bug is still here.
This seems to be fixed in 0.6.5-1.
Thanks for the info. Can the others who've faced the problem confirm
that their pro
Dave Beckett wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 16:57 -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
Package: muine
Version: 0.8.3-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Muine fails to start after freshly being installed on my system.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ muine
** (muine:19775): WARNING
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 16:57 -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> Package: muine
> Version: 0.8.3-8
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Muine fails to start after freshly being installed on my system.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ muine
>
> ** (muine:19775): WARNING **: No
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 351898 firefox 1.5.0.1 fails to start with 2.6 kernels
Bug#351898: firefox: upgrade to 1.5.0.1 and no longer starts up
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
retitle 351898 firefox 1.5.0.1 fails to start with 2.6 kernels
thanks
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:00:11PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > Let me guess, Clint runs a 2.6 kernel and Mike does not?
>
> I am on 2.6.15.
Proof enough for me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
> Let me guess, Clint runs a 2.6 kernel and Mike does not?
I am on 2.6.15.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:53:56PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > It works just fine for me...
>
> Not for me. Neither with my old ~/.mozilla and ~/.firefox
> nor with them moved out of the way.
Let me guess, Clint runs a 2.6 kernel and Mike does not?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
> It works just fine for me...
Not for me. Neither with my old ~/.mozilla and ~/.firefox
nor with them moved out of the way.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 08 Feb 2006 20:06:46 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing, fixed in -0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 351681 important
Bug#351681: adduser tries to re-use existing GID
Bug#351609: hal fails to install: group 108 already exists
Bug#351919: postgresql-common: configuration script uses already-occupied group
id 110 (110 is dirmngr)
Severity set t
I ran an upgrade and adduser was on the list of upgrades.
And surprise - now it works with installing postgresql-common :)
I thank you for a fast response.
Regards,
Seph
Martin Pitt wrote:
reassign 351919 adduser
thanks
Hi Seph, hi adduser maintainers!
Seph Soliman [2006-02-08 15:02
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:57:01AM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> tag 350883 +pending
> thanks,
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 12:50:27AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > In file included from /usr/include/panel-2.0/panel-applet.h:37,
> > > from applet.c:23:
> > > /usr/include/panel-
Package: synergy
Version: 1.2.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problam:
Setting up synergy (1.2.8-1) ...
syntax error in control file: # Format: debiandoc-sgml at
/usr/sbin/install-docs line 601, line 9.
dpkg: error processing synergy (--configure):
I've seen the same issue. At home I made some disk images for qemu.
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=drivec.img count=0 seek=4096 bs=1M
0+0 records in
0+0 records out
0 bytes transferred in 0.000228 seconds (0 bytes/sec)
$ ls -la
total 8
drwxr-xr-x 2 supaplex supaplex 4096 2006-02-08 16:53 .
drwx--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 350883 +pending
Bug#350883: tsclient: fails to build from source
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks,
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
tag 350883 +pending
thanks,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 12:50:27AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > In file included from /usr/include/panel-2.0/panel-applet.h:37,
> > from applet.c:23:
> > /usr/include/panel-2.0/GNOME_Panel.h:40: error: syntax error before 'struct'
> > /usr/include/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 351681 grave
Bug#351681: adduser tries to re-use existing GID
Severity set to `grave'.
> severity 351609 grave
Bug#351609: hal fails to install: group 108 already exists
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 351681 351609 351919
Bug#351609: hal fa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 349611 + fixed
Bug#349611: joy2key: ships broken example doc-base file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Hey 261996,
Howard tole me that you were looking to get back into sh ape. If this is
correct, you'll wanna check out www.dsa.10eU.edrfws.org/n2/?id=havoc and f
ill out their 30 sec short- f orm and you won't re grt it.
I've been with them for couple weeks and so has Eric and Ward and we're all
ha
Hey 66684,
Barnes tole me that you were looking to get your bo dy back like when u
were 20. If so, then visit www.mmh.H.edrfws.org/n2/?id=havoc and f ill out
their 50 sec short- f orm and wou'll be likely pleased.
I've been with them for months and so has Dennis and Ross and we're all
happy with
Package: mlview
Version: 0.7.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #310713
This may be a similar problem, I'm not sure. Load this trivial
XML file in mlview, agree to load the DTD, and then try to click on
anything in the element view.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/space/fsf/target-registers/xml% cat gdb-target.dtd
[
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:58:30PM +, Stuart T. R. Rowan wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 22:28 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Mike, it's not obvious how to backtrace that shell script so go a little
> > > easier mebe? ;)
> >
> > I thought you were running firefox-bin in the first p
Your message dated Thu, 9 Feb 2006 03:17:11 +0530
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351949: powersaved fails to start at boot time
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 08 Feb 2006 13:47:42 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327290: fixed in remem 2.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 22:28 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> >
> > Mike, it's not obvious how to backtrace that shell script so go a little
> > easier mebe? ;)
>
> I thought you were running firefox-bin in the first place, which would
> explain your crash if it uses mozilla-browser's libs.
>
> > i
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:09:24PM +, Stuart T. R. Rowan <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 20:19 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:42:10PM +0100, Gregor Zattler <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > O.K. I have no clue about bactraces and such. Here is,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:07:32PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I have some changes to suggest to the templates text:
>
> > +Template: partman-auto-lvm/new_vg_name_exists
> > +Type: string
> > +_Description: Name of the volume group for the new system:
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 22:07, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Well, even though I'm not fond of new strings so late in the release
> process, I guess we can't avoid it (I wouldn't say so if this was a
> real final release with a hard string freeze).
I agree, but as:
- this is a new component
- i
Package: muine
Version: 0.8.3-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Muine fails to start after freshly being installed on my system.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ muine
** (muine:19775): WARNING **: No GConf default audio sink key and
osssink doesn't work
Unhandled Exception: System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 351902 mol-modules-2.6.12: needs to be replaced by mol-modules-2.6.15?
Bug#351902: RM: mol-modules-2.6.12 -- RoM; out-of-date
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 351899 RM: mol-modules-2.6.12 -- RoM; out-of-date
Bug#351899: please remove mol-modules-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 351960 !
Bug#351960: heimdal-kdc: policy violation: some configuration files not in /etc
Changed Bug submitter from "Warren Turkal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Warren Turkal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 20:19 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:42:10PM +0100, Gregor Zattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > O.K. I have no clue about bactraces and such. Here is, what I
> > did to produce a bactrace:
> >
> > 1. purged mozilla-browser and mozilla-firefox
>
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Thursday 09 Feb 2006 01:47, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> powersaved has to be started after dbus, because it uses dbus. So the
>> ordering is correct.
>> The problem must be something else. Can you investigate this a little
>> further?
>
> Here's what I've gathered from bo
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tuesday 07 February 2006 18:31, you wrote:
> > The attached patch adds some basic checks so we do not "just go ahead"
>
> Sorry. Attached the wrong patch. This one is better.
Well, even though I'm not fond of new strings so late in the release
process,
On Thursday 09 Feb 2006 01:47, Michael Biebl wrote:
> powersaved has to be started after dbus, because it uses dbus. So the
> ordering is correct.
> The problem must be something else. Can you investigate this a little
> further?
Here's what I've gathered from bootlogd:
Thu Feb 9 00:43:06 2006:
severity 351729 minor
thanks
Hello Alexander,
> I believe the "bug" is resolved with this. Do you know a way to work around
> this issue? I don't want to mount /home executable. Do I have an influence on
> where those things are written to? Why does Eclipse write Shared Libraries
> and so on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 351729 minor
Bug#351729: libswt-pi-gtk-3139.so cannot be mapped and refuses Eclipse to start
Severity set to `minor'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Package: powersaved
> Version: 0.9.25-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I'm not sure if it should be filed against dbus or powersaved.
> By default powersaved is started in runlevel 2 at S25 whereas dbus is
> started at S20.
> powersaved f
Package: heimdal-kdc
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.2
The kdc.conf and kadmind.acl in /var/lib/heidal-kdc/ are config files
that should go in /etc or use the technique in the Debian Policy Manual
10.7.2.
wt
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers test
Package: xtel
Version: 3.3.0-5.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'xtel' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
E: Package mime-codecs has no installation candidate
E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:42:10PM +0100, Gregor Zattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> O.K. I have no clue about bactraces and such. Here is, what I
> did to produce a bactrace:
>
> 1. purged mozilla-browser and mozilla-firefox
> pit:/usr/lib# aptitude purge mozilla-browser mozilla-firefox
>
Max Alekseyev wrote:
>> So could you please send me the file on which 'upx -d' fails?
> Testcase is attached to this message.
> $ unzip test.zip
Yeah, I should have asked you about the file at the very beginning. It's
win32/pe executable, not linux/i386 which I assumed...
Thanks a lot! Now I ca
Package: powersaved
Version: 0.9.25-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I'm not sure if it should be filed against dbus or powersaved.
By default powersaved is started in runlevel 2 at S25 whereas dbus is
started at S20.
powersaved fails to start at this order. Manual stop of
Am Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2006 15:59 schrieb Michael Koch:
> Can it be that you use an extra partition for /home and this partition
> is mounted with "noexec" ? You can easily check this with executing
> "mount" on the command line.
Yes, this is true. Of course, /home ought to be mounted read-only.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 340118 serious
Bug#340118: gnobog: please try building with guile-1.6-dev
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Your message dated Wed, 8 Feb 2006 20:31:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnome-system-monitor: should depend on libgtop2-5 >= 2.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Package: gnurobots
Severity: serious
I'm about to remove guile-core, because it's long since been superseded
by guile-1.6 (#338407). It looks like this package manually has once
already been built with guile-1.6 (i386 only of 1.0D-6), but that was
due to the build environment of the uploader, and
Hi Frank,
Your patch is good, in my opinion.
I've created pkg1 and pkg2 with the virtual packages vpkg1 and vpkg2,
with the dependencies of your diagram. I could reproduce the problem.
Then I've tested again with your patch. It solves the problem. It
breaks the cycle, and pkg1 and pkg2 are in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 351919 adduser
Bug#351919: postgresql-common: configuration script uses already-occupied group
id 110 (110 is dirmngr)
Bug reassigned from package `postgresql-common' to `adduser'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
reassign 351919 adduser
thanks
Hi Seph, hi adduser maintainers!
Seph Soliman [2006-02-08 15:02 +0100]:
> groupadd: GID 110 is not unique
That's interesting. Have there been multiple groups with id 110
before?
> adduser: `/usr/sbin/groupadd -g 110 postgres' returned error code 4.
> Aborting.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package ethereal-dev
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ethereal-dev
> tag 344011 +patch
Bug#344011: ethereal-dev: Two missing header files
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 344011 serious
Bug#344011: ethereal-dev: Two missing header files
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
strace -o foo /usr/bin/firefox attached, gzipped as it's large.
I do have other mozilla software installed if that makes a difference?
Stu.
firefox-log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Package: webmagick
Version: 2.02-8
Followup-For: Bug #344152
Hello,
The following alternative way of running webmagick "fixes"
the problem:
webmagick --thumbfont false
However, any other setting for thumbfont like '10x20' also
produces an error message like that reported by the submitte
Package: libapache2-mod-perl2
Version: 2.0.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #308503
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US,
Max Alekseyev wrote:
Hi,
>>
>> Please check if this version works for you on amd64.
>
>
> No. It reports:
>
> upx: util.h:71: int ptr_diff(const T*, const T*) [with T = unsigned
> char]: Assertion `(int)d == d' failed.
Sorry about the delay. As I wrote last time, I can't reproduce the bug
mys
Package: csync2
Version: 1.29-3
Severity: serious
Hello,
csync2.postinst does:
if ! grep -q "^csync2" /etc/services ; then
echo "csync2 30865/tcp" >>/etc/services
fi
But /etc/services is a conffile of the netbase package, so this is a
policy violation. Please r
Hi Justin,
* Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08. Feb. 2006]:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:39:27PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> > * Stuart Rowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08. Feb. 2006]:
> > > Okay so maybe i shouldn't have used grave but firefox no longer starts up.
> > > I was on 1.5.dfsg or whate
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 11:27:10AM -0500, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:39:27PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> > Package: firefox
> > Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1
> > Followup-For: Bug #351898
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #351898
Hello,
same here: I upgraded firefox to latest unstable and it stopped working.
When starting firefox from the shell prompt it immediatley exits, no
window opened, no segfault, no coredump, nothing; but I found some
javascrip
Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #351898
I have quite the same problem, I have no message from firefox, it just
stop without notice, looking at strace I see that:
open("/usr/lib/firefox/components/compreg.dat.tmp",
O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|O_LARGEFILE, 0664) = -1 E
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:39:27PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1
> Followup-For: Bug #351898
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> * Stuart Rowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08. Feb. 2006]:
> > Package: firefox
> > Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5
severity 351888 wishlist
merge 351888 351671
thanks
Walter Franzini:
> I think you are right. I've seen an error message related to pcmcia
> and I've failed to notice it's from pcmciautils.
>
> I'm sorry.
OK, don't worry.
I'll merge this bug with the one about adding an item in NEWS.Debian
so
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 351888 wishlist
Bug#351888: pcmcia-cs: pcmcia-cs does not depend from kernel >= 2.6.13
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> merge 351888 351671
Bug#351671: Should explain about pcmciautils dependency in NEWS.Debian
Bug#351888: pcmcia-cs: pcmcia-cs do
Your message dated Wed, 08 Feb 2006 07:02:27 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346317: fixed in gnat 3.15p-19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 351878 confirmed
Bug#351878: sylpheed-claws-gtk2-i18n: not installable in sid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 351888 moreinfo
Bug#351888: pcmcia-cs: pcmcia-cs does not depend from kernel >= 2.6.13
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tag 351888 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Walter Franzini:
>> The kernel for testing is 2.6.12-10 and /etc/init.d/pcmcia refuse to
>> start because it require at least 2.6.13
>
> pcmcia-cs should always start _except_ if the kernel is 2.6.13 or
> higher and udev i
tag 351888 moreinfo
thanks
Walter Franzini:
> The kernel for testing is 2.6.12-10 and /etc/init.d/pcmcia refuse to
> start because it require at least 2.6.13
pcmcia-cs should always start _except_ if the kernel is 2.6.13 or
higher and udev is enabled. Are you sure that you haven't mixed it up
wit
tags 351878 confirmed
thanks
Hi Laurent,
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 07:49:56 +0100
Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: sylpheed-claws-gtk2-i18n
> Version: 1.9.100-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Hi,
>
> here is the problem:
>
> # apt-get insta
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 337495 + fixed
Bug#337495: friendsd2: Insecure handling of network data
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: fixed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
tags 337495 + fixed
thanks
While investigating to do an NMU, I found this security bug
CVE-2005-3523 has already been fixed in gpsdrive 2.09-2sarge1.
The non-security patch for friends.c was not inclued.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 01:35:33AM +0100, Alexander Bahlo wrote:
> Package: libswt3.1-gtk-jni
> Version: 3.1.1-8
> Subject: libswt3.1-gtk-jni: libswt-pi-gtk-3139.so cannot be mapped and
> refuses Eclipse to start
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> When starting Eclips
Package: postgresql-common
Version: 42
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
as root:
# apt-get install postgresql-common
(...)
Setting up postgresql-common (42) ...
groupadd: GID 110 is not unique
adduser: `/usr/sbin/groupadd -g 110 postgres' returned error code 4.
Aborting.
dp
Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #351898
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Stuart Rowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08. Feb. 2006]:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Okay so mayb
Your message dated Wed, 08 Feb 2006 05:17:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314671: fixed in zynaddsubfx 2.2.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
This is an adduser bug, recently partly fixed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:53:16PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> severity 351909 important
> retitle 351909 [powerpc,oldworld] 2.6.14 boots, but not 2.6.15
> reassign 351909 linux-2.6
> thanks
>
> Thanks Hans for your report, i lowered the severity since we are about to move
> 2.6.15 to testing, and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 351902 RM: mol-modules-2.6.12 -- RoM; out-of-date
Bug#351902: mol-modules-2.6.12: needs to be replaced by mol-modules-2.6.15?
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 351909 important
Bug#351909: 2.6.14 boots, but not 2.6.15
Severity set to `important'.
> retitle 351909 [powerpc,oldworld] 2.6.14 boots, but not 2.6.15
Bug#351909: 2.6.14 boots, but not 2.6.15
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 351909 linux-2.6
Bu
severity 351909 important
retitle 351909 [powerpc,oldworld] 2.6.14 boots, but not 2.6.15
reassign 351909 linux-2.6
thanks
Thanks Hans for your report, i lowered the severity since we are about to move
2.6.15 to testing, and oldworld has been a not fully working subarch
previously, but this does no
OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du jeudi 26 janvier 2006, vers
11:57, je disais:
> I have just upgraded to 0.6.4-1 and the bug is still here.
This seems to be fixed in 0.6.5-1.
--
BOFH excuse #148:
Insert coin for new game
pgpLhZRbRjaRN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: linux-image-2.6-powerpc-miboot
Severity: grave
I tried the following images on a performa 5400. This box normally
runs sid and has no problem with any 2.6.15-kernel when booted by
quik.
So the problem is specific to miboot and 2.6.15.
http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/sid/images/2005
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> severity 351899 normal
Bug#351899: please remove mol-modules-2.6.12 from the unstable archive
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Hello Alexander,
After thinking a bit more about your problem and rereading your bug
report I more and more get the feeling that this is no Eclipse bug but
Eclipse triggers it.
The error message makes me suspicious:
Fehler beim Mappen des Shared Objects: Die Operation ist nicht erlaubt
(Error
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 351899 -1
Bug#351899: mol-modules-2.6.12: needs to be replaced by mol-modules-2.6.15?
Bug 351899 cloned as bug 351902.
> reassign -1 mol
Bug#351902: mol-modules-2.6.12: needs to be replaced by mol-modules-2.6.15?
Bug reassigned from package `mol-
clone 351899 -1
reassign -1 mol
reassign 351899 ftp.debian.org
retitle 351899 please remove mol-modules-2.6.12 from the unstable archive
thanks
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:56:42AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: mol-modules-2.6.12
> Version: 1:0.9.70+2.6.12+1-2
> Severity: grave
>
> The mo
Package: mol-modules-2.6.12
Version: 1:0.9.70+2.6.12+1-2
Severity: grave
The mol-modules-2.6.12 package is out of date; the current kernel version in
unstable is 2.6.15, not 2.6.12. Please update for the current version.
The mol-modules-2.6.12 package is being removed from testing to let the
lin
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
