Bug#346945: marked as done (xmeter: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:17:15 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346945: fixed in xmeter 1.15-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#347894: marked as done (php5: Two security problems in PHP5)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:17:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347894: fixed in php5 5.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#341352: marked as done (Fwd: xlibs-dev Transition)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:17:14 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346812: fixed in xfaces 3.3-25 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#346812: marked as done (xfaces: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:17:14 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346812: fixed in xfaces 3.3-25 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#346049: marked as done (sweep_0.8.4+0.9.0svn301-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: permission denied)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:02:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346049: fixed in sweep 0.9.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: Bug#348577: geneweb fails to start because the "WRAPPER" file is not executable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 348577 important Bug#348577: geneweb fails to start because the "WRAPPER" file is not executable Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrat

Bug#348577: geneweb fails to start because the "WRAPPER" file is not executable

Quoting Benoit Friry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Package: geneweb > Version: 4.10-17 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Hello Christian, > > The /etc/init.d/geneweb start procedure calls a $WRAPPER file (which > is /usr/lib/geneweb/gwd.wrapper), but this file is not execut

Bug#348577: geneweb fails to start because the "WRAPPER" file is not executable

severity 348577 important thanks Quoting Benoit Friry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Package: geneweb > Version: 4.10-17 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Hello Christian, > > The /etc/init.d/geneweb start procedure calls a $WRAPPER file (which > is /usr/lib/geneweb/gwd.wra

Bug#346812: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Hi, thanx for the patch, I can do the upload today. On 1/18/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > package xfaces > tag 346812 patch > thanks > > I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA > group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and >

Bug#348629: marked as done (Linking a program against libcpufreq fails because of missing /lib/libsysfs.la)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:14:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#348629: Linking a program against libcpufreq fails because of missing /lib/libsysfs.la has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#346691: marked as done (inventor: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:02:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346691: fixed in inventor 2.1.5-10-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#348510: marked as done (python2.4-gnome2-extras depends upon libgtkhtml2-0 in experimental)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:50:40 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#348510: python2.4-gnome2-extras depends upon libgtkhtml2-0 in experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#346828: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Hello, Thanks Justin, ...but I made new package yesterday. I'll ask upload soon. Justin Pryzby wrote: > package xmms-mpg123-ja > I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA > group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and > produced a binary packa

Bug#348632: "Wrong Password!" given, but password is Correct!

Package: gringotts Version: 1.2.8+1.2.9pre1-10 Severity: grave Problem: Gringotts does not allow me access to my .grg file via ususal String on unstable. Solution: Copy .grg over to Sarge, install Gringotts and export the DISPLAY (In my case to the same X server where the local Gringotts failed).

Bug#347080: marked as done (terminatorx: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:17:15 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347080: fixed in terminatorx 3.82-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#346955: marked as done (wmressel: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346955: fixed in wmressel 0.8-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package wmmail Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wmmail > tag 347052 patch Bug#347052: wmmail: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Processed: Re: Bug#330999: marked as done (samba.postinst destroys smbpasswd if LDAP/NIS is down)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 330999 Bug#330999: samba.postinst destroys smbpasswd if LDAP/NIS is down Bug reopened, originator not changed. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#347052: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package wmmail tag 347052 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff out

Bug#330999: marked as done (samba.postinst destroys smbpasswd if LDAP/NIS is down)

reopen 330999 quit > Version: 3.0.20b-3 > This bugs was closed when the postinst code to handle woody->sarge > upgrades was removed. No, it wasn't. This was not related to FHS migration code that was removed. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian

Bug#346629: marked as done (camorama: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:02:20 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346629: fixed in camorama 0.17-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#346975: marked as done (wmtz: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:47:32 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346975: fixed in wmtz 0.7-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package wmibam Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wmibam > tag 347098 patch Bug#347098: wmibam: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package wmppp.app Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wmppp.app > tag 346983 patch Bug#346983: wmppp.app: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package wmrack Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wmrack > tag 346898 patch Bug#346898: wmrack: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package wmscope Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wmscope > tag 346952 patch Bug#346952: wmscope: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assist

Bug#347098: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package wmibam tag 347098 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff out

Bug#346952: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package wmscope tag 346952 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff ou

Bug#346983: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package wmppp.app tag 346983 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff

Bug#346898: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package wmrack tag 346898 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff out

Bug#347418: marked as done (libogg: FTBFS with new make)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:32:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347418: fixed in libogg 1.1.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#347060: marked as done (wmtop: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:39:40 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in wmtop 0.84-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package wmspaceweather Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wmspaceweather > tag 346977 patch Bug#346977: wmspaceweather: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#346977: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package wmspaceweather tag 346977 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and deb

Bug#346945: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

I should be able to send this in tonight. Thanks for the prod. Justin Pryzby wrote: package xmeter tag 346945 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with

Bug#346975: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > package wmtz > tag 346975 patch > thanks > > I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA > group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and > produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the m

Bug#348629: Linking a program against libcpufreq fails because of missing /lib/libsysfs.la

Package: libcpufreq-dev Version: 0.4-1 Severity: grave Linking against libcpufreq (using libtool) is currently not possible because libcpufreq.la lists the dependency lib "/lib/libsysfs.la", which is not in libsysfs-dev (anymore). Recompilation against a current version of sysfsutils solves the pr

Bug#348628: postgresql: unable to start: failed to initialize lc_message to ""

Package: postgresql Version: 7.4.7-6sarge1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Starting PostgreSQL database server: postmaster(FAILED) ERROR: ERROR: PostgreSQL postmaster did not start because of an unknown reason. PostgreSQL's init script (/etc/init.d/postgresql) attempted to

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xdaliclock Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xdaliclock > tag 346805 patch Bug#346805: xdaliclock: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xcircuit Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xcircuit > tag 346798 patch Bug#346798: xcircuit: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package wmtz Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wmtz > tag 346975 patch Bug#346975: wmtz: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. De

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package x2x Ignoring bugs not assigned to: x2x > tag 346755 patch Bug#346755: x2x: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debia

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xbat Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xbat > tag 346789 patch Bug#346789: xbat: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. De

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xbattle Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xbattle > tag 346776 patch Bug#346776: xbattle: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assist

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xbatt Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xbatt > tag 346790 patch Bug#346790: xbatt: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xcal Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xcal > tag 346778 patch Bug#346778: xcal: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. De

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xcolmix Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xcolmix > tag 346802 patch Bug#346802: xcolmix: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assist

Bug#346778: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package xcal tag 346778 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff outpu

Bug#346975: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package wmtz tag 346975 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff outpu

Bug#346805: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package xdaliclock tag 346805 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff

Bug#346802: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package xcolmix tag 346802 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff ou

Bug#346790: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package xbatt tag 346790 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff outp

Bug#346755: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package x2x tag 346755 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff output

Bug#346629: Intend to NMU camorama

On Ter, 2006-01-17 at 10:21 +0100, Amaya wrote: > Sure! It's your package, it wants *your* love! :* Ok, cool, then I'll upload it right away. Sorry to make you guys work on it and then suddenly come around and fix it myself! And thanks a lot for the poke anyway! damn... I'm a slacker :-( Cheers

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xfaces Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xfaces > tag 346812 patch Bug#346812: xfaces: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Bug#341352: Fwd: xlibs-dev Transition Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. P

Processed: severity of 341352 is serious, merging 341352 346812

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > severity 341352 serious Bug#341352: Fwd: xlibs-dev Transition Severity set to `serious'. > merge 341352 346812 Bug#341352: Fwd: xlibs-dev Transition Bug#346812: xfaces: FTBFS: build-

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xipmsg Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xipmsg > tag 346956 patch Bug#346956: xipmsg: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Bug#346812: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package xfaces tag 346812 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff out

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xjump Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xjump > tag 346771 patch Bug#346771: xjump: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#346956: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package xipmsg tag 346956 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff out

Bug#346771: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package xjump tag 346771 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff outp

Bug#348018: marked as done (gnucash: crash on startup)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:05:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#348018: gnucash: Still crashes on startup has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xmcd Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xmcd > tag 346824 patch Bug#346824: xmcd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. De

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package mtoolsfm Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mtoolsfm > tag 346915 patch Bug#346915: mtoolsfm: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xkbset Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xkbset > tag 346782 patch Bug#346782: xkbset: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xletters Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xletters > tag 346941 patch Bug#346941: xletters: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Bug#346941: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package xletters tag 346941 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff o

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xmeter Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xmeter > tag 346945 patch Bug#346945: xmeter: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xmms-fmradio Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xmms-fmradio > tag 346826 patch Bug#346826: xmms-fmradio: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xmms-mpg123-ja Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xmms-mpg123-ja > tag 346828 patch Bug#346828: xmms-mpg123-ja: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#346915: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package mtoolsfm tag 346915 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff o

Bug#348018: gnucash: Still crashes on startup

Matthew MacLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can confirm this new error with the i386 version of the package, with > slib verions 3a2-3, 3a2-4, and 3a2-5. Can you please file a new bug report then, since it is clearly a distinct error than the old one? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Bug#346945: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package xmeter tag 346945 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff out

Bug#346826: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package xmms-fmradio tag 346826 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdi

Bug#346782: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package xkbset tag 346782 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff out

Bug#346834: marked as done (xplot: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:47:22 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346834: fixed in xplot 1.19-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#346729: marked as done (jazip: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:32:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346729: fixed in jazip 0.34-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#346402: marked as done (poster: FTBFS: Build dependency on libpaperg-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:47:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346402: fixed in poster 20020830-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xpostit Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xpostit > tag 346837 patch Bug#346837: xpostit: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assist

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xppaut Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xppaut > tag 346836 patch Bug#346836: xppaut: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xpm2wico Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xpm2wico > tag 346833 patch Bug#346833: xpm2wico: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Bug#348407: pine: security hole in imap support

This one time, at band camp, Santiago Vila said: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Will Lowe wrote: > > > Package: pine > > Version: 4.62-1 > > Severity: grave > > Justification: user security hole > > > > http://www.washington.edu/pine/ says: > > > > Note: Install Pine 4.64, or later version, to fix a buf

Bug#348018: gnucash: Still crashes on startup

I can confirm this new error with the i386 version of the package, with slib verions 3a2-3, 3a2-4, and 3a2-5. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#346833: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package xpm2wico tag 346833 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff o

Bug#346837: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package xpostit tag 346837 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff ou

Bug#348614: fails to remove

Package: tetex-doc Version: 3.0-11 Severity: serious Removing tetex-doc ... mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN... mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFDIST-TETEX... mktexlsr: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R... mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R... mktexlsr: Done. rm: cannot

Bug#337269: marked as done (gatos: FTBFS: invalid lvalue in assignment)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:32:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337269: fixed in gatos 0.0.5-16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#348528: marked as done (octaviz: not installable in sid)

Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2006 01:57:45 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#348528: octaviz: not installable in sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#347816: marked as done (gcolor2: Segfault on startup)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:02:32 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347816: fixed in gcolor2 0.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xsel Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xsel > tag 346875 patch Bug#346875: xsel: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. De

Processed: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package xsol Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xsol > tag 347048 patch Bug#347048: xsol: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. De

Bug#348407: pine: security hole in imap support

I believe that a mailicious IMAP server can gain access to the local system (where Pine is running). Agree that non-free sucks, but wanted to point the problem out since I'm sure a lot of folks are using our pine and pine-tracker packages. On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:04:53AM +0100, Santiago Vila w

Bug#348018: gnucash: Still crashes on startup

Package: gnucash Version: 1.8.12-4 Followup-For: Bug #348018 After updating to the latest slib and gnucash, I get this error on startup: Unbound variable: gnc:menuname-ncreports I know it's different than the error above, but it occurs at the same point that that one used to. -- System Informa

Bug#348407: pine: security hole in imap support

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Will Lowe wrote: > Package: pine > Version: 4.62-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: user security hole > > http://www.washington.edu/pine/ says: > > Note: Install Pine 4.64, or later version, to fix a buffer overflow > problem. Read iDEFENSE Security Advisory for full deta

Bug#346875: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package xsel tag 346875 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff outpu

Bug#347048: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

package xsol tag 347048 patch thanks I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and produced a binary package with expected debdiff output from the most recent version in sid. Build logs and debdiff outpu

Bug#346686: marked as done (gatos: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:32:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346686: fixed in gatos 0.0.5-16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#346505: marked as done (vtk FTBFS due to dependency on xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:44:55 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line vtk FTBFS due to dependency on xlibs-dev has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#346506: marked as done (libvtk4-dev: Should not depend on xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:44:55 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line vtk FTBFS due to dependency on xlibs-dev has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#347161: marked as done (libvtk4-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:44:55 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line vtk FTBFS due to dependency on xlibs-dev has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

  1   2   3   >