Bug#343834: marked as done (libpt-1.8.3c2: FTBFS on i386)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:45:31 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343834: libpt-1.8.3c2: FTBFS on i386 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#341857: marked as done (gimp-gap: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make a shared lib.)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:47:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341857: fixed in gimp-gap 2.2.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Processed: merging 335199 339120

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.9 > merge 335199 339120 Bug#335199: cupsys: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib. Bug#339120: cupsys_1.1.99.b1.r4748-4(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: ld failed Merged 335199 339120. > E

Bug#343834: libpt-1.8.3c2: FTBFS on i386

2005-12-17 Thread Justin Pryzby
Package: libpt-1.8.3c2 Version: 1.8.4-2 Severity: serious On i386, I randomly did 'debuild' about apt-get source libpt-1.8.3c2 and installing the build-deps. g++ -D_REENTRANT -fno-exceptions -Wall -I/tmp/pwlib-1.8.4/include -Os -felide-constructors -x c++ -c ../../ptclib/pssl.cxx -o /tmp/pwlib-

Bug#343833: Uploaders: field broken

2005-12-17 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Package: xfce4-icon-theme Severity: serious The Uploaders field of this package is broken, as detected by lintian: E: xfce4-icon-theme source: uploader-address-missing Yves-Alexis Perez This causes several QA scripts, such as the PTS, to choke on this package. Could you please fix this in the ne

Bug#343714: marked as done (/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/evms_bootdebug contains bashisms and fails to include dependencies in the initrd)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:17:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343714: fixed in evms 2.5.3-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#339981: marked as done (FTBFS on mips(el))

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:17:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339981: fixed in evms 2.5.3-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: forgot bcc

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity #292290 important Bug#292290: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7: XFS filesystem corruption: Input/output error Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Processed: goofed

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 274167 important Bug#274167: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686: appears to cause reiserfs corruption on Sid Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: Re: Bug#339981: linux-kernel-headers: includes non-existant file cpu-feature-overrides.h on mips(el)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 339981 evms Bug#339981: linux-kernel-headers: includes non-existant file cpu-feature-overrides.h on mips(el) Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-headers' to `evms'. > severity 339981 serious Bug#339981: linux-kernel-headers: includes

Bug#343822: xorg-x11: FTBFS: manifest differences

2005-12-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: xorg-x11 Version: 6.8.99.903.dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following error: --- debian/MANIFEST.amd64 2005-12-17 22:22:20.0 +0100 +++ debian/MANIFEST.amd64.new 2005-12-17 22:22:20.0 +0100 @@ -4

Bug#343042: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 don't boot, yaird fail

2005-12-17 Thread Carlos González
package: yaird version: 0.0.12-1 The linux-image2.6.14-2-686 fail to boot with this errors: /bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev: No such file or directory This is using yaird for create the initrd, for solve(how I see in some bugreport), I downgrade my yaird to the version 0.0.11-12, and: dpkg-rec

Bug#340835: marked as done (sparc: /lib64/libc.so.6: unexpected reloc type 0x4f)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341514: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#343571: marked as done (libc6: FTBFS [powerpc] weak alias issues)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343571: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#342755: marked as done (glibc: ftbfs [sparc] Error: symbol `__bind' is already defined)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342755: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#341514: marked as done (libc6-sparc64: All 64-bit binaries fail to execute.)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341514: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#341514: marked as done (libc6-sparc64: All 64-bit binaries fail to execute.)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340835: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#340835: marked as done (sparc: /lib64/libc.so.6: unexpected reloc type 0x4f)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340835: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#339415: marked as done (FTBFS: Redefinitions of __divdi3, __moddi3, __udivdi32, and __umoddi3)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339415: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#343701: apt-get: Unable to configure a package that failed to install, config.dat locked by frontend

2005-12-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:17:44AM +1100, Chris McCowage wrote: > On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 05:01 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:53:34PM +1100, Chris McCowage wrote: > > > > > nimbus:/home/cmc# ps aux | grep 6163 > > > root 6163 0.0 0.8 10792 8772 pts/0S+

Bug#343443: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7: initrd(yaird) doesn't contain HD modules

2005-12-17 Thread Pau Capdevila
Here's the output of dpkg-reconfigure $ sudo dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 Password: Running depmod. Finding valid ramdisk creators. Using mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk. Not updating initrd symbolic links since we are being updated/reinstalled (2.6.14-5 was configured last, accord

Bug#342778: marked as done (dar FTBFS on mips, mipsel)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:07:18 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed by newer binutils has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Processed: these bugs are grave; they make the package unusable by ANYONE

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 331068 grave Bug#331068: undefined references while building pngcrush in sid Severity set to `grave'. > severity 329886 grave Bug#329886: pngcrush broken by new libpng packages Bug#329905: pngmeta: Fails to start at all (undefined symbol: png_

Processed: Re: cupsys: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib.

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 335199 - fixed-in-experimental Bug#335199: cupsys: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib. Tags were: fixed-in-experimental experimental Tags removed: fixed-in-experimental > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assis

Bug#343443: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7: initrd(yaird) doesn't contain HD modules

2005-12-17 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:53:33 +0100 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:25:21PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:48:49 +0100 > > Sven Lu

Bug#343443: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7: initrd(yaird) doesn't contain HD modules

2005-12-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:25:21PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:48:49 +0100 > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Please tell me how to obtain the installation log you mentioned > > > earlier. > > > > not s

Bug#340375: Subject: kuser destroys all passwords if /etc/shadow isn't present

2005-12-17 Thread Christopher Martin
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 20:23, Charles G Montgomery wrote: > Subject: kuser destroys all passwords if /etc/shadow isn't present > Package: kuser > Version: 4:3.4.2-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable Hello, I forwarded the issue upstream, and a check was added for th

Processed: Re: cupsys: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib.

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 335199 1.1.99.b1.r4876-1 Bug#335199: cupsys: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib. Bug marked as found in version 1.1.99.b1.r4876-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system ad

Bug#343747: belpic: client authentication does not work in Firefox

2005-12-17 Thread jan colpaert
Package: belpic Version: 2.3.13.full-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Although I can install the Belpic security device in Firefox, the library makes Firefox crash as soon as I go to a site that required client authentication with eID. the system starts to read the card,

Bug#335199: cupsys: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib.

2005-12-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
found 335199 1.1.99.b1.r4876-1 thanks It seems this bug is back now, it didn't show up in version from 1.1.99.b1.r4748-2 to 1.1.99.b1.r4841-1, but it's back with 1.1.99.b1.r4876-1. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO

Bug#343443: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7: initrd(yaird) doesn't contain HD modules

2005-12-17 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:48:49 +0100 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please tell me how to obtain the installation log you mentioned > > earlier. > > not sure, Jonas will probably give you the exact command to test > this, but you could do :

Bug#343746: dbus: FTBFS: error: conversion from 'long int' to 'QVariant' is ambiguous

2005-12-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: dbus Version: 0.60-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build (on amd64) with the following error: ../qt/qdbusmarshall.cpp: In function 'QVariant qFetchParameter(DBusMessageIter*)': ../qt/qdbusmarshall.cpp:72: error: conversion from 'long int' to 'QVariant' is ambiguous /

Processed: Re: Bug#342163: kdeartwork-emoticons: files under kdeartwork-3.4.3/emoticons/YazooSmileys22 fail DFSG #1

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 342163 confirmed pending Bug#342163: kdeartwork-emoticons: files under kdeartwork-3.4.3/emoticons/YazooSmileys22 fail DFSG #1 There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, pending > found 342163 Bug#342163: kdeartwork-emoticons: files under kde

Bug#342163: kdeartwork-emoticons: files under kdeartwork-3.4.3/emoticons/YazooSmileys22 fail DFSG #1

2005-12-17 Thread Christopher Martin
tags 342163 confirmed pending found 342163 found 342163 4:3.4.3-2 found 342163 4:3.4.2-1 stop On Monday 05 December 2005 17:47, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Package: kdeartwork-emoticons > Version: 3.4.3 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 2.1 > > Hi, > > it looks like the files under > >

Bug#343745: apt: FTBFS on alpha/experimental (apt_0.6.43exp2)

2005-12-17 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Package: apt Severity: serious Version: 0.6.43exp2 Tags: experimental Justification: Fails to build from source Generating ../build/po/domains/libapt-pkg4.0/zh_TW.po .. done. Generating ../build/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.0.mo: 213 translated messages, 17 f

Processed: probably not a bug in irssi

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package irssi Ignoring bugs not assigned to: irssi > severity 343608 minor Bug#343608: Core dump at start Severity set to `minor'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adm

Bug#343443: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7: initrd(yaird) doesn't contain HD modules

2005-12-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 07:08:35PM +0100, Pau Capdevila wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for not giving all this info from the beggining. > > The filesystem is ReiserFS. /me hopes you don't have any important data on that disk :) > The output of lspci is: > > Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP

Processed: reproducible

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 343444 grave Bug#343444: netenv segmentation fault Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To

Bug#343606: marked as done (libcatalyst-perl: missing build-dep on libtemplate-perl)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:17:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343606: fixed in libcatalyst-perl 5.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#343735: marked as done (multisync: needs to build-depend on libbluetooth1, libopenobex)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:18:23 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line I am confused has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#343443: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7: initrd(yaird) doesn't contain HD modules

2005-12-17 Thread Pau Capdevila
I attach the output of "yaird -d -t" if it is useful. Pau A Saturday 17 December 2005 18:55, Sven Luther va escriure: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:14:32PM +0100, Pau Capdevila wrote: > > Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 > > Version: 2.6.14-5 > > Followup-For: Bug #343443 > > > > > > The default i

Bug#343735: Acknowledgement (multisync: needs to build-depend on libbluetooth1, libopenobex)

2005-12-17 Thread shields
Also missing is libssl-dev. -- Shields. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#343443: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7: initrd(yaird) doesn't contain HD modules

2005-12-17 Thread Pau Capdevila
Hi, Sorry for not giving all this info from the beggining. The filesystem is ReiserFS. The output of lspci is: Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP (different version?) (rev c1) RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 0 (rev c1) RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Me

Bug#313219: Let op: Het bericht aan [EMAIL PROTECTED] is tegengehouden door de mailfilter van thuis.nl.

2005-12-17 Thread thuis.nl
Een e-mail van u is tegengehouden door de mailfilter van thuis.nl. Het bericht was gezonden aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Het onderwerp was: Re: Thank you for delivery. De zender was: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Het bericht was ontvangen op 17-12-2005 om 19:06:52. Het verzend adres was: 82.98.249.10. De err

Processed: your mail

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 326382 Bug#326382: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thanks Stopping

Bug#343443: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7: initrd(yaird) doesn't contain HD modules

2005-12-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:14:32PM +0100, Pau Capdevila wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 > Version: 2.6.14-5 > Followup-For: Bug #343443 > > > The default installation did not boot failing to found hard disk devices. So, what kind of disk do you have, and what controller does it sit own

Bug#343735: multisync: needs to build-depend on libbluetooth1, libopenobex

2005-12-17 Thread Michael Shields
Package: multisync Version: 0.82-5.1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Without libbluetooth1 or libopenobex installed, multisync fails to build: checking for baswap in -lbluetooth... no checking for sdp_list_free in -lbluetooth... no checking for correct SD

Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

2005-12-17 Thread Robert Luberda
Max Alekseyev wrote: Hi, > It fails to be build from sources on amd64 with the following error: I've just uploaded 1:1.94+0.20051214cvs-2, which fixes the error. The patch is very simple, I'm attaching it in case you didn't want to wait for autobuilders and recompile the package yourself. Pleas

Processed: tagging 342819

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > tags 342819 + confirmed Bug#342819: postgresql-pljava: ftbfs [sparc] gcc-3.3: Command not found There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > End of message, stopping processing he

Bug#326466: mesa: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'xutils, xlibmesa-gl-dev'

2005-12-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Hi, It seems there isn't any progress on this at all for a long time. Could someone please shed some light on what is going on with this? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: retitle 342619 to DNS logic error: Delivers to MX query's additional section only, causing mailloss

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 342619 DNS logic error: Delivers to MX query's additional section > only, causing mailloss Bug#342619: Possible exim retry bug (Re: master mail problems -- help needed) Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#341174: boost FTBFS on hppa

2005-12-17 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:59:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hello, Hi, > Is anyone looking into this problem with building boost on hppa? As there > are quite a few packages which build-depend on boost (including parts of > KDE, and aptitude), this is likely to cause hppa to hold up the c2

Bug#343714: Cannot use evmsn from initrd due to missing library

2005-12-17 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 04:24:54PM +0100, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: >> Note that this happens after-the-fact by more recent initramfs-tools, using >> mklibs; copy_exec is deprecated. > Where would one find the newer versions? I'm using 0.44 which is the current > version in sid, and there isn't a

Processed: Fixed in NMU of kmatplot 0.4-7.1

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 286533 + fixed Bug#286533: kplot: FTBFS: not using -fPIC to make shared lib. There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 300867 + fixed Bug#300867: kmatplot: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid cast from type 'double' to type 'QSGFill::Style' Tags

Processed: Update #343714

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 343714 /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/evms_bootdebug contains > bashisms and fails to include dependencies in the initrd Bug#343714: Cannot use evmsn from initrd due to missing library Changed Bug title. > tags 343714 + patch Bug#343714: /us

Processed: tagging

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 338795 +pending Bug#338795: bashisms There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tag 341881 +pending Bug#341881: never runs any backups from cron when told to run "everyday" There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tag 338796 +pending Bug#3

Bug#342619: Possible exim retry bug (Re: master mail problems -- help needed)

2005-12-17 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 04:17:45PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 04:07:51PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:12:56AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > I'm quite sure it's an exim bug, but haven't quite nailed it yet. The > > > bug has b

Bug#342619: Possible exim retry bug (Re: master mail problems -- help needed)

2005-12-17 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 04:07:51PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:12:56AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > I'm quite sure it's an exim bug, but haven't quite nailed it yet. The > > bug has been witnessed positively both on master.d.o and on > > one mailserver I maintai

Bug#342619: Possible exim retry bug (Re: master mail problems -- help needed)

2005-12-17 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:12:56AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > I'm quite sure it's an exim bug, but haven't quite nailed it yet. The > bug has been witnessed positively both on master.d.o and on > one mailserver I maintain. Interestingly, it doesn't seem to be IPv6 > related (or maybe the

Bug#292290: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7: XFS filesystem corruption: Input/output error

2005-12-17 Thread Joost van Baal
Op za 17 dec 2005 om 03:29:04 +0100 schreef maximilian attems: > > backports.org has newer semi-official builds. > take care regarding the udev version while using such backports. FWIW, thanks to Wessel Dankers, various builds of 2.6 images for sarge (currently 2.6.13.4, with usable xfs support)

Bug#343720: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2005-12-17 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Package: djvulibre Severity: serious The -dev package has to Depends on the library package itself (since it's useless without it) and on libjpeg62-dev (according to the dependency_libs of the .la). The attached patch fixes the issue. diff -Nur djvulibre-3.5.16.orig/debian/changelog djvulibre-3.5

Processed: Re: Taking LVM snapshots can lead to an unuseable system

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 320312 normal Bug#320312: Taking LVM snapshots can lead to an unuseable system Severity set to `normal'. > tags 320312 morinfo Unknown tag/s: morinfo. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security

Processed: sparc fixes committed to svn

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 340835 + pending Bug#340835: sparc: /lib64/libc.so.6: unexpected reloc type 0x4f Tags were: patch Bug#341514: libc6-sparc64: All 64-bit binaries fail to execute. Tags added: pending > tag 342755 + pending Bug#342755: glibc: ftbfs [sparc] Error: sym

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

2005-12-17 Thread Maximilian Attems
reassign kernel-package stop On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:48:55PM +0800, LUK ShunTim wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 > Version: 2.6.14+2.6.15-rc5-0experimental.1 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > > After installing linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686 and rebooting,

Bug#343691: Upgrade to 0.8.6g-3 overwrites /etc/cacti/debian.php will null values

2005-12-17 Thread sean finney
hi jesse, On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 02:31:15AM -0700, Jesse Molina wrote: > During the upgrade, I recall being prompted about the new > dbconfig-common option. I selected "n" for No. However, the file was > cleared, rendering Cacti disfunctional. I didn't notice until today > that polling had sto

Bug#320312: Taking LVM snapshots can lead to an unuseable system

2005-12-17 Thread maximilian attems
severity 320312 normal tags 320312 morinfo stop On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:46:58PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:32:58PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > hmm i'm not shure it deserves the "critical" stamp. > > No it does not. The system can boot without a working /us

Bug#320312: Taking LVM snapshots can lead to an unuseable system

2005-12-17 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:32:58PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > hmm i'm not shure it deserves the "critical" stamp. No it does not. The system can boot without a working /usr. > anyway could you lvm2 maintainer look into that #320312. The referenced message refers to lvm 2.00.16, sarge ship

Bug#320312: Taking LVM snapshots can lead to an unuseable system

2005-12-17 Thread maximilian attems
hmm i'm not shure it deserves the "critical" stamp. anyway could you lvm2 maintainer look into that #320312. thanks :) -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#292290: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7: XFS filesystem corruption: Input/output error

2005-12-17 Thread Loic Minier
Hi, On Sat, Dec 17, 2005, maximilian attems wrote: > if you are bound to 2.6.8 you'd anyway better have not > heavy io. backports.org has newer semi-official builds. > take care regarding the udev version while using such backports. For my part, I no longer use XFS, I had too many times

Processed: reiserfs wooes

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity #342387 important Bug#342387: oops on find_get_block with reiserfs Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, De

Processed: Re: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7: XFS filesystem corruption: Input/output error

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags #292290 important Unknown tag/s: important. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l1

Bug#292290: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7: XFS filesystem corruption: Input/output error

2005-12-17 Thread maximilian attems
tags #292290 important stop newer xfs would have needed serious core changes in 2.6.8. the debian kernel team had been penalized by the unforseen long sarge core freeze. it's very unfortunate as xfs in debian's kernel had special attention. ext2, ext3 is recommended for 2.6.8 usage. if you are bo

Bug#308639: marked as done (kernel-build vs. kernel-headers splitted broken, headers unuseable)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:04:13 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ppc kernel-build vs. kernel-headers splitted broken, headers unuseable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Processed: Re: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686: appears to cause reiserfs corruption on Sid

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 274167 important Unknown tag/s: important. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10

Processed: Re: Reproduced, also using ext2 + dm-crypt on top of RAID5

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 336153 important Bug#336153: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386: Filesystem errors while writing to DM disk Severity set to `important'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Processed: known 2.6.8 fucked md status

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity #325726 important Bug#325726: kernel-image-2.6.8-11-amd64-generic: kernel panics/hangs (SATA related?) Severity set to `important'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admini

Bug#339230: diff of the NMU

2005-12-17 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Please find attached the diff of the NMU I have just done for the libstdc++ allocator change. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~a

Bug#336153: Reproduced, also using ext2 + dm-crypt on top of RAID5

2005-12-17 Thread maximilian attems
severity 336153 important stop 2.6.8 is known to have an fucked md and doesn't stand heavy fileload unless you are lucky. the archive features now 2.6.14 please try it out, beware that the new initramfs generating tools are still in dev -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Bug#274167: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686: appears to cause reiserfs corruption on Sid

2005-12-17 Thread maximilian attems
tags 274167 important stop as the bug submitter is speaking about unstable, he should inbetween use 2.6.14 which has a much better reiserfs, which still needs some SuSe patch massaging. anyway if you are bound to 2.6.8 reiserfs is not a recommended rockstable fs. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Processed: downgrade - alternatives exists

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity #298736 important Bug#298736: initrd-tools - mkinitrd does not find scsi driver on 2.6.10 Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Bug#341516: wpasupplicant: kernel panic on start with hostap driver

2005-12-17 Thread maximilian attems
please attach to your response output of: dmesg > dmesg.txt -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#343712: gcl: FTBFS: ./configure: line 2413: syntax error near unexpected token `('

2005-12-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: gcl Version: 2.6.7-12 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on most arches with the following error: checking for text start... _start checking system version (for dynamic loading)... checking for makeinfo... makeinfo ./configure: line 2413: syntax error near unexpected

Bug#343710: wvstreams: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: wvhash.cc:33: error: cast from 'const void*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision

2005-12-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: wvstreams Version: 4.2-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on 64 bit arches with the following error: utils/wvhash.cc: In function 'unsigned int WvHash(const void*)': utils/wvhash.cc:33: error: cast from 'const void*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision make[1]: *** [

Bug#343701: marked as done (apt-get: Unable to configure a package that failed to install, config.dat locked by frontend)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 05:01:54 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343701: apt-get: Unable to configure a package that failed to install, config.dat locked by frontend has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#343608: Core dump at start

2005-12-17 Thread David Pashley
On Dec 17, 2005 at 05:48, Juhapekka Tolvanen praised the llamas by saying: > > I think I found the reason for that core dump: > > http://w-ber.ormgas.com/html2utf8.pl > > If UTF-8 is really not in use and that script is loaded in > ~/.irssi/startup , irssi dumps core during startup. Probably the

Bug#343686: debsums: checksums mismatch + bug #343048 again

2005-12-17 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, LUK ShunTim said: > However, the strange thing is when I invoke reportbug to report it, I got > these > bunch of checksum errors > > > Getting status for linux-image-2.6.15-rc5-686... > Verifying package integrity... > There may be a problem with your installation

Bug#343679: marked as done (gloox: ftbfs [sparc] doxygen: Command not found)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 04:32:04 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343679: fixed in gloox 0.7.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#327931: marked as done (avida: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:28:31 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Acknowledged has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#338930: gambas - FTBFS: creating symbolic link: Permission denied

2005-12-17 Thread L. Redrejo
Thanks, In fact I had already apply the same solution for the packages a couple of weeks ago, but they I am in the nm process and I am waiting for a sponsor to upload them. They are located at http://apt.linex.org/linex/gambas/ . If you are a debian maintainer it would be great if you can check the

Bug#343701: apt-get: Unable to configure a package that failed to install, config.dat locked by frontend

2005-12-17 Thread Chris McCowage
Package: apt-get Version: apt 0.6.42.1 for linux i386 compiled on Oct 23 2005 11:34:57 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable apt-get is broken, while attempting to install cupsys, libspl1 was scheduled for installation but failed. Any further attempts fail as below. Summary /v

Bug#343347: marked as done (rus-ispell: aspell-ru built in wrong debian/rules target)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:28:26 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in rus-ispell 0.99f9-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respo

Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: ide fails to initialize, fails to boot

2005-12-17 Thread Dominique Dumont
Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Just to avoid misunderstandings: did you add the ide-generic > to repair a non-booting system, or just by way of prevention? > > If the amd74xx also fails to boot without ide-generic, I'll need > to prepare a modified yaird patch. Here's wha

Bug#288819: please depend on autotools-dev

2005-12-17 Thread Roberto Lumbreras
The patch included in this NMU is... BIG... just because one build-depends line change!! Please build-depend on autotools-dev and delete config.{sub,guess} in the debian/rules clean target and link them to /usr/share/misc/config.{sub,guess} when they are needed. Salud, -- Roberto Lumbreras

Bug#341174: boost FTBFS on hppa

2005-12-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello, Is anyone looking into this problem with building boost on hppa? As there are quite a few packages which build-depend on boost (including parts of KDE, and aptitude), this is likely to cause hppa to hold up the c2a transition unless some progress is made here. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek

Bug#343691: Upgrade to 0.8.6g-3 overwrites /etc/cacti/debian.php will null values

2005-12-17 Thread Jesse Molina
Package: cacti Version: 0.8.6g-3 Severity: grave Justification: n After the last upgrade of Cacti, the /etc/cacti/debian.php was replaced with default/null values. This caused polling to stop and data for five days was lost for my install. During the upgrade, I recall being prompted about the

Processed: yawn

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 343687 firefox_1.5.dfsg-1(m68k/unstable): lots of 'asm specifier' > errors Bug#343687: firefox_1.5.dfsg-1(m68k/unstable): lots of 'arm specifier' errors Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assis

Bug#341474: marked as done (trustedqsl: infinite loop on some buildds)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:02:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341474: fixed in trustedqsl 1.11-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#320048: marked as done (SECURITY: buffer-overrun in apache2-ssl (CAN-2005-1268))

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:05:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320063: fixed in apache2 2.0.54-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#320063: marked as done (Security: buffer-overrun in apache2-ssl)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:05:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320063: fixed in apache2 2.0.54-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#320063: marked as done (Security: buffer-overrun in apache2-ssl)

2005-12-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:05:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320048: fixed in apache2 2.0.54-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

  1   2   >