On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 09:59:21PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> -while getopts "d:km:o:r:" flag; do
> - case $flag in
> - d)
> - echo "$PROG: $flag unsupported"
> +TEMP=`getopt -o d:km:o:r: --long
> supported-host-version:,supported-targ
I saw those patches here:
http://people.ubuntu.com/~scott/patches/gal2.4/
So I tried to install ubuntu's packages, but it seems like they are
named after the gal version version (libgal2.4-common instead of
libgal-common).
So evolution is still not installable.
It's been over a month now :) Any
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 09:42:54PM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 06:15:04PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I would really like to have the choice of both approaches, also for
> > less common tasks like switching from 2.4 or preparing an alien bootup
> > (either f
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:12:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gtkdiskfree: insecure temporary file creation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> (I might write the corresponding patch if you wish.)
Please! :)
--
.''`. Follow the white Rabbit - Ranty (and Lewis Carroll)
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.c
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#331696: fixed in dar 2.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: udev
Version: 0.070-5
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: breaks unrelated software
The dvb.sh script was replaced with inline code in udev 0.070-1. This
code fails to produce /dev/dvb/* nodes: following errors were seen.
Oct 16 12:29:47 localhost udev[7381]: udev_make_node
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334033: fixed in kbear 2.1.1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:32:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334163: fixed in mftrace 1.1.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:43:54 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294437: fixed in vdk2 2.4.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:43:54 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#262091: fixed in vdk2 2.4.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Is there a new upload for sysklogd in the works? This bug is repeatable
and it causes real data loss if a log file grows to over 2gb in size.
Changes to the rules file to get the LFS_CFLAGS were wrong. The patch is
simple:
--- debian/rules.orig 2005-09-03 22:34:01.0 -0700
+++ debia
Package: lirc-modules-source
Version: 0.7.1pre2-10
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
Hi,
lirc-modules-source modifies its /etc/lirc/lirc-modules-source.conf
conffile in postinst. This is a violation of policy 10.7.3.
("[Conffiles] must not be modified by the maintainer scripts duri
Package: pinball-dev
Version: 0.3.1-4
Severity: serious
pinball was compiled with libstdc++6, so you need to change
the libstdc++5-3.3-dev dependency of pinball-dev to libstdc++6-dev, too
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers tes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 303779 2:3.4.0-4
Bug#303779: motor: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses
precision
Bug marked as found in version 2:3.4.0-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
found 303779 2:3.4.0-4
thanks
Somehow you managed to not fix the bug despite of claiming so in the
changelog, motor stilf FTBFS on alpha and ia64
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 207756 + fixed
Bug#207756: amaya: build-depend on libpng12-dev instead of libpng2-dev
There were no tags set.
Bug#328338: amaya: please rebuild against latest libpng
Bug#331082: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on libpng2-dev
Tags added: fixed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> Hi Luk >@2005.10.14_14:10:42_+0200
Hi
> I don't think so. librrd2 is not backwards compatible to librrd0, so it is
> not as simple as updating the build dependency.
That may be the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 334163 mftrace: Please package version 1.1.17 of mftrace
Bug#334163: gf2pbm: fails entirely on powerpc when compiled with -O2
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Hi,
what about this bug? Is one rc-bug more and should be easy
to fix.
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
Forget about that mouse with 3/4/5 buttons -
gimme a keyboard with 103/104/105 keys!
pgp3X
retitle 334163 mftrace: Please package version 1.1.17 of mftrace
thanks
Han-Wen Nienhuys is fast!
Thomas
--- Begin Message ---
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>I'm attempting a fix now.
>
>
> Done; here is the patch:
>
>
> I've verifie
Package: yada
Severity: serious
Hi
yada rebuilds the debian/control file when it is run, *AND* it goes and
*modifies* data in the first paragraph of it.
This is *really* broken and should never be done, except by the
maintainer itself. The reason is simple: If its done automagically and
noone ch
Package: mftrace
Severity: grave
Version: 1.1.16-1
Tags: patch, upstream
gf2pbm on powerpc fails entirely when compiled with -O2. It produces
errors like "Too many bits found when loading character 65", and the
resulting output is empty.
I have found the following patch solves the problem. I f
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 23:41:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 0.3.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:30:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324268: fixed in scim-pinyin 0.5.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:30:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324268: fixed in scim-pinyin 0.5.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:30:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324808: fixed in scim-pinyin 0.5.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> reassign 332661 ghc6
Bug#332661: ghc-cvs - fails to build
Bug reassigned from package `ghc-cvs' to `ghc6'.
> merge 334110 332661
Bug#332661: ghc-cvs - fails to build
Bug#334110: ghc6
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:30:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297975: fixed in scim-pinyin 0.5.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 259671 1:0.11.15-1
Bug#259671: Missing dependency on libsm-dev
Bug marked as found in version 1:0.11.15-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
I have exactly the same problem here. When trying to build
a package with apt-build, configure fails. When using
another mechanism -- apt-get source -b or by just
typing ./configure, everything is fine. Only apt-build
fails.
It used to work until a recent update, ca. 3 weeks ago. I'm
usin
found 259671 1:0.11.15-1
thanks
This problem still persists.
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: gnugk
Version: 2.2.3-2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
gnugk fails to build:
> -> Considering libsqlplus-dev (>= 1.7.9.sp4-2)
> Tried versions:
>-> Does not satisfy version, not trying
> E: Could not satisfy build-dependency.
> E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed.
The attache
Package: gnuift
Version: 0.1.14-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
gnuift fails to build:
> -> Considering libsqlplus-dev (>= 1.7.40-2)
> Tried versions:
>-> Does not satisfy version, not trying
> E: Could not satisfy build-dependency.
> E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed.
The attached
Package: gnome-ruby
Version: 0.34-1
Severity: serious
gnome-ruby fails to build:
> dh_movefiles
> dh_movefiles: Compatibility levels before 3 are deprecated.
> dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ruby/1.6/gdk_pixbuf.rb not found (supposed
> to put it in libgdk-pixbuf-ruby1.6)
> dh_movefiles: debian
Package: gnat-glade
Version: 3.15p-7
Severity: serious
gnat-glade fails to build because it cannot determine that the Ada
compiler is recent enough:
> checking if the Ada compiler is recent enough... ./configure: line 1713:
> test: Debian 3.15p-15: integer expression expected
> no
> configure: e
Package: gtksourceview-sharp
Version: 0.5-6
Severity: serious
gtksourceview-sharp fails to build because dh_install cannot copy
debian/tmp/usr/lib/monodoc/sources:
> dh_install --sourcedir=debian/tmp
> cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp//usr/lib/monodoc/sources/': No such file or
> directory
> dh_insta
Package: libopenvrml4-dev
Version: 0.15.10-1
Severity: serious
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/openvrml.pc requires mozilla-js, but
libopenvrml4-dev does not depend on mozilla-dev so mozilla-js.pc is
not installed.
This is serious because it prevents gtklookat from building.
--
Matt
signature.asc
Descript
Package: hat
Version: 2.02-12
Severity: serious
hat fails to build because its build-dependency on nhc98 cannot be
satisfied:
> -> Considering nhc98 (>= 1.16-7) [arm hppa i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390]
> Tried versions:
>-> Does not satisfy version, not trying
> E: Could not satisfy
Package: gpsim-dev
Version: 0.20.14-7.1
Severity: serious
gpsim-logic fails to compile because /usr/include/gpsim/modules.h uses
default arguments for something other than function parameters:
> c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2
> -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/incl
Package: gnbd-kernel
Version: 0.trunk20050206-1
Severity: serious
gnbd-kernel fails to build:
> -> Considering kernel-tree-2.6.10-5
>-> Trying kernel-tree-2.6.10-5
>-> Cannot install kernel-tree-2.6.10-5; apt errors follow:
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
>
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:17:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329246: fixed in mindi 1.04-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:17:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324302: fixed in mindi 1.04-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 334150 !
Bug#334150: Lack of dependency makes rpm2cpio unusable on amd64
Changed Bug submitter from "Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to "Artur
R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 334141 lftp@uniyar.ac.ru
Bug#334141: Crashes after any transfer on Alpha
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> tags 334141 + confirmed upstream
Bug#334141: Crashes after any transfer on Alpha
There were no ta
forwarded 334141 lftp@uniyar.ac.ru
tags 334141 + confirmed upstream
severity 334141 normal
merge 334059 334141
thanks
Am Samstag, den 15.10.2005, 22:08 +0200 schrieb Falk Hueffner:
Hello Falk,
> Severity: grave
I downgraded the severity because the file is downloaded correctly.
> [EMAIL PROTEC
Package: rpm
Version: 4.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
rpm2cpio gives following message:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/f$ rpm2cpio fglrx64_6_8_0-8.18.6-1.x86_64.rpm | cpio -idv
rpm2cpio: error while loading shared libraries: libbeecrypt.so.6: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
rp
There is also no dependency on libbeecrypt6 in rpm package.
Regards
Artur
--
Promotor polecił mi, żebym przy opisie wzorów podtrzymywania swojego
statusu przez adminów korzystała z książki opisującej analogiczne
procesy... w więzieniu i wśród młodocianych przestępców. :)
Package: rpm,manpages-pl
Severity: serious
Unpacking rpm (from .../archives/rpm_4.4.1-2_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/rpm_4.4.1-2_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/pl/man1/gendiff.1.gz', which is also in
package manpages-pl
-- System Infor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 333609
Bug#333609: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgssapi_krb5
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 286471 2.1.5-10-4
Bug#286471: inventor: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses
precision
Bug marked as found in version 2.1.5-10-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
reopen 333609
thanks
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 05:18:25AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #333609: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgssapi_krb5,
> which was filed against the libcurl3-openssl-dev package.
>
> It has been closed by o
found 286471 2.1.5-10-4
thanks
According to
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=inventor&ver=2.1.5-10-4&arch=alpha&stamp=1124871129&file=log&as=raw
your 64bit fixes didn't work on alpha...
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Oct 15, 2005, at 10:59, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:Hi.I propose to make to attached NMU to make amaya installable in unstableagain (and fix some other build related issues on the way). If there areno objections I will upload it in the next days.Go for it. I have a good start at getting the lastest
Package: lftp
Version: 3.3.1-1
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/lftp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp% lftp ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian
cd ok, cwd=/debian
lftp ftp.debian.org:/debian> get README
1055 bytes transferred
*** glibc detected *** double free
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 20:52:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327797: bins: contains paths from the build process
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I had a look at the patch by Erik, and ended up doing the following
improvements:
* Use GNU getopt to properly handle long-opts
* Quote echo'ed strings
* Redirect error messages to stderr
* Use test -n
* Emit error when failing version
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 06:15:04PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:34:57 +0200 Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:57:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:47:57AM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
>
Package: enigmail
Severity: serious
I guess you are aware of it since you uploaded mozilla 1.7.12 yourself
but lets note it in the BTS, too: enigmail is currently neither buildable nor
installable in sid and needs to be updated for 1.7.12
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Just for the record, this problem had been fixed before in 2.36-1.1,
thanks to hints from Frank Lichtenheld, but somehow it came back to
life again.
Cheers,
Flo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: dnprogs
Version: 2.30
Severity: serious
in mail/receive.c you use $ in macro names. This isn't allowed on
arm by default anymore. See #327849 for details and a possible
fix (aside from just not using $ in macro names...)
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian R
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 02:16:45PM +1000, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 01:44:09AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld said
> > Package: lyx
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > lyx currently can't be installed on ia64 due to a binNMU that produced
> > dependencies on lyx-common with the binNMU version
Hi.
I propose to make to attached NMU to make amaya installable in unstable
again (and fix some other build related issues on the way). If there are
no objections I will upload it in the next days.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
diff -Naur amaya-8.5.b
Package: beagle
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Starting beagled from the terminal gives a crash, with the following
text in the terminal:
===
$ beagled
** (beagled:13223): WARNING **: The following assembly referenced from
/usr/lib/bea
Package: aime
Version: 0.60.3-7.1
Severity: serious
aime FTBFS on alpha and ia64:
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/aime-0.60.3'
Making all in src
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/aime-0.60.3/src'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../intl -g -frepo -c ability.cpp
g
Package: gramps
Version: 2.0.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Cannot launch gramps as it exits with an "Segmentation fault" error.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: alpha
Shell:
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:27:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in upload of libgnomeprint 2.12.1-2 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag #325335 - patch
Bug#325335: Greylisting Config. Doc. ist incorrect
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> severity #325335 important
Bug#325335: Greylisting Config. Doc. ist incorrect
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> severity 207756 serious
Bug#207756: amaya: build-depend on libpng12-dev instead of libpng2-dev
Severity set to `serious'.
> merge 207756 331082
Bug#207756: amaya: build-depend on libp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 333727 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#333727: FTBFS: Missing build-deps, -lm
Tags were: experimental patch
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> block 321668 with 321664
Bug#321668: FTBFS in sid
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 321664
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 04:34:57PM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:57:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:47:57AM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 12:53:41PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> > Hey, i didn
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 04:25:42PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 04:12:43PM +0200, Albert 'Tigr' Dorofeev wrote:
> > asmail does not need -lXt.
>
> It tries to link against, so it needs it.
I removed the Xt from the list of libraries in 1.8.
Albert
--
GPG fingerprint =
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> # this sounds hardly RC
> severity 328370 important
Bug#328370: rss2email: 'r2e run' crashes with 'TypeError: cannot concatenate
'str' and 'int' objects'
Severity set to `important'.
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 11:41:07AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:57:31 +0200
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > The patch claims support for 2.6.8, which is where development
> > > started, but later yaird
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:51:40 +0200
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, etch will not ship with a 2.6.8 kernel, so the upgrade path to
> 2.6.8 is not something we need to concern ourself with. the upgrade
> path from 2.6.8 is another mather,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[trimming recipients to lessen duplicates]
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:34:57 +0200
Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:57:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:47:57AM +0200, Erik van Konij
tag #325335 - patch
severity #325335 important
thanks
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 04:49:33PM +0200, Clément Stenac wrote:
> As you have spamassassin 3.X, you need to follow the 3.X instructions,
> that are around line 190 of README.greylisting.gz, and which tell to use
> "eval:greylisting" and a prior
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328336: fixed in gif2png 2.5.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hello Martin,
This patch is included in bins (1.1.29-2) but the bug is still open and
it is an RC bug.
Did you forget to close it in debian/changelog or I am missing
something?
Bye,
Le Monday 12 September 2005 à 17:37:36, Martin Michlmayr a écrit:
> * Adam Lackorzynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
The non-suid command "loadkeys" can be used by any local user having
console access. It does not just apply to the current virtual console
but to all virtual consoles and i
Trying to reinstall removed packages:
> Trying to uninstall newly installed packages:
> Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping ghc6
> **
> Finished at 20051015-0853
> Build needed 00:00:00, 0k disk spa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 331303 + fixed
Bug#331303: cacti-cactid: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 333940 + fixed
Bug#333940: Unsatisfiable build-dep on libsnmp5-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> q
Package: bayonne
Version: 1.2.15-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build because it's not using -fPIC to
make a shared library.
>From the build log:
alpha-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -DVERPATH=\"1.2.15\" -g -O
2 -I/usr/include/cc++2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -DXML_SCRIPTS
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 07:02:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333116: fixed in gnome-system-tools 1.4.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:57:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:47:57AM +0200, Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 12:53:41PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hey, i didn't know the mkinitrd wrapper was shell, or i would have done it
> myself. I wonde
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 04:12:43PM +0200, Albert 'Tigr' Dorofeev wrote:
> asmail does not need -lXt.
It tries to link against, so it needs it.
Bastian
--
Only a fool fights in a burning house.
-- Kank the Klingon, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown
signature.asc
Description:
> > gcc asmail.o gui.o mbox.o maildir.o mh.o pop3.o imap.o socklib.o globals.o
> > x_color.o md5c.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXpm -lXext-lXt -lpthread -lrt -o
> > asmail
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXt
asmail does not need -lXt. This bug has been fixed
in the upstream version 1.8. Available for
I do not know, whether I have already respond to you...
Am 2005-09-18 14:14:59, schrieb Florian Weimer:
> * Michelle Konzack:
> > I can confirm this too
> > It does not affect Debian, but Mandrake and Redhat... :-)
>
> How have you determined this?
>
> Can you rule out that it's not reproducib
Package: centericq
Version: 4.21.0-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
Yesterday I discovered the same bug as described on:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100519
All versions of centericq in Debian are vulnerable.
You can find a backtrace, coredump and strace on:
http://nion.modprobe.de/
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #14619 (project findutils):
Updated patch, including the example suggested in comment #8 is attached.
cu andreas
___
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: find.diff Size:5 KB
updat
-lXt
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [asmail] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/asmail-1.7'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20051015-075
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 11:04:28PM +1000, Rob Weir wrote:
> Hey Michael,
Hi Rob,
> these bugs have been sitting around with patches for a while now; will
> you have time to do a vdk2 upload soon? Would you like someone to NMU
> it for you?
Thanks for the kind offer. I found some time today and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> severity 328338 serious
Bug#328338: amaya: please rebuild against latest libpng
Severity set to `serious'.
> merge 328338 331082
Bug#328338: amaya: please rebuild against latest libpn
Follow-up Comment #11, bug #14619 (project findutils):
Eric wrote:
---
> However, if it is desired, find could treat mode "x" as an
> extension to POSIX, as equivalent to "+x", so that -perm /x could
> be shorthand for -perm /+x.
---
I would prefer if this special exemption was n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 199557 + fixed
Bug#199557: openal fails to build on mips(el)
Tags were: patch
Bug#283117: FTBFS on mips / mipsel
Tags added: fixed
> tag 283117 + fixed
Bug#283117: FTBFS on mips / mipsel
Tags were: fixed patch
Bug#199557: openal fails to build on m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 325148
Bug#325148: vdkbuilder2: needs to be rebuilt with g++ 4.0
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 293667
Bug#293667: Mailscanner Wont Upgrade Or Install After Removing Old Version
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> close 293667 4.46.2-3
Bug#293667: Mailscanner Wont Upgrade Or Install After Removing Old Version
'close' is deprecated; see
reopen 325148
thanks
Hi Michael,
> libvdkbuilder2 - Plugin libraries bundled with VDKBuilder
> libvdkbuilder2-dev - Header files and static libraries for VDKBuilder plugins
> vdkbuilder2 - RAD for VDK
> Closes: 325148
> Changes:
> vdkbuilder2 (2.4.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* rebui
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325148: fixed in vdkbuilder2 2.4.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
