Package: yaird
Severity: Serious
Hello, ...
This is the second step in the linux-2.6 >=2.6.13 ramdisk-tool resolution
process. As you well know, 2.6.13 dropped devfs, whcih means initrd-tool
cannot be used anymore, and we now have a choice of yaird or initramfs-tools,
to make things nice and all,
Package: initrd-tools
Severity: Serious
Hello, ...
This is the second step in the linux-2.6 >=2.6.13 ramdisk-tool resolution
process. As you well know, 2.6.13 dropped devfs, whcih means initrd-tool
cannot be used anymore, and we now have a choice of yaird or initramfs-tools,
to make things nice a
Package: initramfs-tools
Severity: Serious
Hello, ...
This is the second step in the linux-2.6 >=2.6.13 ramdisk-tool resolution
process. As you well know, 2.6.13 dropped devfs, whcih means initrd-tool
cannot be used anymore, and we now have a choice of yaird or initramfs-tools,
to make things nic
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 12:02:04AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
...
> Just to clarify: if you fix the inline asm in glibc, then you don't
> need to recompile any of the currently broken libraries or
> applications.
We don't need to fix the inline asm - the kernel is required to
handle the misal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 333839 pending
Bug#333839: Broken on ia64 by binNMU, needs new upload
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 06:17:46AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I have attached a patch that changes the alignment of the f_env type. I
> have tested it separately from the glibc, it works.
Yes, your patch looks right.
Please also add the following comment in front of the fenv_t declaration.
I
tag 279689 +pending
tag 333067 +pending
thanks
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:29:01PM -0700, Ian Eure wrote:
> Same problem as Rich reported. Old kernel was using the regular text
> console. System now boots with fbcon. It dies sometime after the network
> configuration with the endless scrolling riva
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 01:44:09AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld said
> Package: lyx
> Severity: serious
>
> lyx currently can't be installed on ia64 due to a binNMU that produced
> dependencies on lyx-common with the binNMU version number, but since
> this package is arch all, it isn't available with
Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 05:59:33AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Ok, that's mean that theoretically it would break the ABI, but
practically, it does not break the ABI as the alignment is the same
(otherwise we would also have noticed SIGBUS in other applications).
Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 05:59:33AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Ok, that's mean that theoretically it would break the ABI, but
practically, it does not break the ABI as the alignment is the same
(otherwise we would also have noticed SIGBUS in other applications).
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:54:30PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 08:40:20AM +0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > >I don't think that's what is happening at all: I think that in one of
> > >these cases, your test file's on-stack fenv_t is aligned, and on the
> > >other it isn
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 05:59:33AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Ok, that's mean that theoretically it would break the ABI, but
> practically, it does not break the ABI as the alignment is the same
> (otherwise we would also have noticed SIGBUS in other applications).
Just to clarify: if you fi
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 05:59:33AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Ok, that's mean that theoretically it would break the ABI, but
> practically, it does not break the ABI as the alignment is the same
> (otherwise we would also have noticed SIGBUS in other applications).
>
> Said in other words, a
Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit :
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:17:21PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:54:30PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
drow is right, as usual. our fenv_t needs to be defined with
__attribute__((aligned(8))) or similar.
I'd recommend "fixing" the asm
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:17:21PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:54:30PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > drow is right, as usual. our fenv_t needs to be defined with
> > > __attribute__((aligned(8))) or similar.
> >
> > I'd recommend "fixing" the asm instead: tha
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:54:30PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > drow is right, as usual. our fenv_t needs to be defined with
> > __attribute__((aligned(8))) or similar.
>
> I'd recommend "fixing" the asm instead: that's an ABI change and would
> require heinous rebuilds.
Sorry - I'm not f
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333791: fixed in quantlib 0.3.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 10:57:36PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 07:21:32PM +0200, Attila Kinali wrote:
> > *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x088e9208 ***
> Can you still reproduce this? If so, it says that bash dumped core;
> the core dump sh
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 07:21:32PM +0200, Attila Kinali wrote:
> Package: locales
> Version: 2.3.5-6
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> when updating locales to version 2.3.5-6 it failes after
> generating the locales:
>
> ---
> jashugan:/home/attila# apt-get install
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:31:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327595: Why not closed?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Howdy,
I incorporated Lennert's suggestion and created a patch that fixes the
problem on at least i386.
--
Matt
diff -ru gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15-old/debian/rules2
gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/debian/rules2
--- gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15-old/debian/rules2 2005-10-13 06:58:48.0
-0700
+++ gcc-2.95-2.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 08:40:20AM +0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> >I don't think that's what is happening at all: I think that in one of
> >these cases, your test file's on-stack fenv_t is aligned, and on the
> >other it isn't. The code you posted for gcc 4.0 looks fine. I think
> >the assembly i
I don't think that's what is happening at all: I think that in one of
these cases, your test file's on-stack fenv_t is aligned, and on the
other it isn't. The code you posted for gcc 4.0 looks fine. I think
the assembly is broken or the definition of fenv_t.
drow is right, as usual. our fenv_t
Le jeu 2005-10-13 a 19:50:45 -0400, David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> Can you test the 0.8.10rc6 packages at:
>
> deb http://www.davidpashley.com/debian/irssi ./
nice, it worky again. thank you :). booboos in my conf, but i think
it's because it's left overs from an svn build
20:36 -->
Hi!
I believe this bug was fixed in upstream version 1.1.5.
While it is not yet released, snapshots are available from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/golded-plus/
Max
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 05:04:55PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> To say that this is a compiler bug, you would have to show that gcc-4.0 is
> *wrong* to 32-bit align the fenv_t struct instead of 64-bit aligning it.
> You'd have to check with the compiler folks to be sure, but I don't think
> this
On 13 October 2005 at 20:08, Luk Claes wrote:
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Package: quantlib
| Severity: grave
| Version: 0.3.10-1
|
| Hi
|
| libquantlib0-dev is uninstallable as it depends on libboost-test1.33.0
| (< 1.32.0+1.33.0-cvs20050727-99) while version 1.33.0-
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 11:05:01PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> I think you are misunderstanding him, Steve, or I am misunderstanding
> the whole thing (which is not unlikely). I think Aurelian is saying
> that the same source code that you supplied builds and runs fine with
> gcc-3.4, but not wit
Le jeu 2005-10-13 a 19:50:45 -0400, David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> Can you test the 0.8.10rc6 packages at:
>
> deb http://www.davidpashley.com/debian/irssi ./
sure.
um, PPC? :). do you have the debian diff so i can build it? never
mind, saw that you have the Sources.gz there, and the
Can you test the 0.8.10rc6 packages at:
deb http://www.davidpashley.com/debian/irssi ./
--
David Pashley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: lyx
Severity: serious
lyx currently can't be installed on ia64 due to a binNMU that produced
dependencies on lyx-common with the binNMU version number, but since
this package is arch all, it isn't available with this version number.
Please do a sourceful upload to get ia64 fixed by a rec
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 12:20:50AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> - gcc-4.0 generates wrong code
> For that see my attached file. It's the file from the glibc, with the
> code from Steve pasted at the end. It works with gcc-3.4, but fails
> with gcc-4.0.
I don't think that's what is happenin
Package: pmp-common
Version: 2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Due to the merging of hotplug and coldplug into udev the
automatic recognition of the device no longer works.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT polic
Package: ctrlproxy
Version: 2.6.2-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
After running ctrlproxy for a fairly long time as daemon:
Mem: 30180 29248932 0 1336 5596
-/+ buffers/cache: 22316 7864
Swap:60440 60440
Hi,
Stephen Gran a écrit :
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 07:26:43PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
When looking at the assembly code generated with gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4 and
with gcc-4.0, I see some differences:
I also don't speak hppa assembly, but it
Hi Philipp,
Josef released a new version.
Cheers,
André
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 07:26:43PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > When looking at the assembly code generated with gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4 and
> > with gcc-4.0, I see some differences:
>
> > I also don't speak hppa assembly, but it is obvious that
Package: kernel-image-2.6.12
Version: kernel-image-2.6.12-686
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Upgraded from old unstable system to current unstable.
After upgrade rebooting failed after loading ide-cd it reports
"lost interrupt".
Booting from 2.6.8 stock kernel package
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:47:32 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332337: fixed in libmusicbrainz-2.0 2.0.2-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:47:32 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332335: fixed in libmusicbrainz-2.0 2.0.2-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:53:06AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> The attached patch to glibc-2.3.5-3 works for me.
I'm taking a look at this, but I don't think it's enough: unlike some
other platforms, you can't use the i386 headers to build 64-bit
programs. You need to either install both set
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:24:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kcdlabel is no longer in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:24:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kcdlabel is no longer in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
CAN-2005-3185 has been confirmed by mitre.org (in a non-disclosed mail to me
and others)
It covers both the curl and the wget flaw (as they are identical).
--
-=- Daniel Stenberg -=- http://daniel.haxx.se -=-
ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol
--
To
> dh_install: command returned error code 256
> > make: *** [install] Error 1
> > **
> > Build finished at 20051013-0627
> > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
>
I just take a look at the buildd log. It's like there is problem
compiling somethi
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325678: fixed in svnmailer 1.0.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329088: fixed in stellarium 0.7.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
> severity 308502 normal
Bug#308502: USB problems installing sarge
Severity set to `normal'.
> severity 308236 normal
Bug#308236: Debian Installer: After successful install system doesn
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:17:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333642: fixed in evolution-sharp 0.10.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:17:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320515: fixed in linux-kernel-headers 2.6.13+0rc3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:17:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320515: fixed in linux-kernel-headers 2.6.13+0rc3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:17:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320515: fixed in linux-kernel-headers 2.6.13+0rc3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:20:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line boot-floppies end of life
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:20:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line boot-floppies end of life
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> # -fpedantic only present in the samples/Makefile and not ./Makefile anymore
> severity 297250 normal
Bug#297250: nvidia-settings: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): unrecognized command line
op
Joey,
i uploaded curl 7.13.2-2sarge3 to http://people.debian.org/~cavok/curl/
for your review, i'm waiting the clearance to upload.
the CAN-2005-3185 name is taken from iDEFENSE advisory 10.13.05 but
still not confirmed by cve.mitre.org.
regards
domenico
-[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
-
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:47:45 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #333783,
regarding less: Does not work properly line length > 80
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED
I had a very simliar problem on Red Hat a while ago.
The scenario was as follows:
0. the module loading tool runs during boot with PID 1.
1. tool calls insmod for several stacked modules.
2. forks insmod for module 1
3. waits for insmod's completion with wait4(-1).
4. Some other process (e.g. /s
Hello
To me it would be good to know if any of these issues are valid
if you use 2.6 kernel and patch from sarge?
Regards,
// Ola
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 07:00:27PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear Micah,
>
> Thank you for your tests, I have
Hi.
This bug seems to have been fixed in 4.4.2-7. Is there any reason
it wasn't closed?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: normal
#272004 has as only version 0.3.0-test2-1 registered which is
higher than the version number in unstable (probably not intentionally
but by maintainer's fault, but anyway). So it really should only
apply to experimental. But the BTS seems to assume that th
El jue, 13-10-2005 a las 11:46 +0800, Paul Wise escribió:
> Package: beagle
> Version: 0.1.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Thanks for uploading the new version of beagle! Unfortunately it depends
> on a newer version of libevolution-cil than is available in debi
Hello
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 08:32:56PM -0400, micah wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> Ok, I've done a few things. First I've tested and determined a number of
> problems with the testfs.sh-0.99 that was being used. Bertl has
> incorporated my changes, and fix
close 222384 1.0.0-3
close 222384 1.0.0-2.2
thanks
Closing this bug for the sake of version tracking. Not sure if the above
will work correctly, though... Let's find out.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> # doesn't affect sarge even though the version number is the same
> tags 251159 sid
Bug#251159: cl-tclink: should depend on libssl0.9.7
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 222384 1.0.0-3
Bug#222384: mason: Mason does not setup /etc/rc.* links
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.0.0-3, send any further explanations to
Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROT
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:00:48PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Version 0.4.0-12 of the octaviz package compiled correctly on the alpha
> architecture. Could you please confirm that this version also builds on
> ia64 and amd64, such that I can close these bug reports?
Yes, seems to have bui
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:44:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing for the sake of version tracking
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:44:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing for the sake of version tracking
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:29:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: gmpc
> Version: 0.12.0-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of gmpc_0.12.0-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
> [...]
> > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> > Bu
Package: xconq
Version: 7.4.1-2.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
Your package did show up on this list and I propose to orpha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: quantlib
Severity: grave
Version: 0.3.10-1
Hi
libquantlib0-dev is uninstallable as it depends on libboost-test1.33.0
(< 1.32.0+1.33.0-cvs20050727-99) while version 1.33.0-1 is already in
unstable.
Cheers
Luk
- --
Luk Claes - http://peopl
Package: uim-skk
Severity: serious
uim-skk depends on skkdic which in turn depends on freecdb which should
be removed. But apparently nobody cared to fix skkdic yet. So either
uim-skk needs to be dropped or skkdic needs to be fixed (and probably
taken over from the current maintainer)
Gruesse,
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327477: fixed in bash 3.0-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> tags 333740 + sarge
Bug#333740: abiword: [CAN-2005-2972] More RTF import buffer overflows
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: sarge
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Plea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> block 327326 with 327948
Bug#327326: libqt-perl: please upgrade to libqt3-mt !
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Bug#327993: libqt-perl: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transiti
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 07:26:43PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> When looking at the assembly code generated with gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4 and
> with gcc-4.0, I see some differences:
> source code:
> __asm__ (
>"fstd,ma %%fr0,8(%1)\n"
>"fstd,ma %%fr1,8(%1)\n"
>"fstd
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 329998 + fixed
Bug#329998: kinoplus: please rebuild against g++-4.0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 32 + fixed
Bug#32: kino-dvtitler: please rebuild against g++-4.0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Hi.
Openal currently fails to build on mips and mipsel again since you
again missed to include the NMU patches in subsequent uploads.
Please consider the following updated patch. If you don't raise any
objections I will upload a NMU tomorrow.
diff -Naur openal-0.2005080600.bak/debian/changelog
o
[Ccing [EMAIL PROTECTED], because there is people who know hppa assembly
there]
Hi!
Steve Langasek a écrit :
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.5-6.0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: this is the bug that broke the toolkit that held up the \
C++ transition that ruined the port that HP built
Hey G
I've NMUed both kinoplus and kino-dvtitler for the CXX transition.
Trivial patches:
diff -Naur dvtitler-0.2.0.bak/debian/changelog
dvtitler-0.2.0/debian/changelog
--- dvtitler-0.2.0.bak/debian/changelog 2005-10-13 19:05:49.0
+0200
+++ dvtitler-0.2.0/debian/changelog 2005-10-13 19:11:56
Package: less
Version: 391-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
The last few days less less seems to be acting weird, so I tried
downgrading to 382-2 and the problem went away.
The problem seems to be with files having a line length of > 80
and when scrolling with the arrow up/down or j/k keys. It's not
sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: libicq2000
Severity: grave
Version: 0.3.2-3
Hi
libicq2000 is uninstallable due to libsigc++0c102 not being available
anymore. Note that it is *not* enough to rebuild your package to fix
this bug! You should also rename libicq2000 to libicq20
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> # package already compiled with g++ 4.0
> tags 33 fixed
Bug#33: kino-timfx: please rebuild against g++-4.0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
>
End of message, stoppin
Package: inkscape
Version: 0.42.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Using the Text and Font dialog to change text objects causes the font size to
become
larger and larger. (Using the text tool to edit the text in-line is ok.
I have a drawing with 12 pt text. If I bri
I'll be updating the official package to 0.8 next week sometime.
--
-><- Nick Rusnov
-><- http://nick.industrialmeats.com
-><- [EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.5-6.0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: this is the bug that broke the toolkit that held up the \
C++ transition that ruined the port that HP built
Hey Goto-san,
There is a bug in libm that results in unaligned access on hppa when calling
feholdexcept() or fegetenv(
I do not see any fix for sarge,
I've updated my server but there were no updates to webmin.
As far as I have read webmin-1.180 is vulnerable as well.
So what to do ?
Carsten
--
"There are two major products that came out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence." --
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 07:02:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#93: fixed in maxima 5.9.1-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 07:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333731: fixed in bug-buddy 2.10.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:14:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332545: X error prevents wine startup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:14:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332545: X error prevents wine startup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:14:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#332545: X error prevents wine startup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 325813 patch
Bug#325813: fftw: shared libraries must be linked with dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
tags 325813 patch
thanks
Hi James, Paul,
The attached patch incorporates the changed mpich build dependency, and also
should fix the linkage of all the shared libraries in the package. Paul, I
see from bug #263126 that you were planning an upload to fix the RC bug;
hopefully this patch makes thi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 321014 + fixed
Bug#321014: Dependency on transitional package was introduced
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 333701 + fixed
Bug#333701: cogito - depends against ssh
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 333705 + fixed
Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 333731 serious
Bug#333731: bug-buddy doesnt depend on gconf2
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 333510
Bug#333510: [FTBFS] perl fails on arm with -O2
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs datab
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
