Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:44:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in last upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Package: arc
Version: 5.21l-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi!
There is a recent report about insecure temporary files in ncompress,
similar to the recent advisories about gzip:
http://www.zataz.net/adviso/arc-09052005.txt
Can you please check this? There is no CAN number yet. If this is a
Package: ncompress
Version: 4.2.4-15
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi!
There is a recent report about insecure temporary files in ncompress,
similar to the recent advisories about gzip:
http://www.zataz.net/adviso/ncompress-09052005.txt
Can you please check this? There is no CAN number yet.
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's very old, seems to have no upstream development anymore, has
> not many users and there are some alternatives.
The package "zone-file-check" is obsolete, it has been superseded by
the utility "named-checkzone" that is included in the "bind
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> The package doesn't have many users, is upstream dead as far as I can
> see (though there is a newer upstream version available, but it's from
> 2003). There's also a CDB perl module available that had some releases
> in the last months.
I think the situation is ver
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 22:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325941: fixed in k3b 0.12.4a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327940: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302917: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327231: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327231: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327002: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327231: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327002: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327002: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.5-6
Severity: serious
/usr/include/bits/syscall.h on mips and mipsel only contains definitions for
the ABI-specific syscalls. The rest of the syscalls (suchs as SYS_pivot_root)
are missing, which is causing other packages to build without support for
the syscall, a
Package: valgrind
Version: 1:3.0.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Whoever is compiling Valgrind for i386 is compiling it with -msse making
it incompatible on every machine without SSE support, basically anything
before the P3/AXP.
I originally reported this bug direct
Hi,
Shouldn't this be a bug against the m68k toolchain? Unless something
in wxPython changed that I am not aware of, it has always done this
(and not been a problem) previously, no?
I'm not wholly against patching this package in the name of pragmatism,
especially if a release were otherwise im
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 308502 normal #I screwed up and typed the wrong bug number
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> merge 319094 309958 308052
Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot
Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain
Package: mkisofs
Version: 2.01+01a03-1
Severity: grave
mkisofs segfaults when creating isos.
Example:
mkisofs -dvd-video -V ISO_`date +"%d-%m-%Y"` -o image.iso image
Segmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 319094 serious
Bug#319094: package conflicts blackbox & fluxbox
Severity set to `serious'.
> severity 309958 serious
Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file
Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot
Severity set
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Sorry for this, I only saw the already opened one after
> # filing another, as its severity wasn't adequate
> merge 319528 329036
Bug#319528: scorched3d: dependency borkage (libwxgtk2.4 instead of
libwxgtk2.4-1)
Bug#329036: scorched3d: depends on lib
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328742: fixed in libcatalyst-plugin-session-fastmmap-perl
0.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # This makes the package uninstallable, is certainly RC
> severity 319528 grave
Bug#319528: scorched3d: dependency borkage (libwxgtk2.4 instead of
libwxgtk2.4-1)
Severity set to `grave'.
> tag 319528 sid
Bug#319528: scorched3d: dependency borkage (lib
Package: scorched3d
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
The subject/title says it all: libwxgtk2.4 has been removed from
unstable on July, 13th 2005, making scorched3d uninstallable.
--
Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 328837 RM: titrax -- RoM; old, superseded
Bug#328837: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> severity 328837 normal
Bug#328837: RM: titrax -- RoM; old, superseded
Severity set to `normal'.
> reassign 328837 ftp.debian.o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 323798 + fixed
Bug#323798: [sparc] corrupted double-linked list
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 03:48:20PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> These grave bugs in gs-gpl are blocking work and causing trouble for
> many people. Is there anything I can do to help get them fixed? I'm
> happy to do NMUs if that would be helpful. Please advise.
I would encourage you to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 308052 + fixed-upstream
Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot
Tags were: sid confirmed
Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> tags 309958 + fixed-upstream
Bug#309958: fluxbox and bl
I uploaded an NMU for this bug:
diff -u openmotif-2.2.3/debian/changelog openmotif-2.2.3/debian/changelog
--- openmotif-2.2.3/debian/changelog
+++ openmotif-2.2.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+openmotif (2.2.3-1.2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix FTBFS on s390 (a
This is fixed in 0.9.14 upstream, by renaming bsetroot to fbsetroot.
From the changelog:
*05/07/12:
Renaming of 'bsetroot' to 'fbsetroot' (Mathias)
blackbox's 'bsetroot' and fluxbox's 'bsetroot' have different syntax
nowadays and collide when you install fluxbox and blackbox. hence
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> # patch also seems to fix the FTBFS on s390
> severity 323798 serious
Bug#323798: [sparc] corrupted double-linked list
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processin
These grave bugs in gs-gpl are blocking work and causing trouble for
many people. Is there anything I can do to help get them fixed? I'm
happy to do NMUs if that would be helpful. Please advise.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327502: fixed in qtorrent 2.9.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314654: fixed in qtorrent 2.9.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
I no longer use the software either and it is no longer maintained
upstream.
I agree with removal of the package, What should happen now?
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 06:23:07PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Package: titrax
> Version: 1.98.1-6
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> During the Debi
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318901: fixed in aspell-he 0.9+0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Lawrence,
this bug was due to a change in libqt3-mt 3.3.4-8. The Debian Qt maintainers
have been so kind to back out this change in libqt3-mt 3.3.5-1, therefore you
can close this bug report.
greetings
Torsten
- --
Torsten Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: xine-ui
Version: 0.99.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrading glibc (libc6) xine loads, but dies as soon as you try to
do anything with it like right clicking on the video window.
I fixed that by just rebuilding xine-ui from source (apt-get source
xine-
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328938: fixed in libf2c2 20050501-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327975: fixed in kxmleditor 1.1.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327676: fixed in stardata-common 0.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327975: fixed in kxmleditor 1.1.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 324594 + fixed
Bug#324594: nvidia-settings: FTBFS: Missing build dependencies.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 05:23 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:31:57PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > As these bugs have been open for a month without a response from the
> > maintainers, I plan to NMU these packages in 1 week (or sooner, at the
> > maintainers' request).
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> merge 328910 328954
Bug#328910: c2hs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'groff-base'
Bug#328954: c2hs: FTBFS: Please install groff to use LinuxDoc DTD SGML Text
Conversion
Merged 328910
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 11:44:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328964: libtheora-dev is not sid installable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> found 328017 0.35-2
Bug#328017: kxdocker: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Bug marked as found in version 0.35-2.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
Hello,
the fix for this bug is in SVN now. Due I'm still waiting for my account
to be created I need a sponsor to get it uploaded. The package is at
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~rafl/Code/Debian/nomeata/
Regards,
Flo
--
BOFH excuse #386:
The Internet is being scanned for viruses.
signature
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328948: fixed in gxmms 0.3.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327724: fixed in kazehakase 0.3.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hello, This is due to :
* Removed the s390 patch, which needs a full review with regard to the
PedUnit stuff i believe. In particular with regard to the sector size
support. Please try to get this one integrated upstream, as it is the last
problematic big debian-specific patc
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328971: fixed in vtk 4.4.2-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 321837 + fixed
Bug#321837: [Fwd: Log for successful build of mmv_1.01b-12.1 (dist=unstable)]
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> severity 321837 grave
Bug#321837: [Fwd: Log for successful build of mmv_1.01b-12.1 (dist=unstable)]
Severity set to `
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: powstatd-crypt
> Version: 1.5.1-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
> decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
> long time could cover up som
Package: partconf
Version: 1.10
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
During installation for s/390, partconf no longer recognizes partitions on
a dasd. This is probably due to recompilation against libparted 1.6.24.
pgpmSfYq3oxbn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 07:53:32AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> gjdoc failed to build on a sparc buildd, but built fine on my sparc
> pbuilder. I suspect this may be due to using the latest version of
> the gcc related packages in the pbuilder.
Strange it fails in my uptodate pbuilder on i386. R
Package: wxwindows2.4
Version: 2.4.4.1.1
Severity: serious
Hello,
wxwindows2.4 FTBFS on m68k, presumably due to the use of -O3 to
compile wxPython. Lowering the optimization level to -O2 should help.
This will probably bite wxwidgets2.6.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim]
Hello Frank!
On Saturday 10 September 2005 17:10, you wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 10:34:31AM +0200, Yven Johannes Leist wrote:
> > thanks for your patch, I'll upload a fixed package soon. (To be more
> > exact: after I return from my holidays, which will be in in two weeks
> > approximately.)
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: powstatd
> Version: 1.5.1-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
> decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
> long time could cover up some QA p
gjdoc failed to build on a sparc buildd, but built fine on my sparc
pbuilder. I suspect this may be due to using the latest version of
the gcc related packages in the pbuilder.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: udev
Version: 0.056-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I am trying to upgrade my kernel from 2.6.11 to 2.6.12 when doing so it reports
an error about hal in need of udev >= 0.063 . So I try to upgrade udev which
in turn need a kernel >= 2.6.12 .
Here are the comma
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 07:02:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326726: fixed in xmame 0.99-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 327937 by 328971
Bug#327937: ifrit: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Was blocked by: 327595
Blocking bugs added: 328971
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 328910 328954
Bug#328910: c2hs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'groff-base'
Bug#328954: c2hs: FTBFS: Please install groff to use LinuxDoc DTD SGML Text
Conversion
Merged 328910 328954.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Package: libcrypto++
Version: 5.2.1c2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hello,
libcrypto++ FTBFS on arm, m68k and hppa due to GCC 4 giving an
Internal Compiler Error there. Using -O1 or -O0 does not help, so the
workaround is to compile with g++-3.4 on those architectures (this is
possible
Package: vtk
Version: 4.4.2-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: patch
vtk-4.4.2-7 fails to build from source in an unstable pbuilder instance
and on most buildds (http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=vtk) due to
a bad Build-Dep. The attached patch fixes this and a bug with the
maint
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 293187 serious
Bug#293187: pkspxy: Please use a newer version of Berkeley DB
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 326927 + confirmed upstream sarge
Bug#326927: tcpick: implicitly converted pointers
Tags were: patch
Tags added: confirmed, upstream, sarge
> severity 326927 grave
Bug#326927: tcpick: implicitly converted pointers
Severity set to `grave'.
> quit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 327327 grave
Bug#327327: tcpick: does not run on ppc
Severity set to `grave'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To
Package: krb4
Severity: serious
Hi,
libdb4.1 is soon going to be removed from unstable. Please consider to
move your package to a newer version, e.g. libdb4.3.
Cheers,
Andi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 06:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326734: fixed in gnugo 3.7.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 327327 + upstream sarge
Bug#327327: tcpick: does not run on ppc
Tags were: confirmed patch
Tags added: upstream, sarge
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Subject: libtheora-dev is not sid installable
Package: libtheora-dev
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
apt-get install libtheora-dev fails this way with sid :
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libtheora-dev: De
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 327327 +confirmed +upstream +sarge
Unknown tag/s: +upstream, +sarge.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-exper
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 05:32:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328925: fixed in jesred 1.2pl1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 10:53:32 +0200, Andreas Jochens writes:
>This is caused by two different Build-Depends lines in debian/control
>which irritates 'apt-get build-dep'. There should be only a single
>occurrence of 'Build-Depends:' in debian control.
*blush* silly me...a fixed package is on the way
* Michelle Konzack:
>> I tried both examples on
>> debian sid x86_64, mutt 1.5.10-1
>> debian sarge x86, mutt 1.5.9-2
>> All four combinations (two mailboxes, two debian systems)
>> ran normally, no crashes or any other unusual behavior.
>> So this might not apply to debian at all.
>
> I can con
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:52:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328937: plplot: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Hello,
unless I missed something this doesn't seem to be fixed with version
0.35-2 of the kxdocker package:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/martin -> LANG=EN ; apt-get install kxdocker/unstable
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Selected version 0.35-2 (Debian:unstable) for
Package: c2hs
Version: 0.13.6-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
sgml2html c2hs.sgml
Processing file c2hs.sgml
sgml2txt c2hs.sgml
Please install groff to use LinuxDoc DTD SGML Text Conversion
make[2]: *** [c2hs.txt] Error 1
groff is only a suggeste
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:46:21 +0100 (BST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bugs closed with the latest upload.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 04:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324026: fixed in ffmpeg 0.cvs20050918-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Sunday 18 September 2005 12:31, you wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 12:06:05PM +0100, Grahame wrote:
> > Version 0.4.8-7 fails to upgrade with the following error:
> > dpkg-query: parse error, in file `/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 8587
> > package `libhal-storage0': `Depends' field, referenc
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 04:31:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328950: libhal-storage0: Fails to install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: libhal-storage0
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Version 0.4.8-7 fails to upgrade with the following error:
dpkg-query: parse error, in file `/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 8587 package
`libhal-storage0':
`Depends' field, reference to `libhal0': version contains
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 12:13:31PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On mar, sep 13, 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > You could try building at a lower optimization level (than -O3), or without
> > one or more of the fancy -f options used. Incidentally, the options line
> > passed to GCC is really stu
Package: gxmms
Version: 0.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Youo package is failing to build with the following error:
fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch
make: *** No rule to make target `binary-arch'. Stop.
You need to have a binary-arch target in your rules file.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: guile-gnome-platform
Version: 2.7.99-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
configure.ac:20: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_DISABLE_STATIC
If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf d
Package: orsa
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
touch debian/stamp-makefile-build
docbook2x-man debian/manpages/xorsa.xml
uudecode debian/examples/inner_solar_system.orsa.uu
cd src/liborsa && doxygen Doxyfile
/bin/sh: doxygen: comman
Package: libf2c2
Version: 20050501-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
cc -c -DSkip_f2c_Undefs -fPIC -I ../src -DNON_UNIX_STDIO -Df2c F77_aloc.c
F77_aloc.c:1:17: error: f2c.h: No such file or directory
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: plplot
Version: 5.3.1-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
/usr/bin/g++ -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic -o plplot_octave.oct plplot_octave.o
-L../../src/.libs -lplplotd -L/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../..
-lfreetype -lz -L/build/buildd/plpl
Hi,
On mar, sep 13, 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> You could try building at a lower optimization level (than -O3), or without
> one or more of the fancy -f options used. Incidentally, the options line
> passed to GCC is really stupid, containing wonders like
> '-finline-functions ... -f
Package: libhtml-prototype-perl
Version: 1.34-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'libhtml-prototype-perl' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
dh_clean arrange-stamp binary-stamp binary-arch-stamp binary-indep-stamp
build-stamp config-stamp install-stamp
debian/ru
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 11:13:33AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: gjdoc
> Version: 0.7.5-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> When building 'gjdoc' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
> I get the following error:
>
> checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
> You have no CLA
Package: gjdoc
Version: 0.7.5-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'gjdoc' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
You have no CLASSPATH, I hope it is good
checking for uudecode... no
configure: WARNING: I have to c
Package: jesred
Version: 1.2pl1-9
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'jesred' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
dpatch
Get:1 http://localhost unstable/main dpatch 2.0.14 [80.9kB]
debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed
Fetched 80
Package: silc-toolkit
Version: 0.9.12-4.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'silc-toolkit' on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:
# get proper name for shlib package
/silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/control.sh /silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/control
/silc-toolkit-0.9.12/lib/.libs
make: e
Package: libpam-opie
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
The package links code licensed under the GPL to code which is covered
by licenses with advertising clauses, for example:
| License to copy and use this software is granted provided that it
| is identified as the "RSA Data Securit
Package: hyperestraier
Version: 0.5.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'hyperestraier' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
cd rubynative && /usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/hyperestraier-0.5.7/rubynative'
( cd src && if ! [ -f Makefile ] ; then ruby ex
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328819 normal
Bug#328819: very old package, should this be removed?
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 328819 RM: math3d -- RoM; old, unused
Bug#328819: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 328819 ftp.debia
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
