Bug#326006: marked as done (kde-i18n: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'bzip2')

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 23:32:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326006: fixed in kde-i18n 4:3.4.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#326165: kmail: kamil doesn't install after upgrade to kde 3.4.2

Package: kmail Version: 4:3.3.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After an upgrade of kde to 3.4.2-1 kmail doesn't get installed: # apt-get install kmail Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that

Processed: Re: Bug#326090: perl: 'libperl.so' missing in 'libperl-dev' package

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 326090 cpio Bug#326090: perl: 'libperl.so' missing in 'libperl-dev' package Bug reassigned from package `perl' to `cpio'. > retitle 326090 cpio -p does not copy dangling symlinks Bug#326090: perl: 'libperl.so' missing in 'libperl-dev' package

Bug#326090: perl: 'libperl.so' missing in 'libperl-dev' package

reassign 326090 cpio retitle 326090 cpio -p does not copy dangling symlinks thanks On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:33:08PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: >Without 'libperl.so' some packages which Build-Depend on >'libperl-dev' will FTBFS. This build worked fine when originally run. It appears that the

Bug#325954: marked as done (depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 22:47:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325954: fixed in scummvm 0.7.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: reopen xserver-xorg 325397 since the user reproduced it with a free driver

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 325397 Bug#325397: [amd64] Crash X sometimes with powernow-k8 Bug reopened, originator not changed. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs d

Bug#318946: User expectations and shorewall

Florian Weimer wrote: > * Martin Schulze: > > > What was the behaviour pre-sarge? > > What is the behaviour post-sarge (or rather in sarge)? > > Do you mean "before and after the upstream security update"? The > terms pre-sarge/post-sarge do not make much sense to me in this > context, I'm afrai

Bug#320899: FTBFS: Conflicting static and non-static declarations

tags 320899 patch thanks Hi Roger, Please find attached a pair of patches that fix the gcc 4.0 compatibility issues in im-sdk. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL

Processed: Re: FTBFS: Conflicting static and non-static declarations

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 320899 patch Bug#320899: FTBFS: Conflicting static and non-static declarations There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Processed: Re: Bug#325421: acknowledged by developer (I think this is fixed)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 325421 Bug#325421: Crashes in /usr/bin/guile-1.6 when adding sub-accounts Bug reopened, originator not changed. > severity 325421 important Bug#325421: Crashes in /usr/bin/guile-1.6 when adding sub-accounts Severity set to `important'. > thanks

Bug#325997: libofx2: Conflict with libofx1c2

Benjamin Drieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Unfortunately, the bug is in libofx1c2 (or rather, one specific >> version of it). I'm not sure the correct fix, but bug #325710 >> contains what I *think* is the right fix. > > libofx2 supersedes

Bug#325421: acknowledged by developer (I think this is fixed)

reopen 325421 severity 325421 important thanks Martijn Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I think this bug is also fixed by the bugfix in 1.8.10-15 of gnucash. >> Please install that and if the bug still occurs for you, reopen this >> bug report and I will see what I can figure out. > > The

Bug#325997: this is RC

severity 325997 important thanks Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > severity 325997 serious > thanks Please read bug 325710. The bug is in libofx1c2, which is now an obsolete package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA

Processed: Re: Bug#325997: this is RC

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 325997 important Bug#325997: libofx2: Conflict with libofx1c2 Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs data

Bug#324617: mozilla-firefox: history window segfaults

I can confirm that 1.0.4-2sarge3 fixes the history crashing bug for me. Thanks! -- Geoff Crompton Debian System Administrator Strategic Data +61 3 9340 9000 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#326079: subversion: bug marked as fixed in nmu still lives

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package subversion Ignoring bugs not assigned to: subversion > tags 316143 -fixed Bug#316143: subversion: segfault when adding a directory Tags were: pending fixed sid Bug#323376: svn segfaults when using LC_ALL=pl_PL locales Tags removed: fixed > mer

Bug#76918: from Winifred

remember me? my page http://heinzherold.net/view.cgi?s=bbase&m=CDAIB.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#263186: Diff of the NMU

Hi, Please find attached the diff of the NMU that have just been upload. Bye, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel

Bug#326079: subversion: bug marked as fixed in nmu still lives

package subversion tags 316143 -fixed merge 316143 326079 thank ya [Carlo Perassi] > Hi. > My previous #316143 (co-merged with #323376) still applies as such: Thanks. Apparently the fix wasn't included in the experimental NMU, but it's in the repository now and will be in the next 1.2.3 upload.

Bug#326130: poppler: renamed libraries for the C++ transition but did not bump build-deps

Package: poppler Version: 0.4.0-1 Severity: serious Hello, when renaming libpoppler0-qt to libpoppler0c2-qt, the build-dependency on libqt3-mt-dev should have been bumped to (>= 3:3.3.4-4). Unlike normal applications, libraries are expected to specify in their Build-Depends the transitio

Bug#326131: qca: renamed libraries for the C++ transition but did not bump build-deps

Package: qca Version: 1.0-7 Severity: serious Hello, when renaming libqca1 to libqca1c2, the build-dependency on libqt3-mt-dev should have been bumped to (>= 3:3.3.4-4). Unlike normal applications, libraries are expected to specify in their Build-Depends the transitioned versions of othe

Processed: Re: WTF?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 208967 normal Bug#208967: docbook2man uses hyphens instead of minus signs Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#208967: WTF?

severity 208967 normal thanks On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:31:25PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > severity 208967 grave > thanks > > Christian, what about communicating with the bug reporters instead of > silently downgrading the bugs? > > In fact this problems fscks the groff conversion in every De

Bug#318946: User expectations and shorewall

* Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > * Martin Schulze: > > > What was the behaviour pre-sarge? > > What is the behaviour post-sarge (or rather in sarge)? > > Do you mean "before and after the upstream security update"? The > terms pre-sarge/post-sarge do not make much sense to me in this > c

Processed: this is RC

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 325997 serious Bug#325997: libofx2: Conflict with libofx1c2 Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database

Bug#301796: marked as done (kdeedu: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): Please do not use /lib64 on amd64 and ppc64)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:23:21 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#301796: fixed in kdeedu 4:3.4.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#325973: marked as done (qscintilla: rebuild for c++ transition [NMU prepared])

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:24:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325973: fixed in qscintilla 1.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#318164: marked as done (CXX 4.0 transition)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:58:43 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318164: fixed in hdf5 1.6.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#324592: marked as done (digikam: Libraries should be split in a lib and -dev package.)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:03:59 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324592: fixed in digikam 0.7.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#326031: pike7.2_7.2.580-4 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: Attempt to call the NULL-value

Hi Marek, On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:06:03PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote: > > A full build log can be found at > > . > > This is a serious bug because it is a regression on an architecture >

Bug#326031: pike7.2_7.2.580-4 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: Attempt to call the NULL-value

On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 03:04:59PM -0700, Steve Langasek scribbled: > Hi Marek, Hello Steve, > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:06:03PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote: > > > > A full build log can be found at > > >

Bug#321841: marked as done (since ksocrat-data will move to non-free, kscocrat needs to go to contrib)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:39:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321841: fixed in ksocrat 3.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#323010: libcrypto

* Angel Vidal (Kry) [Fri, 26 Aug 2005 06:20:05 +0200]: Hello, (when answering to a bug report, please be sure to mail not only the bug address, in this case [EMAIL PROTECTED], but to the submitter too, since the Debian BTS does not automatically forward messages to the submitter. I only f

Bug#299702: Hugs98-2005 should not go into sarge yet

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is this bug still applicable. Can it enter etch/testing? Regards, Roger - -- Roger Leigh Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/ Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/ GPG

Bug#318946: User expectations and shorewall

* Martin Schulze: > What was the behaviour pre-sarge? > What is the behaviour post-sarge (or rather in sarge)? Do you mean "before and after the upstream security update"? The terms pre-sarge/post-sarge do not make much sense to me in this context, I'm afraid. > What do you think is the vulnera

Bug#325759: marked as done (digikam-doc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'kdelibs4-dev')

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:17:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325759: fixed in digikam-doc 0.7.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#318946: User expectations and shorewall

Florian Weimer wrote: > * Martin Schulze: > > > So a summary would be to leave the package as it is in sarge, right? > > Based on the facts, I reach the opposite conclusion. The upstream > changes should be merged. However, since easy workarounds are > possible, we might get away without code c

Processed: Fixed in NMU of polygen 1.0.6-7sarge1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 325468 + fixed Bug#325468: polygen: ignores umask Tags were: security Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --

Bug#326020: marked as done (icewm: FTBFS (amd64): Missing Build-Depends on 'libxpm-dev, librandr-dev, libxinerama-dev')

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:02:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326020: fixed in icewm 1.2.23-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#326031: pike7.2_7.2.580-4 (arm/unstable): FTBFS: Attempt to call the NULL-value

On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 03:49:20AM -0700, Steve Langasek scribbled: > Package: pike7.2 > Version: 7.2.580-4 > Severity: serious > > pike7.2 is failing to build on the arm autobuilder with the following > error: > > [...] > make[4]: Entering directory > `/build/buildd/pike7.2-7.2.580/build/linux-

Bug#319311: marked as done (icewm_1.2.22-2(alpha/unstable): broken upload)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:02:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319311: fixed in icewm 1.2.23-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#326020: marked as done (icewm: FTBFS (amd64): Missing Build-Depends on 'libxpm-dev, librandr-dev, libxinerama-dev')

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:02:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319311: fixed in icewm 1.2.23-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#325841: marked as done (ginac_1.3.2-1 (ia64/unstable): FTBFS: no matching function for call to 'GiNaC::registered_class_options::print_func(void (GiNaC::add::*)(const GiNaC::print_context&, unsigned int)const)')

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:02:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325841: fixed in ginac 1.3.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#319311: marked as done (icewm_1.2.22-2(alpha/unstable): broken upload)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:02:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326020: fixed in icewm 1.2.23-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#310516: marked as done (gnugk: ftbfs [sparc] RasTbl.cxx:31:22: stl_supp.h: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 21:57:05 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gnugk built for C++ migration. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#326091: openoffice.org2-writer: crash at opening a ms-word document without true java.

severity 326091 important retitle 326091 openoffice.org2-writer: crash at opening a ms-word document tag 326091 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Jean-Michel wrote: > Justification: renders package unusable lol. Read the severity descriptions. This is *not* grave. > I try to open a ms-word document with bo

Processed: Re: Bug#326082: ipw2200-source: fail at compiling ipw2200 modules

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 326082 wishlist Bug#326082: ipw2200-source: fail at compiling ipw2200 modules Severity set to `wishlist'. > merge 326082 325523 Bug#325523: ipw2200: modules don't build with kernel 2.6.13 Bug#326082: ipw2200-source: fail at compiling ipw2200 m

Bug#318946: User expectations and shorewall

* Martin Schulze: > So a summary would be to leave the package as it is in sarge, right? Based on the facts, I reach the opposite conclusion. The upstream changes should be merged. However, since easy workarounds are possible, we might get away without code changes, if issuing the update Lorenz

Processed: Re: Bug#326091: openoffice.org2-writer: crash at opening a ms-word document without true java.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 326091 important Bug#326091: openoffice.org2-writer: crash at opening a ms-word document without true java. Severity set to `important'. > retitle 326091 openoffice.org2-writer: crash at opening a ms-word document Bug#326091: openoffice.org2-

Bug#318946: User expectations and shorewall

Florian Weimer wrote: > As far as I understand it, from the perspective of the security team, > it is not clear if the upstream change breaks existing user > configurations. Users might rely on the current behavior and use it > to deliberately weaken the filter policy. This is a reasonable > ques

Processed: subversion Debian ci: r348 - in trunk/debian: . patches

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 316143 pending Bug#316143: subversion: segfault when adding a directory Tags were: fixed sid Bug#323376: svn segfaults when using LC_ALL=pl_PL locales Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: I bounced this message to debian-devel to force a solution with the curl ssl/gnutlds diverties. ... My resume on Daniels point of view is to get a different .so name for gnutls in the very short term and kick off ssl in Debian apps midterm! Tha

Bug#326082: ipw2200-source: fail at compiling ipw2200 modules

severity 326082 wishlist merge 326082 325523 thanks This can't be grave, the 2.6.13 kernel is not even in sid. And please avoid filing dupes, thanks. Mike On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:51:58PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: ipw2200-source > Version: 1.0.6-2 > Seve

Processed: setting package to ftp.debian.org, retitle 302462 to RM: howl -- RoM; license issues (APSL 2.0)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.5 > package ftp.debian.org Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ftp.debian.org > retitle 302462 RM: howl -- RoM; license issues (APSL 2.0) Bug#302462: RM: howl -- license issues (APSL 2.0) Chan

Bug#326035: valknut: rebuild for c++ transition [NMU]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:24:32PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: > Package: valknut > Version: 0.3.7-1 > Severity: grave > Tags: patch > Justification: renders package unusable > hello, > i rebuilt valknut against latest libstdc++6 and libqt3-mt for the c++ > transition. > see attached patch. Valkn

Processed: remove request -> ftp.debian.org

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 302462 ftp.debian.org Bug#302462: RM: howl -- license issues (APSL 2.0) Bug reassigned from package `howl' to `ftp.debian.org'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#326091: Acknowledgement (openoffice.org2-writer: crash at opening a ms-word document without true java.)

The crash seems to be simply due to an incompatible ms-word file. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326101: sfs_1:0.8-0+pre20050819.1-1(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k

Package: sfs Version: 1:0.8-0+pre20050819.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. Tags: sid sfs fails to build from source on m68k. You've likely been bit by bug# 323133. One workaround would seem to be described in

Bug#325643: libcurl and moc

Hi all, I bounced this message to debian-devel to force a solution with the curl ssl/gnutlds diverties. On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 the mental interface of Daniel Stenberg told: > Hi > > The problem you have with libcurl and OpenSSL/GnuTLS is not strictly an > "upstream problem". > > In the curl pro

Bug#326096: tapiir: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libasound-dev'

Package: tapiir Version: 0.7.1-7 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'tapiir' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: checking for jack_client_new in -ljack... yes checking for ALSA CFLAGS... checking for ALSA LDFLAGS... -lasound -lm -ldl -lpthread checking for libasoun

Bug#326097: spim: FTBFS: static declaration of 'exception_file_name' follows non-static declaration

Package: spim Version: 7.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'spim' on unstable, I get the following error: make[2]: Entering directory `/spim-7.1' gcc -O2 -I/usr/X11R6/include-Dlinux -D__amd64__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPE

Bug#326091: openoffice.org2-writer: crash at opening a ms-word document without true java.

Jean-Michel wrote: Package: openoffice.org2-writer Version: 1.9.125+2.0beta2-1 Severity: grave Tags: experimental Justification: renders package unusable I try to open a ms-word document with both oofice2 and oowriter2. Both crashes at importing the document. The software say 2 lines on stderr

Bug#325951: marked as done (depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:32:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325951: fixed in libtunepimp 0.3.0-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#326090: perl: 'libperl.so' missing in 'libperl-dev' package

Package: perl Version: 5.8.7-4 Severity: serious I just tried to rebuild perl_5.8.7-4 from source on unstable and found that the resulting 'libperl-dev' package does not contain 'libperl.so': perl-5.8.7# dpkg-buildpackage -b [...] perl-5.8.7# dpkg -c ../libperl-dev_5.8.7-4_i386.deb drwxr-xr-x r

Bug#326091: openoffice.org2-writer: crash at opening a ms-word document without true java.

Package: openoffice.org2-writer Version: 1.9.125+2.0beta2-1 Severity: grave Tags: experimental Justification: renders package unusable I try to open a ms-word document with both oofice2 and oowriter2. Both crashes at importing the document. The software say 2 lines on stderr or stdout: javaldx: Co

Bug#326093: clanlib: Please rename 'debian/libclanlib2.install' to 'debian/libclanlib2c2.install'

Package: clanlib Version: 0.6.5-1-2.3 Severity: serious Tags: patch The current 'libclanlib2c2' binary package is basically empty, i.e. it does not contain any libraries. This causes FTBFS bugs in other packages. Please rename 'debian/libclanlib2.install' to 'debian/libclanlib2c2.install' to fix

Bug#323035: Processed: referring issue to technical committee

On 8/30/05, Robert McQueen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raul Miller wrote: > > It's not clear to me why this was assigned to the technical committee. > The problem is that the maintainer refuses to concede that his packages > are in violation of Debian's shared library packaging policy, or > belie

Bug#325277: kmerlin not supported upstream - needs changes for msn changes

tag 312130 wontfix tag 325227 wontfix retitle 312130 kmerlin: package unusable due to msn server changes retitle 325227 kmerlin: package unusable due to msn server changes thanks On a regular basis the protocols for MSN are changed and any clients trying to access this service also need to chang

Bug#317202: marked as done (libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 11:02:21 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317202: fixed in kdeartwork 4:3.4.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Processed: kmerlin not supported upstream - needs changes for msn changes

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 312130 wontfix Bug#312130: kmerlin: can't connect to messenger.hotmail.com (JavaScript?) There were no tags set. Bug#325277: Kmerlin: kmerlin is broken (javascript?) Tags added: wontfix > tag 325227 wontfix Bug#325227: hamfax: Conflict in qt3/plugi

Bug#312130: Remove kmerlin from archive

Package: ftp.debian.org Please remove kmerlin from the Debian archive, unstable (and stable if possible). On a regular basis the protocols for MSN are changed and any clients trying to access this service also need to change. Unfortunatly kmerlin now has no upstream support and thus the clie

Bug#325850: marked as done (post-install fails because of absence of "mlton" doc control file)

Your message dated Thu, 1 Sep 2005 10:41:58 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop

Bug#318946: User expectations and shorewall

As far as I understand it, from the perspective of the security team, it is not clear if the upstream change breaks existing user configurations. Users might rely on the current behavior and use it to deliberately weaken the filter policy. This is a reasonable question because the existing docume

Bug#326082: ipw2200-source: fail at compiling ipw2200 modules

Package: ipw2200-source Version: 1.0.6-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable module fails at compiling: dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f build-arch-stamp build-indep-stamp configure-stamp rm -rf modules /usr/bin/make clean make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ipw2200' ma

Bug#324548: pinentry-qt: unmet dependancies

Magnus von Koeller wrote: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > pinentry-qt: Depends: libqt3-mt (>= 3:3.3.4) but it is not going to > be installed E: Broken packages This is the version from unstable: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/libs/libqt3-mt > ii libqt3c102-mt

Bug#326079: subversion: bug marked as fixed in nmu still lives

Package: subversion Version: 1.2.3-0.1 Severity: grave Tags: experimental l10n Justification: renders package unusable Hi. My previous #316143 (co-merged with #323376) still applies as such: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/svn$echo $LANG [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/svn$svnadmin create svntes

Bug#325982: marked as done (sip4-qt3: rebuild for c++ transition (NMU))

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 10:02:28 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325982: fixed in sip4-qt3 4.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#324797: resolve dependency problems with python-wxgtk

Hi Cédric, I think the package can be fixed... boa-constructor (0.3.0-4) depends on libwxgtk2.4-python (>= 2.4.0.8-0.1) and boa-constructor (0.4.4cvs20050714-1) depends on wxpython2.6-0 Both packages has been removed from unstable. Like python-wxglade shows they have been replaced by python-wxg

Bug#321666: marked as done (hpoj: can't talk to printer)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:49:23 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in hpoj-0.91-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#324592: [Fwd: digikam_0.7.4-3_i386.changes REJECTED]

--- Begin Message --- Hi Maintainer, i decided to reject this package for now. The newly splitted lib misses the whole Depends: line, you missed to add it to the debian/control part of the lib. As the description reads as it could be used standalone you need it there, and not only in the digikam

Bug#324592: [Fwd: digikam_0.7.4-4_i386.changes is NEW]

--- Begin Message --- digikam_0.7.4-4.diff.gz to pool/main/d/digikam/digikam_0.7.4-4.diff.gz digikam_0.7.4-4.dsc to pool/main/d/digikam/digikam_0.7.4-4.dsc digikam_0.7.4-4_i386.deb to pool/main/d/digikam/digikam_0.7.4-4_i386.deb (new) libdigikam-dev_0.7.4-4_i386.deb optional libdevel digita

Bug#324483: Works now

severity 324483 normal thanks You are right, uninstalling libswfdec0.3 fixes that. I leave it to the maintainer to decide what to do further with the bug! Thanks and regards, Sebastian -- Blog: http://www.withouthat.org/~sebastian/blog PGP-Key: http://www.withouthat.org/~sebastian/public.key F

Processed: Works now

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 324483 normal Bug#324483: does not start up anymore Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- T

Bug#302462: Please remove howl

Hi, I didn't realise I was a blocker on this, my apologies. Please just completely remove howl. There's really no point putting it in non-free. Thanks, - Jeff -- GNOME Summit: October 8th-10th http://live.gnome.org/Boston2005 She said she loved my mind, though by most accoun

Bug#324548: pinentry-qt: unmet dependancies

Well, the new upload now seems to be messing up dependencies for me. 0.7.2-1 was still installed fine. Currently, pinentry-qt is uninstallable according to apt-get: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/magnus# apt-get install pinentry-qt Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some p

Bug#323350: marked as done (egroupware: Another XMLRPC vulnerability)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 09:02:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323350: fixed in egroupware 1.0.0.009.dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#326073: sylpheed: causes corruption of non-ASCII messages after "edit with external editor"

Package: sylpheed Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: grave Tags: l10n Justification: causes non-serious data loss When "edit with external editor" is choosen after a part of the message has already been composed in sylpheed's own editor, non-ASCII characters (japanese, for instance) are automatically re

Bug#326076: yehia: FTBFS: 'node' was not declared in this scope

Package: yehia Version: 0.5.4-6 Severity: serious When building 'yehia' on unstable, I get the following error: ../../yehia/node.h:211: error: 'node' was not declared in this scope ../../yehia/node.h: In member function 'void Yehia::G_Node::erase(Yehia::G_Node_Iterator) [with T = Yehia::PluginI

Bug#325570: gs ppc problem ?

I think the gs-gpl on ppc coredump showing up here is probably related to the gs-esp on ppc coredump that I discuss in the attached message. Regards, Ian. --- Begin Message --- I have been investigating problems with gs that show up with gs-esp in Ubuntu. There turns out to be a bug in gs which

Bug#325944: marked as done (depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 07:17:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325527: fixed in alsaplayer 0.99.76-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#325944: marked as done (depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 07:17:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325944: fixed in alsaplayer 0.99.76-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#325527: marked as done (alsaplayer-common depends on unavailable liboggflac1)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 07:17:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325527: fixed in alsaplayer 0.99.76-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#325527: marked as done (alsaplayer-common depends on unavailable liboggflac1)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 07:17:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325944: fixed in alsaplayer 0.99.76-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#321433: k3b: k3d dependances

Package: k3b Version: 0.12.3-0.0 Followup-For: Bug #321433 On my debian sid, k3b wont install because it depend of : k3blibs | -> depends of dbus-qt-1 -> now dbus-qt-1c2 kdelibs4 libqt3c102-mt -> now libqt3-mt -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unsta

Bug#326044: grass: FTBFS (amd64): *** Unable to locate PostgreSQL includes.

On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 14:46 +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > Package: grass > Version: 6.0.0-1 > Severity: serious > > When building 'grass' on amd64/unstable, > I get the following error: > > checking for Tk_MainWindow in -ltk8.3... yes > checking whether to use PostgreSQL... yes > checking for l

Processed: tagging 323350

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > tags 323350 + sarge etch sid Bug#323350: egroupware: Another XMLRPC vulnerability Tags were: security Tags added: sarge, etch, sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Processed: reassign 323350 to egroupware-core

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > reassign 323350 egroupware-core Bug#323350: egroupware: Another XMLRPC vulnerability Bug reassigned from package `egroupware' to `egroupware-core'. > End of message, stopping processi

Bug#325879: marked as done (wdg-html-validator: "Missing comma causes validate to fail to run")

Your message dated Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:34:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing the bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r

Bug#326052: FTBFS: Unknown style nwalsh

Package: sgml2x Version: 1.0.0-9 Severity: serious sgml2x fails to build: > bin/docbook-2-html -c catalog -C ./sgml2x-aliases -s nwalsh TODO.sgml > openjade1.3:stylesheet/dsssl/docbook/misc/doctype.dsl:10:71:W: cannot > generate system identifier for public text "-//OpenJade//DTD DSSSL > Specif

Bug#325647: FTBFS: quicktime/quicktime.h -> lqt/quicktime.h

Hi, > There's only a handful of backwards-incompatible stuff, though, so it > might well be that a symlink hack works for most packages in Debian, but > I'd rather have a second opinion on that from someone more familiar with > libquicktime. Unfortunately, the maintainer appears to be awol recen

  1   2   >