On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:23:02PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > Option a) doesn't seem particularly sensible to me, btw, because the
> > "risk" is near certain...
> Incidentally, is it possible to put udev on hold, upgrade everything
> else, install a new kernel and then select udev for up
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 01:59:26AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 31, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you aren't
> > satisfied with the current solution, the answer is to figure out a
> > better one rather than lamenting that no one else has. (I do have a
> This is where t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4
> # user security hole, not root security hole
> severity 325785 grave
Bug#325785: phpldapadmin: system disclosure
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 325813 -1 -2 -3
Bug#325813: fftw: shared libraries must be linked with dependencies
Bug 325813 cloned as bugs 325816-325818.
> reassign -1 k6fftwgel
Bug#325816: fftw: shared libraries must be linked with dependencies
Bug reassigned from package `
Package: warped
Followup-For: Bug #325155
Here is a more complete patch for the mpich changes.
I'm also somewhat confused by why the binary package does not have a
dependency on the mpich shared library. It seems like it should,
since it seems to build against the shared library, but that hasn't
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:29:03AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:04:22AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I would like to get a new version of ghc6 into unstable soon.
> > I think it's best to build the current version with gcc 3.3.
> > Upstream seem to be taking a while to ge
Package: mergeant
Version: 0.52-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
tail of the build log:
cc -DXTHREADS -DORBIT2=1 -pthread -I/usr/include/libgnomedb-1.2
-I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgda-1.2 -I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0
-I/usr/include/bonobo-activation
Package: fftw
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.2
fftw and its varient packages currently build shared libraries with rules
like:
cd mpi && gcc -shared -Wl,-soname \
-Wl,libfftw_mpi.so.$(version_major) \
-o .libs/libfftw_mpi.so.$(lib_version) sched.lo \
TOMS_t
Package: scalapack
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
mpich was caught up in the C++ transition, and has also dropped the mpich
package. mpicc and friends have moved to a libmpich1.0-dev package, and
the runtime has moved to mpich-bin.
Attached is a patch that I believe sh
Package: blacs-mpi
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
mpich was caught up in the C++ transition, and has also dropped the mpich
package. mpicc and friends have moved to a libmpich1.0-dev package, and
the runtime has moved to mpich-bin.
Attached is a patch that I believe sh
Package: netpipe
Followup-For: Bug #323744
In addition to the change of mpich package names, netpipe must also be
rebuilt for the mpich C++ transition, since the shared library package
has changed names.
The patch previously submitted on this bug is incomplete; it leaves the
binary package still
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:23:02PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:59:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > > Becuase I roll my own kernel. If I upgrade the kernel with gcc-3.3
> > > (currently the Sarge default) and then upgrade to Etch (which will have
> > > gc
Thomas,
I guess I don't follow...
udev 0.060 and to some extent greater depends on kernel 2.6.12 or
greater. Not sure whether something up to .068 fixed this or not.
kernel-source 2.6.11 is unstable and 2.6.8 is testing.
Looking at the udev .068 package in unstable, it looks like there are
plen
Here is some additional info:
1. I've verified that the current GNU version,
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/cpio/cpio-2.6.tar.bz2 , DOES NOT have this bug.
2. Debian cpio version 2.6-4 still contains the bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Hi Kurt,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:04:22AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> I would like to get a new version of ghc6 into unstable soon.
> I think it's best to build the current version with gcc 3.3.
> Upstream seem to be taking a while to get the new release out
Yeah; the release seemed imminen
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325791: fixed in libofx 1:0.8.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Aug 31, "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Incidentally, is it possible to put udev on hold, upgrade everything
> else, install a new kernel and then select udev for upgrade?
Everything else which does not depend on the new version of conflicts
with the old version, which will be
"Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The libofx source package includes a debian/shlibs file that
> inappropriately reads
>
> libofx 1 libofx1c2
>
> and evidently overrides dh_makeshlibs; as a result, packages such as
> gnucash that build against the library fail to pick up appropriat
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:11:26AM +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
> Thanks Steve, where is this patch from? Is this debian made or from
> bugzilla or somewhere? If it is not yet know to upstream I will forward it.
I wrote it. I poked around in upstream cvs a little bit, and couldn'
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:59:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > Becuase I roll my own kernel. If I upgrade the kernel with gcc-3.3
> > (currently the Sarge default) and then upgrade to Etch (which will have
> > gcc-4.0 for a default) I will run into problems if I decide to add new
> > modul
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325379: fixed in pycairo 0.9.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Aug 31, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you aren't
> satisfied with the current solution, the answer is to figure out a
> better one rather than lamenting that no one else has. (I do have a
This is where these threads usually end...
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description:
Thanks Steve, where is this patch from? Is this debian made or from
bugzilla or somewhere? If it is not yet know to upstream I will forward it.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 02:07:51AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: mozilla
> Severity: serious
>
> The current mozilla package fails to build on
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:06:39AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:43:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > 1) upgrade your kernel
> > > > 2) dist-upgrade
> > > > That doesn't seem terribly elaborate to me? And if people choose not to
> > > > read, well, they get
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:48:17PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> (pruning CC list; AFAIK all will still get the message this way)
> On Tuesday 30 August 2005 04:56, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > So we're going to have another release with a very elaborate upgrade
> > > procedure in the release notes (wh
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:02:30AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Basically, this package should not have been allowed into unstable and is
> already of questionable use for Debian at this point, given Debian's
> extremely limitted LSB support. As such, I demand that it be
> immediately remove
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:02:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325375: fixed in f-spot 0.1.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:14:42 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325650: pbuilder create sid fails
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: insserv
Version: 1.00.8-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I copied the two scripts, checked that the boot order in the rc*d directories
still made sense, then ran "insserv
- -v" and ended up with a serverely broken
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:32:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317423: fixed in kdemultimedia 4:3.4.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:32:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317205: fixed in kdemultimedia 4:3.4.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:32:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324384: fixed in newpki-client 2.0.0+beta4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:17:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290455: fixed in psi 0.9.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Yes, the postscript, PDF and OpenGL backends were removed at cairo 1.0.0
after upstream made them unsupported (for now) and the pycairo bindings
need a rebuild to reflect that.
Dave
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: libofx2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 8.6
Hi, Thomas.
The libofx source package includes a debian/shlibs file that
inappropriately reads
libofx 1 libofx1c2
and evidently overrides dh_makeshlibs; as a result, packages such as
gnucash that build against the library fail to
Raul Miller wrote:
> It's not clear to me why this was assigned to the technical committee.
>
> There's definitely some issues here. For example, it sounds like libsilc
> has some bugs that need to be fixed.
>
> But is there any problem that the technical committee needs to decide on?
>
> If so,
(pruning CC list; AFAIK all will still get the message this way)
On Tuesday 30 August 2005 04:56, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > So we're going to have another release with a very elaborate upgrade
> > procedure in the release notes (which a lot of users, especially
> > desktop users, don't read anyway
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:29:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207549: fixed in doc-debian 3.1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
* Paul Gear:
> The maintainer is not the problem. Lorenzo has prepared 2.2.3-2 for
> sarge [1] and has tested the before and after situations and found that
> the bug is fixed. The problem is no response from Martin Schulze.
>
> [1] http://idea.sec.dico.unimi.it/~lorenzo/tmp/
This information s
Package: phpldapadmin
Version: 0.9.6c-6
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
if unpatched and vulnerable, a user can see any file on target system,
poc:
http://[target]/[path]/phpldapadmin/welcome.php?custom_welcome_page=../../../../../../../../etc/
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 13:55:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325757: sparc32: catch-22 between kernel-image-2.4 and
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 318176 libmagick6
Bug#318176: imagemagick in combination with transcode fails (amd64)
Bug#325651: ale: unable to open image `[mangled file name]': No such file or
directory.
Hi
The problem you have with libcurl and OpenSSL/GnuTLS is not strictly an
"upstream problem".
In the curl project there are some ideas floating around that are being
discussed on how this could be fixed for Debian (and other distros) but that
is only because they don't do it themselves, it
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 13:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [drupal-devel] Bug#323347: Another XMLRPC issue in drupal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
> The new upstream release 4.5.4 resolves this issue.
If the bugs are fixed in the current version then they should be closed
*now*, not waiting until the next upload.
Version 4.5.5 (and 4.6.3) does not have an XML-RPC security hole to our
best knowledge.
Karoly Negyesi
Drupal security tea
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 317493 moreinfo
Bug#317493: liquidwar: makes awful noise on start and crashes on exit
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:50:27PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:51:46PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:16:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > Indeed, i am waiting for the glibc/g++/whatever transition to finish to be
> > > able to check t
Package: anon-proxy
Version: 00.02.39-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch, upstream
The logging code in anon-proxy contains a misuse of the syslog function
allowing potential remote compromise of the host it is running upon.
(This depends whether logging is enabled).
The patch below fixes t
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:16:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Indeed, i am waiting for the glibc/g++/whatever transition to finish to be
> able to check this, since last i tried a couple of libraries had not been
> rebuilt. The package was removed from testing until then.
I've NMUed all of these
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:51:46PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:16:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Indeed, i am waiting for the glibc/g++/whatever transition to finish to be
> > able to check this, since last i tried a couple of libraries had not been
> > rebuilt.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:44:33PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Package: drupal
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: security
> > Justification: user security hole
> > [I'm pretty sure you are already aware of it; but here it is anyway]
> > Another XMLRPC vulnerabilit
Peter Hanappe wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22
> Severity: grave
>
> On sparc32/sun4m:
>
> I'm upgrading from kernel 2.2.20 to 2.4.27 using the command:
>
> # apt-get install -f kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc32
>
> The kernel package depends on libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22_sparc.
> The instal
Package: libapache-mod-speedycgi
Version: 2.22-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hi,
removing libapache-mod-speedycgi leaves /etc/apache/httpd.conf
zero-sized. This happens because the postrm script tries to comment
out references to the module like this:
cat /etc/apa
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320722: fixed in lookup 1.08b-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: digikam-doc
Version: 0.7.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'digikam-doc' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
checking for snprintf... yes
checking for X... configure: error: Can't find X includes. Please check your
installation and add the correct path
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22
Severity: grave
On sparc32/sun4m:
I'm upgrading from kernel 2.2.20 to 2.4.27 using the command:
# apt-get install -f kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc32
The kernel package depends on libc6_2.3.2.ds1-22_sparc.
The installation of libc6 fails with the message:
W
I have been investigating problems with gs that show up with gs-esp in
Ubuntu. There turns out to be a bug in gs which causes problems for
gs's memory management system.
For your edification I enclose the patch that I've just uploaded into
Ubuntu Breezy. I think something like this patch is like
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:20:58PM +0200, ILF wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> hi
>
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 18:47:05 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for the report, but this should be fixed in the 1.2-3 release.
>
> no, it's not:
>
> # apt-get install
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:02:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323849: fixed in libterm-readline-gnu-perl 1.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:02:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322746: fixed in libterm-readline-gnu-perl 1.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:02:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323849: fixed in libterm-readline-gnu-perl 1.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:02:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304604: fixed in libterm-readline-gnu-perl 1.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:02:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304604: fixed in libterm-readline-gnu-perl 1.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:02:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304604: fixed in libterm-readline-gnu-perl 1.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:02:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322746: fixed in libterm-readline-gnu-perl 1.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:02:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322746: fixed in libterm-readline-gnu-perl 1.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:02:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323849: fixed in libterm-readline-gnu-perl 1.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300536: fixed in kdenetwork 4:3.4.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318180: fixed in kdenetwork 4:3.4.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Gustavo Noronha Silva a écrit :
> Em Ter, 2005-08-30 às 14:45 +0200, Olivier Schwander escreveu:
>
>>Josselin Mouette a écrit :
>>
>>>It could be some GNOME program run as root with HOME=/home/olivier.
>>
>>The problem appeared after an upgrade of gnome-session and a logout. But
>> only one user
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320120: fixed in traceroute 1.4a12-20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 320120 + pending
Bug#320120: [PATCH] traceroute bus error on sparc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Hello,
2.6.8 has known issues with software-raid. You can try a newer kernel,
preferably linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 from unstable - unless you are
using udev, then you need to uninstall udev first (or use a backport).
is this problem reproducible with a 2.6.12 debian kernel?
By the way: you s
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325725: fixed in libsdl-sound1.2 1.0.1-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 18:47:05 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the report, but this should be fixed in the 1.2-3 release.
no, it's not:
# apt-get install hardware-monitor
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree...
Note sure if this should be a separate bug report but it seems to be related
to this issue.
Although the above mentioned version mismatch has been fixed pgadmin still can
not be installed. It seems to require exactly libwxgtk2.5.3 even though the
dependencies indicate a later version (libwxgtk
Package: bison-doc
Version: 1:2.0-2
Severity: serious
<-- snip -->
Selecting previously deselected package bison-doc.
(Reading database ... 138894 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking bison-doc (from .../bison-doc_1%3a2.0-2_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/arc
Em Ter, 2005-08-30 às 14:45 +0200, Olivier Schwander escreveu:
> Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> > It could be some GNOME program run as root with HOME=/home/olivier.
>
> The problem appeared after an upgrade of gnome-session and a logout. But
> only one user is concerned: an .ICEauthority used by
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-11-amd64-generic
Version: 2.6.8-14
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Keep getting lockups, in particular whilst trying to sync a RAID5 array across
several SATA drives.
Setting a RAID1 partition across the same drives seems to work OK though.
Package: libsdl-sound1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2
Fails to install in a clean chroot:
monster:/# apt-get install libsdl-sound1.2
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.5
> reassign 318176 libmagick6
Bug#318176: imagemagick in combination with transcode fails (amd64)
Bug reassigned from package `imagemagick' to `libmagick6'.
> merge 318176 325651
Bug#318
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 323347 4.5.5-1
Bug#323347: Another XMLRPC issue in drupal
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 4.5.5-1, send any further explanations to Moritz
Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 06:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321669: fixed in enigma 0.92.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 325714 python2.3
Bug#325714: python2.3-ipython: Segfault when entering any command.
Bug reassigned from package `python2.3-ipython' to `python2.3'.
> close 325714
Bug#325714: python2.3-ipython: Segfault when entering any command.
'close' is de
reassign 325714 python2.3
close 325714
thanks
* Peter Gebauer wrote:
> Typing any command and pressing enter results in a segfault. Please
> tell me if you need any additional information.
That's an already fixed bug in python2.3, hence I'm reassigning and
closing your bugreport.
Upgrade your py
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.5
> severity 325720 grave
Bug#325720: File read error
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 325720 325651
Bug#325651: ale: unable to open image `[mangled file name]': No such file or
director
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.5
> severity 318176 grave
Bug#318176: imagemagick in combination with transcode fails (amd64)
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 318176 325651
Bug#318176: imagemagick in combination with tr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 39 aeromail: unusable with default PHP configuration
Bug#39: aeromail can't login
Changed Bug title.
> severity 39 serious
Bug#39: aeromail: unusable with default PHP configuration
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping p
Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> Le mardi 30 août 2005 à 08:54 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva a écrit :
>
>>Em Ter, 2005-08-30 às 11:38 +0200, Olivier Schwander escreveu:
>>
>>> ** (gnome-session:7151): WARNING **: Unable to read ICE authority
>>>file: /home/olivier/.ICEauthority
>>>
>>>A solut
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 323578 +sarge
Bug#323578: drupal: DRUPAL-SA-2005-004
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
> tag 323347 +sarge
Bug#323347: Another XMLRPC issue in drupal
Tags were: security
Tags added: sarge
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Package: python2.3-ipython
Version: 0.6.15-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Typing any command and pressing enter results in a segfault.
Please tell me if you need any additional information.
Here's the ldd for my Python 2.3 binary:
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthr
Le mardi 30 août 2005 à 08:54 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva a écrit :
> Em Ter, 2005-08-30 às 11:38 +0200, Olivier Schwander escreveu:
> > ** (gnome-session:7151): WARNING **: Unable to read ICE authority
> > file: /home/olivier/.ICEauthority
> >
> > A solution is to change owner/group of
Guenter Geiger wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the patch. I am fighting with a changed API for ffmpeg on
unstable though. Did you compile on testing ?
for quicktime, neither "quicktime/quicktime.h" nor "lqt/quicktime.h"
should be included but plain "quicktime.h" (and the full include-path
returned b
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
to override optimization flags for this package? It seems that if
nothing else, setup.py should allow you to set ext_args = ['-O2'], which
is the policy-recommended optimization level for all architectures
anyway.
I tried to follow your hint:
$ grep
Em Ter, 2005-08-30 às 11:38 +0200, Olivier Schwander escreveu:
> ** (gnome-session:7151): WARNING **: Unable to read ICE authority
> file: /home/olivier/.ICEauthority
>
> A solution is to change owner/group of the file .ICEauthority from root:root
> to username:username.
>
> I think it
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 04:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325283: fixed in yabasic 2.761-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: drupal
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> [I'm pretty sure you are already aware of it; but here it is anyway]
>
> Another XMLRPC vulnerability has been detected that affects Drupal
> as well. Please see http://www.harde
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 323605 moreinfo
Bug#323605: aspell-es: at install time : Could not build the hash file for es
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> severity 323605 important
Bug#323605: aspell-es: at install time : Could not build the hash file for es
Sev
Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2005 04:17:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298421: fixed in sphinx2 0.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 325605 + moreinfo
Bug#325605: dhcp3-server core dumps when receiving a request on sparc64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
