Package: evince
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
I'm currently unable to install evince because it depends on
libcairo1, which isn't available in the archive. I think it just
needs to be rebuilt against the newer version of libcairo.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefe
Package: libmusicbrainz-2.1
Version: 2.1.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi Andreas,
Under the 0-day NMU policy for the C++ ABI transition, I have prepared an
NMU for libmusicbrainz-2.1, because this library provides C++ interfaces and
must be rebuilt so that a number of other C++-based package
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318364: fixed in aatv 0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Right, the request server doesn't read past a line starting with two
> # hyphens, so it can't read past MIME boundaries. Redo the bug changes
> # that were done in messages that also contained patches.
> package a2ps
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: a2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 320622 ocaml
Bug#320622: ocalm: FTBFS: ../ocamlopt: Command not found
Bug reassigned from package `ocaml' to `ocaml'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.2
> severity 320621 grave
Bug#320621: libdjvulibre1 3.5.14-6 changes soname without warning
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 320621 320682
Bug#320621: libdjvulibre1 3.5.14-6 changes sonam
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 300699 - patch
Bug#300699: alex: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): lexical error in string/character
literal
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 07:57:36PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
On which architecture the package FTBFS?
On buildd.debian.org all attempted built have been completed
successfully ...
Before forwarding the patch upstream I would like to hav
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 05:40:37PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Dear mentors,
> the last version of ocaml I uploaded FTBFS on all autobuilders but
> build properly on my unstable and in a pbuilder chroot.
>
> According to the build logs (e.g. [1]) the FTFBS happened at this point:
>
>
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 07:57:36PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: pcre-ocaml
> Version: 5.10.0-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/pcre-ocaml-5.10.0/lib'
> ocamlc -c -cc "cc" -ccopt "-g
Status report
I am almost done with solving all the problems for libcrypto++ with
respect to the GCC4 transition. My plan is as follows. I will upload
to experimental and/or test the build on other architectures than i386.
If everything works smoothly, I will upload to sid.
--
Package: libmysqlclient14,mysql-client-4.1,mysql-server-4.1
Version: 4.1.13-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
in the latest mysql-dfsg-4.1, the dependencies from the above three
packages have been changed to include "Depends: mysql-common-4.1 (>=
4.1.12-1)". This makes the packages uninstallable,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 320622 ocaml
Bug#320622: ocalm: FTBFS: ../ocamlopt: Command not found
Warning: Unknown package 'ocalm'
Bug reassigned from package `ocalm' to `ocaml'.
>
End of message, stop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package a2ps
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: a2ps
> severity 280370 grave
Bug#280370: a2ps using lp broken
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 267527 280370
Bug#267527: a2ps option "-P" does not work
Bug#280370: a2ps using lp broken
Merged 267527 280370.
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:48:52PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> reopen 320017
> thanks
> * Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > vim (1:6.3-071+1sarge1) stable; urgency=high
> > .
> >* New upstream patches (081 and 082), see README.gz for details.
> > + 6.3.081, 6.3.082: Fix arbit
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 10:38:41PM +0200, Holger Leskien wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:30:38PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > The bug is still present in testing for me.
> > Upgrade->crash
> > downgrade->working.
> Thank you for testing. I anticipated this.
> > Strictly speaking, this is pr
package a2ps
severity 280370 grave
merge 267527 280370
thanks
I'm not completely sure that this bug should be grave, but I can see the
justification since right now a2ps can't print on any system that uses
lpr. Anyway, since one of these bugs was already marked grave, I'll
change the severity on
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:41:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing. Not an Xorg bug.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
The bug is still present in testing for me.
Upgrade->crash
downgrade->working.
Here was the upgrade:
Inst libgnomecanvas2-0 [2.8.0-1] (2.10.2-2 Debian:testing) []
Inst libgnomecanvas2-common [2.8.0-1] (2.10.2-2 Debian:testing)
Strictly speaking, this is probably not a bug in evolution, but I don't
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:30:38PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> The bug is still present in testing for me.
> Upgrade->crash
> downgrade->working.
Thank you for testing. I anticipated this.
> Strictly speaking, this is probably not a bug in evolution, but I don't
> know where exactly the pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 319319 normal
Bug#319319: xscreensaver: does not start: 'couldn't setgroups ... not permitted'
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 320508 grave
Bug#320508: libopenal0 depends on libsmpeg0 (replaced)
Severity set to `grave'.
> tags 320508 + sid
Bug#320508: libopenal0 depends on libsmpeg0 (replaced)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 320587 important
Bug#320587: xchat: Xchat close when i use /unloadall
Severity set to `important'.
> tag 320587 moreinfo
Bug#320587: xchat: Xchat close when i use /unloadall
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> tag 320587 unreproduc
tags 319771 +pending
thanks
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Francois Gurin wrote:
> Package: sfs-common
> Version: 1:0.8-0+pre20041016.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
>
> SFS packages have a dependency on libgmp3 which is not available on sid.
> It has been replaced wit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 319771 +pending
Bug#319771: sfs-common: can't install SFS in sid
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:53:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed with a bin NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
On Jul 30, 11:22am, Joey Hess wrote:
> Finally, the reason this bug is grave, vpopmail's author says that
> version 5.4.6 contains fixed for SQL injection vulnerabilities which
This one doesn't apply to current Debian package.
Pawel
--
(___) | Pawel Wiecek - Coven / S
Package: pcre-ocaml
Version: 5.10.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/pcre-ocaml-5.10.0/lib'
ocamlc -c -cc "cc" -ccopt "-g -Wall -O2 \
-DPIC \
Package: ocalm
Version: 3.08.3-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
if [ -x ./ocamlopt ]; then \
/usr/bin/make -C ocaml-md5sums/ opt;\
else
Package: libdjvulibre1
Version: 3.5.14-6
Severity: serious
Any number of packages that link to /usr/lib/libdjvulibre.so.14
(I hit evince 0.3.0-2 first) break horribly when libdjvulibre.so.15 is
installed ahead.
I'm not sure how this should be handled, but neither the changelog
nor the version nu
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317762: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317762: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:52 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#269152: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317762: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Want to learn how to build your own website?
http://vamo.8funbpq15i8x5r8.hjendozoacl.com
All movements go too far.
Subdue your appetites, my dears, and you've conquered human nature.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300102: fixed in goo 0.155-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
d in this scope
ggcov-webdb.c:1235: error: 'DB_HASH' was not declared in this scope
ggcov-webdb.c:1235: error: 'DB_CREATE' was not declared in this scope
ggcov-webdb.c:1249: error: 'key' was not declared in this scope
ggcov-webdb.c:1250: error: 'value' was not decl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.2
> severity 320582 grave
Bug#320582: libdjvulibre1: soname of library changed
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:02:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320523: fixed in gtkdialog 1:0.58.11-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:17:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320568: fixed in ocamlnet 1.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320520: fixed in gossip 0.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi,
Apparently, the bug with the libccscript disappeared with the transition
to g++ 4.0, so it should be ok to close this bug when the gcc-4.0 build
package will be uploaded.
However, bayonne FTBFS with g++ 4.0. If you didn't already have them,
patches are attached :
- Fix 1 is for friend classes
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 03:36:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU that sets -fno-inline-functions on m68k to work around
> the compiler bug there (-finline-functions is being set in the upstream
> configure script). In the process, I found a couple of other issues in
> debian/
Package: vpopmail-bin
Severity: grave
Tags: security
vpopmail has a couple of security holes:
CAN-2004-2239 a buffer overflow in vsybase.c
Originally reported here:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2004-08/0226.html
Confirmed by author as fixed in cvs here:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.2
> tags 320361 + sid
Bug#320361: rt2500-source: can't installed compiles package with
linux-image-2.6.12
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing he
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi
Have a look at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=devtodo&archive=no&version=&dist=unstable
This is what the form at
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/
came up with when I selected
search for:
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:32:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319431: fixed in dvr 3.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Package: glide
Severity: serious
Version: 2002.04.10-9
>From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:
...
cc -g -Wall -O6 -mcpu=i486 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
-fexpensive-optimizations -ffast-math -DBIG_OPT -I.
-I/tmp/buildd/glide-2002.04.10/build-tree/glide2x/swlibs/include
-
>That's why I sent you the previous mail. I
>will gladly prepare a package of elmo which fixes this bug and 3 minor
>issues that have been reported. The question is: who is going to
>upload it because my previous sponsor is not replying to my emails.
If your sponsor is not responding, it is re
Package: xchat
Version: 2.4.3-0.2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
when i use /unloadall xchat close/quit
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i38
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:48:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319433: FTBFS: Unable to find libmlgdome2-xslt
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
reopen 320017
thanks
* Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> vim (1:6.3-071+1sarge1) stable; urgency=high
> .
>* New upstream patches (081 and 082), see README.gz for details.
> + 6.3.081, 6.3.082: Fix arbitrary shell commands execution by wrapping
>them in glob() or expand() func
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 320017
Bug#320017: vim: Arbitrary code execution in modelines
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Hi,
thanks for reporting this
This will be fixed in -18.
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps
and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail prefe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 287924 + fixed
Bug#287924: ppxp: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function
'SigQuit'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:18:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320017: fixed in vim 1:6.3-071+1sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 286964 + fixed
Bug#286964: guppi: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 08:20:17PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:39:58AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > And, what *does* config.log have to say about this? The build log on
> > buildd.debian.org certainly shows that libx11-6 and libx11-dev were
> > installed, so -lX11
tags 319235 patch
thanks
Hi Matt,
I've prepared an NMU that sets -fno-inline-functions on m68k to work around
the compiler bug there (-finline-functions is being set in the upstream
configure script). In the process, I found a couple of other issues in
debian/rules, which I've addressed. Please
Package: kdelibs4
Version: 4:3.3.2-6.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Updating kdelibs to 3.3.2-7 breaks kmail on 3 different Linux Systems
with Debian/unstable installed and Kernel 2.6.11-mm1:
Standard kernel 2.6.11 with patch from
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Please close once woody and sarge are dealt with.
>
> Sorry, my fault... I forgot to reopen it.
>
> Anyway, there will be no official update from the security team, so
> I'm going to upload a fixed package to stable-proposed-updates (and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 319235 patch
Bug#319235: flac_1.1.1-5.1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
retitle 320357 fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in unstable, stable and
possibly oldstable
tags 320357 + patch
thanks
Hi,
the attached patch seems to fix it. Want me to NMU?
-Michael
--- rules.orig 2005-07-30 11:20:27.0 +0200
+++ rules 2005-07-30 11:42:13.0 +0200
@@ -108,7 +108
Hi,
this isn't fixed in sid either, because debian/rules is fucked up and
only applies the patch after the build. I just noticed this by chance
because I suddenly got bitten by the old fetchsizelimit bug again (for
APOP) and started to investigate... And why is there an old random
unrelated bugfi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 320357 fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in unstable, stable and
> possibly oldstable
Bug#320357: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in stable and possibly oldstable
Changed Bug title.
> tags 320357 + patch
Bug#320357: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 un
* Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Please close once woody and sarge are dealt with.
Sorry, my fault... I forgot to reopen it.
Anyway, there will be no official update from the security team, so
I'm going to upload a fixed package to stable-proposed-updates (and
maybe oldstable-proposed-updates) which w
onsider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries
are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them.
make: *** [config.status] Error 1
******
Build finished at 20050730-0321
FAILED [dpkg-buildp
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319907: fixed in slang 1.4.9dbs-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 320567 0.14.2-2
Bug#320567: FTBFS: missing build-dep on cdbs
Bug marked as found in version 0.14.2-2.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: hsftp
Version: 1.15-1
Severity: serious
It seems as though hsftp doesn't really work:
'''[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ hsftp -v -p [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Username , remote host <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Command: ssh -p -x -l matti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'pwd'
... hangs indefinitely until ^C ...
Signal
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:58:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320504: liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev: liblablgtk2-ocaml
dependency problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 09:01:18PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> So, the only one that's not the same is evolution, and the bug was
> reported for etch's version...
So the bug must be still present in etch. And I have no intention to
corrupt my system again by trying to test (mix) th
Package: screem
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
>From my build log:
...
Checking correctness of source dependencies...
Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_=*=PROVIDED=*= gcc-4.0_4.0.1-2
g++-4.0_4.0.1-2 binutils_2.16.1-2+kbsd libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.1-2
libstdc++6_4
Package: ocamlnet
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
>From my build log:
...
Installed
/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1/debian/libocamlnet-ocaml-dev/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/netstring/netaccel_link.mli
Installed
/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1/debian/libocamlnet-ocam
Hi,
Do you have JuK set to output to aRts? If so, try changing the MediaSystem
option in your ~/.kde/share/config/jukrc (it's in [Settings]) to 2 and
then start JuK. If it starts, try using outputting to aKode (or GStreamer)
instead.
I haven't looked into the problem any further, however,
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315676: fixed in libapache2-mod-perl2 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
severity 320559 important
thanks
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 02:42:29AM -0400, Daniel Bungert wrote:
> Package: ecamegapedal
> Version: 0.4.4
> Severity: serious
> Please add a build-depends on libxinerama-dev.
That doesn't seem appropriate; ecamegapedal only pulls in libxinerama as a
result of qt-x
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308252: fixed in libapache2-mod-perl2 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:47:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319336: fixed in mozilla-firefox 1.0.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:47:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319336: fixed in mozilla-firefox 1.0.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 320559 important
Bug#320559: FTBFS: missing build-dep on libxinerama-dev
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Don't be jealous of your friends, enhance your erections now
Feeling great is around the corner!
Enhance your erections http://superchaplevitra.com/?cid-vig_txt01
good bye
Freeman Calhoun
Phone: 711-179-4416
Mobile: 981-817-4259
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
N.V.R http://superchapcialis.com/pleas
reopen 319929
found 319929 2.08-2
thanks
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 01:23 +0200, bholliger wrote:
> InstallOptions.dll is not usable on Windows. The dialog is not coming up.
Hmm, I'll investigate this tomorrow.
> filefunc.exe, logiclib.exe, textfunc.exe and textfunctest.exe produces
> gpf's when com
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:14:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320555: gcc-defaults: gcj-4.0 requires
/usr/lib/libgcj.spec from non-dependent libgcj6-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Hello Lucas,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 05:22:17PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
> Helge Kreutzmann wrote, On 29/07/05 13:30:
> > Well, I don't think so. I read in your changelog:
> > - new upstream patch because of security issue CAN-2005-2335
> >
> > There is no mention of a bug in the BTS here (n
85 matches
Mail list logo
