Package: openoffice.org2
Version: 1.9.108-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Justification: no longer builds from source
When compiling on a Ubuntu system with gcc-4.0 4.0_4.0.0ds1-11 ported
from Debian, I noticed some compile errors. I think some of these are
applicable to Debian, so I am rep
tags 315781 pending
thanks
Hi,
Reported bug is fixed in an NMU I just uploaded to the 7-day delayed
queue on gluck.
debian/changelog is detailed on what's changed:
in control: s/Depends: libcurl3/Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}/;
in rules: uncomment dh_shlibdeps
.
Kees: if you prepare a new pack
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 316942 sid
Bug#316942: greenwich: lost dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Good day,
This just in - 2005 Digital Filters have just been released
with the latest Pass-Through technology video bypass chip.
At this time, it's the only digital filter on the market
today that you can get with the new lockup buster technology!
Now you can get Sports, HBO, Cinemax, Starz, Ad
Package: greenwich
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
For some reason, greenwich 0.8.1-1 has no Depends header, even though
it almost certainly needs one per Policy 3.5.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'u
You need to Build-Depend on python-pyrex now, since that's the package
that has the pyrexc symlink to python2.3-pyrexc.
--
Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet."
-- Orson Scott Card
--
To UN
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20050704 15:30]:
> What if you remove gaim from your session? It is known to have a
> broken session handling. (Same question for xpad, but I doubt
> this one is at fault.)
Removing either or both of them does not change the situation.
Even rem
Package: python-imaging
Version: 1.1.5-2
Severity: grave
I have both python2.3-imaging and python2.4-imaging installed. The upgrade to
python-imaging 1.1.5-2 fails with the following message:
Preparing to replace python-imaging 1.1.4-3.1 (using
.../python-imaging_1.1.5-2_all.deb) ...
Unpacking re
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jul 2005 14:17:21 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308667: fixed in glimpse 4.18.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
That looks good. I'll update Debian's copyright file.
Thanks!
Shaun
On 7/3/05, Golda Velez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One last note - my license to redistribute needs to be renewed in 2008. That
> should be included in the note, just in case I do not renew for some reason,
> then my ability to
Package: selinux-policy-default
Version: 1:1.18-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to install selinux-policy-default it fails:
blackTiger:~# LANG=C apt-get install selinux-doc selinux-policy-default
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Hi there,
I am experiencing the same problem after an upgrade of nautilus-data to
version 2.10.1-3 . I have filed a bug with the number 316853
accordingly. Comparing the .gnome2/session files, the only similarities
are the nautilus program. So I would guess that this is it. Another clue
that it ha
Your message dated Mon, 4 Jul 2005 17:43:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315968: Bug fixed in later kernel version upstream
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Le lundi 04 juillet 2005 à 15:00 +0200, KELEMEN Peter a écrit :
> 1,id=11c0a8000400010991714940268780001
> 1,RestartStyleHint=0
> 1,Priority=50
> 1,Program=gaim
> 1,CurrentDirectory=/home/fuji
> 1,DiscardCommand=/bin/true
> 1,CloneCommand=gaim
> 1,RestartCommand=gaim --session 11c0a8000400010
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20050704 12:46]:
> Please attach your .gnome2/session file.
Here you are.
Peter
--
.+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+''
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jul 2005 07:32:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#187386: fixed in lft 2.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jul 2005 07:32:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#214827: fixed in lft 2.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Le lundi 04 juillet 2005 à 02:26 +0200, KELEMEN Peter a écrit :
> Package: gnome-control-center
> Version: 1:2.10.1-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After upgrade, GNOME session startups are blocked by
> /usr/lib/control-center/gnome-settings-daemon sitting in a re
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jul 2005 06:32:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315136: fixed in findutils 4.2.22-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jul 2005 11:30:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316323: FTBFS: internal errors: lower_stmt error and
segmentation fault
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
On 2 Jul 2005, tony mancill wrote:
> I have the exact same versions of the package and all of the
> dependencies listed in the bug report, and cannot reproduce the bug.
Weird
> However, your version of perl isn't listed in the dependencies -
> could you please send me that just to be sure?
5.8.7
> "Falk" == Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Falk> This is nearly always a hardware problem. Can you reproduce
Falk> it on a different machine?
Hello,
Thanks for your prompt response.
It looks like you are right, I compiled it on another computer and it
worked fine.
Please
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 02:15:46AM +0300, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:15:36PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > Ok, change committed. You are now attributed in the administrivia section.
> > Thanks for the great doc.
>
> You suck. You know you just ended a potentially great a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 316447 critical
Bug#316447: remote code execution in PEAR::XML_RPC
Severity set to `critical'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
24 matches
Mail list logo
