Bug#316815: there is no i386-linux-g++

2005-07-03 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: lam4-dev Version: 7.1.1-3.1 Severity: grave mpiCC (and mpicc) no longer works, complaining: - The LAM/MPI wrapper compiler was unable to find the specified compiler i386-linux-g++ in your PATH. Note that this com

Bug#316792: request-tracker3.4: rt3 and rt3.4 dependencies broken

2005-07-03 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 316792 important severity 316796 important thanks On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 04:31:07PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > dselect says: > request-tracker3.4 depends on rt3.4-clients (= 3.4.1-2) > for both request-tracker3.4 and rt3.4-clients, and will not allow me > to select them together.

Processed: Re: Bug#316792: request-tracker3.4: rt3 and rt3.4 dependencies broken

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 316792 important Bug#316792: request-tracker3.4: rt3 and rt3.4 dependencies broken Severity set to `important'. > severity 316796 important Bug#316796: request-tracker3: rt3 and rt3.4 dependencies broken Severity set to `important'. > thanks

Bug#316593: rosegarden4: rosegarden uninstallable

2005-07-03 Thread Enrique Robledo-Arnuncio
Thanks. I'll get to this ASAP. The dependency on a specific library version is neccesary. Currently libjack is not guaranteing backwards binary compatibility. Enrique On 7/2/05, Itai Seggev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: rosegarden4 > Version: 1.0-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: re

Bug#316798: gnome-control-center: GNOME session startup is blocked

2005-07-03 Thread KELEMEN Peter
Package: gnome-control-center Version: 1:2.10.1-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrade, GNOME session startups are blocked by /usr/lib/control-center/gnome-settings-daemon sitting in a read() syscall and not advancing. Reproduced on two different hardware. -- Sys

Bug#316796: request-tracker3: rt3 and rt3.4 dependencies broken

2005-07-03 Thread Robin Lee Powell
Package: request-tracker3 Version: 3.0.12-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable dselect says: request-tracker3 depends on rt3-clients (= 3.0.12-7) for both request-tracker3 and rt3-clients, and will not allow me to select them together. If I force it, it says: The followin

Bug#316792: request-tracker3.4: rt3 and rt3.4 dependencies broken

2005-07-03 Thread Robin Lee Powell
Package: request-tracker3.4 Version: 3.4.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable dselect says: request-tracker3.4 depends on rt3.4-clients (= 3.4.1-2) for both request-tracker3.4 and rt3.4-clients, and will not allow me to select them together. If I force it, it says: The

Bug#312358: kdm crashes on startup

2005-07-03 Thread Christopher Martin
On July 3, 2005 09:27, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > The real question is why the kde packages don't conflict with earlier > > kdm versions if they don't work with them... (not that kde had too few > > conflicts, how about a little backwards compatibility anyway?) > > This situation is mostly fixed in

Bug#316573: move of files in /var/lib/misc to /var/lib/db silently breaks scripts depending on libnss-db

2005-07-03 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
severity 316573 normal tags 316573 moreinfo thanks On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: libnss-db > Version: 2.2-6.3 > Severity: grave > > The last NMU moved /var/lib/misc/Makefile to /var/lib/db/Makefile. > It's not mentioned in the changelog, it breaks existing scripts. > sorry,

Processed: Re: Bug#316573: move of files in /var/lib/misc to /var/lib/db silently breaks scripts depending on libnss-db

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 316573 normal Bug#316573: move of files in /var/lib/misc to /var/lib/db silently breaks scripts depending on libnss-db Severity set to `normal'. > tags 316573 moreinfo Bug#316573: move of files in /var/lib/misc to /var/lib/db silently breaks

Bug#306078: marked as done (icheck: not for sarge)

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 16:47:11 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306078: fixed in icheck 0.9.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#313445: marked as done (gok: depends on unavailable libwnck4)

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 16:02:26 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313445: fixed in gok 1.0.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#316650: ethereal: Assertion failed when starting

2005-07-03 Thread Adam Aube
On Sunday 03 July 2005 04:38 am, W. Borgert wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 01:32:22AM -0400, Adam Aube wrote: > > I have strace output (over 4000 lines of it), but it's probably best to > > take this to debian-user, since it appears to be unreproducible. > > Check two things: > > 1. Do you have s

Bug#315561: serious

2005-07-03 Thread Lawrence Williams
I will setup a pbuilder sid environment this afternoon and rebuild sdl against slang2. Lawrence On July 3, 2005 03:59 pm, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > I am marking this bug serious as it is release-critical (FTBFS). > It  is also holding up the transition of several other packages to > libslang2;

Processed: tagging 316764

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 316764 sid Bug#316764: wmfire depends on unavailable package libgtop2-2 There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#316764: wmfire depends on unavailable package libgtop2-2

2005-07-03 Thread Marc Wilson
Package: wmfire Version: 1.2.1-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable As above. Unstable now has libgtop2-5, which is part of the Gnome 2.10 transition, isn't it? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Arc

Processed: serious

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 315561 serious Bug#315561: libsdl1.2: please apply this patch for libslang2 Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debi

Bug#311835: haskell-cabal: FTBFS: Can't satisfly build dependency on ghc6

2005-07-03 Thread Isaac Jones
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Is there any progress on this? Is there a reason you didn't > switch to the new ghc6 6.4 yet? Yes, the problem is that ghc 6.4 comes with Cabal, but it needs to be removed for me to upload a new version of haskell-cabal, or libghc6-cabal-dev wil

Processed: Fixed in upload of kionjb 0.1.6-3 to experimental

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 309140 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#309140: kionjb: FTBFS: Build depends on libnjb-dev (<< 1.2) which is not available. Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assist

Bug#308270: swt-gtk: ftbfs [sparc] error: Can't find default package `java.lang'

2005-07-03 Thread Shaun Jackman
tag 308270 +help thanks swt-gtk 3.0+3.1M4-3 builds successfully on ia64, hppa, alpha, s390 and powerpc, but it failed to build on arm, sparc, and m68k. The package is being built using gcj-3.3. The error message is... org/eclipse/swt/internal/Platform.java:0: error: Can't find default package `ja

Bug#308667: License does not allow modifications, yet source code is modified

2005-07-03 Thread Golda Velez
Hi Shaun Yes, Debian may redistribute binaries of glimpse built from modified source code. Let me know if you need a formal license to that effect. Thanks for bringing this up, and for maintaining a non-free archive! I have considered asking the University of Arizona (which holds the permanen

Processed: swt-gtk: ftbfs [sparc] error: Can't find default package `java.lang'

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 308270 +help Bug#308270: swt-gtk: ftbfs [sparc] error: Can't find default package `java.lang' Tags were: sid Tags added: help > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#308667: License does not allow modifications, yet source code is modified

2005-07-03 Thread Shaun Jackman
Hello Golda, I maintain the Debian package of glimpse, and I've patched a few minor bugs. Another Debian developer has raised the issue though that the glimpse license doesn't explicitly allow distributing modified versions of the software. May Debian redistribute binaries of glimpse built from mo

Bug#316542: marked as done (gimp: FTBFS: Still uses slang1-dev.)

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:49:53 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#316538: marked as done (gimp FTBFS: bogus explicit build-dep on slang1-dev)

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:49:53 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#316093: ressource files should not be in etc

2005-07-03 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 11:18:23AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:59:25PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > #include > > * Thomas Dickey [Sun, Jul 03 2005, 06:53:55AM]: > > > > > >I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled > > > >terminal descript

Bug#316093: ressource files should not be in etc

2005-07-03 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:59:25PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > * Thomas Dickey [Sun, Jul 03 2005, 06:53:55AM]: > > > >I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled > > >terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits > > >them. Instead, they sh

Bug#314764: poldi: FTBFS in experimental: Not using -fPIC to build shared lib.

2005-07-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
tags 314764 - fixed-in-experimental thanks Hi, It looks like this hasn't been fixed yet. Now it fails with this instead: ld --shared -x \ -o pam_poldi.so pam_poldi.o \ ../common/libpoldi-common.a ../jnlib/libjnlib.a \ ../libscd/libscd.a -lgcrypt -lgpg-error -lusb -lc ld: ../jnl

Processed: Re: poldi: FTBFS in experimental: Not using -fPIC to build shared lib.

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 314764 - fixed-in-experimental Bug#314764: poldi: FTBFS in experimental: Not using -fPIC to build shared lib. Tags were: fixed-in-experimental experimental Tags removed: fixed-in-experimental > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Bug#314289: experiencing the same issue

2005-07-03 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 02:49:42PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > I'm experiencing the same issue with this package. Here's an strace -f of > the sshd process, starting after I typed my password (password removed). Could I have that strace with '-s 1024' or similar, so that I can see what the log

Bug#263359: marked as done (wap-wml-tools: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper' and 'libxml-dev)

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:32:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#263359: fixed in wap-wml-tools 0.0.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#314645: moreinfo, unreproducible, downgrade

2005-07-03 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 03:10:35PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > I suggest tagging this moreinfo,unreproducible, and downgrading when > and if that is necessary for new packages to move to testing (which > should be deliberately prevented until #314289 is fixed). Please leave this bug in its curre

Bug#316509: marked as done (calamaris break at loading calamaris::calBars3d)

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 08:47:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316509: fixed in calamaris 2.99.1.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#316738: missing files (boo.pc and boo.lang)

2005-07-03 Thread Mirco Bauer
Package: boo Severity: serious The 0.5.5.1651-2 version of the boo package is missing some files which the -1 version had, and 2 of them are important for usage and linking against boo. boo.pc is missing in -2, thus monodevelop for example can't be build with boo support. boo.lang is missing in -2

Bug#316691: marked as done (mono-utils should define replaces for mono-mcs)

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 08:17:27 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316691: fixed in mono 1.1.8.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#316729: bashism in the init script

2005-07-03 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jul 03, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nice of you to check the open bugs... Actually I did, but only looked at serious bugs, which is the expected severity for a bashism which breaks dash. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#316683: dbus: ftbfs [sparc] Building python explicitly requested, but can't build python

2005-07-03 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 06:33:27PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > Package: dbus > Version: 0.23.4-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid > Justification: fails to build from source > > > The build attempt on the sparc buildd failed due to unavalable > dependancies. Looks like that's because of the j

Bug#316729: bashism in the init script

2005-07-03 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 02:00:38PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Package: dhcp3-server > Version: 3.0.2-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > This breaks with dash: > > - if ! /usr/sbin/dhcpd3 -t >& /dev/null; then > + if ! /usr/sbin/dhcpd3 -t 2>&1 /dev/null; then > Nice of you to

Processed: tagging 316729

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 316729 + pending Bug#316729: bashism in the init script Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Bug#316729: bashism in the init script

2005-07-03 Thread Marco d'Itri
Package: dhcp3-server Version: 3.0.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch This breaks with dash: - if ! /usr/sbin/dhcpd3 -t >& /dev/null; then + if ! /usr/sbin/dhcpd3 -t 2>&1 /dev/null; then -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: fix pending

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 316691 + pending Bug#316691: mono-utils should define replaces for mono-mcs There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > severity 316691 serious Bug#316691: mono-utils should define replaces for mono-mcs Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopp

Bug#316714: marked as done (XMLRPC vulnerability)

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 07:02:24 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316714: fixed in phpwiki 1.3.7-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#316093: ressource files should not be in etc

2005-07-03 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Thomas Dickey [Sun, Jul 03 2005, 06:53:55AM]: > >I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled > >terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits > >them. Instead, they should be moved to /usr/share and links from them to > >/etc/terminfo/... sh

Bug#316093: ressource files should not be in etc

2005-07-03 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Eduard Bloch wrote: Hello, I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits them. Instead, they should be moved to /usr/share and links from them to /etc/terminfo/... should be created, so

Bug#316725: header file exception.h needs to include stdarg.h

2005-07-03 Thread Marc Leeman
Package: libmagick6-dev Version: 6:6.2.3.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: no longer builds from source Bug: #315503 against dvdauthor showed a problem with the newest libmagick package. the header file exception.h uses va_list without including stdarg.h. Including stdarg.h solves

Bug#315012: marked as done (RM: nautilus-media -- RoM; superseded by totem)

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 05:18:09 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#315012: fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#316093: ressource files should not be in etc

2005-07-03 Thread Eduard Bloch
Hello, I think Bill has a good point here. Ressource files like compiled terminal descriptions should not be in etc since hardly anyone edits them. Instead, they should be moved to /usr/share and links from them to /etc/terminfo/... should be created, so the local admin still has a chance to modif

Bug#315055: marked as done (RM: innovation3d -- RoM; orphaned upstream, broken)

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 05:21:49 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed innovation3d, innovation3d-plugins from unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#316714: XMLRPC vulnerability

2005-07-03 Thread Matthew Palmer
Package: phpwiki Tags: security Severity: serious Just got this through the PHPWiki list. I'm going to pull xmlrpc.inc as suggested. I pulled the package from Sarge because I didn't think it was releasable, so there's no need to go through a full DSA cycle. Just keeping the security team in the

Bug#273601: marked as done (ifrit should not go into sarge)

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 3 Jul 2005 10:09:39 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line allow ifrit into testing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#316650: ethereal: Assertion failed when starting

2005-07-03 Thread W. Borgert
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 01:32:22AM -0400, Adam Aube wrote: > I have strace output (over 4000 lines of it), but it's probably best to take > this to debian-user, since it appears to be unreproducible. Check two things: 1. Do you have self-compiled modules for ethereal, not part of the Debian p

Bug#316281: marked as done (pbuilder create fails to install build-essential)

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 03:17:19 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316281: fixed in pbuilder 0.128 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#315086: marked as done (Heimdal telnetd Buffer Overflow Vulnerability)

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 03:02:10 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#315065: fixed in heimdal 0.6.3-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#315065: marked as done (Remotely exploitable buffer overflow in getterminaltype function)

2005-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2005 03:02:10 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#315065: fixed in heimdal 0.6.3-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#315065: Remotely exploitable buffer overflow in getterminaltype function

2005-07-03 Thread Brian May
> "Moritz" == Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Moritz> I've extracted the security relevant fix from the Moritz> 0.6.4->0.6.5 patch. If you are planning more extensive Moritz> changes for packaging 0.7 it might be a good idea to Moritz> release a fixed package for

Bug#316143: subversion: libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 reproduces bug here

2005-07-03 Thread Chung-chieh Shan
Package: subversion Version: 1.2.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #316143 Unfortunately, I have exactly the same dependent package versions (including libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22) as indicated in the original bug report, yet I see the same problem (tested with a freshly created, local fsfs repository). Ken