Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 316593 sid
Bug#316593: rosegarden4: rosegarden uninstallable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
On Thursday 23 June 2005 10:38, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> | If the command string is specifically crafted, is it possible to use
> | this stack overflow to execute arbitrary code on the Asterisk system.
> | The resulting execution is (typically) run with root privileges.
Upstream the asterisk pa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 316590 sarge
Bug#316590: cacti: further security vulnerabilities (php-hardened 032005 042005
052005)
Tags were: security
Tags added: sarge
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
> Something I found on the Ubuntu site suggested to solve this problem
> by setting apt up to install a file in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d to set
> APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated to 1. I think this would be better
> than either using --force-yes or trying to determine whether
> --allow-unauthenticated wi
Quoting Karsten M. Self (kmself@ix.netcom.com):
> Package: debian-installer-manual
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.3
(no legal nitpicking in the following, just common sense)
Please note for further reference that each and every line, paragraph,
documentation, translation, line of c
Package: rosegarden4
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Rosegarden depends on libjack0.90.0-0 and jackd. However, the current
version of jackd depends on libjack0.10.0, thus making rosegarden
uninstallable. Perhaps rosegarden should depend only on jackd, thus
au
reopen 315532
tags 315532 + sarge
thanks
Please keep this bug open until a DSA for sarge has been issued.
Thanks.
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg signed mail preferred
64bit GNU powered
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 315532
Bug#315532: asterisk: Buffer overflow in command line parser
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 315532 + sarge
Bug#315532: asterisk: Buffer overflow in command line parser
Tags were: security
Tags added: sarge
> thanks
Stopping
Something I found on the Ubuntu site suggested to solve this problem
by setting apt up to install a file in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d to set
APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated to 1. I think this would be better
than either using --force-yes or trying to determine whether
--allow-unauthenticated will be allo
Package: cacti
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
for more information: http://www.cacti.net/release_notes_0_8_6f.php
i will be preparing an update this weekend.
sean
- -- System Information:
Debian Release:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 315703 security
Bug#315703: cacti: remote vulnerabilities (CAN 2005-{1524,1525,1526})
Tags were: sarge
Tags added: security
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
I think this bug's severity should be set to wishlist, losing routes
temporarily because of a daemon restart does not count as "data
loss".
Nearly every daemon gets restarted after installation, dh_installinit
(debhelper) defaults to that anyway.
Nevertheless, please consider restarting quagga a
Hi,
> > It would be nice if there was such an option, but I see no hint of it
> > in 'man apt-get' or 'apt-get --help'.
> >
> > pbuilder needs to work with multiple releases, so if there was such a
> > new option that did not work in woody, sarge, etch and sid it souldn't
> > be used. (or pbuild
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:15:36PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> Ok, change committed. You are now attributed in the administrivia section.
> Thanks for the great doc.
You suck. You know you just ended a potentially great and entertaining
flamewar by leaving one side without arguments? ;-)
(jk, o
Package: uptimed
Version: 1:0.3.3-6
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
uptimed failed to build from source on a sparc buildd, duplicated on
my sparc pbuilder. It also failed to build on some other buildds.
dh_testdir
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/
(It's all well and good to say one's dropping a thread, but so much
harder to stick to. Trying, trying ...)
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 03:20:31AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Really. Listen to yourself. Are you honestly claiming that someone
> asking that we acknowledge his (involuntary) contribu
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jul 2005 20:23:29 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316487: debian-installer-manual: Missing copyright credit:
Karsten M. Self for section C.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.15
> reassign 295213 upgrade-reports
Bug#295213: general: Upgrade removed /usr/local (symlink)
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `upgrade-reports'.
>
End of message, stopping proce
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 12:36:14PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> This bug concerns appropriate copyright notice in the Debian Installer
> Guide which adapts substantial material originally written by me.
>
> My license allows use under DFSG compliant guidelines, but requests
> attribution. I in
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:58:07PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Yes. And?
>
> So you think it's acceptable to have a work in main, whose license is
> "if you're Debian, you're never allowed to remove this work, or I'll
> sue you for an unrelated, alre
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 09:02:46PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Do you really not understand actual license issues? There is, as I
> understand it, a currently released work, which knowingly incorporates a
> substantial amount of Karsten's work, and violates his license in doing
> so. This is not
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 04:16:29PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > debian-legal and DPL added to distribution.
>
> I'm afraid that by escalating this unnecessarily, as well as resorting
> to certian rhetoric (for which I cannot be bothered to do a
> point-by-point rebuttal), y
This one time, at band camp, Glenn Maynard said:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:58:07PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> So you think it's acceptable to have a work in main, whose license is
> "if you're Debian, you're never allowed to remove this work, or I'll
> sue you for an unrelated, already-f
on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:08:27PM -0500, Bill Allombert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 12:36:14PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > > > The Debian Project has been distributing this work in violation of my
> > > > copyrights. I've previously requested this be remedied in 20
Package: fam
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Fam was installed via dependancies of the gnome virtual package. Since
it was running it appears to have kept an open handle on one of my
compact flash cards when it was attached to the system and thus it was
inadvertantly re
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 12:17:43AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Wait one second...
> Of course excision is possible, but is it really a good idea?
> I don't think so.
That's not d-legal's decision, or the DPL's. It's the maintainer's
decision. There are procedures in place to overrule a mainta
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.0ds1-11
Severity: serious
When I tried to rebuild gcc-4.0, it failed as follows:
baseline_name=`basename
/tmp/buildd/gcc-4.0-4.0.0ds1/src/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/i486-linux-gnu`; \
baseline_parentdir=`dirname
/tmp/buildd/gcc-4.0-4.0.0ds1/src/libstdc++-v3/config/a
Aleksey I Zavilohin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, where fix in stable? I think you can`t upload new version in
> sarge. Maybe need contact with Security Team?
I have done that. Alas, there hasn't been any response yet.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
And the real question is, why did an NMU change it in the first place.
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 01:11:48AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: libnss-db
> Version: 2.2-6.3
> Severity: grave
>
> The last NMU moved /var/lib/misc/Makefile to /var/lib/db/Makefile.
> It's not mentioned in the chang
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:58:07PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Sure. That's fairly equivalent to (a).
Just in case I wasn't clear, the point was that the fix for past stable
releases, and the fix for unstable and the next release, are unrelated;
it's reasonable to do entirely different things,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> package apt-move
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: apt-move
> severity 316492 serious
Bug#316492: Unmet dependencies of apt-move in latest unstable...
Severity set to `serious'.
> merg
Package: libnss-db
Version: 2.2-6.3
Severity: grave
The last NMU moved /var/lib/misc/Makefile to /var/lib/db/Makefile.
It's not mentioned in the changelog, it breaks existing scripts.
sorry, that's just bad style for a NMU.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 13:01:26 -0700 Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> IANAL, IANADD, but it's hard for me to imagine that there is any
> sensible or just way to resolve this other than to credit Karsten with
> a significant contribution to the Guide. Such a guide is of course
> largely factual and could
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
"apt" was upgraded and now seems to use GPG checks for installing packages.
"apt-build" doesn't handle this change, a priori, according to this log :
-> Moving packages to repository <-
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:08:24PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> a) Remove the material concerned from the installation guide in woody
>> and sarge and get new versions uploaded to the archive. Apologise
>> profusely. Potentially still be sued.
> d) A
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 16:34:54 -0400 Glenn Maynard wrote:
[...]
> > - I would prefer attribution to excision.
>
> Being DFSG-free is a prerequisite for being in Debian, but being DFSG-
> free does not compel Debian to include a work. Your preferences don't
> make excision of a work unacceptable.
I had a similar message from the calamaris cron.daily:
/usr/bin/calamaris: Couldn't load package calamaris::calBars3d,
maybe it is not installed: No such file or directory
There is a simple workaround: install libgd-graph-perl.
/usr/share/perl5/calamaris/calBars3d.pm tries to use parts of GD:G
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:33:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315955: fixed in samba 3.0.14a-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jul 2005 23:32:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fwd: asterisk_1.0.9.dfsg-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
package apt-move
merge #316207 #316492
thanks
Thanks for the reports; I will try to get this done this weekend.
--
Chuan-kai Lin
http://www.cs.pdx.edu/~cklin/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 11:08:24PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Regardless of what we do in future versions, we're currently
> distributing material in violation of a copyright holder's license. Our
> choices are pretty much:
>
> a) Remove the material concerned from the installation guide in w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 315083 grave
Bug#315083: libgtk2.0-0: breaks mozilla-firefox on amd64
Severity set to `grave'.
> retitle libgtk2.0-0: breaks other software: Gdk-WARNING **:
> gdk_property_get(): length value has wrapped in calculation (did you pass
> G_MAXL
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 12:36:14PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > > The Debian Project has been distributing this work in violation of my
> > > copyrights. I've previously requested this be remedied in 2003, the
> > > situation remains uncorrected:
> > >
> > > http://lists.debian.org/debia
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A past error does not prohibit the maintainer from excising any part
> of the work, at his discretion. You don't get to say "you made a
> mistake in the past, so you're not allowed to remove my work now".
Regardless of what we do in future versions, we'
I'm experiencing the same issue with this package. Here's an strace -f of
the sshd process, starting after I typed my password (password removed).
Process 5023 attached - interrupt to quit
read(6, "\0\0\0\21", 4) = 4
read(6, "4\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\10", 17) = 17
write(7, "\0\0\0\r\6", 5
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 04:34:54PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> The fact that you're trying to coerce a maintainer to include a work
> instead of attempting to address his reasons for doing so, is enough for
> me to agree with Joey's decision.
That doesn't actually seem to me to be what he's doin
I was beginning to doubt that this was actually related to a change in
kernel-source so i tried going back to 2.6.11-3.
And it fails just like the others!?
So it seems it's something else that broke it and the kernel-image
package update just trigerred the problem...
Could this be related to lib
on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 04:34:54PM -0400, Glenn Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Dropped [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fair enough for now.
> What the hell were you thinking?
That after three years of trying to get appropriate credit I might as
well take this to the top.
> Throwing a tantrum and s
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'm afraid you've misconstrued my email, but since it was directed as
> Karsten, I'm not going to bother to expand on it unless he
> misunderstands it too. I prefer to write fewer words on this topic than
> I could write to just fix the issue in the manual.
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:17:28 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311712: fixed in kdenetwork 4:3.3.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 04:16:29PM -0400, Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > debian-legal and DPL added to distribution.
>
> I'm afraid that by escalating this unnecessarily, as well as resorting
> to certian rhetoric (for which I cannot be bothered to do a
> point-b
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#316362: security problem with drupal,
which was filed against the drupal package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
unsa
Dropped [EMAIL PROTECTED] What the hell were you thinking? Throwing a tantrum
and screaming at every email address you can find doesn't make your
argument more valid (on the contrary, it suggests that you don't have
much of an argument at all).
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 12:36:14PM -0700, Karsten M
reopen 316362
tags 316362 + sarge, security
thanks
Please keep this bug open until an DSA has been released.
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg signed mail preferred
64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~k
Karsten M. Self wrote:
> debian-legal and DPL added to distribution.
I'm afraid that by escalating this unnecessarily, as well as resorting
to certian rhetoric (for which I cannot be bothered to do a
point-by-point rebuttal), you've convinced me it's best I bow out of the
discussion, permantly.
T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 316362
Bug#316362: security problem with drupal
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 316362 + sarge, security
Bug#316362: security problem with drupal
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge, security
> thanks
Stopping processing here
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 316519 sid
Bug#316519: libpostgis1-pg74: uninstallable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
IANAL, IANADD, but it's hard for me to imagine that there is any
sensible or just way to resolve this other than to credit Karsten with
a significant contribution to the Guide. Such a guide is of course
largely factual and could bear many resemblances to Karsten's without
constituting plagiarism o
Rick Moen wrote:
> I'm disappointed -- as an author and as a Debian user. This is no way
> to treat a generous volunteer.
I'm afraid you've misconstrued my email, but since it was directed as
Karsten, I'm not going to bother to expand on it unless he
misunderstands it too. I prefer to write fewer
Hi Frederik,
> > i've just tried kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-k8 with the exact same result...
>
> This is interesting. You have latest initrd-utils installed, and your
> system is up to date?
i've initrd-tools 0.1.81.1 ... the latest according to packages.debian.org.
> can you please send your mk
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 316538 316542
Bug#316538: gimp FTBFS: bogus explicit build-dep on slang1-dev
Bug#316542: gimp: FTBFS: Still uses slang1-dev.
Merged 316538 316542.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
merge 316538 316542
thanks
They're obviously the same problem, merging.
And I'd agree, if it doesn't use slang directly, don't build
depend on it.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian-legal and DPL added to distribution.
This bug concerns appropriate copyright notice in the Debian Installer
Guide which adapts substantial material originally written by me.
My license allows use under DFSG compliant guidelines, but requests
attribution. I initially requested attribution
Joey, please hear me out. Debian needs to fix this, and your response
to Karsten isn't sufficient or appropriate.
First, Karsten has a reasonable moral claim on Debian for an author
acknowledgement: Compare his Debian Chroot Install notes, which _were_
the first generally available clear explana
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:02:19PM -0400, Pascal Giard wrote:
>
> Hi Frederik,
>
> i've just tried kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-k8 with the exact same result...
This is interesting. You have latest initrd-utils installed, and your
system is up to date?
can you please send your mkinitrd.co
Correction to my previous response: uxterm doesn't background itself, it
simply calls the first xterm in the path and not /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm
explicitly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Frederik,
i've just tried kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-k8 with the exact same result...
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 02:10:04AM -0400, Pascal Giard wrote:
> > Since kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic 2.6.11-4, the kernel-image won't
> > boot.
> >
> > The first error message says something like:
> > "
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> priority 284914 grave
Bug#284914: postinstall kill running klogd
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Package: gimp
Version: 2.2.8-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package currently fails to build because you have
conflicting build dependencies: You build depend on slang1-dev
and aalib1-dev. aalib1-dev itself has a dependency on
libslang2-dev, which of course conflicts with slang1-dev.
Please chang
Package: gimp
Version: 2.2.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
gimp explicitly build-depends on slang1-dev, even though its only use
of slang is indirect, via aalib. Now that aalib has migrated to slang
2, whose development package conflicts with slang 1's, gimp can no
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 02:10:04AM -0400, Pascal Giard wrote:
> Since kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic 2.6.11-4, the kernel-image won't
> boot.
>
> The first error message says something like:
> " Can't load shared object file libc.so.6 "
> The second error message says it can't find sda1
Karsten M. Self wrote:
> Section C.4 of the Debian GNU/Linux Installation Guide is based on notes
> I wrote for performing a chroot installation of Debian under an existing
> GNU/Linux system.
>
> The current version of the manual has modified this work, but is still
> clearly based on the documen
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:02:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316362: fixed in drupal 4.5.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hi!
This vulnerability has been assigned CAN-2005-1774, please mention
that in the changelog.
Thanks!
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Thanks for the bug report; I'm still trying to reproduce this on my
system. Here are a couple of notes:
* uxterm backgrounds itself after opening the terminal window, and hence
is not going to work with clusterssh at this time. I don't think it's
ever worked, and this is noted in the README.Debi
Package: libpostgis1-pg74
Severity: serious
Justification: unkown
Hi,
libpostgi1-pg74 is uninstallable in unstable because it depends on
postgresql >=7.4.0 and <7.4.99, but postgresql currently is 7.5.8. I
think libpostgis1-pg74 needs to depend on postgresql-7.4.
Andreas
-- System Information:
Package: calamaris
Version: 2.99.1.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
1)
calamaris does not work any more. It ends with the message: "Couldn't load
package calamaris::calBars3d, maybe it is not installed: No such file or
directory" (invoked via /etc/cron.daily/calamaris).
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 316476 kernel-image-2.6.11-9-amd64-generic
Bug#316476: kernel-source-2.6.11: Fails to boot since 2.6.11-4
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic'
Bug#316
Package: debian-installer-manual
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
Section C.4 of the Debian GNU/Linux Installation Guide is based on notes
I wrote for performing a chroot installation of Debian under an existing
GNU/Linux system.
The current version of the manual has modified this wor
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:48:03PM +0200, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> Indeed. To be exhaustive, one should write a command-line parser that
> would affect the options to lp or lpr accordingly to their respective
> syntax.
>
> That is what I try to do with this patch against the script, but o
Thanks for fixing my mess.
I wasn't sure if the kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic one was going
to reach anyone since bugs.debian.org was showing "unknown
maintainer".
And kernel-source-2.6.11-amd64-generic was a mistake.
Sorry about that,
won't happen again.
-Pascal
On 7/1/05, Steve Langasek <
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 316479 sid
Bug#316479: clusterssh: cssh does not start and complains about X11/Protocol.pm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
Hello,
Update: A new vulnerability has been discovered in squirrelmail. We'll
release one advisory for this one and the new one (to be announced soon).
Thijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: clusterssh
Version: 3.17.1-1
Severity: grave
When I try to run cssh, I get the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cssh lb
Can't read: at /usr/share/perl5/X11/Protocol.pm line 2301
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Here's my ~/.csshrc :
#terminal = aterm
terminal = uxterm
terminal_options = ""
a
severity 312513 important
tags 312513 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
Downgrading, since no one else is reporting this problem with 3.0.14a.
Stephen, does using the posted testparm output as an smb.conf (munged
appropriately for your domain values) get you anywhere with trying to
reproduce this bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> # fixed in CVS
> tags 315955 pending
Bug#315955: samba package build fails; DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM is 'linux-gnu' now
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 312513 important
Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 312513 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
There were no tags se
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 02:10:04AM -0400, Pascal Giard wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.6.11
> Version: 2.6.11-4
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> (Sorry if this is a dupe, i had filled it against
> kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-generic).
kernel-source-2.6.11 is proba
88 matches
Mail list logo
