Bug#314654: Bug #314654 - qtorrent: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'

Hello, thanks for your reply! On 05-Jun-18 00:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What s wrong with qtorrent build depending on python-2.4-dev only ? > Would using "dh_python -V 2.4" fix the issue too ? I tried that but it still fails to build. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#314645: /usr/sbin/sshd: time delay of password check proves account existence to attackers

This one time, at band camp, Justin Pryzby said: > Package: ssh > Version: 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.4 > Severity: critical > File: /usr/sbin/sshd > Tags: security > Justification: root security hole This part seems like panic - it's a user level security hole, if it exists. This one time, at band camp,

Bug#314716: [pkg-xmule] Bug#314716: fails to install

Am Samstag, den 18.06.2005, 00:54 +0200 schrieb Bas Zoetekouw: > Package: xmule > Version: 1.9.4b-1 > Severity: serious > > xmule fails to install due to a filename conflixt with amule: > > Unpacking xmule (from .../xmule_1.10.0b-1_i386.deb) ... > dpkg: error processing > /var/cache/apt/archives/

Bug#313453: marked as done (does not depend on libecpg5 (package missing?))

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:54:58 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313453: fixed in postgresql-8.0 8.0.3-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#313452: marked as done (package is empty)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:54:58 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313452: fixed in postgresql-8.0 8.0.3-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#313218: gtodo: Problem found

Package: gtodo Version: 0.14-4 Followup-For: Bug #313218 Hi Guilherme. My apologies for the time delay. Unfortunately the spare time available to me is short. I would wager you are using the 2.6 kernel :) After upgrading to Gnome 2.10, several of my Gnome applications failed with different va

Bug#313454: marked as done (package is empty)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:54:58 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313454: fixed in postgresql-8.0 8.0.3-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#314289: Bug #314289 - ssh: unable to login after upgrade to 4.1p1-3

Could you do /etc/init.d/rmnologin then retry ? I had a user which found it it was not run and broke its ssh login for non root users. Also could you confirm there where no other upgrade at the same time that could break the user session : the user shell and the like I cannot reproduce the bug :

Bug#310111: marked as done (haskell-http_0.4.20041219-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: outdated build-deps)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:26:37 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#310111: fixed in haskell-http 0.4.20050430-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#314654: Bug #314654 - qtorrent: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'

What s wrong with qtorrent build depending on python-2.4-dev only ? Would using "dh_python -V 2.4" fix the issue too ? Please tell me if you cannot test, i ll try to find time to learn how to make a clean build environemnt (i am not DD ) Regards Alban -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT

Bug#207932: Statement that all of Debian needs to be Free?

On 6/17/05, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> etc/{CENSORSHIP,copying.paper,INTERVIEW,LINUX-GNU,THE-GNU-PROJECT,WHY-FREE} > > > > only "copying.paper" sounds like a license; the rest are simply documents, > > which must be DFSG-free to be i

Bug#314716: fails to install

Package: xmule Version: 1.9.4b-1 Severity: serious xmule fails to install due to a filename conflixt with amule: Unpacking xmule (from .../xmule_1.10.0b-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/xmule_1.10.0b-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/ed

Bug#313444: marked as done (galeon: uninstallable because of gnome 2.10 in sid)

Your message dated Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:36:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313444: galeon: uninstallable because of gnome 2.10 in sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#311182: marked as done (ikvm: FTBFS: Does not make the libikvm-native packages when running binary-arch.)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:38 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#311182: fixed in ikvm 0.14.0.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#307100: marked as done (ikvm: FTBFS: mono not configured correctly)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:38 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#307100: fixed in ikvm 0.14.0.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#310300: marked as done (ikvm: FTBFS in experimental: Only has Build-Depends-Indep, and changed to arch any package.)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:38 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#310300: fixed in ikvm 0.14.0.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#314484: marked as done (Error on login: 'The Application "gnome-panel" has quit unexpectedly')

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#314484: fixed in gnome-vfs2 2.10.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#312525: 312525 explaination

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Regis Boudin wrote: > Hi, Hello, > To fixes are possible. Either making the dlopen against the library > soname, 'libxmms.so.1', which is a quick fix (patch attached) but will > be broken if the soname changes, but I doubt it will for XMMS. This fix s

Processed: severity of 314447 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > #this does not meet the definition of a critical security hole > severity 314447 important Bug#314447: spamassassin: CAN-2005-1266 Denial of Service Vulnerability in SpamAssassin 3.

Processed: tagging 314654

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 314654 sid Bug#314654: qtorrent: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev' Tags were: patch Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processed: merge to nmu

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package serpento Ignoring bugs not assigned to: serpento > severity 275476 serious Bug#275476: serpento: 0.4.1 NMU diff Severity set to `serious'. > merge 275476 257131 Bug#257131: serpento: installation fails if dictd package is present Bug#275476: s

Bug#289856: about wrong license

Hi, This bug will soon be half a year old. Is there a reason why this package hasn't been moved to non-free/contrib yet? Cheers, piem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314628: marked as done (libmagick6: Missing dependency (libltdl3) on amd64 platform)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:01:35 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug #314628 - libmagick6: Missing dependency (libltdl3) on amd64 platform has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#314657: marked as done (belocs-locales-data: FTBFS: Patch update_CVS.diff does not apply)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:47:09 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#314657: fixed in belocs-locales-data 2.3.4-16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#314700: f2c: segfaults on i386 since last security update

Package: f2c Version: 20010821-3.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The latest version of f2c segfaults on i386 despite the analysis of #305971 that the woody code should not have this problem. I'm raising this as a separate bug so that it gets fixed as f2c in woody is no

Bug#302554: xnap: FTBFS

Package: xnap Followup-For: Bug #302554 Hi, > The package does not build because 'unzip' is missing from the > Build-Depends. I'm not sure how did you deside on the unzip build dependency. I got unzip installed in my system and I still get the same error as you do. About you patch: There is n

Bug#314653: mh-e: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'emacs21'

Hello, thanks for your reply. On 05-Jun-17 14:32, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), texinfo > > +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, texinfo, emacs21 > > Why remove the version number there? It is not necessary to r

Bug#207932: Statement that all of Debian needs to be Free?

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 06:04:20PM +0200, Dylan Thurston wrote: > I'm surprised that someone thinks that there's any controversy on this > point. As I understand it, the current situation is that, with the > release of sarge, everything in Debian should be DFSG free, including > programs, document

Bug#314657: belocs-locales-data: FTBFS: Patch update_CVS.diff does not apply

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 02:34:51PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 07:42:00PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > Package: belocs-locales-data > > Version: 2.3.4-15 > > Severity: serious > > > With the attached patch 'belocs-locales-data' can be compiled > > on amd64 using gcc-

Bug#300573: config.sub and config.guess

Hi, I don't have any of the architectures on which it fails, but I think I found one of the reasons of the FTBFS. The config.sub and config.guess files in the libical-0.23 directory are oudated (1999). The attached patch should at least fix the problem seen on the s390 and parisc buildds. Regards

Processed: ok

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 312578 ftp.debian.org Bug#312578: Dummy package should be removed? Bug reassigned from package `raidtools2' to `ftp.debian.org'. > retitle 312578 RM: raidtools2 -- obsolete dummy package Bug#312578: Dummy package should be removed? Changed Bug

Bug#314480: dbus-1 does not start because of segmentation fault

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 04:46:26PM +0200, christian dare wrote: > Package: dbus-1 > Version: 0.23.4-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > I ve just installed the system from the sarge s cd .( clean disk , no > upgrade ) Are you using NIS ? Sjoerd -- Mathematicians

Bug#314657: belocs-locales-data: FTBFS: Patch update_CVS.diff does not apply

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 07:42:00PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > Package: belocs-locales-data > Version: 2.3.4-15 > Severity: serious > With the attached patch 'belocs-locales-data' can be compiled > on amd64 using gcc-4.0. Patch not attached. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

Bug#314653: mh-e: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'emacs21'

Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When building 'mh-e' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, > I get the following error: > > echo ";; (require 'mh-e-autoloads)" >> mh-e-autoloads.el > echo ";;" >> mh-e-autoloads.el > echo ";;; Code:" >> mh-e-autoloads.el > emacs -batch --no-site-file --multi

Bug#314645: /usr/sbin/sshd: time delay of password check proves account existence to attackers

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 13:46 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:33:49AM -0700, Greg Webster wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 13:13 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > Definitely would be a good test...I'd like to see someone validate what > > > > I've been seeing. > > > I see l

Bug#314671: zynaddsubfx: freezes the system if run as root

Package: zynaddsubfx Version: 2.2.1-2 Severity: critical Tags: sarge Hi Eduardo, I can run zynaddsubfx as non-root, but running as root it freezes the system in a way that even running "under" strace userland tool it isn't generating any output (stdout or files). Note that there's a while(1) in

Bug#314645: /usr/sbin/sshd: time delay of password check proves account existence to attackers

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:33:49AM -0700, Greg Webster wrote: > On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 13:13 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > Definitely would be a good test...I'd like to see someone validate what > > > I've been seeing. > > I see lots of the same logfile entries; but I have doubts that it is > >

Processed: (no subject)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 279010 Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#279010: gnome-core: should depends on x-windows-system-core Changed Bug submitter from Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > tag 313537 patch Bug#313537: qpopper-drac

Bug#314657: belocs-locales-data: FTBFS: Patch update_CVS.diff does not apply

Package: belocs-locales-data Version: 2.3.4-15 Severity: serious When building 'belocs-locales-data' on amd64/unstable, I get the following error: |--- belocs-locales-data.orig/po/CVS/Entries |+++ belocs-locales-data/po/CVS/Entries -- No file to patch. Skipping patch. 2 o

Bug#314656: nano depends on a library in /usr/lib

Package: nano Version: 1.3.7-2 Severity: serious Package: ncurses Version: 5.4-6 Severity: serious starting with version 1.3.6-0, nano depends on libncursesw5, making nano unusable without having /usr mounted. either nano should be fixed or libncursesw5 be moved to /lib. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Bug#306280: marked as done (FTBFS: libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library object from `')

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:32:53 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line FTBFS: libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library object from `' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#314645: /usr/sbin/sshd: time delay of password check proves account existence to attackers

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 13:13 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > Definitely would be a good test...I'd like to see someone validate what > > I've been seeing. > I see lots of the same logfile entries; but I have doubts that it is > looking for a valid account, and not just looking for an *opened* > acco

Bug#314654: qtorrent: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'

Package: qtorrent Version: 2.9.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'qtorrent' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dh_strip dh_compress dh_fixperms dh_python dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting. (Probably forgot to Build-Depend on python.) make: *** [bina

Bug#314653: mh-e: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'emacs21'

Package: mh-e Version: 7.84-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'mh-e' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: echo ";; (require 'mh-e-autoloads)" >> mh-e-autoloads.el echo ";;" >> mh-e-autoloads.el echo ";;; Code:" >> mh-e-autoloads.el emacs -batch --no-site-file --mu

Bug#314645: /usr/sbin/sshd: time delay of password check proves account existence to attackers

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:59:45AM -0700, Greg Webster wrote: > On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 12:51 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:14:04AM -0700, Greg Webster wrote: > > > Package: ssh > > > Version: 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.4 > > > Severity: critical > > > File: /usr/sbin/sshd > > > T

Bug#314645: /usr/sbin/sshd: time delay of password check proves account existence to attackers

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:14:04AM -0700, Greg Webster wrote: > Package: ssh > Version: 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.4 > Severity: critical > File: /usr/sbin/sshd > Tags: security > Justification: root security hole > > Due to the delay that is caused by password checking, once ssh > determines that the logi

Bug#314645: /usr/sbin/sshd: time delay of password check proves account existence to attackers

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 12:51 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:14:04AM -0700, Greg Webster wrote: > > Package: ssh > > Version: 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.4 > > Severity: critical > > File: /usr/sbin/sshd > > Tags: security > > Justification: root security hole > > > > Due to the dela

Bug#314568: libstdc++6-4.0-dev will not install "MD5Sum mismatch"

reassign 314568 ftp.debian.org severity 314568 important thanks not a package problem. Please try to get the package from another mirror. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: libstdc++6-4.0-dev will not install "MD5Sum mismatch"

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 314568 ftp.debian.org Bug#314568: libstdc++6-4.0-dev will not install "MD5Sum mismatch" Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++6-4.0-dev' to `ftp.debian.org'. > severity 314568 important Bug#314568: libstdc++6-4.0-dev will not install "MD5Sum m

Bug#225539: python-pcgi: removal is an option

Package: python-pcgi Followup-For: Bug #225539 I've investigated this package when looking at RC bugs before Sarge release. The upstream of this software has changed drastically and unless this is heavily used by someone it might be better to start packaging new upstream from scratch. -- System I

Processed: severity fix

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 314447 critical Bug#314447: spamassassin: CAN-2005-1266 Denial of Service Vulnerability in SpamAssassin 3.0.1-3.0.3, fixed in 3.0.4 Severity set to `critical'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Bug#312670: marked as done (mtr: debian/copyright doesn't list where the upstream sources were obtained)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:27:15 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 0.69-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#314645: /usr/sbin/sshd: time delay of password check proves account existence to attackers

Package: ssh Version: 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.4 Severity: critical File: /usr/sbin/sshd Tags: security Justification: root security hole Due to the delay that is caused by password checking, once ssh determines that the login attempt is for a valid account, attackers can statistically prove the existenc

Bug#314639: proguard: FTBFS: jar: Command not found

Andreas Jochens wrote: > Package: proguard > Version: 3.2-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > When building 'proguard' in a clean chroot on amd64/unstable, > I get the following error: > > debian/rules binary > mkdir -p build > mkdir -p lib > jikes-classpath +E +Z0 -d build/proguard -sourcep

Bug#314639: proguard: FTBFS: jar: Command not found

Package: proguard Version: 3.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'proguard' in a clean chroot on amd64/unstable, I get the following error: debian/rules binary mkdir -p build mkdir -p lib jikes-classpath +E +Z0 -d build/proguard -sourcepath src src/proguard/ProGuard.java jikes-class

Bug#312106: preconfiguration bug break woody to sarge upgrade

Salut Bill, > When trying to upgrade from woody, nut-cgi .config file fails with: > > Preconfiguring packages ... > nut-cgi failed to preconfigure, with exit status 10 > (Reading database ... 65666 files and directories currently installed.) > Preparing to replace nut-cgi 0.45.5-rel-1 (using ...

Bug#314628: libmagick6: Missing dependency (libltdl3) on amd64 platform

Package: libmagick6 Version: 6:6.2.3.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable the package missing a dependency on libltdl3 on the amd64 platform. i installed the lib manually to get around this bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstabl

Bug#207932: Bug #207932 - emacs21: Includes non-free documents

Followup for : http://bugs.debian.org/207932 Thanks you for helping debian tracks licencing issues. Though this bug looks like an extension of the GFDL issue to some non documentation texts. This have not been agreed upon by debian-legal (in fact as far as i know "licences" and such documents have

Bug#312024: marked as done (proguard: ftbfs [sparc] cannot stat `./lib/proguard.jar': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:47:19 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#312024: fixed in proguard 3.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#314534: my solution

I have test this solution : - add a user lists-archives with home directory in /var/lib/lists-archives and password disabled - add user lists-archives in the group "list" - in /etc/alias delete this line : lists-archives: "|/usr/bin/procmail /etc/lists-archives/procmailrc" - in /var/lib/lists-a

Bug#214623: marked as done (Non-free logo included in main)

This is a followup for : http://bugs.debian.org/214623 The last step of the fix have been unaswered for a year : > On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 07:03:06AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Debian's imagemagick package includes the ImageMagick logo, which is > > apparently not DFSG free. Th

Processed: adding etch to the list of affect distributions

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package imagemagick Ignoring bugs not assigned to: imagemagick > tags 214623 etch Bug#214623: Non-free logo included in main Tags were: sarge-ignore sid sarge woody Tags added: etch > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assis

Bug#305971: f2c also broken on Woody i386 after security upgrade

Package: f2c Version: 20010821-3.2 Followup-For: Bug #305971 The version of f2c now in Woody ie. 3.0r6, segmentation faults on startup on i386 as well with the same strace as quoted for m68k. The latest security patch seems to have broken the executable completely. I'm guessing this would have t