Bug#313334: twisted-doc-api: API Documentation non-existant

Package: twisted-doc-api Version: 2.0.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [EMAIL PROTECTED] dpkg -L twisted-doc-api /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/twisted-doc-api :) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT

Bug#311616: marked as done (Sarge installation doesn't work, missing files in the init.d/snort file)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:47:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#311616: fixed in snort 2.3.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#313324: hardware-monitor: Not installable on unstable using GNOME 2.10

Package: hardware-monitor Version: 1.2-1.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable $ aptitude install hardware-monitor Läser paketlistor... Färdig Bygger beroendeträd Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Färdig Reading task descriptions... Färdig E: Ku

Bug#175604: cxx's "compaq" mangling style not supported by binutils

Hi Adam, Since the cxx package is now unusable with current binutils, is there any reason to keep this package around in the archive? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#278675: debget: relies on outdated archive structure

Hi Roderick, Are you still interested in maintaining debget? Is the patch supplied by Alexis to fix this RC bug satisfactory? FWIW, I don't think there's much point to keeping this package in the archive if no one currently finds it useful, just on the chance that someone may fix it later. Than

Processed: tagging 313081

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 313081 security Bug#313081: find -follow: infinite loop with symlinks to ./ Tags were: confirmed Tags added: security > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#263359: wap-wml-tools: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper' and 'libxml-dev

Hi Fernando, Are you still interested in maintaining wap-wml-tools? This RC bug has been open for ten months now, because the source package doesn't comply with current policy. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#308705: removing ipfwadm

On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:54:40PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:47:40PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > > There is no consensus that this package should be removed. Since I am still > > willing to maintain it, I don't believe removal is appropriate at this time. >

Bug#313316: mozilla-js-debugger: menu option doesn't do anything at all.

Package: mozilla-js-debugger Version: 2:1.7.8-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I go to Tools -> Web Development -> JavaScript Debugger ... and nothing happens. Nothing at all. The JavaScript Console shows no errors, and neither does the text console Mozilla is run from. I

Processed: severity of 313278 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 313278 serious Bug#313278: [ncurses-term] file conflict with mlterm-common during upgrade Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please cont

Bug#313081: [bug #13381] infinite loop with -follow.

Update of bug #13381 (project findutils): Open/Closed:Open => Closed Release:None => 4.2.19 Fixed Release:None => 4.2.22 ___

Bug#313219: gedit: Additional Information

Package: gedit Version: 2.10.3-1 Followup-For: Bug #313219 Hi I've included some relevant information based on this bug. I am now also using reportbug as suggested. I'm currently completing a major project and therefore have very little spare time available to me. Unfortunately, I will therefor

Bug#313150: marked as done (netinstall for sarge points to testing)

Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:01:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313150: netinstall for sarge points to testing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#313014: mol-modules tight version bindings make this package uninstallable, thwart security support

reopen 313014 reassign 313014 mol-modules-2.6.11 thanks On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 09:45:34PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote: > Steve Langasek writes: > > The current version of mol-modules-2.6.8 is uninstallable in unstable, > It is also obsolete, so I have asked for it to be removed from the archi

Processed: Re: Bug#313014: mol-modules tight version bindings make this package uninstallable, thwart security support

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 313014 Bug#313014: mol-modules tight version bindings make this package uninstallable, thwart security support Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reassign 313014 mol-modules-2.6.11 Bug#313014: mol-modules tight version bindings make this p

Bug#313081: [bug #13381] infinite loop with -follow.

Update of bug #13381 (project findutils): Severity: 3 - Normal => 6 - Security Status:None => Fixed Assigned to:None => jay ___

Bug#272994: marked as done (gcc-m68hc1x: [ia64] FTBFS: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:03:15 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#272994: gcc-m68hc1x: [ia64] FTBFS: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#313229: bind9-host: Returns host: couldn't get address for '': not found

severity 313229 important thanks On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 04:32:43PM +0100, Colin Davis wrote: > Package: bind9-host > Version: 1:9.3.1-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > The package returns: > host: couldn't get address for '': not found > when running: host xxx.tld

Processed: Re: Bug#313229: bind9-host: Returns host: couldn't get address for '': not found

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 313229 important Bug#313229: bind9-host: Returns host: couldn't get address for '': not found Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#308705: removing ipfwadm

On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:47:40PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > There is no consensus that this package should be removed. Since I am still > willing to maintain it, I don't believe removal is appropriate at this time. I see, I'm curious how many people actually still use this package, now that 2

Processed: severity of 313218 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 313218 grave Bug#313218: gtodo: Program refuses to load if a single todo item exists Severity set to `grave'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: severity of 313219 is grave, tagging 313219

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 313219 grave Bug#313219: gedit: Crashes when attempting to load a file Severity set to `grave'. > tags 313219 sid Bug#313219: gedit: Crashes when attempting to load a file T

Processed: severity of 313217 is important, tagging 313217

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 313217 important Bug#313217: unstable capplets 2.8 makes unstable nautilus 2.10 uninstallable Severity set to `important'. > tags 313217 sid Bug#313217: unstable capplets 2.

Bug#230527: marked as done (fenris: FTBFS: Cannot execute /lib/libc.so.6)

Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:32:12 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#230527: fixed in fenris 1:0.07-m2+build3245-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#189698: marked as done (fenris: FTBFS: problems executing gdb)

Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:32:12 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#189698: fixed in fenris 1:0.07-m2+build3245-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#298152: #298152: checkinstall: incorrectly sets Arch:x86_64 for .deb under amd64

You should be using something like dpkg --print-architecture or dpkg-architecture instead. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#313263: marked as done (r-cran-mnp: FTBFS: ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'MNP')

Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:47:37 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313263: fixed in r-cran-mnp 2.3-2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: tagging 298152

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 298152 patch Bug#298152: checkinstall: incorrectly sets Arch:x86_64 for .deb under amd64 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. P

Bug#313263: r-cran-mnp: FTBFS: ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'MNP'

Package: r-cran-mnp Version: 2.3-2-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/r-cran-mnp-2.3-2/src' ** R ** data ** moving datasets to lazyload DB ** preparing package for lazy loading Error in loadNamespace(i[[1]]

Bug#313014: marked as done (mol-modules tight version bindings make this package uninstallable, thwart security support)

Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:45:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313014: mol-modules tight version bindings make this package uninstallable, thwart security support has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#298152: #298152: checkinstall: incorrectly sets Arch:x86_64 for .deb under amd64

Attached patch will deal with amd64 in the same way as with ppc. -- Regards, Sasha. Alexandra N. Kossovsky, software engineer. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- checkinstall.old2005-06-12 22:44:24.311870357 +0400 +++ checkinstall2005-06-12 22:45:36.265687623 +0400 @@ -1144,11 +114

Bug#313081: [bug #13381] infinite loop with -follow.

URL: Summary: infinite loop with -follow. Project: findutils Submitted by: ametzler Submitted on: Son 12.06.2005 um 17:17 Category: find Severi

Processed: #298152: checkinstall: incorrectly sets Arch:x86_64 for .deb under amd64

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 298152 serious Bug#298152: checkinstall: incorrectly sets Arch:x86_64 for .deb under amd64 Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admi

Processed: bug 313081 is forwarded to http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=13381 ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 313081 > http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitem&item_id=13381 Bug#313081: find -follow: infinite loop with symlinks to ./ Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detaili

Bug#313219: gedit: Crashes when attempting to load a file

On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 03:04:20PM +0100, Barrie Millar wrote: > The debugging information for this error is shown at the bottom of this > message. Unfortunately it seems most of the symbols have been stripped. All binaries in Debian are stripped, usually with debhelper's dh_strip; (which just call

Bug#200185: marked as done (ccache: Incorrect symlinks in /usr/lib/ccache)

Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 12:32:18 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#200185: fixed in ccache 2.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#313229: bind9-host: Returns host: couldn't get address for '': not found

Package: bind9-host Version: 1:9.3.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYP

Bug#295571: marked as done (ia64 unstable debootstrap fails due to libparted rename)

Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 11:02:28 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295571: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#308232: Pending upload

tags 308232 + pending tags 308789 + pending tags 309227 + pending tags 309475 + pending tags 311169 + pending tags 311980 + pending thanks Those bugs are pending upload. Fixed in the SVN repository, release: 2.18-7. Cheers. -- Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#313219: gedit: Crashes when attempting to load a file

Package: gedit Version: 2.10.3-1 Severity: critical Hi When attempting to load via any method, Gedit crashes with the following helpful error: The application "gedit" has crashed unexpectedly. The debugging information for this error is shown at the bottom of this message. Unfortunately it see

Bug#313218: gtodo: Program refuses to load if a single todo item exists

Package: gtodo Version: 0.14-4 Severity: critical Hi After performing a security update this afternoon which also downloaded and installed Gnome 2.10, gtodo totally fails to restart if a single todo item is located on an existing list. It starts perfectly if a configuration cannot be found. How

Processed: Pending upload

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 308232 + pending Bug#308232: bugzilla: [FHS] Creates tempfiles on /usr/share. Tags were: pending confirmed sid Tags added: pending > tags 308789 + pending Bug#308789: Insecure password handling Tags were: confirmed security sid Tags added: pending

Bug#313217: unstable capplets 2.8 makes unstable nautilus 2.10 uninstallable

Package: capplets Version: 1:2.8.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable In current Debian unstable, there is nautilus 2.10 which conflicts with libnautilus2-2 and depends on capplets. The version of capplets in unstable is 2.8, and the package depends on libnautilus2-2. aptit

Bug#313066: gem: FTBFS: Shared lib links against static non-PIC lib.

On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 03:07:31PM +0200, günter geiger wrote: > > My feeling is that there is no shared library because the upstream authors > do not have established shared library versioning, which makes maintaining > the package (and those that depend on it harder). Do you mean they do not ha

Bug#313206: sox: Does not cope well with running out of disk space

Package: sox Version: 12.17.3-4woody2 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss I invoke sox in the following way: sox file.au file.wav sox runs out of disk space half-way through the conversion (as confirmed by a subsequent df), but appears to terminate normally: nothing is pr

Processed: Bug#309257: libpano12: patent problems

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 309257 important Bug#309257: libpano12: patent problems Severity set to `important'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: switching email addresses

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 312058 ! Bug#312058: ttf-larabie-uncommon: upgrade fails due to missing dependency Changed Bug submitter from Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > submitter 298842 ! Bug#298842: mailman: private archives authenti

Bug#313150: netinstall for sarge points to testing

Hi Jan-Jaap, On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 10:15:32AM +0200, Jan-Jaap Fahner wrote: > Discovered when doing a fresh install: > When installing sarge using the sarge-i386-netinst.iso, the sources.list > for apt is set up to point to > 'testing' instead of 'stable' or 'sarge'. This means that using the

Processed: reassign 313150 to debian-cd

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reassign 313150 debian-cd Bug#313150: netinstall for sarge points to testing Warning: Unknown package 'apt-get' Bug reassigned from package `apt-get' to `debian-cd'. > End of message

Bug#313150: netinstall for sarge points to testing

Package: apt-get Version: 0.5.28.6 Severity: serious Discovered when doing a fresh install: When installing sarge using the sarge-i386-netinst.iso, the sources.list for apt is set up to point to 'testing' instead of 'stable' or 'sarge'. This means that using the netsetup for sarge, you still g

Bug#312115: SIGSEGVs make libdbi unuseable

Hi Markus, > $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH="." LD_PRELOAD="libefence.so.0" ./dbtest > > Electric Fence 2.1 Copyright (C) 1987-1998 Bruce Perens. > > ElectricFence Aborting: Allocating 0 bytes, probably a bug. > Illegal instruction And what is this dbtest program? Considering that there are no packages

Processed: tagging 311616

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > # well, not RC for post-sarge, and it's up to Joey whether to ignore it for > r1 > tags 311616 = sarge Bug#311616: Sarge installation doesn't work, missing files in the init.d/snort

Bug#303300: marked as done (file permissions modification race (CAN-2005-0953))

Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:53:37 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#303300: and woody? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Processed: severity of 100900 is important, tagging 100900

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 100900 important Bug#100900: php4: unmet depends while building source Severity set to `important'. > # the non-RCness is not sarge-specific > tags 100900 - sarge-ignore Bu

Processed: severity of 237329 is important, tagging 237329

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 237329 important Bug#237329: bad shlibs file entry, needs to tighten deps Severity set to `important'. > # the non-RCness is not sarge-specific > tags 237329 - sarge-ignore