Bug#274234: Your old ITA of statslog

retitle 274233 O: statslog -- An IRC Channel Logger thanks On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 02:53:18AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > You have expressed in bug report #274233 [0] the intent to adopt > the package "statslog". The last comment to this from you is dated from > 01-10-2004, which is more tha

Bug#76918: College Degree in 2 Weeks!

A Genuine College Degree in 2 Weeks! Have you ever thought that the only thing stopping you from a a great job and better pay was a few letters behind your name? Well now you can get them! 1-801-289-4723 BA BSc MA MSc MBA PHD Within 2 weeks! No Study Required! 100% Verifiable These are real,

Processed: fixed in etch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 306990 -etch Bug#306990: lvm2: Strange error when attempting to install Tags were: etch sarge patch Tags removed: etch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Processed: reassign 312556 to partman-md, severity of 312556 is normal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reassign 312556 partman-md Bug#312556: debian-installer partition bugs Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `partman-md'. > severity 312556 normal Bug#312556: debian-ins

Bug#312378: marked as done (portmap: Loses conffile in update from sarge -> sid)

Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:34:19 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line portmap: Loses conffile in update from sarge -> sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#312737: marked as done (geotoad: Fails to parse caches properly)

Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:17:23 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#312737: fixed in geotoad 3.7.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#84368: Bug#278675: [debget] all RC bugs closed with this patch

On Fri, 6 May 2005 17:24:07 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Hello, I know debget is not in testing and is supposed to be removed > soon, anyway, the patch here will fix all of those RC bugs against it. Thanks for the patch, but it seems to me it isn't addressing the main proble

Bug#311357: Debian and astronomy (was: Re: Bug#311357: Upgrade of 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel breaks via-rhine)

Hey Justin, I am trying to get Darwin X windows up and running. Do you have any suggestions or know where I can get some help in putting it together! Thank you. Harold On Jun 9, 2005, at 5:00 PM, Justin Pryzby wrote: Are you an astronomy user of Debian? Justin -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#312720: rpc.mountd ignoring tcpd restrictions

This one was wide of the mark, now that I discovered something. Apparently I have a custom firewall rule to block the nfsd ports. But none for statd or mountd? Is it possible that they restricted their listening in some way in woody, by /etc/exports possibly? Seems unlikely, and yet why would I h

Bug#311357: Debian and astronomy (was: Re: Bug#311357: Upgrade of 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel breaks via-rhine)

Are you an astronomy user of Debian? Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 312737

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 312737 patch Bug#312737: geotoad: Fails to parse caches properly There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#312737: geotoad: Fails to parse caches properly

Package: geotoad Version: 3.7.5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I'm not sure if it's the recent changes/upgrades to geocaching.com or just the caches that I have been looking at recently, but geotoad can no longer parse the cache information properly. Here is a diff for

Bug#312584: marked as done (librsvg2-bin: current version of package depends on packages outside unstable)

Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2005 18:04:15 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#312584: fixed in libgnomeprintui 2.10.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#312720: nfs-kernel-server: rpc.mountd ignoring tcpd restrictions

Package: nfs-kernel-server Version: 1:1.0.6-3.1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.30 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages nfs-kernel-server d

Bug#310226: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#310226: octave2.9: FTBFS: linking a shared lib to a static lib fails.

On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 07:52:02PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: > > As README.Debian explains, glpk is not reentrant, so there cannot be a > shared library. So one could either try to fix that (which is probably > difficult), or build a nonshared PIC library. Is that also possible > with libtool?

Processed: tagging 251178

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 251178 sid Bug#251178: FTBFS - Please rebuild gfontview with libt1-dev instead t1lib-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please con

Processed: tagging 251182

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 251182 sid Bug#251182: FTBFS - Please rebuild ttf2pt1 with libt1-dev instead t1lib-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please conta

Processed: tagging 251181

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 251181 sid Bug#251181: FTBFS - Please rebuild tex-guy with libt1-dev instead t1lib-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please conta

Processed: tagging 251184

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 251184 sid Bug#251184: FTBFS - Please rebuild vflib3 with libt1-dev instead t1lib-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contac

Processed: tagging 251183

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 251183 sid Bug#251183: FTBFS - Please rebuild ultrapoint with libt1-dev instead t1lib-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please co

Bug#309739: Processed: Unfixed in Woody

reassign 309739 tiff thanks Steve Langasek wrote: > > > reopen 309739 > > Bug#309739: libtiff4: vulnerable to CAN-2005-1544 > > Bug reopened, originator not changed. > > > > tags 309739 woody > > Bug#309739: libtiff4: vulnerable to CAN-2005-1544 > > Tags were: security > > Tags added: woody > >

Bug#310226: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#310226: octave2.9: FTBFS: linking a shared lib to a static lib fails.

Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-22 16:23]: > >> Your package is failing to build on a few arches (atleast hppa >> and amd64) because when you're creating the shared lib you're >> linking to a static version. > > This is actually an upstre

Processed: Re: Processed: Unfixed in Woody

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 309739 tiff Bug#309739: libtiff4: vulnerable to CAN-2005-1544 Bug reassigned from package `libtiff4' to `tiff'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administra

Bug#284835: electricsheep: Version in woody is so old it doesn't work at all

Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > woody cannot be updated anymore now sarge is released. I guess there are > no options left other than to close this bug.. Seems that way. Either that, or just leave it tagged woody, to document the problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject o

Bug#309739: Processed: Unfixed in Woody

On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 07:03:18AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > reopen 309739 > Bug#309739: libtiff4: vulnerable to CAN-2005-1544 > Bug reopened, originator not changed. > > tags 309739 woody > Bug#309739: libtiff4: vulnerable to CAN-20

Processed: tagging 312670

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 312670 sid Bug#312670: mtr: debian/copyright doesn't list where the upstream sources were obtained There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing

Bug#312578: Dummy package should be removed?

* Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-09 00:53]: > As this is a dummy transitional package for Sarge, and upgrades skipping > a stable release are not supported, I think this package should be > removed from unstable and that way from etch, in order to reduce package > bloat. In the

Bug#311188: debian-edu-config: Messes "programmatically" with conffiles of other packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09-06-2005 16:50, Geert Stappers wrote: > I like the "huge installation manual idea". > > It allows to fully comply Debian policy. > > > The next step will be automating the installation. Debian currently do not allow automation, because no pac

Bug#311188: debian-edu-config: Messes "programmatically" with conffiles of other packages

On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 01:33:13PM +0200, Morten Werner Olsen wrote much more then: > An extreme solution to this bug could have been to rewrite > debian-edu-config as a HUGE installation-manual, and tell the > sysadmins (I expect that there wouldn't be many left) to manually do > all the configur

Bug#312665: marked as done (Only /usr/share/doc/ssh directory in the package)

Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:08:37 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#312665: Only /usr/share/doc/ssh directory in the package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#312684: wesnoth crash at startup with no useful message

Package: wesnoth Version: 0.9.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Wesnoth crash at startup. the error come from un uncaght exception from libzipios++. the exception in throw because libzipios think that the ziped data file for wesnoth are corrupted, but they are good (I cop

Bug#268783: marked as done (Security Flaw in Gaim)

Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2005 13:52:55 GMT with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing bugs that only affect woody has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Unfixed in Woody

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 309739 Bug#309739: libtiff4: vulnerable to CAN-2005-1544 Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 309739 woody Bug#309739: libtiff4: vulnerable to CAN-2005-1544 Tags were: security Tags added: woody > thanks Stopping processing here. Pleas

Bug#312670: mtr: debian/copyright doesn't list where the upstream sources were obtained

Package: mtr Version: 0.69-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 Copyright information Hello Robert, your newly created debian/copright violates a "must" directive of the Debian Policy, please see : | In addition, the copyr

Bug#312665: Only /usr/share/doc/ssh directory in the package

Package: ssh Version: 1:4.1p1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I guess this dpkg -L snippet tells everything: kaylee ~/src % dpkg -L ssh /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/ssh /usr/share/doc/ssh/copyright /usr/share/doc/ssh/NEWS.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/ssh/

Bug#312627: marked as done (cacti: Cacti RRD are not in a writable tree)

Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:49:34 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#312627: cacti: Cacti RRD are not in a writable tree has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#312627: cacti: Cacti RRD are not in a writable tree

Package: cacti Version: 0.8.6c-7 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.1.1 The data files used by cacti are stored in /usr/share/cacti/ which is defined to be mounted READ-ONLY. This make cacti unuseable in some servers. Thoses files have to be put in /var tree, conformly with the FHS. /usr/s

Processed: Fixed in NMU of mdadm 1.9.0-4sarge1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 299623 + fixed Bug#299623: mdadm: Fails to upgrade while udev installed Tags were: sarge patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, D

Bug#312618: ocaml-nox: Installation fails when emacsen-common is not configured

Package: ocaml-nox Version: 3.08.3-3 Severity: serious Setting up ocaml-nox (3.08.3-3) ... ERROR: emacsen-common being used before being configured. ERROR: This is likely a bug in the ocaml-nox package, which needs to ERROR: add one of the appropriate dependencies. ERROR: See /usr/share/doc/emacse

Bug#284835: electricsheep: Version in woody is so old it doesn't work at all

Hello Anthony, > I suspect this is because upstream is now on 2.5. The package in woody > now is quite worthless as is; maybe the stable release manager would > accept a woody update? woody cannot be updated anymore now sarge is released. I guess there are no options left other than to close this

Processed: FTBFS due to t1lib-old removal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 251178 FTBFS - Please rebuild gfontview with libt1-dev instead > t1lib-dev Bug#251178: Please rebuild gfontview with libt1-dev instead t1lib-dev Changed Bug title. > severity 251178 serious Bug#251178: FTBFS - Please rebuild gfontview with lib