Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:44:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line go away!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 06:42:33PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:19:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > reopen 310982
> > tags 310982 security
> > thanks
> >
> > samba 3.0.14a-4 didn't make the cut for sarge, so this bug is still present
> > in the release. That being the cas
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:36:41 +1000 (EST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#312390: apache-ssl: apache-ssl uses 100% cpu after bogus
http request
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:02:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309542: fixed in epiphany-extensions 1.6.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2005 19:47:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309195: fixed in epiphany-browser 1.6.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 312406 sid
Bug#312406: gnome-core: Does not install in SID
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 06:56:41PM -0400, Percival Tiglao wrote:
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
This is a temporary situation while we transition to GNOME 2.10.
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTE
Package: gnome-core
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Just finished upgrading Debian SID, can't install gnome-core anymore due
to missing dependencies.
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
req
Package: apache-ssl
Version: 1.3.26.1+1.48-0woody3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
I'm using debian woody, with the apache-ssl server, and several times over
the past two months I've seen the server start using 100% cpu (per process;
sometimes just one apache-ssl p
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2005 17:03:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299308: fixed in vino 2.10.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hello
Ok, here we go. I know why I voted against that change...
RFCs are of course not free just as the GPL is not free. It is a
standard document... Well it probably have to be removed...
Regards,
// Ola
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:20:35PM -0400, Chung-chieh Shan wrote:
> Package: pptp-linux
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 312364 important
Bug#312364: failure on \"o character
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 301618 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301618: Two new stable upstream versions fix serious bugs
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> forwarded 304666 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304666: zorp: FTBFS: Link errors in zorp bin
Looks like the announcement to debian-devel-announce was sent as I was
typing this bug report. Doh.
RF
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: pptp-linux
Version: 1.5.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
/usr/share/doc/pptp-linux includes specification documents like
pptp-draft.txt.gz, rfc1701.txt.gz, rfc1702.txt.gz, and rfc1990.txt.gz.
I thought RFCs were not free?
Thanks,
Ken
-- System Information:
Debia
Package: muttprint
Version: 0.72d-1
Severity: serious
muttprint failed while parsing an e-mail with the word
Veiligheidsco\366rdinatie
The \366 character is an o with an umlaut. Replacing that character
solves the problem (\"o to o).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers u
On Tuesday, 7 June 2005 18:53, Itai Seggev wrote:
> Package: kdm
> Version: 4:3.3.2-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: experimental
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I think the title says it all. :) I've upgraded all my kde packages to
> 3.4 (experimental) and now kdm crashes on startup.
That
Package: kdm
Version: 4:3.3.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Justification: renders package unusable
I think the title says it all. :) I've upgraded all my kde packages to
3.4 (experimental) and now kdm crashes on startup. The trace is included
below.
Using host libthread_db library "/lib
Package: cdimage.debian.org
Severity: critical
Justification: root security hole
After grabing yesterday's i386 sarge businesscard CD (3.1r0) and
installing, during base-config, apt-config thinks the system is
"testing", and tries to insert use the following sources line:
# deb http://security.d
On 2005-06-07 17:48+0900 Horms wrote:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 01:11:54PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
severity 311357 grave
thanks
* Alan W. Irwin wrote:
This is a confirmation of the bad problem with the via-rhine module
for the latest version of the 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel.
So
Package: ntp-server
Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-8
Severity: serious
ObJustification: installation of ntp-server into a clean/buildd chroot
kills ntpd in base
25 # There's also the problem of spurious ntpd server
processes,
26 # caused by the
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:19:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> reopen 310982
> tags 310982 security
> thanks
>
> samba 3.0.14a-4 didn't make the cut for sarge, so this bug is still present
> in the release. That being the case, it would be far better to fix this bug
> in the kernel instead of
Thank you for your bug report. I apologize for taking so long to
respond to it and for the delay in fixing it. Expect an upload shortly.
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 17:24 +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: filler
> Version: 1.02-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> When building 'filler' in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 308439 serious
Bug#308439: telnetd: usermod doesn't work with LDAP
Severity set to `serious'.
> retitle 308439 telnetd: can't remove the package
Bug#308439: telnetd: usermod doesn't work with LDAP
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processi
tags 308897 + pending
thanks
* Paul Brossier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> please correct me if this is over inflated severity. justification:
> introduces a security hole on systems where you install the packages
>
> in its default configuration, backup-manager stores a .tar.gz of /etc in
> /va
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:33:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kmd: Integer overflow in ELF header parsing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 308897 + pending
Bug#308897: backup-manager: insecure default configuration
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Your message dated Tue, 7 Jun 2005 12:52:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310929: smart: ftbfs [sparc] attempts to install into
build system /usr/share
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 01:11:54PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> severity 311357 grave
> thanks
>
> * Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> > This is a confirmation of the bad problem with the via-rhine module
> > for the latest version of the 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel.
>
> Sounds like a RC bug, so I
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2005 00:39:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line confirm a4b718c88aeb3ff018eac6eaaf4d5679cd91aec8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2005 03:02:12 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285046: fixed in wmkbd 0.4.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:54:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug in bug system?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
32 matches
Mail list logo
