Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a serious Linux kernel 2.6 bug that causes MaraDNS to hang

2005-06-06 Thread Kai Hendry
Package: maradns Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The 1.0.28 packages are here: http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/hendry/debian/maradns/ -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-

Bug#311623: marked as done (FTBFS: missing versioned dependency on libapache2-mod-perl2)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 20:17:19 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#311623: fixed in libapreq2-perl 2.05-dev-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#312140: xwatch bug reproduced

2005-06-06 Thread Ben Hay
Can you confirm that the DISPLAY varialbe is set appropriately? Thanks for the backtrace. Could you do the same with a local build (preferably with debugging enabled (gcc -g). You can just: cd /tmp/; apt-get -b source xwatch; cd xwatch-2.11; gdb ./xwatch

Processed: retitle 308897 to backup-manager: insecure default configuration

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > retitle 308897 backup-manager: insecure default configuration Bug#308897: backup-manager: secure repository Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please con

Bug#305072: marked as done (CAN-2005-0706: Bufferoverflow in CDDB response parsing)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 20:02:13 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#305072: fixed in gnome-vfs2 2.10.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#312140: xwatch bug reproduced

2005-06-06 Thread Justin Pryzby
tag 312140 moreinfo thanks I can reproduce a SEGV, though I don't know if its the same one: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xwatch /var/log/mail.info xwatch: Can't open display Segmentation fault The backtrace has at most a few sane stack frames: #0 0x400cbc6a in XAllocColor () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.

Bug#311000: marked as done (tries to overwrite files in libfam0 when upgrading from woody)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:03:02 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#311000: fixed in gamin 0.1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#312274: linuxsampler: ftbfs [sparc] Required libgig version not found

2005-06-06 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: linuxsampler Version: 0.3.cvs20050604-1_powerpc Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source linuxsampler fails to build on all buildds, duplicated on a sparc pbuilder. checking for GIG_CFLAGS... checking for GIG_LIBS... Required libgig version not found! You

Processed: tagging 312267

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 312267 - sid Bug#312267: t1lib-old: This package should not be released in next stable (etch) Tags were: sid etch Tags removed: sid > End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#312024: 3.2-2 still has this problem

2005-06-06 Thread Blars Blarson
still ftbfs on all buildd and my pbuilder. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#312140: xwatch bug reproduced

2005-06-06 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 08:25:11AM +1000, Ben Hay wrote: > >Are you running xwatch from outside of > >X (this would explain the crash, and make the bug not RC. Then, the > >bug is simply "xwatch doesn't check the return value of some > >preliminary X function")? > > I am running xwatch from a Kon

Bug#312267: t1lib-old: This package should not be released in next stable (etch)

2005-06-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:44:18PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > The t1lib 1.3.x is na old and upstream unsupported version of library. > This package will be - sooner or later - scheduled for remove from > Debian. Is there a reason why this shouldn't be scheduled sooner, rather than later?

Bug#312140: xwatch bug reproduced

2005-06-06 Thread Ben Hay
Are you running xwatch from outside of X (this would explain the crash, and make the bug not RC. Then, the bug is simply "xwatch doesn't check the return value of some preliminary X function")? Justin I am running xwatch from a Konsole session within X. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [

Processed: Keep out of etch

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 312267 + sid Bug#312267: t1lib-old: This package should not be released in next stable (etch) Tags were: etch sid Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrat

Bug#312140: Bug #312140 - xwatch: segmentation fault

2005-06-06 Thread Ben Hay
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you send a backtrace ? There is a small howto at : http://wiki.debian.net/?HowToGetABacktrace though if you don't feel like doing it all : $ gdb xwatch gdb) r /var/log/mail.info ... gdb) bt full would already help quite a bit. Also : $ strace -f -o xwatch.trace

Bug#312267: t1lib-old: This package should not be released in next stable (etch)

2005-06-06 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
Package: t1lib-old Severity: serious Tags: sid etch The t1lib 1.3.x is na old and upstream unsupported version of library. This package will be - sooner or later - scheduled for remove from Debian. If you are an admin/user which has locally built any software depending on t1lib 1.3.1 you should r

Processed: closing 229021

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > close 229021 Bug#229021: tor: don't migrate to testing 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Peter Palf

Processed: backup-manager: insecure default configuration

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 308897 critical Bug#308897: backup-manager: secure repository Severity set to `critical'. > tags 308897 security Bug#308897: backup-manager: secure repository There were no tags set. Tags added: security > thanks Stopping processing here. Pl

Bug#305435: marked as done (bazaar: ftbfs [sparc] test-framework: line 28: 13580 Bus error)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:04:40 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bazaar 1.4.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop

Processed: Fixed in NMU of bazaar 1.4.1-1

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 305435 + fixed Bug#305435: bazaar: ftbfs [sparc] test-framework: line 28: 13580 Bus error Tags were: confirmed sid Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrat

Bug#304258: marked as done (yate: ftbfs [sparc] /usr/src/modules/zaptel/zaptel.h: No such file or directory)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 20:22:00 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in SID has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#311958: kdebase: FTBFS: error making docs.

2005-06-06 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 01:21:05PM -0400, Christopher Martin wrote: > On June 5, 2005 15:30, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > This a minimal sid chroot (only essential + build essential installed) > > with the following additional installed: > > apt-get install cdbs debhelper autotools-dev gawk gettext > > k

Bug#311958: kdebase: FTBFS: error making docs.

2005-06-06 Thread Christopher Martin
On June 5, 2005 15:30, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > This a minimal sid chroot (only essential + build essential installed) > with the following additional installed: > apt-get install cdbs debhelper autotools-dev gawk gettext > kdelibs4-dev/experimental dbus-qt-1-dev libldap2-dev libhal-dev > libhal-storag

Bug#289901: marked as done (lifelines: Potential nasty problems in 3.0.39. Fake RC bug to prevent it entering sarge)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 6 Jun 2005 18:36:09 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Close fake bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#304405: marked as done (geneweb: prerm alters random files on the filesystem)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 6 Jun 2005 17:49:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing woody bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#312018: gaim-encryption: archived bug #305719 is still present in sarge

2005-06-06 Thread Leo \"Costela\" Antunes
OK, hadn't notivced that, I'm going to contact debian-release and see if we can get the new version pushed into Sarge. Thanks for the heads up On Sáb, 2005-06-04 at 23:30 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: gaim-encryption > Version: 2.36-3 > Severity: grave > Tags: sarge > > > This is a remin

Bug#312243: roxen4: Roxen4 shutdown kills independent mysql instance

2005-06-06 Thread Peter J. Holzer
Package: roxen4 Version: 4.0.325-1 Severity: critical Tags: patch Justification: breaks unrelated software The roxen startup script /usr/share/roxen4/start incorrectly uses the file /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.pid instead of /var/run/roxen4/mysqld.pid to determine the pid of its mysql instance. Thus w

Processed: This qualifies as "serious"

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 132054 serious Bug#132054: netatalk: Should not conflict with bigloo Bug#145482: netatalk: netatalk conflicts with bigloo Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trac

Processed: dup merging

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 306279 306385 Bug#306279: netatalk 2.0.2-3 conflict with package yudit Bug#306385: netatalk: uniconv conflicts with yuedit. Merged 306279 306385. > severity 306279 serious Bug#306279: netatalk 2.0.2-3 conflict with package yudit Bug#306385: netat

Bug#312025: marked as done (adplug: ftbfs [sparc] No rule to make target `binary-arch')

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 10:02:11 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#312025: fixed in adplug 1.5.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#310982: smbmount does not honor uid and gid options with 2.4 kernel

2005-06-06 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:19:28AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > reopen 310982 > tags 310982 security > thanks > > samba 3.0.14a-4 didn't make the cut for sarge, so this bug is still present > in the release. That being the case, it would be far better to fix this bug > in the kernel instead of

Bug#311835: haskell-cabal: FTBFS: Can't satisfly build dependency on ghc6

2005-06-06 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:30:24PM -0700, Isaac Jones wrote: > I believe that GHC 6.4 should come with Cabal, but I'm not positive > about what Ian decided. Ian: Does it come with Cabal? All the latest versions of the implementations come with cabal (although the nhc98 with cabal isn't yet upload

Bug#303860: marked as done (celestia: ftbfs [sparc] no KDE libraries installed)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 08:48:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#303860: fixed in celestia 1.3.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#312130: Removal

2005-06-06 Thread Filipus Klutiero
OK...thanks for your reply. So there are 2 projects named KMerlin on SF. The good one is http://sourceforge.net/projects/kmerlin/ The homepage of this project points to http://www.olsd.de/portal which is also a 404. If upstream's bug tracker is at SF, there are 2 bugs, the last one is over a yea

Processed: present in etch

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 312021 etch Bug#312021: tinyhoneypot lacks a dependency on adduser Tags were: sarge Tags added: etch > tags 299623 etch Bug#299623: mdadm: Fails to upgrade while udev installed Tags were: sarge patch Tags added: etch > tags 308391 etch Bug#308391

Bug#311634: marked as done (libfuse2: leaking previous memory contents to unprivileged users)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2005 07:32:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#311634: fixed in fuse 2.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#310982: smbmount does not honor uid and gid options with 2.4 kernel

2005-06-06 Thread Steve Langasek
reopen 310982 tags 310982 security thanks samba 3.0.14a-4 didn't make the cut for sarge, so this bug is still present in the release. That being the case, it would be far better to fix this bug in the kernel instead of in smbfs. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Descriptio

Bug#308819: openmotif: affected by vulnerabilities in libxpm

2005-06-06 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 308819 = patch security woody sarge etch thanks Although an NMU was uploaded for this bug, because openmotif is in non-free there were no autobuilds for the package and so it was not updated in time for release. This bug still exists in sarge and etch, and possibly in woody as well. -- Ste

Processed: Re: openmotif: affected by vulnerabilities in libxpm

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 308819 = patch security woody sarge etch Bug#308819: openmotif: affected by vulnerabilities in libxpm Tags were: fixed patch security Tags set to: patch, security, woody, sarge, etch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you nee

Processed: Re: smbmount does not honor uid and gid options with 2.4 kernel

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 310982 Bug#310982: smbmount does not honor uid and gid options with 2.4 kernel Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 310982 security Bug#310982: smbmount does not honor uid and gid options with 2.4 kernel There were no tags set. Tags adde

Bug#172723: marked as done (Segfault When Calling mysql_real_connect() After mysql_options())

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 6 Jun 2005 03:04:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Segfault When Calling mysql_real_connect() After mysql_options() has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#312130: I confirm the bug

2005-06-06 Thread Cesar Martinez Izquierdo
Hi, I've tried the program and i'm also unable to log in. Probably the best thing to do is to delete the package from sarge, as it is totally unuseful and there is lots of alternatives (unless some users report that it's usable for them). Regarding the source code, it can be downloaded from Sou

Bug#311976: marked as done (courier-authlib: FTBFS: Missing build dependency on procps)

2005-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:03:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug applies only to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#312194: k3b hangs at startup

2005-06-06 Thread Nicolas DEGAND
Package: k3b Version: 0.11.20-2 Severity: grave k3b hangs at startup when the Splash Screen says "verifying CD drives" (not sure of what it says in English). Same as root. k3bsetup works only as root (hangs as normal user without message) but does not find any obvious problem. -- System Inform