Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:36:50 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in upload of glibc 2.3.4-2 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 300806 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#300806: (Seemingly) All programs fail to start, with the error message:
relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_starting_up, version
GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link ti
I just saw the same problem upgrading to sarge. I had a look around and
it looks like the script simply wasn't written to be run under set -e.
When a script uses $? liberally to explicitly test success/failure of
commands, you can't just enable -e and expect it to work. You have
to carefully ins
severity 289646 important
thanks mate
Hi. I've uploaded a new kdesdk with the s/check/checkWord/ patch, so
I'm lowering the severity of this bug. I'm leaving it open however,
since kbabel was in fact using the kdelibs API as documented -- in
theory kbabel was doing nothing wrong, so the problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 289646 important
Bug#289646: kbabel: crash with some .po file
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks mate
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
tags 300440 +patch
thanks
Hi Stefan,
I've tracked this bug and with the vorlon and fatalerror help
i reproduced it this way:
- Install dhelp package;
- Install doc-linux-it package;
- Remove or move /usr/share/doc;
- dpkg-reconfigure doc-linux-it. =)
There's patch below that i think can help yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 300440 +patch
Bug#300440: post-installation returns error code 21 if /usr/share/doc/menu/html
does not exist
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug track
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:38:27AM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 08:36:01PM +, Paul Brossier wrote:
> > there is probably a better mean to do so though, ie checking what
> > type of conversion is needed according to libavcodec, but it does
> > effectively fixes the XV Di
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 21:02:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#236046: fixed in flying 6.20-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
severity 300775 wishlist
tags 300775 -security
thanks
Hi. I've explicitly decided not to upgrade PAM for sarge. I had also
decided when 0.77 came out that I didn't see a good reason to take it.
Taking a new pam release is a painful process.
That said, I'm looking for people to help with PAM. W
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 300775 wishlist
Bug#300775: Pam: newer upstream version (0.78) available fixing security bugs
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> tags 300775 -security
Bug#300775: Pam: newer upstream version (0.78) available fixing security bugs
Tags were: security
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 298029 + fixed
Bug#298029: lshw: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): explicit qualification in declaration
of `std::string hw::strip(const std::string&)'
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Tags added: fixed
> tag 300788 + fixed
Bug#300788: lshw: FTBFS(amd64/gcc-4.0): M
Package: isdnutils-base
Version: 1:3.3.0.20041110-1
Tags: patch
Severity: grave
Justification: cuts users from access to packages.debian.org
The ISDN device template (/usr/share/isdn/default/device.DEVICE), which is
copied to /etc/isdn/ for every device created via /usr/sbin/isdnconfig
contains th
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 08:36:01PM +, Paul Brossier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:39:16PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > Furthermore, it looks obviously buggy. Eg. the little-endian
> > version of the first loop uses values Y[0] and Y[1], while the
> > big-endian variant reuses Y[0] twic
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 06:58:30PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: xfsprogs
> Version: 2.6.26-1
> Severity: grave
> This package seems to be not built on unstable, libhandle requests
> executable stack, while a unstable build does not do that.
I've uploaded recompile-only binNMUs for each
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 18:47:09 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296433: fixed in kdesdk 4:3.3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Actualy the SS5 (at least the one I have got here) does have the problem
for libc6 version I need a kernel above 2.4.21, and for that kernel I
need that libc6 version.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Langasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ;
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Marc
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:07:34 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301252: xfsprogs - not compiled on unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:07:34 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301252: xfsprogs - not compiled on unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:07:34 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301252: xfsprogs - not compiled on unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:59:54 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 0.3.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:57:35PM +0100, Robin Harmsen wrote:
> at this moment I am testing the Debian Installer on a SS5 (sun4m I thougt)
> cause I wanted a newer kernel then 2.2.20. but it isn't working very well
> I am willing to test this upgrade-kernel to get a beter kernel and be able
> t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 301257 sid
Bug#301257: gauche_0.8.3-1(mipsel/unstable): configure built with broken
libtool.m4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing her
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 301254 sid
Bug#301254: dosfsck: new version shows lots of errors
Tags were: sid
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:00:46PM +0100, Alessandro Pagnin wrote:
> Ok, I've uninstalled makedev and reinstalled with udev. The installation
> proceeds bat with this error:
>
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/makedev.postinst: line 27: /sbin/MAKEDEV: no such file or
> directory
That shouldn't be possible..
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:44:10PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The attached patch updates sched_[gs]etaffinity to the new interface
> from glibc 2.3.4.
Investigation in the lintian lab on gluck.d.o shows that there are at least
two packages, valgrind and schedutils, which would need to be update
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 301039 patch
Bug#301039: lsh-server: wrong path of lsh-execuv
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 01:54:38PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > As many of you may know on some machines users will need to install
> > a current kernel before they will be able to upgrade woody to sarge
> > (or better: glibc
Hi,
I just fixed the problem, the patch is attached.
Tags: patch
thanks.
fix_lsh-execuv.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
bye
Stefan
--
http://www.dreamind.de/
Oroborus and Debian GNU/Linux Developer.
Ok, I've uninstalled makedev and reinstalled with udev. The installation
proceeds bat with this error:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/makedev.postinst: line 27: /sbin/MAKEDEV: no such file or
directory
also for lines 28 and 45.
Then, reinstalling kde, I obtain this error for the libraw1394-5:
Configuro l
This is indeed a dupe of http://bugs.debian.org/281628
which is upstream
http://bugs.kde.org/73999
The bug owner thought he fixed the bug, but later announced it wasn't fixed
before KMail 1.8, which only shipped in KDE 3.4.0.
This bug is no reason to keep 3.3.2 from Sarge, but it won't fix with it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> retitle 255339 kernel-patch-debianlogo: Would like an updated version for
> 2.4.26 and 2.6.6
Bug#255339: debianlogo: Would like an updated version for 2.4.26 and 2.6.6
Changed Bug ti
Package: libant1.6-java
Severity: serious
When trying to build 'libant1.6-java' in a clean chroot,
I get the following error:
... Bootstrapping Ant Distribution
... Compiling Ant Classes
Found 1 system error and issued 1 warning:
*** Semantic Warning: I/O warning: "No such file or directory" wh
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 19:33 +0100, Marek Habersack wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:58:10AM -0300, Gustavo Franco scribbled:
> > Hi Marek,
> Hello Gustavo,
>
> [damned, forgot to upload a new version...]
>
> > The free fonts site that you said is corefonts.sf.net.These fonts
> > aren't free a
Package: gauche
Version: 0.8.3-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of gauche_0.8.3-1 on solitude by sbuild/mipsel 17
> Build started at 20050320-1947
[...]
The version of libtool used to build this source package is too old to
correct
(I am not sure if I am right in mentioning additional bugs
in this bug report. Please correct me if this is not the
convention and I will file a separate one.)
Below I have listed new bugs I found and the solutions to
fix them (except of one).
Just FYI, I have these packages now installed:
> dpkg
* Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-24 09:28]:
> It is still there, although I wrote a mail to ftp-master months ago
> asking for removal. I do not intend to maintain this package any
> more, and I believe there are better packages for the same task.
You have to file a bug report on ftp.de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 301254 sid
Bug#301254: dosfsck: new version shows lots of errors
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:58:10AM -0300, Gustavo Franco scribbled:
> Hi Marek,
Hello Gustavo,
[damned, forgot to upload a new version...]
> The free fonts site that you said is corefonts.sf.net.These fonts
> aren't free as in DFSG and there's a package at contrib section
> called 'msttcorefont
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 14:05 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Martin Michlmayr [2005-03-24 12:10 +]:
> > * Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-24 12:39]:
> > > Since termpkg is not in Debian any more, can you please close this
> > > bug?
> >
> > It seems it's still there? Or is this a
Le jeudi 24 mars 2005 Ã 14:27 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh a
Ãcrit :
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what to do now. Is it possible to link our wxgtk2.4 against
> > > glib2.0? Or unlink libsdl from using libglib?
> >
> > I'm afraid there is no miracle soluti
severity 297639 grave
thanks
Hi,
this bug can be resolved adding
LOG_FORMAT=bind92
to /etc/default/bindgraph. This will fix parsing with testing version of
bind9 (still at 9.2), since now bindgraph defaults to --format=bind93
which is not in testing. (BTW, this bug will never show in unstable,
Package: dosfstools
Version: 2.11-1
Severity: grave
Hello,
the new 2.11-1 dosfsck shows lots of errors on my filesystems (FAT32,
LFN / VFAT), while the filesystem looks quite okay and neither Windows
scandisk nor 2.10-1 dosfsck show any errors.
The errors reported are (perhaps among others):
* S
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 297639 grave
Bug#297639: bindgraph unable to parse dns log file
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
Package: acl
Version: 2.2.29-1
Severity: grave
This package was not built on unstable for i386:
| $ strings /usr/lib/libattr.a | grep GCC | sort -u
| GCC: (GNU) 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)
This misscompilation leads to executable stack.
Bastian
--
Our missions are peaceful -- not for
Package: attr
Version: 2.4.21-1
Severity: grave
This package was not built on unstable for i386:
| $ strings /usr/lib/libattr.a | grep GCC | sort -u
| GCC: (GNU) 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)
This misscompilation leads to executable stack.
Bastian
--
Our missions are peaceful -- not for
Package: xfsprogs
Version: 2.6.26-1
Severity: grave
This package seems to be not built on unstable, libhandle requests
executable stack, while a unstable build does not do that.
Bastian
--
Our missions are peaceful -- not for conquest. When we do battle, it
is only because we have no choice.
Hello
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 02:41:29PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Some further notes about util-vserver's failure to build from source:
>
> * dietlibc-dev on hppa fails to define O_FOLLOW and O_LARGEFILE. Adding
> these to CFLAGS allows util-vserver to build until it fails to link,
> becaus
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > I'm not sure what to do now. Is it possible to link our wxgtk2.4 against
> > glib2.0? Or unlink libsdl from using libglib?
>
> I'm afraid there is no miracle solution. Getting wxgtk2.5 to install
Miracle? no. Technical, sound, and sane? Yes: Versi
I installed a minimal basic "stable" installation of Debian (no packages
selected with tasksel or dselect)
when doing the upgade as stated on
http://higgs.djpig.de/upgrade/upgrade-kernel/ via the dpkg method.
I first needed to install zlib1g, ash and stat.
maby it is better to mention that those
A small followup with additional comments.
Justin Pryzby wrote:
[]
It seems that your request can be easily satisfied by using the
reentrant versions of these functions, like getpwnam_r. I'm including
a test file I've been playing with, which indicates that a patch, if
necessary, would be unintrus
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:11:32PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
[...]
> Sarge and sid have the same SDL version. You are basically comparing
> libsdl1.2debian-all and libsdl1.2debian-oss.
Yes you're right. I didn't notice that I'm using -all on my box.
> > Any reason for such huge disproport
I installed a minimal basic "stable" installation of Debian (no packages
selected with tasksel or dselect)
when doing the upgade as stated on
http://higgs.djpig.de/upgrade/upgrade-kernel/ via the dpkg method.
I first needed to install zlib1g, ash and stat.
maby it is better to mention that those
Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:55:06PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Package: libpam-ssh
Version: 1.91.0-5
Severity: critical
A long time ago (circa 1998 or so) I looked at pam-ssh project and
noticied several problems with it. And since it's now in Debian,
the same problems appli
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 15:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 10:34:08PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> > building the package mdbtools in a clean build environment
> > (with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
>
> It would generally be helpful if you would include in these bug
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0-2.37.200411220627
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Three security vulnerabilities have been found in Firefox:
I'm write a collective bugreport for all three vulnerabilities, as you'll
they're
all fixed in 1.0.2:
CAN-2005-0399:
An GIF processing error when pars
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package mdadm
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mdadm
> tags 294404 help
Bug#294404: udev does not create /dev/md* devices at boot-up
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:55:06PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Package: libpam-ssh
> Version: 1.91.0-5
> Severity: critical
>
> A long time ago (circa 1998 or so) I looked at pam-ssh project and
> noticied several problems with it. And since it's now in Debian,
> the same problems applies to
On Thursday 24 March 2005 15:41, Mark Purcell wrote:
[...]
> I intend to upload libkexif1 and rebuilt kipi-plugins and digkameplugins
> to unstable. They will all sit in unstable until showimg is uploaded to
> unstable at which time they can all migrate to testing together.
>
> I don't want to wai
tags 297769 patch
thanks
The attached patch updates sched_[gs]etaffinity to the new interface
from glibc 2.3.4.
Bastian
--
Phasers locked on target, Captain.
diff -ruN glibc-2.3.2.ds1/debian/changelog glibc-2.3.2.ds1.new/debian/changelog
--- glibc-2.3.2.ds1/debian/changelog2005-03-24 15:16:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 297769 patch
Bug#297769: glibc: sched_setaffinity() provides obsolete interface
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Hi Marek,
The free fonts site that you said is corefonts.sf.net.These fonts
aren't free as in DFSG and there's a package at contrib section
called 'msttcorefonts', AFAIK the postinst retrieves the fonts
from the website.
Can't you confirm if caudium works without these and that
other font ?
Hi Matthew,
On Thursday, 24 Mar 2005, you wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > As many of you may know on some machines users will need to install
> > a current kernel before they will be able to upgrade woody to sarge
> > (or better: glibc of woody to gl
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 02:14:24AM +0100, Achim Bohnet wrote:
> > > Both libkexif1 & libkexif0 can co-exist in unstable together and
> > > libkexif0 won't be removed until all reverse dependancies are taken care
> > > of.
> >
> > That's not true; libkexif0 and libkexif1 are both built from the lib
Hi Christophe,
Is this bug really rendering the package unusable? If not,
please downgrade its severity. It'll help us track the RC
bugs better. btw, are the examples really needed to make this
package work?
If it's really a grave bug, i note that in your last reply
to this you said that you'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 300703 +patch
Bug#300703: autofs: Upgrade fails
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
tag 296905 +pending
thanks
This fix is now in SVN and should appear in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 296905 +pending
Bug#296905: CAN-2005-0531: Buffer overflow in atm_get_addr
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
On Thursday 24 March 2005 14:37, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
[analysis skipped]
> I'm not sure what to do now. Is it possible to link our wxgtk2.4 against
> glib2.0? Or unlink libsdl from using libglib?
I found the cause:
libSDL.so from libsdl1.2debian-all links against glib2.0 (and much othe
Le jeudi 24 mars 2005 à 14:37 +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo a écrit :
> [ sid / unstable ]
>
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])~$ldd /usr/lib/libSDL.so
> libartsc.so.0 => /usr/lib/libartsc.so.0 (0x40103000)
> libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0x40109000)
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> As many of you may know on some machines users will need to install
> a current kernel before they will be able to upgrade woody to sarge
> (or better: glibc of woody to glibc of sarge). I've tried to use the
> available informati
Hi,
at this moment I am testing the Debian Installer on a SS5 (sun4m I thougt)
cause I wanted a newer kernel then 2.2.20. but it isn't working very well
I am willing to test this upgrade-kernel to get a beter kernel and be able
to do a woody->sarge upgrade
I think I will start with it right afther
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:42:48AM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> zion:~# apt-cache showpkg libsdl-mixer1.2 libsdl-net1.2 libsdl1.2debian-all |
> grep '^ ' | sort -u | cut -d ',' -f 1 > /tmp/sdldeps
> zion:~# apt-cache showpkg libwxgtk2.4 | grep '^ ' | sort -u | cut -d ',' -f
> 1
> > /tmp/wxdep
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> As many of you may know on some machines users will need to install
> a current kernel before they will be able to upgrade woody to sarge
> (or better: glibc of woody to glibc of sarge). I've tried to use the
> available information to provide the needed file
Hi all.
As many of you may know on some machines users will need to install
a current kernel before they will be able to upgrade woody to sarge
(or better: glibc of woody to glibc of sarge). I've tried to use the
available information to provide the needed files for these kernel
upgrades.
To my kn
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:17:23 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301168: fixed in wvstreams 4.0.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi!
Martin Michlmayr [2005-03-24 12:10 +]:
> * Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-24 12:39]:
> > Since termpkg is not in Debian any more, can you please close this
> > bug?
>
> It seems it's still there? Or is this another package?
>
> 13048:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] madison termpkg
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 301200 grave
Bug#301200: sylpheed-claws: buffer overflow bug in 0.8.0 -> 1.0.3, 1.9.0 ->
1.9.4
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Package: libpam-ssh
Version: 1.91.0-5
Severity: critical
A long time ago (circa 1998 or so) I looked at pam-ssh project and
noticied several problems with it. And since it's now in Debian,
the same problems applies to Debian too.
Here's one.
in pam_sm_authenticate() routine, pam_ssh saves struc
Package: sylpheed-claws
Severity: critical
Justification: security hole, buffer overflow
Tags: security, sarge, sid, experimental
According upstream:
A buffer overflow which occurred when displaying a message with
attachments which have MIME-encoded filenames was fixed.
This is fixed in 1.0.4 (
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: wvstreams
> Source: wvstreams
> Version: 4.0.2-1
> Severity: serious
>
>* Acknowledge NMUs. (Closes: #292618, #297694, #297554, #286593, #289237)
>* We now depend on XPLC 0.3.11.
>
> Lovely. After four consecutive NMUs to try to get
severity 301195 normal
thanks
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:54:36PM +0100, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Package: mc
> Version: 1:4.6.0-4.6.1-pre3-1
> Severity: serious
> File: /usr/bin/mcedit-debian
> Justification: unknown;/etc should not be overwritten
> thank you for your work on the mc package.
> Tod
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 301195 normal
Bug#301195: /usr/bin/mcedit-debian: mcedit-debian becomes default editor
without confirmation
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
* Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-24 12:39]:
> Since termpkg is not in Debian any more, can you please close this
> bug?
It seems it's still there? Or is this another package?
13048:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] madison termpkg
termpkg | 3.3-1 | unstable | source
13049:[EMAIL PROTE
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.4-1
Followup-For: Bug #300842
I had the same problem. A workaround, if you still have an open
terminal somewhere, is (bash syntax) :
export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1
Then you should be able to finish installing libc6 and libc6-686 and the
bug will disappear.
Regards,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 301193 grave
Bug#301193: sylpheed: buffer overflow bug in 0.8.0 -> 1.0.3, 1.9.0 -> 1.9.4
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Raoul,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:00:23AM +0100, raoul bhatia wrote:
> Package: libapache-mod-php4
> Version: 4:4.3.10-9
> Severity: critical
> apache crashes with the log different entries in
> /var/log/apache/error.log:
> ssl enabled:
> [Sun Mar 13 10:15:52 2005] [notice] child pid 23162 exit
Package: mc
Version: 1:4.6.0-4.6.1-pre3-1
Severity: serious
File: /usr/bin/mcedit-debian
Justification: unknown;/etc should not be overwritten
Stefano,
thank you for your work on the mc package.
Today I found out that somehow the latest upgrade of the mc package
must have overwritten the alterna
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:32:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [powerpc] no console after initial install, maybe udev related.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Package: sylpheed
Severity: critical
Justification: security hole, buffer overflow
Tags: security, sarge, sid, experimental
According upstream:
A buffer overflow which occurred when displaying a message with
attachments which have MIME-encoded filenames was fixed.
This is fixed in 1.0.4, to be u
Hi!
Since termpkg is not in Debian any more, can you please close this
bug?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: avalon-framework
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
The attached patch adds the necessary Build-Depends on junit.
It also adds /usr/share/java/junit.jar to the CLASSPATH
in debian/rules. Without these changes the package FTBFS.
The patch also updates the Build-Depends from j2sdk1.3 to j2sdk1
Hi!
zion:~# apt-cache showpkg libsdl-mixer1.2 libsdl-net1.2 libsdl1.2debian-all |
grep '^ ' | sort -u | cut -d ',' -f 1 > /tmp/sdldeps
zion:~# apt-cache showpkg libwxgtk2.4 | grep '^ ' | sort -u | cut -d ',' -f 1
> /tmp/wxdeps
zion:~# diff -u /tmp/sdldeps /tmp/wxdeps | grep '^ '
scorched
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # requested by vorlon
> tags 277619 + sarge-ignore
Bug#277619: [fixed for 2.0] openoffice.org: deletes files when /tmp is full
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Tags added: sarge-ignore
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 09:10:57AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:39:04AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:56:42AM +0100, Bas Kloet wrote:
> > > Package: liblablgtk2-ocaml
> > > Version: 2.4.0+2004.11.19-3
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Justification: r
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 09:10:57AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Well, it still is a bug in unstable, even if we (the ocaml maintainers)
> know that it is only transitory. I have already tagged the bug report as
> "pending" and the RM has tagged it as "sid" , but I don't think it should
> be closed
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:39:04AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:56:42AM +0100, Bas Kloet wrote:
> > Package: liblablgtk2-ocaml
> > Version: 2.4.0+2004.11.19-3
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> >
> > This package depends on ocaml-base-3
97 matches
Mail list logo
