I tried to reproduce the bug with upgrading a2ps, but failed. What I
did: Before each test, on a sarge machine, with only the base system
installed, I installed the old versions of a2ps (1:4.13b-4) and
emacsen-common (1.4.15). Also depdendencies of these, from current
sarge.
The tests:
* dist-upg
Hello
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:27:52AM +0100, Willi Mann wrote:
> Package: cron-apt
> Version: 0.2.1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
>
> The manpage of cron-apt is licensed under the the GNU Free Documentation
> License. This license fails the DFSG even if you claim
Ohh. Did
Thank you for your attention.
You have been pre-approved for a new home loan.
This offer is unconditional and your credit is in no way a factor.
You will find all details below:
___SUMMARY___
Interest: 3.45
Term: 360 months
Max Price: $350,000
Closing Date: 30 days
Please follow this
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:02:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295904: fixed in gaim 1:1.1.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09-02-2005 23:55, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Have you investigated these bugs at all?
No, I haven't.
The code is dead upstream for several years and I begin to loose
interest in keeping it artificially alive...
Haven't decided yet. Currently I am
> *** dbinc/mutex.h
> --- dbinc/mutex.h
> ***
What? This patch is already applied; do you want it reversed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 295904
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1145742&group_id=235&atid=100235
Bug#295904: gaim: 1.1.3-1: dies with SIGABRT on startup
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=det
this is being looked into upstream. details will go to
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1145742&group_id=235&atid=100235
the problem appears to be in the glib 2.6 g_stat or g_unlink function.
luke
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:17:41 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296189: fixed in seahorse 0.7.6-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:47:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#277701: fixed in pwlib 1.8.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
I'm get the same aforementioned segfault in gaim 1.1.3 on Debian Sid for ppc
using Windowmaker (wmaker 0.91.0-7) from the standard Debian mirrors.
--
___
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
Development packages should contain a shared library (.a), header
files, and a linker symlink (libfoo.so => libfoo.so.0).
Justin
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 11:30:33PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:53:32 +0100,
> Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Package: libantl
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:47:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278847: fixed in pwlib 1.8.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On 2005/02/21 23:30, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excuse my stupid question but which files should be there?
What about the header files and the libantlr.a which were present in
previous versions of libantlr-dev? ;)
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=f
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:53:32 +0100,
Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libantlr-dev
> Version: 2.7.5-1
>
> file list from the package:
>
> drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-02-02 19:30:13 ./
> drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-02-02 19:30:10 ./usr/
> drwxr-xr-x root/root
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:10:27 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing #262814: rebuild with libtiff4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
reopen 296087
severity 296087 minor
thanks
So if the Microsoft EULA doesn't apply to anything included in the
package, why is it included with the other licenses without any
indication that the corresponding components are not present in this
version?
Peace,
Dylan
signature.asc
Descript
Not working correctly on apache2, both with prefork and worker MPMs.
It appears that files are not being cached, at least according to
mmcache.php. In fact, seems like there's some sort of infinite
looping or other type of memory/cpu hogging activity when cache is
enabled. I'll fall back on apac
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:47:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296280: fixed in webcalendar 0.9.45-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 296087
Bug#296087: IMPORTANT: Microsoft EULA is NON-FREE and give MS specific rights!!
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity 296087 minor
Bug#296087: IMPORTANT: Microsoft EULA is NON-FREE and give MS specific rights!!
Severity set to
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:44:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296346: FTBFS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 296346 xfree86-common
Bug#296346: FTBFS
Bug reassigned from package `bidwatcher' to `xfree86-common'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Package: bidwatcher
Version: 1.3.17-1
Severity: serious
The new version FTBFS everywhere.
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -g -O2 -Wall -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2
-I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -c bidwatcher.cpp
In file included from bidwatcher.cpp:57:
/usr/include/gtk-1.2/gdk/gd
Hi,
I use Xfce 4.2 here (os-works.de debs) on an up-to-date Sid ppc machine
and I get the same segfault in gaim as described in this bugreport.
ciao,
Michele
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Heya,
I'm having the same problems, I build the package with -ggdb and was
able to extract the following information from different runs:
--- 8< --- gdb --
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1211270224 (LWP 19122)]
0x08061c53 in CBasicFaxConversion::RecvSFF
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 02:34:24PM +0100, Roel Teuwen wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-32
> Version: 2.6.8-6
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After filing bugreport #294167 (apt-listbugs: segmentation fault on
> hppa), it was closed by the developer, stating th
is any one hitting this crash *not* using gnome?
luke
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 296272 normal
Bug#296272: debconf does not change root variable on gnump3d.conf
Severity set to `normal'.
> tags 296272 pending
Bug#296272: debconf does not change root variable on gnump3d.conf
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> st
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#159478: fixed in fcheck 2.7.59-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
* Justin Pryzby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050221 16:40]:
> I can't reproduce this. mount.c:856 blocks all signals, then tries to
> mount the fs, then updates mtab, then unblocks signals. I tested and
> this appears to ensure atomicity of the mount,mtab block WRT signals.
This won't help if you e.g. m
Hello Steve,
a week ago I outlined a procedure I suggest for dealing with RC bug
188448 reported by me. In brief:
a) Remove abuse-* from testing
b) Wait for an upload to the 32bit archs only
c) Downgrade 188448 to important (maybe only wishlist),
hence abuse-* can re-enter testing
Since the ch
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't reproduce this. mount.c:856 blocks all signals, then tries to
> mount the fs, then updates mtab, then unblocks signals. I tested and
> this appears to ensure atomicity of the mount,mtab block WRT signals.
Jason, I just did it again:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 04:19:06PM +0100, Heiner wrote:
> Package: sarg
> Version: 2.0.3-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> sarg promts "Speicherzugriffsfehler" (Segmantation Fault), tried deb
> package over apt-get and compiled fom source, same outcome
Could you sen
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 09:14:42AM -0500, pryzbyj wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 03:59:20PM -0800, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> > Package: mount
> > Version: 2.12p-2
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: user security hole
> >
> >
> > If a non-root user mounts media (in my case, a CD-ROM), and att
Regis Boudin wrote:
Hi,
I am not a PostgreSQL specialist, but to become a DD I have been asked
to send patches to fix some RC bugs, so...
Anyway, I am currently working on these issues, and I have managed to
get this package installed correctly, and the database created. It would
need a few more te
Package: sarg
Version: 2.0.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
sarg promts "Speicherzugriffsfehler" (Segmantation Fault), tried deb package
over apt-get and compiled fom source, same outcome
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (5
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 296234 sarge-ignore
Bug#296234: cron-apt: manpage under GFDL -> non-free
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge-ignore
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Package: php4-snmp
Version: 4:4.3.10-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Latest version of php4-snmp causes apache to segfault on startup (undetected by
apachectl which exit cleanly). Commenting out extension=snmp.so in
/etc/php4/apache/php.ini is a workaround, but ph
* Lionel Elie Mamane [2005-02-21]:
> It is a serious bug to fail if /bin/sh is a non-bash, but POSIX
> compliant shell. Either we hit an ash bug, or it is a serious bug of
> greylistd. Laurent, please check whether it still occurs with the
> latest version of dash; if it does, please confirm here (
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 295884 grave
Bug#295884: cdbs: Changes control file to add new build dependency.
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Package: webcalendar
Version: 0.9.45-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Justification: user security hole
Upstream reports a security hole:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1121329&group_id=3870&atid=303870
| There is a security hole in WebCalendar 0.9.45 and
| earlier
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 03:59:20PM -0800, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Package: mount
> Version: 2.12p-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: user security hole
>
>
> If a non-root user mounts media (in my case, a CD-ROM), and attempts
> to kill the process (in my case, a mad combination of ^C and ^\),
reopen 296266
severity 296266 serious
thanks
Justification: Policy 10.4
It is a serious bug to fail if /bin/sh is a non-bash, but POSIX
compliant shell. Either we hit an ash bug, or it is a serious bug of
greylistd. Laurent, please check whether it still occurs with the
latest version of dash; if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 296266
Bug#296266: greylistd: fails to install
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity 296266 serious
Bug#296266: greylistd: fails to install
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-32
Version: 2.6.8-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After filing bugreport #294167 (apt-listbugs: segmentation fault on
hppa), it was closed by the developer, stating the cause is the kernel
because of kernel messages in dmesg.
It was my unde
Package: gnump3d
Version: 2.9.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have installed gnump3d and configure with debconf but the programs
does not start.
I have found a bug in the scripts that configure gnump3d.conf.
dpkg-reconfigure -plow gnump3d work well but does not chang
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:04:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Discard bug.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 296243 grave
Bug#296243: autofs: init script fails if entry in nsswitch.conf contains tabs
Severity set to `grave'.
> tags 296243 + sarge
Bug#296243: autofs: init script fails if entry in nsswitch.conf contains tabs
There were no tags set.
Tag
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:41:58 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Package: greylistd
Version: 0.8.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
greylistd fails to install properly:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install -f
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 57 not upgraded
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 296238 grave
Bug#296238: autofs breaks nis auto.master when there is a tab in nsswitch
Severity set to `grave'.
> reopen 296243
Bug#296243: autofs: init script fails if entry in nsswitch.conf contains tabs
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 296238 important
Bug#296238: autofs breaks nis auto.master when there is a tab in nsswitch
Severity set to `important'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Package: dcgui-qt
Version: 0.3.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The recent version of libdc0 conflicts with dcgui-qt < 0.3.3. You
probably know that, since you actually uploaded that ;-) However that
makes dcgui-qt uninstallable, or (with the old libdc) unusable because
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 11:27 +0100, Raphaël Fairise wrote:
>Package 2.4.6-10 seems to work fine. :-) (I tried on a new config too)
That's great, thanks Raphaël! I'm hoping Elizabeth can confirm the new
package works for her too (she's a long-term Turck-MMCache user who has
been very active in trac
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:54:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Martin Schulze] [SECURITY] [DSA 674-3] New mailman packages
really fix several vulnerabilities
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:54:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Martin Schulze] [SECURITY] [DSA 674-3] New mailman packages
really fix several vulnerabilities
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:56:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #294499,
regarding swig1.3: ftbfs [sparc] too few arguments to function
`zend_rsrc_list_get_rsrc_type'
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [E
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 294499 - pending
Bug#294499: swig1.3: ftbfs [sparc] too few arguments to function
`zend_rsrc_list_get_rsrc_type'
Tags were: upstream patch pending
Tags removed: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 294499 + patch upstream
Bug#294499: swig1.3: ftbfs [sparc] too few arguments to function
`zend_rsrc_list_get_rsrc_type'
Tags were: pending
Tags added: patch, upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
Le Lundi 21 Février 2005 01:11, Jonathan Oxer a écrit :
> Raphael, you indicated it worked if you used the plain "extension="
> entry - could you just check whether it really is caching for you if you
> do that? (Maybe try stopping Apache, clear /var/cache/turck-mmcache,
> restart Apache, and check
Package: autofs
Version: 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-2
Severity: grave
The diff for etc/init.d/autofs includes:
#
# Check for all maps that are to be loaded
#
function getschemes()
{
-if grep -q ^automount: /etc/nsswitch.conf; then
+if grep -q '^automount:[ \t]' /etc/nsswitch.conf; then
Package: cron-apt
Version: 0.2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
The manpage of cron-apt is licensed under the the GNU Free Documentation
License. This license fails the DFSG even if you claim
> with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts and no Back-Cover
> Texts.
See:
ht
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.6
> tags 296119 + woody
Bug#296119: mailman does not install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: woody
> merge 294647 296119
Bug#294647: mailman: postinst error on security update
Bug#296
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 295777 296209
Bug#295777: gtk-update-icon-cache breaks icons on powerpc
Bug#296209: gnome-icon-theme: New postint script - gtk-update-icon-cache
problems, results in 'blank' icons!
Bug#295778: gtk-update-icon-cache breaks icons on powerpc
Bug#295
reassign 296209 libgtk2.0-0
severity 296209 grave
forwarded 296209 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167942
merge 295777
Hi,
On lun, fév 21, 2005, Matthew Grant wrote:
>
> Is this a Powerpc only problem? I don't think it is though
>
It is, workaround:
rm -f /usr/share/ico
reassign 296206 libgtk2.0-0
severity 296206 important
merge 296175 296206
thanks
Hi,
There's no problem with cross-dependencies in Depends, see all the
-common packages, but it seems there is a problem with dependency on
libgtk2.0-0 on itself (see #296175).
Regards,
--
Loïc Minie
severity 296211 important
tags 296211 - experimental
thanks
Hi,
On lun, fév 21, 2005, Szucs Gabor wrote:
> Package: libgtk2.0-0
> Version: 2.4.14-2
> Severity: critical
> Tags: experimental
This is the second bug you report with severity higher than important
and with the tag "experime
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 296211 important
Bug#296211: libgtk2.0-0 is broken in sid; doesn't export necessary symbols
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 296211 - experimental
Bug#296211: libgtk2.0-0 is broken in sid; doesn't export necessary symbols
Tags were: experim
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 296209 libgtk2.0-0
Bug#296209: gnome-icon-theme: New postint script - gtk-update-icon-cache
problems, results in 'blank' icons!
Bug reassigned from package `gnome-icon-theme' to `libgtk2.0-0'.
> severity 296209 grave
Bug#296209: gnome-icon-th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 296206 libgtk2.0-0
Bug#296206: libgtk2.0-0 and libgtk2.0-bin cross-depend to each other
Bug reassigned from package `libgtk2.0-0' to `libgtk2.0-0'.
> severity 296206 important
Bug#296206: libgtk2.0-0 and libgtk2.0-bin cross-depend to each othe
70 matches
Mail list logo
