Package: kipina
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of kipina_0.1.1-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050122-1759
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
severity 291715 important
thanks
Hi LaMont,
Since this bug only occurs on 64-bit architectures where the package has
not been built, it doesn't appear to fit the criteria for serious bugs.
You're right that this is a bug in debian/rules: configure is being called
with a --with-64bit argument, bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 291715 important
Bug#291715: xt-aterm_2.0.5-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: debian/rules issues?
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Package: zopeinterface
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of zopeinterface_3.0.0-2 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050122-2118
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package
Package: uw-imap
Version: 7:2002edebian1-5
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of uw-imap_7:2002edebian1-5 on caballero by sbuild/ia64
> 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050122-1716
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplie
Package: bible-kjv
Version: 4.17
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of bible-kjv_4.17 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050123-0028
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: libreadlin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 289560 -sarge
Bug#289560: vim: Race conditions and symlink attacks in vim (tcltags and
vimspell)
Tags were: sarge security woody patch
Bug#291125: vim: temporary file vulnerabilities (CAN-2005-0069)
Tags removed: sarge
> thanks
Stopping processin
The package libmultisync-plugin-irmc and
libmultisync-plugin-irmc-bluetooth still have a wrong dependency to
libopenobex1. I presume that you still have the old libopenobex1 library
installed on your system although it's not in the sid/sarge archive
anymore. As a consequence dh_shlibdeps picks
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 288563 grave
Bug#288563: meld: Throws up GtkWarning and starts without the icon toolbar
Bug#287166: meld: traceback when comparing 2 directories
Bug#287167: libglade errors o
Hi Margarita!
You wrote:
> However, I also have the complete GNOME environment, and because of what's
> stated in the rest of this mail I'm inclined to think that Bas doesn't and
> that the core of the problem is there: meld is failing to declare some
> extra dependencies on some GNOME packages,
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:47:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289590: fixed in kernel-patch-2.4.27-hppa 2.4.27-pa4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
After my experience, I thought I'd also share how I got my email back
to a usable state, seeing that this bug makes it impossible to use 2.x
with your current email.
Suggestions exist on the web to start-up without an ~/evolution folder
by renaming it and importing the data, but I'm not keen to ma
Package: gnunet
Version: 0.6.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
For some reason, I did not have libextractor installed. Libextractor depends on
libltdl3, but gnunet does not. Therefore I did not have libextractor installed
as well.
Updating gnunet leads to the following error messa
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:47:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290236: fixed in ldaptor 0.0.34
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:47:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291615: fixed in ldaptor 0.0.34
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:47:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291618: fixed in ldaptor 0.0.34
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 289590 + pending
Bug#289590: kernel-patch-2.4.27-hppa: FTBFS
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
I've been trying to reproduce this bug as well, with no luck. I have the
same versions of meld and its dependencies as the ones listed in the bug
report.
However, I also have the complete GNOME environment, and because of what's
stated in the rest of this mail I'm inclined to think that Bas doesn
Hi,
I've the same video card:
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX
440 AGP 8x] (rev a4)
The same video drivers:
nvidia-kernel-2.6.9-2-386:
Installed: 1.0.6629+1-1
I've tried with my XF86Config-4 and with the one posted here, and I
couldn't reproduce the
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:04:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close bug due to missing information
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hi,
You recently submitted a bug on eroaster,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=288550. I'm unable
to reproduce this; could you add debugging statements to show what are
the value of version[1], len(version[1]), and range(len(version[1]))?
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> tags 288550 - patch
Bug#288550: eroaster crashes upon cdrecord version checking
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:02:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289251: fixed in timidity 2.13.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: evolution
Version: 2.0.3-1.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I am logging this bug report into BTS, because if I was aware of this bug in
Ximain's bugzilla, I would not have upgraded this package.
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=69566
The bu
Tags 279543 +patch
I'm attaching a simple patch that gets rid of this of this FTBFS bug, by
removing the lines that include the badly formatted kernel name.
--
Besitos, {o_
Marga. (')_
diff -Naru enbd-2.4.31-20040412/debian/kernel-patch-enbd.kpatches
../enbd-2.4.31-20040412/debian/kerne
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:02:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291750: fixed in bible-kjv 4.17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Tags 287788 +patch
Bug#287788: gtkboard: doc-base file is invalid
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs datab
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Tags 279543 +patch
Bug#279543: enbd: FTBFS: Malformed kernel version: `2.6.0-test2'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> I'm attaching a simple patch that gets rid of this of this FTBFS bug, by
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> Package: bible-kjv
> Version: 4.16
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to build on all arches with the following
> error:
> cc -Wall -Wformat -Werror -Wshadow -W -Wtraditional -Wmissing-declarations
> -Wmi
> ssing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototype
Package: bible-kjv
Version: 4.16
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on all arches with the following
error:
cc -Wall -Wformat -Werror -Wshadow -W -Wtraditional -Wmissing-declarations -Wmi
ssing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -Wcast-align -Wcast-qual -Wbad-function-ca
st -Wpoin
# I've committed a patch to upstream CVS (both HEAD and gnumeric-1-4 branch)
# to address this. When upstream's feedback to this patch is positive, I'll
# update the Debian packages.
tags 291265 + fixed-upstream patch
retitle 291265 [Fixed in CVS] Silent data loss when saving in a directory with
i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # I've committed a patch to upstream CVS (both HEAD and gnumeric-1-4 branch)
> # to address this. When upstream's feedback to this patch is positive, I'll
> # update the Debian packages.
> tags 291265 + fixed-upstream patch
Bug#291265: gnumeric: Silent
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: serious
Tags: confirmed
Hi,
please lower the priority of db4.1 to optional, and of vacation to
extra (speaking of binary packages, this are the packages libdb4.1 and
vacation). This was agreed by the appropriate maintainers, and is also a
request by the release t
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 16:02:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#284117: fixed in prozilla 1:1.3.7.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 15:53 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> The check for "peer" database type in
> /usr/lib/postgresql/bin/postgresql-startup is not strict enough and it
> catches databases that just so happen to be called -- "peer".
>
> Please fix the regexp match to include a $ at the end so tha
Hi,
I have tried to reproduce the illuminator FTBFS (#286636) in an up-to-date
sid pbuilder and failed. On an initial build [0] it failed due to kernel
problem (#268450). After building and installing the fixed kernel [1] (the
problem has been fixed in the kernel-source, but an updated binary
k
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:00:51 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line these bugs are now dealt with
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:12:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230113: I think this bug can be closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen #291680
Bug#291680: firehol: insecure temporary directory handling
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
Severity: grave
Preconfiguring packages ...
xserver-xfree86 failed to preconfigure, with exit status 139
(Reading database ... 88681 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking xserver-xfree86 (from
/xserver-xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-10_i3
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 03:02:54PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:48:28PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 04:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > I don't quite understand how this would be gs-gpl's fault, it's either
> > > gs-common (becau
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 20:14 +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Michael, I did the patch below. Coul you apply, if this is the right fix ?
The fix is correct. I will release a new version tomorrow.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:47:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291697: fixed in aolserver4 4.0.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: gforge
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear gforge maintainer,
GForge 3.x has directory traversal vulnerabilities because of lack
about sanitisation in some scripts.
You can see detail about vulnerability
tags 290107 +patch
thanks
The problem here seems to be that debbuggtk tries to link against
version 2.6 of libgnome2-java and libglade-java while we currently
have version 2.8. The attached patch should solve this problem.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- debbuggtk-0.28.orig/Makefile
+++ debbuggtk-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 290107 +patch
Bug#290107: debbuggtk: FTBFS: Cannot find org.gnu.glade
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: xt-aterm
Version: 2.0.5-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of xt-aterm_2.0.5-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050122-1712
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
Package: poker3d
Version: 0.2.12-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of poker3d_0.2.12-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050122-1649
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
Hi Steve!
You wrote:
> I can't reproduce this problem on a current sid or sarge system. Do you
> have any GTK-related packages installed from experimental?
As far as I now, this is an up-to-date sid system. Also, I can
reproduce it on two different machines, so I don't think it's some local
er
tag 291619 +pending
thanks
Hi,
* Kurt Roeckx [2005-01-21]:
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to build because it's trying to connect
> to the internet. A package should be completly build from the
> source and should not need anything outside the archive to build.
Fix pending (we need to add "
Why can't the package just be modified so that the postinst does an 'echo
nvidia >>/etc/modules' if it is not already in there?
-Roberto
--
Roberto Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 291619 +pending
Bug#291619: systraq: FTBFS: Tries to download sources outside the debian
archive.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: asterisk-chan-misdn
Version: 0.0.3rc2-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of asterisk-chan-misdn_0.0.3rc2-4 on caballero by sbuild/ia64
> 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050122-1629
[...]
> ** Using build dependenc
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:32:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291680: fixed in firehol 1.214-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hello
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 04:02:10PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: ntop
> Version: 2:3.0-3
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems rrdtool changed it's dependency again, now from
> libgd2-xpm-dev to libgd2-noxpm-dev, and you're build depending on
> libgd2-xpm-dev, and those conflict.
severity 290772 normal
thanks
> I noticed on
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=arm&pkg=fet&ver=3.9.20-1>
> that the arm build of fet failed. This is the error message:
>
> dh_fixperms
> dh_installdeb
> dh_shlibdeps
> dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `debian/fet/usr/bin/fet' gave e
reopen 289600
tags 289600 + sarge
thanks
This is still affecting sarge, and the fixed version seems to
have other problems.
You can close this when the fixed version reaches sarge.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
At the end of the build log i see fet is being built.
Where can I see that build log?
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=fet&ver=3.9.20-1&arch=arm&stamp=1104807080&file=log&as=raw
Looks the same as the sparc ldd bug, but that could be just a coincidence.
I don't think so. sparc ldd problem
> Sending this bug without any investigate is not appropriate action.
^^^ Reassigning
Regards,
-- gotom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 289600
Bug#289600: openswan: can't fulfill the build dependencies
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 289600 + sarge
Bug#289600: openswan: can't fulfill the build dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
> thanks
Stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> severity 189552 serious
Bug#189552: [DPKG] some files from xlibs_4.2.1-6_i386.deb and
magicfilter_1.2-53_i386.deb not installed
Bug#189555: [DPKG] some files from xlibs_4.2.1-6_i38
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 290772 normal
Bug#290772: FTBFS on arm: Running ldd on fet binary fails
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Package: ntop
Version: 2:3.0-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems rrdtool changed it's dependency again, now from
libgd2-xpm-dev to libgd2-noxpm-dev, and you're build depending on
libgd2-xpm-dev, and those conflict.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Well,
Some time ago, actually in December 2003, I was trying to use kino on
powerpc, and I got the exact same problem, I could see that Kino
actually didn't care about the endian issue, I've made a little patch at
that time that made the video ok, I submitted a bug report to kino, but
no action wa
Package: postgresql
Version: 7.2.1-2woody6
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
The check for "peer" database type in
/usr/lib/postgresql/bin/postgresql-startup is not strict enough and it
catches databases that just so happen to be called -- "peer".
Please fix the regexp match to include a $ at th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package prozilla
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: prozilla
> retitle 290242 prozilla: note in ftpparse.c is ambiguous
Bug#290242: prozilla: note in ftpparse.c makes it non-free
Changed Bug title.
> severity 290242 important
Bug#290242: prozilla: note in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 279543 serious
Bug#279543: enbd: FTBFS: Malformed kernel version: `2.6.0-test2'
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: aolserver4-dev
Version: 4.0.9-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
You have a /usr/lib/aolserver4/Makefile.global file which has
this in it:
LIBS+= -L/usr/lib -ltcl8.4 -ldl -lpthread -lieee -lm -lz -lgcc_s
Your Depends line says:
Depends: aolserver4 (= 4.0.9-1), libc6-dev, tcl8.4-dev (>
severity 291658 normal
retitle 291658 nessus-plugins: Some NASL plugins in release 2.2.2a (and later)
are non-free
thanks
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 08:26:39AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Upstream claims that large parts of nessus-plugins has never been
> licensed under the GPL. The copyright
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 291658 normal
Bug#291658: nessus-plugins: non-free
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 291658 nessus-plugins: Some NASL plugins in release 2.2.2a (and
> later) are non-free
Bug#291658: nessus-plugins: non-free
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Sto
Hi Bas,
I can't reproduce this problem on a current sid or sarge system. Do you
have any GTK-related packages installed from experimental?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:48:28PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 04:31:55PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > I don't quite understand how this would be gs-gpl's fault, it's either
> > gs-common (because of an error during the configuration) or apt/dpkg,
> > isn't it? Do you
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 11:20:15AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Hi. What is happening with this bug? It's still rated RC and there
> hasn't been any visible (in the log) activity for a couple of months
> now.
In 279232 (merged bug) there is a proposal for changing the perl
dependencies to solve t
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 14:20:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291605: gcc-4.0: GCC4 internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 06:47:21 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291663: fixed in hamlib 1.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:37:25 -0500, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Bruno Lellis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Package: mozilla-firefox
> > Version: 1.0+dfsg.1-2
> >
> > Just seg faults when it starts loading any site as a normal user.
> > When I start it as root, I can browse any site
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: libavcodec-dev
> Version: 0.cvs20050106-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> [Cc'ing security@, as at least xine-lib embeds libavcodec, there may be
> more, I haven't investigated whether they are affected, but I assume i
Package: firehol
Version: 1.214-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security sarge
Both firehol and firehol-wizard use known temporary file names in a
predictably named temporary directory (PID-based).
Neither program ensures that those directories are safe before blasting
the contents of files within. An
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:32:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#208403: fixed in ucd-snmp 4.2.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:32:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#175395: fixed in ucd-snmp 4.2.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:32:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#186078: fixed in ucd-snmp 4.2.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:32:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#186591: fixed in ucd-snmp 4.2.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:32:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291140: fixed in poedit 1.3.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 291268 + fixed
Bug#291268: gengameng: FTBFS: Missing build dependency?
There were no tags set.
Bug#291331: smilutils: ftbfs [sparc] libtool: link: cannot find the library
`/usr/
Hi. I was looking at the bug logs and it isn't obvious to me why this
bug is rated RC. What's the status of this bug? Can it be downgraded?
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi. What is happening with this bug? It's still rated RC and there
hasn't been any visible (in the log) activity for a couple of months
now.
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem appears only with the latest version of hylafax-server
For the maintainer: downgrading to version hylafax-server 4.2.0-10
the problem is disappeared
Anyway tx, and excuse me for the erroneous report.
Diaolin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Package: amavis-ng
Version: 0.1.6.9-1
Followup-For: Bug #230113
I checked this bugs. I cannot reproduce it on the bug amavis-ng version
(1.6.2) beacause I wasn't able to make it work on unstable ;)
But I tried to reproduce it on the latest version without success (in
the strace, Fabian Fagerholm
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:42:51 +0100 Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> The alsaplayer-common depends on libflac4 which is unavailable on
> unstable since Jan 7th 2005. To solve the problem please rebuild
> the package with libflac-dev >> 1.1.1
I have rebuilt this package according to the guidelines in
if i try to send the fax directly with c2faxsend -f TIFF it works...
only when sending with parameter -f HYLAFAX it segfaults...
The result is that with the -f HYLAFAX the receiver receives the fax
with only the headline and without the body.
probably the operation of merging the headline gives st
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 04:03:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290966: fixed in sffview 0.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 291140
Bug#291140: poedit: FTBFS: Missing dependency?
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs datab
Package: hamlib3-tcl
Version: 1.2.3-1
Severity: grave
The hamlib3-tcl package mysteriously depends on hamlib2, only on i386. This
makes the package uninstallable in unstable.
It's likely that the package build picked up an existing version of
libhamlib.so in /usr/lib on the maintainer's machine
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 291559 sid
Bug#291559: Capi4hylafax segfaults during send and receive
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> severity 291559 grave
Bug#291559: Capi4hylafax segfaults during send and receive
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping pr
On 20.01.05 Margarita Manterola ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> After upgrading tetex-bin, it stopped working. On reinstalling, this is
> what I get:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LANG=en_US sudo apt-get install --reinstall tetex-bin
> Reading
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 291265 + sarge sid
Bug#291265: gnumeric: Silent data loss when saving in a directory with
iso8859-1 name
Tags were: upstream confirmed
Tags added: sarge, sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
96 matches
Mail list logo
