Control: block -1 by 999871
On 2021-11-18 20:15 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2021-11-17 20:21 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
>> Since the feature was already present in a different form,
>> it seems that neovim is the only widespread user of this.
>
> Quite likely.
>
>>> I am not quite sure wha
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 08:15:15PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2021-11-17 20:21 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 05:16:52PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >> Control: reassign -1 ncurses-base 6.3-1
> >>
> >> On 2021-11-17 01:11 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >>
> >> > I j
On 2021-11-17 20:21 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 05:16:52PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Control: reassign -1 ncurses-base 6.3-1
>>
>> On 2021-11-17 01:11 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
>>
>> > I just confirmed that upgrading *only* ncurses-base causes the issue to
>> > appe
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 05:16:52PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 ncurses-base 6.3-1
>
> On 2021-11-17 01:11 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> > I just confirmed that upgrading *only* ncurses-base causes the issue to
> > appear, and downgrading *only* ncurses-base causes the issu
Control: reassign -1 ncurses-base 6.3-1
On 2021-11-17 01:11 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
> I just confirmed that upgrading *only* ncurses-base causes the issue to
> appear, and downgrading *only* ncurses-base causes the issue to
> disappear.
Thanks, that makes sense. For me it is broken in bookw
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 01:11:52AM +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 23:00:08 +0100 Sven Joachim wrote:
> > On 2021-11-16 21:53 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 08:02:53PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > >> On 2021-11-16 16:30 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote
On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 23:00:08 +0100 Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2021-11-16 21:53 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 08:02:53PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >> On 2021-11-16 16:30 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >>
> >> > Package: libncursesw6
> >> > Version: 6.3-1
> >> > Severity
On 2021-11-16 21:53 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 08:02:53PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2021-11-16 16:30 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
>>
>> > Package: libncursesw6
>> > Version: 6.3-1
>> > Severity: important
>> > X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org
>> >
>> > "importan
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 08:02:53PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2021-11-16 16:30 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> > Package: libncursesw6
> > Version: 6.3-1
> > Severity: important
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org
> >
> > "important" because this makes neovim nearly unusable; not RC becau
On 2021-11-16 20:02 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2021-11-16 16:30 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
>> Package: libncursesw6
>> Version: 6.3-1
>> Severity: important
>> X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org
>>
>> "important" because this makes neovim nearly unusable; not RC because
>> I've only obser
On 2021-11-16 16:30 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Package: libncursesw6
> Version: 6.3-1
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org
>
> "important" because this makes neovim nearly unusable; not RC because
> I've only observed it with one combination of terminal and program. I
> p
Package: libncursesw6
Version: 6.3-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org
"important" because this makes neovim nearly unusable; not RC because
I've only observed it with one combination of terminal and program. I
personally think that might still be enough to make it RC until
r
12 matches
Mail list logo
