Hi Bastian,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 03:50:37PM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> No team member reacted to Fabio's requests, so I am going to sponsor Fabio's
> NMU.
> The debdiff is enclosed.
Seems I missed that. Thanks for NMUing.
Cheers,
-- Guido
> diff -Nru virt-manager-3.2.0/debian/changelog
No team member reacted to Fabio's requests, so I am going to sponsor Fabio's
NMU.
The debdiff is enclosed.diff -Nru virt-manager-3.2.0/debian/changelog
virt-manager-3.2.0/debian/changelog
--- virt-manager-3.2.0/debian/changelog 2020-12-05 09:36:56.0 +0100
+++ virt-manager-3.2.0/debian/ch
Il 02/02/2022 11:56, Bastian Germann ha scritto:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 17:55:18 +0100 Fabio Fantoni
wrote:
>> Hi, I saw that remain few days for autoremoval from testing I
prepared an MR with some upstream patch that solve current FTBFS with
some tests and another small fix for a crash case:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 17:55:18 +0100 Fabio Fantoni
wrote:
Hi, I saw that remain few days for autoremoval from testing I prepared
an MR with some upstream patch that solve current FTBFS with some tests
and another small fix for a crash case:
https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/virt-manager/-/m
Hi, I saw that remain few days for autoremoval from testing I prepared
an MR with some upstream patch that solve current FTBFS with some tests
and another small fix for a crash case:
https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/virt-manager/-/merge_requests/12
can someone merge it and do a new build
Source: virt-manager
Version: 1:3.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> === short test summary info
> ===
6 matches
Mail list logo
