Bug#996336: pygalmesh: autopkgtest regression on i386

2021-10-14 Thread Nico Schlömer
Yeah, that's a little weird. And it only occurs on i386? Sounds like a CGAL bug then. On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 3:24 PM Drew Parsons wrote: > > On 2021-10-13 13:42, Nico Schlömer wrote: > > Or PR upstream. I can merge and release any time. > > Thanks Nico. I'll check which tolerances it needs and f

Bug#996336: pygalmesh: autopkgtest regression on i386

2021-10-13 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2021-10-13 13:42, Nico Schlömer wrote: Or PR upstream. I can merge and release any time. Thanks Nico. I'll check which tolerances it needs and file a PR. The error in test_rectangle might need your attention, "At index 0 diff: 279 != 276". I guess it's not just tolerances. Drew

Bug#996336: pygalmesh: autopkgtest regression on i386

2021-10-13 Thread Nico Schlömer
Or PR upstream. I can merge and release any time. Cheers, Nico On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 1:39 PM Drew Parsons wrote: > > Not entirely unexpected. Upstream reorganized tests and tolerances, so > I wanted to check if we had a full pass or not. > Looks like we'll have to reinstate test_relax_toleran

Bug#996336: pygalmesh: autopkgtest regression on i386

2021-10-13 Thread Drew Parsons
Not entirely unexpected. Upstream reorganized tests and tolerances, so I wanted to check if we had a full pass or not. Looks like we'll have to reinstate test_relax_tolerance.patch On 2021-10-13 12:03, Adrian Bunk wrote: Source: pygalmesh Version: 0.10.5-1 Severity: serious https://ci.debian

Bug#996336: pygalmesh: autopkgtest regression on i386

2021-10-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: pygalmesh Version: 0.10.5-1 Severity: serious https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/i386/p/pygalmesh/15928897/log.gz ... === FAILURES === test_rectangle __