Control: tag -1 + patch
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 05:40:42PM +1000, Alexander Zangerl wrote:
> sorry, but i disagree. yes, it is a bug. but no, it is not severity
> important: a 2000+ levels deep directory hierarchy has no
> practical relevance whatsoever.
> and a workaround exists: don't create rid
Dear Maintainer,
I guess this crash might be a stack exhaustion.
Given the function treescan in dirs.c would allocate
for locname 4096 bytes, and this function is called recursively,
we would fill up a stack of 8MB, which 'ulimit -s' shows at
my system as default.
Therefore another workaround mi
On Sat, 09 Oct 2021 19:06:21 +0200, наб writes:
...
># mkdir -p /tmp/img.d/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a/a
2030+ levels deep.
>Picking Severity: important, because this means it's /impossible/ to
>restore (or even view!) a valid dump.
sorry, but i disagree. yes, it is a
3 matches
Mail list logo
