Control: severity -1 serious
Hi,
Eduard Bloch (2021-06-08):
> I set it RC because it deliberately breaks other package's (legal)
> operations,
The whole purpose of AppArmor policy is to restrict operations to
a pre-defined set. This package does nothing else than shipping opt-in
extra AppArmor p
Hallo,
* intrigeri [Wed, Jun 02 2021, 10:13:12AM]:
> Control: tag -1 + upstream
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor-profiles/-/merge_requests/51
> Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> Eduard Bloch (2021-05-28):
> > see attachment, your config which doesn't allow link c
Control: severity -1 important
intrigeri (2021-06-02):
> I see you've made this bug RC. I'd like to better understand the
> severity, so I can figure out what I should do for Bullseye.
> I'm wondering because I'm using this AppArmor policy on sid with
> apt-cacher-ng myself, and I can't find trace
Control: tag -1 + upstream
Control: forwarded -1
https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor-profiles/-/merge_requests/51
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
Eduard Bloch (2021-05-28):
> see attachment, your config which doesn't allow link calls, which
> sporadically breaks operation of apt-cacher-ng in une
Package: apparmor-profiles-extra
Version: 1.33
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
see attachment, your config which doesn't allow link calls, which
sporadically breaks operation of apt-cacher-ng in unexpected ways.
The suggested change should probably be improved, I am no apparmor
expert.
[ 145
5 matches
Mail list logo
