Bug#988643: [RFS] vtk-dicom/0.8.12-3

2021-05-23 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Andreas Beckmann, on 2021-05-22: > On 22/05/2021 15.53, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > I redid > > the vtk-dicom/0.8.12-3 revision to simply remove the broken > > symlink. > Sponsored. Unblock request filed. > The d/not-installed is probably not working as expected, IIRC it does not > su

Bug#988643: [RFS] vtk-dicom/0.8.12-3

2021-05-22 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 22/05/2021 15.53, Étienne Mollier wrote: I redid the vtk-dicom/0.8.12-3 revision to simply remove the broken symlink. Sponsored. The d/not-installed is probably not working as expected, IIRC it does not support wildcards. But you are still at compat level 12, so dh_missing will only warn.

Bug#988643: [RFS] vtk-dicom/0.8.12-3

2021-05-22 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi all, Sorry for the noise with my previous sponsor request. I redid the vtk-dicom/0.8.12-3 revision to simply remove the broken symlink. Changes are available at the same location[1], updated debdiff is available in attachment. I redid the tests to make sure no regressions were introduced, an

Bug#988643: [RFS] vtk-dicom/0.8.12-3

2021-05-22 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Andreas, Andreas Beckmann, on 2021-05-22: > On 22/05/2021 12.03, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > consecutive to changes in multi-arch hints I had to bring per > > lintian regression, I attempted to install concurrently the > > package libvtk-dicom-dev both in native and foreign > > architecture, and

Bug#988643: [RFS] vtk-dicom/0.8.12-3

2021-05-22 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 22/05/2021 12.03, Étienne Mollier wrote: consecutive to changes in multi-arch hints I had to bring per lintian regression, I attempted to install concurrently the package libvtk-dicom-dev both in native and foreign architecture, and it would now fail with the following: I'd leave out the M-A

Bug#988643: [RFS] vtk-dicom/0.8.12-3

2021-05-22 Thread Étienne Mollier
Greetings fellow maintainers, I brought a few changes to vtk-dicom to address the remaining RC bug #988643. Changes are available on Salsa for review[1]. You will find a debdiff against the version in bullseye attached. I did a few tests to make sure the issue is corrected, such as: - running