OK. Then I'll try to add this fix in bullseye.
Le lun. 10 mai 2021 à 12:40, Mateusz Mikołajczyk
a écrit :
>
> not sure how to check this. I googled for "debian source code" and that's the
> source for samba version in bullseye (I think):
>
> https://sources.debian.org/src/samba/2:4.13.5+dfsg-1/s
not sure how to check this. I googled for "debian source code" and that's
the source for samba version in bullseye (I think):
https://sources.debian.org/src/samba/2:4.13.5+dfsg-1/source3/smbd/reply.c/#L7094
I marked the line that has the patch on samba's gitlab
the patch was made in upstream lit
I think the bug is not present in bullseye.
Le lun. 10 mai 2021 à 12:09, Mateusz Mikołajczyk
a écrit :
>
> sorry, I'm a bit confused. did you mean bullseye is frozen? Does it mean that
> this patch won't make it to bullseye either and I'd have to switch to sid
> instead? the patch is definetely
sorry, I'm a bit confused. did you mean bullseye is frozen? Does it mean
that this patch won't make it to bullseye either and I'd have to switch to
sid instead? the patch is definetely not a feature implementation, it
simply makes samba conform with the SMB protocol. this particular function
was bu
Le lun. 10 mai 2021 à 11:29, Mateusz Mikołajczyk
a écrit :
>
> actually, I thought that I couldn't do this but on a second thought as I
> understand I'd simply have to change all my entries in sources.list from
> buster to bullseye ? I'm using armbian if that's relevant to the story :)
>
I don'
actually, I thought that I couldn't do this but on a second thought as I
understand I'd simply have to change all my entries in sources.list from
buster to bullseye ? I'm using armbian if that's relevant to the story :)
pon., 10 maj 2021 o 10:44 Mathieu Parent napisał(a):
> Le ven. 7 mai 2021 à
Le ven. 7 mai 2021 à 15:24, Mateusz Mikołajczyk
a écrit :
>
> Package: samba
> Version: 4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u1
>
> I was testing samba with an really old DOS client. it turns out that ever
> since samba 3.2.0 there was an upstream change that broke this legacy
> printing support. It was already me
Package: samba
Version: 4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u1
I was testing samba with an really old DOS client. it turns out that ever
since samba 3.2.0 there was an upstream change that broke this legacy
printing support. It was already merged upstream but the patch is super
tiny - a one liner:
https://gitlab.c
8 matches
Mail list logo
